₦airaland Forum

nateevs:
I do not share the same view on the use of Sanchez. I criticised Poch for playing Sanchez. I only said I understand the tactical reason behind using Sanchez.

The whole of January has come and gone, why are you not asking the board why they haven't brought in a new goalie? Have they not been seeing the mistakes from Sanchez?

Do you think if Maresca has a better goalie, he wouldn't use him?

nateevs:
You better stay the f..uck away from my mentions. What part of my profile spells viewing centre type to you?

Ibime:
It's his final delivery that's the problem, and the speed of his passing across the backline

Bissaka was a winger until the day he made his professional debut. Palace had injury problem at RB so they brought him from academy to play there and that's where he's been since

diggz:
I’m sure if I look through everyone’s posts, I’ll find people praising this guy’s ruthlessness, including you. But now you want us to believe he’s powerless?

This is the same guy who straight-up told Chilwell off, benched Chalobah at the start of the season, and sent Petrovic out on loan. Now you want us to question the board, and not him? Why?

Was it the board that told him to stick with that ridiculous high line yesterday, or that decided to loan out Petrovic and refuse to bring Santos back?

Maresca is silly!

Caicedobets:
I dare you to go there and cap the nonsense you spilled and let me see if they won't change it for u there
Online analyst

nateevs:
So I see you have no real views of your own, so you align your views with thuggery of viewing centres, for fear of not being stabbed by the UP-Shesi wing of the fan base. Right?

Abeg dress go one side. Viewing centre analyst

Caicedobets:
no you are talking nonsense by defending Maresca who is clearly out of sorts.
How will a true fan be supporting a coach doesn't know how to do his job

Your support of maresca shows how nonsense your opinion is.
You are an enemy of the club

nateevs:
And you lack critical thinking ability because according to you, viewing centre thugs are going to break your head open with bottles.

I have been a Chelsea fan since before you were allowed to go watch games by yourself in viewing centres.

The people who hired Maresca have paid and invested a combined £3.3bn so far. That's more money than you can make if you came for 5 lifetimes, paid into one club. They support Maresca.

But your N500 viewing centre ass thinks they are enemy of the club too abi? ..... and you are more passionate than they are...... because they support Maresca?

Alhaji, I have told you to dress go one side. Dress go one side permanently.

nateevs:
If i have to explain this, then it means you guys are not following the news from your club keenly. Clearlake specifically announced that they were looking for a coach and not a manager. The coach will have autonomy over all on-field activities, but will relinquish decision-making about personnel to the owners and TDs. Basically a yes man!

How are you just knowing this?


The ruthlessness being praised was therefore in the action of being able to enforce what was needed by the board, ruthlessly. The directors put Chalobah up for sale, so rightly he didn't play him. Nobody came in for Chalobah until deadline day, and so he was sent on loan. Same for Chilwell and Sterling because the board wanted to align wage bill.

How are you just knowing this?

And so consequently, the high-line is an on-field activity which he has autonomy over. So asking if he should or should not do that is silly. Also, it nearly worked. If Palmer had weighted his pass well to Jackson, it would have been 2-0 and it will be a different story. Managers make mistakes all the time. I don't see anyone having anything to say when he win 10 on a bounce.

Instead I am seeing people revising history now, saying we were only 2nd on the top because others under performed.

airmark:
A Sterling giving Palmer's numbers, would have remained with us.

No sane coach wouldn't have asked Sterling to be ejected from his team with the nonsense he served last season.

nateevs:
Let's not go there Airmark. You and i don't support Sterling. But Sancho, Neto and Madueke, combined have not even matched half of Sterling's dross. But they are still here.

Why?

airmark:
Those ones are not 30 years and there's room for improvement and they can dribble unlike Sterling that can't even dribble two cones successfully, as a winger.

Sterling's dross last season in Epl - 8 goals and 4 assists in 31 matches

Useless Madueke this season in Epl - 7 goals and 3 assists in 21 matches.

The only thing last season's Sterling get pass Madueke, is Ikebe.

nateevs:
Remove Madueke and do the same for Neto and Sancho.

airmark:
He was afraid of missing an open net, maybe because his legs are not straight according to Ibime.

