₦airaland Forum

AntilsIam:
Yes.. Check it out here

GreenCovering:
No it's from wikipedia, with attached research work.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samarkand_Kufic_Quran

As promised, make the shahada now!

henryadex:
US wants to take over the whole world? Please come and take over this zoo called 9ja we beg of you

AntilsIam:
You are not a Christian and satan is your father


“Then they surrendered, and the apostle (Muhammed) confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith, a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. Among them was the enemy of Allah Huyayy b. Akhtab and Ka`b b. Asad their chief. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. As they were being taken out in batches to the apostle they asked Ka`b what he thought would be done with them. He replied, "Will you never understand? Don't you see that the summoner never stops and those who are taken away do not return? By Allah it is death!"


Ibn Isḥaq wrote several works. His major work is al-Mubtadaʾ wa al-Baʿth wa al-Maghāzī—the Kitab al-Mubtada and Kitab al-Mab'ath both survive in part, particularly al-Mab'ath, in ibn Hisham and al-Mubtada otherwise in substantial fragments

smokinloud:
shut up. He's telling you what muhammed companions wrote down about him and you're crying. Bebeto.

Haakeem:
what are you high on

AntilsIam:
Na your father at home dey s!ck, in fact your father na satan, esu orita.. You never see nothing yet

Your existence is miserable to those that owns you

smokinloud:
I clicked on ur Wikipedia link found what you're referring to to be hoax. Wikipedia provided a source to the claim and I clicked and found this:
E. A. Rezvan, "On The Dating Of An “'Uthmanic Qur'an” From St. Petersburg", Manuscripta Orientalia, 2000, Volume 6, No. 3, pp. 19-22
So, I downloaded the pdf and found out E.A Rezvan didn't make the claim. An Islamist probably went to Wikipedia to edit stuff and put source on it. Check out my find out below. SO, IT'S A LIE THERE'S NO SCHOLARLY WORK THAT DATED THE TASHKENT MANUSCRIPT TO THE 6TH CENTURY

fx45:
Is there a single church inside the whole of Saudi Arabia?

DeOTR:
Can Christians enter Mecca and Medina? Ask yourself why Medina that once had a sizeable number of Jews is now an abomination for them. You can read what really happened if you care to know. No be today Islam don dey plague the world

AbuTwins:
What the name of the church Jesus built before he died? I don't know why you guys just pretend to be ignorant!

GreenCovering:
I hope you are not reading the document upside down or have you began to tell lies now? See the citation by the research document below and not some writing on the wikipedia page. The citation was made to the Oxford research work on the Tashkent manuscript while presenting the research work on the St. Petersburg manuscript. But here you are attempting to muddle up the research work on the St. Petersburg manuscript with the Tashkent manuscript.

I also believe you have stumbled on other corroborating evidences such as the Birmingham manuscript that even dates back earlier. But because you want to save your face on Nairaland you came to put up all of these markings up and down in your response to make it look like you had some understandings meanwhile it's all an attempt to falsify facts staring you in the face. The devi is a nairalander, lol.

AntilsIam:
Muhammad did it for Islam and allah

GreenCovering:
I hope you are not reading the document upside down or have you began to tell lies now? See the citation by the research document below and not some writing on the wikipedia page. The citation was made to the Oxford research work on the Tashkent manuscript while presenting the research work on the St. Petersburg manuscript. But here you are attempting to muddle up the research work on the St. Petersburg manuscript with the Tashkent manuscript.

I also believe you have stumbled on other corroborating evidences such as the Birmingham manuscript that even dates back earlier. But because you want to save your face on Nairaland you came to put up all of these markings up and down in your response to make it look like you had some understandings meanwhile it's all an attempt to falsify facts staring you in the face. The devi is a nairalander, lol.

Segxydube:
E no go beta 4 ur papa and mama... Eleribu

AntilsIam:
Your mother is a b!tch, daughter of jezebel

AbuTwins:
The Christian guy I replied mentioned Saudi Arabia and not Mecca and Medina. Every country has the right to enact laws to restrict whoever they want from certain places. How many Muslims exists at all in Vatican city, a city created for the Pope?

