₦airaland Forum

NewHe:
INEC don't defend candidates but defends their own roles!

Leave them, let them continue to entertain their co travelers with half reports mixed with condiments to taste nice.

All Eyes is now on the judiciary if they fall then we don't have a country .

Unfortunately, you are the block head. Will they not defend the result they announced? Are they not party to the case? I don't really understand how you brag with your stupvdity.

Wickedfacts:
INEC doesn't defend the victory of the candidates.
If they do that, they are no longer impartial.

There's a reason why politicians look for blockheads like you to blow their trumpet but never allow their own children to do so.

Where did you read your own case file from? PDP won't accuse the body that conducted the election, like the umpire for the election was APC. Try get brain, e get why.

sparko1:
None of the witness of PDP accuse INEC of anything, besides what do you suppose they will defend.

It's only the parties involved that have that obligation.

Algold:
It is so glaring that the APC are looking for a way out of this mess. They will have to bank of federal might to stay in power. The witnesses against them is so much they are intimidating opposition witnesses in Edo state. May God save democracy in Nigeria.

Edo is gradually witnessing return of thugs and touts liters every where. Bus drivers are paying with their sweat. They now see Obaseki as a saint. Una never see anything. Pray Edo people. Pray harder what will before Edo will be worse than Tinubu

All the witnesses from PDP are useless sir

Kennitrust:
Their master's step.

How many witnesses did Tinubu called on such an intense court case that would have (supposed to) disqualified him.

The judiciary is in their pocket.

Tinubu didn't need to call any witness because pdp an Lp already bungled their case

TriCee:
Those evil people?
They know nothing will happen to APC 'victory'. Decided not to waste time pushing further.

Tribunal will now find one rubbish excuse and affirm the 'victory '.

Did pdp even bring any solid evidence

saviolansky:
Soldier go soldier come barrack remain Inec is the barrack no need to spend time and money another man sickness let APC and governor Okpebolo do the defending

There's nothing to defend since pdp presented a weak case

40yroldman:
Same Ikpeazu, SAN who lost Peter Obi’s case at the presidential tribunal is representing APC at the Edo state tribunal.
Is history about to repeat it's self?
Many are of the opinion that he deliberately failed to prove Peter Obi's case at the tribunal.

He lost because he was on the attacking side. It is easier to win from a defensive point in legal matters

Ringstonermasks:
who doesn't know that APC will loose the court case ?

They will win actually

ValarDoharis:
The court will still rule in favor of APC.

The Supreme Fraud that abandoned the constitution and gave Tilumbu victory despite not winning the federal capital territory and not using IREV. The forgery case was also ignored

Did obi win in the North

They did not present any either for the presidential election and still won the case.

Sosqui:
Unfortunately, you are the block head. Will they not defend the result they announced? Are they not party to the case? I don't really understand how you brag with your stupvdity.

They don't need to since pdp failed

Ihengwu:
They did not present any either for the presidential election and still won the case.

They didn't present because the cases against them where watery

When GEJ won in 2011, did he win the North?

Akpakomiza2:
Did obi win in the North

Wickedfacts:
INEC doesn't defend the victory of the candidates.
If they do that, they are no longer impartial.

There's a reason why politicians look for blockheads like you to blow their trumpet but never allow their own children to do so.

you are the real blockhead here. If they can't defend what they pronounced, then on what basis was the pronouncement made?. If they are not required to defend, then they would not have been called to testify. Pipe down and learn, prat.

NewHe:
INEC don't defend candidates but defends their own roles!

That was how is suppose to be. They suppose to defend the results they announced but they prefer to be looking for technicality in the petition rather than saying this is the actual votes that came from so and so unit. They even reject their own CTC of documents given to petitioners. Meaning they are indirectly giving support to the respondent.

ValarDoharis:
When GEJ won in 2011, did he win the North?

He won the entire south massively, won the middle belt and got good votes in core north. Did obi achieve same

Why are you explaining? I asked if he won the North? Its a yes or know based on what you asked me earlier

Akpakomiza2:
He won the entire south massively, won the middle belt and got good votes in core north. Did obi achieve same

ValarDoharis:
Why are you explaining? I asked if he won the North? Its a yes or know based on what you asked me earlier

He won 4 regions

Goalpost shifted

Akpakomiza2:
He won 4 regions

This case will follow suit the same way with Pete Obi, atiku and tinubu watch how the judge will turn the whole case in favor of APC. People are yet to understand that INEC is a party link to APC

Sosqui:
Where did you read your own case file from? PDP won't accuse the body that conducted the election, like the umpire for the election was APC. Try get brain, e get why.

You are just being emotional, they are accusing APC of falsifying votes, changing figure.

What you don't understand is, PDP is not interested in INEC, accusing INEC means reconducting the election, which they don't want, they are only interested in being declared the winner.

They want to prove malpractice by APC, INEC has to be mentioned because they announced the wrong party according to PDP, but then they won some local government, it won't make sense if they say INEC colluded with APC, so they concentrate on the areas they lost.