₦airaland Forum

diggz:
Forget the bald fraud! You and I watched the game—at least I’m assuming you did. Are you really saying that, after seeing the match, your conclusion is that Sanchez didn’t cost us any chance of picking up at least a point?

airmark:
Meanwhile, against City, we had the chance to be comfortably leading in first half and we failed, no thanks to the usual culprit, Jackson. You can't score 1 goal against City and think it's enough at Ettihad. Real Madrid with just a goal yesterday, wouldn't have won.

airmark:


I always countered this nonsense.

Android17:
So it took you 2.5 years, City treble, historic 4-peat to be right about Pep?

Android17:
He looks leggy. I hope he gets back to form next season.

raumdeuter:
Will there be a next season for KdB at citeh

raumdeuter:
What is your counter? You brought up Mourinho, he is now coaching in Turkey, You brought up Cuntay he is now in Napoli, You brought up Tuchel he is currently jobless

Now its Ancelotti? How?

airmark:
Ancelotti >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudiola

airmark:
Well you are Donstan and not Fifa, the world football governing body that gave Klopp the awards twice, while the overrated Fraudiola never won the Best coach award since 2016.

Ancelotti expectedly will clinch this year's while the fraud will go home with nothing as usual.

Kimbeast:
Manchester City defense literally throw away the game yesterday despite Haaland scoring twice but attack bla bla bla. Who even takes this nigga seriously here.

diggz:
Bro, Tuchel won a Champions League final against a better City team by just one goal, so I’m not buying your argument. That aside, even if we were comfortably leading 2-0 at half-time, how would you account for Sanchez’s brain farts that led directly to the first two goals against us—and probably the third one too? Would you blame the strikers for not scoring or the keeper for throwing the game away?

raumdeuter:
Airmark is specially mumu

airmark:
Bro, my post is about that attack vs defence debate we had last year January, don't muddle things up here or start a needless rounds of argument. Carlo highlighting that the emergency defenders didn't even train together before yesterday and they still won, is a confirmation of my stand back then that a firing attack could cover for a mediocre defence.

Meanwhile, against City, we had the chance to be comfortably leading in first half and we failed, no thanks to the usual culprit, Jackson. You can't score 1 goal against City and think it's enough at Ettihad. Real Madrid with just a goal yesterday, wouldn't have won.

Ibime:
They are not useless as Sterling that will lose every ball and not track back. If you give Sancho ball, you get it back

Kimbeast:
Manchester City defense literally threw away the game yesterday despite Haaland scoring twice but attack bla bla bla. Who even takes this nigga seriously here.

airmark:
A better City team without a striker? Did they even play at Ettihad as I opined in my post? You are now sounding like Lordfalcao bro.

You should know the damage a 2 goal gap can do to the losing side and also how they become more vulnerable to concede more, as they go all out for goals.

No need dragging this bro, as you are hellbent on not succumbing to superior points.

diggz:
Pickford useless like Sanchez. Nonsense keeper!

Skimpledawg:
This is your expectation from your winger?

"Give me, I give you"?

Chai, uwa mmebi

Leyqute:
The guy get too much karamo for body

Unlimited22:
Jackson is out until April.

At least airmark will rest.