If we fail to sign a better striker this January then the Senegal juju dey strong.

nateevs:
So I see you have no real views of your own, so you align your views with thuggery of viewing centres, for fear of not being stabbed by the UP-Shesi wing of the fan base. Right?

Abeg dress go one side. Viewing centre analyst

airmark:
A Sterling giving Palmer's numbers, would have remained with us.

No sane coach wouldn't have asked Sterling to be ejected from his team with the nonsense he served last season.

airmark:


Why should i? You added him with enough braggadoccio because of that washed Sterling.

UncleHaba22:
After all the money Chelsea spent and number of Ayers bought

The only decent player they have is Palmer
No keeper no striker no decent right winger even the left week sef no dey midfield maybe only caciedo seems kinda consistence with good performance

No central back for chalobah to be Una best centre back means wahala dey

Even bench no better players and na garnacho Una wan go buy

The earlier you people know Chelsea can't longer achieve success like under Abrahimovic the better for Una sha

If not for the quality of teams in the Conference league sef Una for collect there

It seems Chelsea will just be a top 4 team

nateevs:
Remove Madueke and do the same for Neto and Sancho.

andrewbaba44:
If some clubs hold half of that Chelsea money ehnn the whole Europe go run

Chelsea even have spending power than mancity but dem just buy rubbish full everywhere

The Palmer signing which isn’t even expensive turns out to be the best signing in the epl for the past few years

They should be winning the conference league easily ,and I think they can make top 4 sha

drisham:
Which numbers your Neto dey give ?

With his 1 league goal all season 😂

Kimbeast:
Please we don't. City is funded by a nation.

princeabdul:
palmer should share the largest blame, that was a bad pass

AirBere:
Oh really? I thought he was a center back because of his physicality, balance and the way he moves and of course his tackling. He should really be thankful for the manager that made him a right back because he would have been in the championship or league two by now as he doesn't have enough skills like passing range and dribbling to make it as a PL regular winger.

Sportsweb:
Is there any difference between Lukaku 1.0 in 2012 and this Jackson.

To me the only difference is that, Roman Chelsea were ambitious and didn't allow amateur striker to use Chelsea to learn how to play ball


This Todd guys are allowing Jackson to use Chelsea to learn how to be a striker. This is the second season, no improvement at all.

Sportsweb:
Is there any difference between Lukaku 1.0 in 2012 and this Jackson.

To me the only difference is that, Roman Chelsea were ambitious and didn't allow amateur striker to use Chelsea to learn how to play ball


This Todd guys are allowing Jackson to use Chelsea to learn how to be a striker. This is the second season, no improvement at all.

Sportsweb:
Lol

nateevs:
If i have to explain this, then it means you guys are not following the news from your club keenly. Clearlake specifically announced that they were looking for a coach and not a manager. The coach will have autonomy over all on-field activities, but will relinquish decision-making about personnel to the owners and TDs. Basically a yes man!

How are you just knowing this?


The ruthlessness being praised was therefore in the action of being able to enforce what was needed by the board, ruthlessly. The directors put Chalobah up for sale, so rightly he didn't play him. Nobody came in for Chalobah until deadline day, and so he was sent on loan. Same for Chilwell and Sterling because the board wanted to align wage bill.

How are you just knowing this?

And so consequently, the high-line is an on-field activity which he has autonomy over. So asking if he should or should not do that is silly. Also, it nearly worked. If Palmer had weighted his pass well to Jackson, it would have been 2-0 and it will be a different story. Managers make mistakes all the time. I don't see anyone having anything to say when he win 10 on a bounce.

Instead I am seeing people revising history now, saying we were only 2nd on the top because others under performed.

diggz:
I’m sure if I look through everyone’s posts, I’ll find people praising this guy’s ruthlessness, including you. But now you want us to believe he’s powerless?

This is the same guy who straight-up told Chilwell off, benched Chalobah at the start of the season, and sent Petrovic out on loan. Now you want us to question the board, and not him? Why?

Was it the board that told him to stick with that ridiculous high line yesterday, or that decided to loan out Petrovic and refuse to bring Santos back?

Maresca is silly!