₦airaland Forum

Look what the cat, our rape apologist, dragged in, and is brandishing as a puerile defense for his inane and weird proclivities to sexual indulgence with minors, smh. Don't worry, you'll soon be caught out and paraded like a thief, caught with his hands stuck in the cookie jar, lmao.

Dtruthspeaker:
Thus, for now as far as I can see statutory rape only avails

1) Virgins below the ages of 13 according to the Criminal Code.

2) Children in nursery and primary school.

3) Children, no matter the age whose parents or guardians are capable of defiling.

4) Insane Persons.

5) Drunks# (it may protect them)

So, for the sake of those depraved minds or those who have understanding issues, let me state here that statutory rape means an irrebuttable presumption of rape has taken place and even if the parties had consensual sex and the accused gives irrebuttable evidence showing that the "protected" consented and participated in the sex, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW IT IS STILL A RAPE.

And the accused immediately stands guilty as a rapist.

That is the meaning of statutory rape.

https://www.nairaland.com/8332802/statutory-rape-only-protects-virgins#133982068

============================

Is our bold-faced rape apologist not aware that statutory rape laws apply to anyone who engages in sexual intercourse with an individual below the age of consent, and that the laws are entirely unconcerned and unbothered about trite, arbitrary distinctions like: "Virgins below the ages of 13 according to the Criminal Code", "Children in nursery and primary school", "Insane Persons", "Drunks" etc etc, hmmm?

Our armchair legal practitioner and rape apologist would be doing himself plenty favors by re-familiarizing himself with the Child Rights Act 2003 wherein Section 31 of the Act in particular, deals specifically with Unlawful Sexual Intercourse>>>

(1) No person shall have sexual intercourse with a child.

(2) A person who contravenes the provision of Subsection (1) of this section commits an offence of rape and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for life.

(3) Where a person is charged with an offence under this section, it is immaterial that ‐

(a) The offender believed the person to be of or above the age of eighteen years; or

(b) The sexual intercourse was with the consent of the child.

^^^special emphasis on Subsection 3, lmao.

cc: Nnamdipapa, ChiefOkporghe, Atk1nson

Dtruthspeaker:
See stupid excuses.

The profundity of this infantile retort is only outmatched by the vastness of your shocking legal illiteracy as a self-acclaimed practitioner of law.

People trying to hide like Kuje prison break escapees and Boko haram members are being caught is it now a person walking about freely?

Non-sequitur. Making the motion to seek him out and get him arrested won't change the fact that you have already deemed it necessary to argue spuriously in his defense on this very thread. You really have no more points to make, do you?

You are all just plain stupid carrying your oyibo stupidity and madness to come and operate here.

Touchy, touchy, aren't we, hmmm ?

The fragile ego of a rape apologist, shattered to a million pieces by mere logic and appeal to decency !

TheDevilsBride:
Look what the cat, our rape apologist, dragged in, and is brandishing as a puerile defense for his inane and weird proclivities to sexual indulgence with minors, smh. Don't worry, you'll soon be caught out and paraded like a thief, caught with his hands stuck in the cookie jar, lma]

See Change of post.

Shebi she claimed she cannot find Mr Olanrewaju, now that I have answered she has run away from that issue and changed post to abuse and shifting the post to the Laws of rape stated on another thread.

So, clearly she has nothing to say regarding the issue of arresting Olanrewaju after her very very stupid excuse

TheDevilsBride:
The profundity of this infantile retort is only outmatched by the vastness of your shocking legal illiteracy as a self-acclaimed practitioner of law.
Non-sequitur. Making the motion to seek him out and get him arrested won't change the fact that you have already deemed it necessary to argue spuriously in his defense on this very thread. You really have no more points to make, do you?
Touchy, touchy, aren't we, hmmm ?
The fragile ego of a rape apologist, shattered to a million pieces by mere logic and appeal to decency !

See all the empty grammar and Ad hominem all because she can not answer about arresting and prosecuting Olanrewaju but was giving very stupid excuses.

Clearly, apart from the ops apparent infatuation for the girl in question and his jealousy that Olanrewaju had her, all these argument here laid by the Jezebel is just diversionary tactics meant to cover the fact that it is likely that Khadija set up the man.

And that all that has happened to her is God punishing her for evil.