Hitler wasn't a Muslim.
And the Christian revolution was not caused by Muslims.

Lies are clear from truth!

smokinloud:
There's nothing wrong with the bible verse that you quoted. The Jews believed in God and God sees them as His children. They sinned against God and God sent His angels to kill them. Can you take spiritual beings to court?!. If muslim Jihadists were angels nobody would have been condemning them. I don't know how ISLAMISTS reason tho. You're saying God is a terrorist for commanding His own angels to kill the Jews that you hate with your soul?!.
Ezekiel 9:7-9
[7]And he said unto them, Defile the house, and fill the courts with the slain: go ye forth. And they went forth, and slew in the city.
[8]And it came to pass, while they were slaying them, and I was left, that I fell upon my face, and cried, and said, Ah Lord GOD! wilt thou destroy all the residue of Israel in thy pouring out of thy fury upon Jerusalem?
[9]Then said he unto me, The iniquity of the house of Israel and Judah is exceeding great, and the land is full of blood, and the city full of perverseness: for they say, The LORD hath forsaken the earth, and the LORD seeth not.

AntilsIam:
Did you hate reading your holy hadith? I won't say anything that has no evidence or proof from your war manual and porn hub book called hoely quran and hadith


Take a look at it here :



“Then they surrendered, and the apostle (Muhammed) confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith, a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. Among them was the enemy of Allah Huyayy b. Akhtab and Ka`b b. Asad their chief. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. As they were being taken out in batches to the apostle they asked Ka`b what he thought would be done with them. He replied, "Will you never understand? Don't you see that the summoner never stops and those who are taken away do not return? By Allah it is death!"


Ibn Isḥaq wrote several works. His major work is al-Mubtadaʾ wa al-Baʿth wa al-Maghāzī—the Kitab al-Mubtada and Kitab al-Mab'ath both survive in part, particularly al-Mab'ath, in ibn Hisham and al-Mubtada otherwise in substantial fragments

Electorate:
Your mother's pussy is smelly and watery reason your father had to get drunk before drilling her, he made a mistake not using a condom on the night you blindly swam into her ovary, else a miserable being like you won't be born...Your father is the Devil, kiss the truth.

You are useless to mankind, your absence wont be felt...bloody parasite.

Bibleteacher:
Thank God you know that your Bible preached killing .

Dey play 😃😃

So your own god of your manmade Bible also killed ? Ahaa

GreenCovering:
I hope you are not reading the document upside down or have you began to tell lies now? See the citation by the research document below and not some writing on the wikipedia page. The citation was made to the Oxford research work on the Tashkent manuscript while presenting the research work on the St. Petersburg manuscript. But here you are attempting to muddle up the research work on the St. Petersburg manuscript with the Tashkent manuscript.

I also believe you have stumbled on other corroborating evidences such as the Birmingham manuscript that even dates back earlier. But because you want to save your face on Nairaland you came to put up all of these markings up and down in your response to make it look like you had some understandings meanwhile it's all an attempt to falsify facts staring you in the face. The devi is a nairalander, lol.

GreenCovering:
I hope you are not reading the document upside down or have you began to tell lies now? See the citation by the research document below and not some writing on the wikipedia page. The citation was made to the Oxford research work on the Tashkent manuscript while presenting the research work on the St. Petersburg manuscript. But here you are attempting to muddle up the research work on the St. Petersburg manuscript with the Tashkent manuscript.

I also believe you have stumbled on other corroborating evidences such as the Birmingham manuscript that even dates back earlier. But because you want to save your face on Nairaland you came to put up all of these markings up and down in your response to make it look like you had some understandings meanwhile it's all an attempt to falsify facts staring you in the face. The devi is a nairalander, lol.

AntilsIam:
Ahahahaha it is now hitting this m!serable slave hardly..

Relax okay, ya bitch mother4ker will make it easy for you by selling her stinky pussiess to feed you at home

AntilsIam:
Ahahahaha slave Oya take camel urine chill body iwo omo ofo, omo irankiran yii