The Jezebel here is really not interested in defending rapes for I even referred her to a thread on the lady who said her father raped her, but the Jezebel said nothing there.

All these abuse and insalts are just diversionary tactics with the op pursuing his mad vindictive agenda of dealing with a Corper who stole and fvcked his 'girlfriend'.

And not one of them has ever arrested and prosecuted anybody even though they knew about this Law.

So, clearly this is all noise making

Smh, lmfao at you here in my room, watching you desperately trying to save face. You know you just got caught slipping, trying to pass the buck as you are wont to do, and blame the girl for Mr. Olarenwaju's perverse actions. But now that I've bursted your wayo wayo rape apologist arse citing Section 31 Subsection 3 of the Child Rights Act 2003, suddenly it's too inconvenient for you to talk about it .

Has anyone noticed yet how Dtruthspeaker intentionally quotemines people's responses, taking singular statements and words out of context, and retrofitting them to sell his dubious narratives? We're just getting started here, as I and Dtruthspeaker both know our many little secrets, that he will soon be pulling more inane rabbits out from inside his dusty tattered hat, trying to deflect and run away from valid criticisms and scrutiny of his position, lol.

Dtruthspeaker:
See Change of post.

Unfortunately for you, nothing changed here, except perhaps your ludicrous attempt to sidestep the law and justify the unjustifiable. Whatever actions I, or any one else on this thread deem necessary to take, is ultimately irrelevant to the discussion we're having, of the legality of the situation.

hebi she claimed she cannot find Mr Olanrewaju, now that I have answered she has run away from that issue and changed post to abuse and shifting the post to the Laws of rape stated on another thread.

You tried running to another thread to peddle your falsehoods. I simply introduced them here as they are relevant to the topic we were having. You were probably hoping I wouldn't notice your sleight of hand, didn't you, lol? Quite hilarious though, that you've suddenly become an active crusader of justice overnight, after watching me expose your lies and hypocrisies relentlessly, without pause. Now you want to take action? I'm not your stepanfetchit that you can give orders, my dear, so come of it. Suddenly you want to be practical in a theoretical discussion, after trying and failing to defend a rapist. How's the view from up there on your high horse of hypocrisy?

So, clearly she has nothing to say regarding the issue of arresting Olanrewaju after her very very stupid excuse

You can keep hiding behind your cheap veil of semantics, twisting people's words out of context, because you're too cowardly to confront the ugliness that your apologetics enable. Your reputation as a moral agent, is already in the mud. It changes nothing .

I can already see his alternate moniker viewing. Oga will soon start liking his posts and replying himself. Kikikikiki.

TheDevilsBride:
Smh, lmfao at you here in my room, watching you desperately trying to save face. You know you just got caught slipping, trying to pass the buck as you are wont to do, and blame the girl for Mr. Olarenwaju's perverse actions. But now that I've bursted your wayo wayo rape apologist arse citing Section 31 Subsection 3 of the Child Rights Act 2003, suddenly it's too inconvenient for you to talk about it .

Has anyone noticed yet how Dtruthspeaker intentionally quotemines people's responses, taking singular statements and words out of context, and retrofitting them to sell his dubious narratives? We're just getting started here, as I and Dtruthspeaker both know our many little secrets, that he will soon be pulling more inane rabbits out from inside his dusty tattered hat, trying to deflect and run away from valid criticisms and scrutiny of his position, lol.



Unfortunately for you, nothing changed here, except perhaps your ludicrous attempt to sidestep the law and justify the unjustifiable. Whatever actions I, or any one else on this thread deem necessary to take, is ultimately irrelevant to the discussion we're having, of the legality of the situation.



You tried running to another thread to peddle your falsehoods. I simply introduced them here as they are relevant to the topic we were having. You were probably hoping I wouldn't notice your sleight of hand, didn't you, lol? Quite hilarious though, that you've suddenly become an active crusader of justice overnight, after watching me expose your lies and hypocrisies relentlessly, without pause. Now you want to take action? I'm not your stepanfetchit that you can give orders, my dear, so come of it. Suddenly you want to be practical in a theoretical discussion, after trying and failing to defend a rapist. How's the view from up there on your high horse of hypocrisy?



You can keep hiding behind your cheap veil of semantics, twisting people's words out of context, because you're too cowardly to confront the ugliness that your apologetics enable. Your reputation as a moral agent, is already in the mud. It changes nothing .

I can already see his alternate moniker viewing. Oga will soon start liking his posts and replying himself. Kikikikiki.

Madam hen, you talk too much ha! Full of empty nothings.

See other people's statements, straight to the point.

You obviously think arguments are won by noise making, long long talk and beating your opponents with tiresome and empty long talk.

You sound like a mad bitter woman o.

@ the bolded you dey fear me so tay I don become thetruthspeaker

TheDevilsBride:
Smh, lmfao at you here in my room, watching you desperately trying to save face..

Says the one who lost everything and has nothing to save because you have already been caught changing post. Meaning you could not answer the issue.

So now, you are talking rubbish and repeating yourself like mad person.

FayaBall:
Madam hen, you talk too much ha! Full of empty nothings.

See other people's statements, straight to the point.

You obviously think arguments are won by noise making, long long talk and beating your opponents with tiresome and empty long talk.

It sound like a mad woman o.

@ the bolded you dey fear me so tay I don become thetruthspeaker

Oo you saw it? And I just called her a mad person

Dtruthspeaker:
Oo you saw it? And I just called her a mad person

Ah, my ears are full of her shouting and screaming like a complete mad woman, ah ah.

Wetin you do am wey she dey sound like one frustrated bat like this so?

FayaBall:
Ah, my ears are full of her shouting and screaming like a complete mad woman, ah ah.

Wetin you do am wey she dey sound like one frustrated bat like this so?

I dey spoil her market in telling men say women don set up all dese things make men dey mumu fall inside na im cause am.

Dtruthspeaker:
I dey spoil her market in telling men say women don set up all dese things make men dey mumu fall inside na im cause am.

Hmmm

FayaBall:
Madam hen, you talk too much ha! Full of empty nothings.

Psychological projection is nasty work, lol. Is this not you ?

FayaBall:
Cluck, cluck, cluck...

FayaBall:
Quack Quack Quack

FayaBall:
See other people's statements, straight to the point.

Again, your incompetence at keeping up with long detailed responses is not my kettle of fish, lol.

You obviously think arguments are won by noise making, long long talk and beating your opponents with tiresome and empty long talk.

Nope. Arguments are won by thorough, detailed presentation of facts and truths, without any logical fallacies, and backed by evidence to dispel any cacophonous ramblings to the contrary from intellectually dishonest people like your type. If we are to go by this criteria, then yes, I've won this argument long ago .

Judging from our exchanges so far, you're only projecting your reasoning on to me, as you've just been distracting yourself from the bitter reality by trying and failing to derail the conversation with ad hominems, non-sequiturs etc etc, between you and your main ID, lmao.

You sound like a mad bitter woman o.

What can a threatened puppy with no teeth do when he's been backed into a corner? Of course he has no choice but to bark. Doesn't change the fact that he's toothless, lol.

I won't even bother insulting you back. My arguments speak for themselves and so no need to recourse to childish personal insults that have nothing to do with the argument. No matter how harsh my criticisms sound to you, you'll keep hearing them, as they're nothing but the truth, lol. So you can keep having your meltdown, while I logically discombobulate any more trite arguments as you put them forward. Deal with it.

@ the bolded you dey fear me so tay I don become thetruthspeaker

It is no secret, lol, your many monikers that abound on this forum, as they all share the same unique writing style and level of reasoning, lmao. But sure, keep trying to deflect. I'm just here to watch you meltdown until your self-implosion, which seems like it's started already.

By the way, no amount of laughing emojis you use will drown out the stench of your defeat on this topic .

Dtruthspeaker:
Says the one who lost everything and has nothing to save because you have already been caught changing post. Meaning you could not answer the issue.

I already know you will fail woefully, at supporting this baseless charge lmao, because you are wilfully dishonest. But can you point to just 1 instance of me "changing post", throughout our correspondence, hmmm? See how I keep sending lifeboats to rescue you, giving you infinite opportunities to redeem yourself and prove my argument is lost, but you refuse to rise above your sunken ship, smh. Notice how everyone else ignores you, because they've grown accustomed to your constant prejudiced, uninformed waffling. I only engage you, partly because I enjoy pointing out your absurd fallacies, lol.

So now, you are talking rubbish and repeating yourself like mad person.

Then why, oh why, Dtruthspeaker are you still struggling, having a hard time, staying on topic, and adequately debunking my rubbish na, lol ?

TheDevilsBride:
I already know you will fail woefully, at supporting this baseless charge lmao..

Change of Post is not so obvious that it needs support?

Clearly you have gone Mad!

TheDevilsBride:
I already know you will fail woefully, at supporting this baseless charge lmao, because you are wilfully dishonest. But can you point to just 1 instance of me "changing post", throughout our correspondence, hmmm?

Dtruthspeaker:
Change of Post is not so obvious that it needs support?

Clearly you have gone Mad!

Tsk, tsk, did I not predict this ?

The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks. He accuses me of changing my posts, while hurling unrelated accusations at the same time like a drunken darts player, blindfolded, aiming at a board he can't even see.

Out of my benevolence, I still offered him a chance to prove his claims with the very digital map coordinates of my supposed transgression, and what did he do? His accusing tongue vanished! Poof! Gone! Like a fart in a spacesuit. Now he goes back down to wallow at his usual level of trolling and infantile insults because he had nothing worthwhile to present .

Look at you, getting dizzy, spinning around in your own self-crafted fog of confusion, smh. I'm loving this though. You really are good for sports, lmao.

TheDevilsBride:
Tsk, tsk, did I not predict this ?.

See it! Mad woman is desperately looking for unending talk so that she can find something to use and save her non existent self.

Or last word

You can have the last word girl, since you need it to live and not die. hahahahahahahaha

Dtruthspeaker:
See it! Mad woman is desperately looking for unending talk so that she can find something to use and save her non existent self.

Or last word

You can have the last word girl, since you need it to live and not die. hahahahahahahaha

^^^Ladies and gentlemen, feast your eyes with final bleats of a slaughtered goat, the quintessential sore loser, with an unhealthy penchant for self-aggrandizement and an unrelenting dedication to the art of obfuscation .

You really did try your best, but you ran out of steam pages ago, even though, like a dogged, if not somewhat dim-witted, canine clinging tenaciously to a tattered bone, you completely refused to relinquish your grasp on a lost cause. Your cheap and feeble foray into watery activism against Mr. Olarenwaju to flip the script and make us look like we're the ones supporting him, was just another desperate attempt to deflect attention from your hypocrisy, given that you were defending him from the very start, and as I expected, it was indeed, a risible failure of an attempt, lmao.

And who can forget your bald-faced lie that I "changed posts". After challenged for proof, you bucked under the weight of your emptiness and gave in. It's probably why you conveniently want to give up now, because you've made so many mis-steps, that even you have now realized the true poverty and absurdity of your position, lmao. But all that is in the past. Now that you've finally put your puerile argument to rest in its coffin, I can comfortably kick the sand over it. Once again, permit me to extend my sincerest gratitude to you for this sidesplitting exhibition of desperation, mendacity, shadow-boxing and intellectual bankruptcy, and I take joy in the fact that future readers will stumble across this thread to witness the gradual disentanglement of your argument from all ends, courtesy of your own inept logic .

And on that note, my work here is done.

======================================

You can have the last word girl

...and when I say I'm done, I mean what I say, unlike Dtruthspeaker who has been claiming to let me have the last word for the past two pages, lmao.

P.S I wouldn't be surprised though Dtruthspeaker, if despite your claims of concession, you still returned, like an emotionally distraught child who got bullied at the playground, to clutter this very thread with yet another vapid retort. Your insecurity is palpable, and I can tell that in your own case, the prospect of having the last word, probably with your FayaBall alt, even in a faceless forum, is no doubt, just too enticing for your fragile ego to resist, lol. I can already predict your split personality disorder will soon kick in, and you'll be quoting and replying to yourself below .

TheDevilsBride:
Again, your incompetence at keeping up with long detailed responses is not my kettle of fish, lol.



Nope. Arguments are won by thorough, detailed presentation of facts and truths, without any logical fallacies, and backed by evidence to dispel any cacophonous ramblings to the contrary from intellectually dishonest people like your type. If we are to go by this criteria, then yes, I've won this argument long ago .

Judging from our exchanges so far, you're only projecting your reasoning on to me, as you've just been distracting yourself from the bitter reality by trying and failing to derail the conversation with ad hominems, non-sequiturs etc etc, between you and your main ID, lmao.



What can a threatened puppy with no teeth do when he's been backed into a corner? Of course he has no choice but to bark. Doesn't change the fact that he's toothless, lol.

I won't even bother insulting you back. My arguments speak for themselves and so no need to recourse to childish personal insults that have nothing to do with the argument. No matter how harsh my criticisms sound to you, you'll keep hearing them, as they're nothing but the truth, lol. So you can keep having your meltdown, while I logically discombobulate any more trite arguments as you put them forward. Deal with it.



It is no secret, lol, your many monikers that abound on this forum, as they all share the same unique writing style and level of reasoning, lmao. But sure, keep trying to deflect. I'm just here to watch you meltdown until your self-implosion, which seems like it's started already.

By the way, no amount of laughing emojis you use will drown out the stench of your defeat on this topic .

Wooow, madness in hyperdrive!

TheDevilsBride:
Psychological projection is nasty work, lol. Is this not you ?

Frustrated mad hen

Dtruthspeaker:
See it! Mad woman is desperately looking for unending talk so that she can find something to use and save her non existent self.

Or last word

You can have the last word girl, since you need it to live and not die. hahahahahahahaha

You don buy mad woman market abi you comot the refuse dump wey she normally dey go relax?

FayaBall:
You don buy mad woman market abi you comot the refuse dump wey she normally dey go relax?

Na because she see say all her stupid wuru wuru and plenty grammar arguments and pettiness wey she dey use load people take thief win no dey work with me.

So the result na vex and madness and frustration and abuse and more plenty plenty useless noise making.

The witch don forget say na empty ñgwõ ñgwõ na im dey make noise pass!

Dtruthspeaker:
Na because she see say all her stupid wuru wuru and plenty grammar arguments and prettiness wey she dey use load people take thief win no dey work with me.

So the result na madness and abuse and more plenty plenty useless noise making.

The witch don forget say na empty ñgwõ ñgwõ na im dey make noise pass!

the madness no be here o. Make she go sniff rotten eba for her usual relaxation spot, she go dey alright las las.

TheDevilsBride:
Ah, I can perceive the stench of butthurt, wafting aimlessly, from your direction, as a noxious cloud of your desperation to tell sad lies, born from the fact that you tried, and failed to muster any poignant or even coherent counterarguments to salvage your tattered claims. Safe to say, lol, that your intellectual well has run dry.

Why not hop on back on your main moniker and actually prove that my arguments are false, hmmm? Or you would prefer to keep clucking and flapping about like this? I know that's more your speed. Don't get me wrong, I'd be happy to keep watching you meltdown for no apparent reason, if only to underscore the fact that, when it comes to the arena of logical discourse, you're little more than a featherweight, swinging wildly at shadows while I continue to dance circles around you .

Jesus, which person pikin Dem finish like dis? 😭😭💀

dragonflyy:
Jesus, which person pikin Dem finish like dis? 😭😭💀

That means her arguments have no value so she is using insults and abuse to make her point.

Citroen19digit:
That means her arguments have no value so she is using insults and abuse to make her point.

To be frank, she was not insulting anyone, just emphasis on the position of the fellow who was defending a rapist.

Citroen19digit:
That means her arguments have no value so she is using insults and abuse to make her point.

that thing no be insult boss.Na the bros argument wey she finish.

dragonflyy:
that thing no be insult boss.Na the bros argument wey she finish.

Everything na insults to our people.

dragonflyy:
Jesus, which person pikin Dem finish like dis? 😭😭💀

Abegi, you just came to support your atheist mad sister.

Every reasonable person can see this is plain madness.

dragonflyy:
that thing no be insult boss.Na the bros argument wey she finish.

Since when did smelling butt become a part of an argument?

Do you not know that any argument that attacks a person rather than the argument is wrong?

All she did was to insult and insult him while trying to argue at the same time. If you remove the insults and look at her arguments you would see that she was just talking her own and how she wants it to be. Meanwhile, law moves in ways we common people do not understand and sometimes do not like but procedure, is procedure.

You can not expect that because a person has been accused so he must be judged guilty. There are procedures which is what I think the guy is saying. And this is of course as he said even the op did not think rape when it was happening.

Nnamdipapa:
To be frank, she was not insulting anyone, just emphasis on the position of the fellow who was defending a rapist.

You are being very unreasonably unfair, where is the support for rapist in telling guys the truth about what girls do, ah ah! Na the kind person wey you be?