₦airaland Forum

lexy2014:
are you not contradicting yourself?

based on the UNs decision to suspend activities in Yemen, is that now antisemitism and enabling terrorists?

what drug are you taking?

This one no go school, how is he contradicting his self, na wa oo..

Righteousness2:
Go school! Go school!
You go say School na Scam.
Now see as you dey Disgrace yoursef 4 publick

The guy brainlessness dey on another level entirely 😂😂😂😂

spendam nau
..antto YisraEL here will support houtis since they are against YisraEL

Holiness2100:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/world/middleeast/united-nations-yemen.html

Useless, pro-jihadist UN!
They should keeep on feeding, pampering and supporting terrorists.

Thank God the weak Joe Biden is no longer there.
God bless Israel for guarding the world against Islamic terrorists and jihadists.

Holiness2100:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/world/middleeast/united-nations-yemen.html

U.N.O. is stung by the bee it kept in its pocket! Hypocrites!! The U.N.O. is indeed in the gutter!!! A Guterres is in there.

lexy2014:
what are you explaining?

did you read the post I responded to?

was there any mention of "double standard"?

if you say that the Houthis are "another flank of terrorists", how then did the post I responded to call the UN "Terrorist enablers" for halting its activities in Yemen?

You lack understanding. With the simplest explanation you still didn't get what the former writer was alluding to when he refers the UN as terrorist enablers. Omashe ooooo

Sicklebear28:
You lack understanding. With the simplest explanation you still didn't get what the former writer was alluding to when he refers the UN as terrorist enablers. Omashe ooooo

since you dont lack understanding and you get what the "former writer is alluding to when he refers the UN as terrorist enablers", I am surprised you were very much unable to answer the simple questions I asked.

pls try again:

did you read the post I responded to?

was there any mention of "double standard"?

if you say that the Houthis are "another flank of terrorists", how then did the post I responded to call the UN "Terrorist enablers" for halting its activities in Yemen?

lexy2014:
since you dont lack understanding and you get what the "former writer is alluding to when he refers the UN as terrorist enablers", I am surprised you were very much unable to answer the simple questions I asked.

pls try again:

did you read the post I responded to?

was there any mention of "double standard"?

if you say that the Houthis are "another flank of terrorists", how then did the post I responded to call the UN "Terrorist enablers" for halting its activities in Yemen?

Who said you called the UN terrorist enablers? The writer was the one who called UN terrorist enablers because the UN accused Israel of blocking supplies to Palestinians now they are doing same because their workers are being detained by the Houthis terrorist. That is what we call double standard

Sicklebear28:
Who said you called the UN terrorist enablers? The writer was the one who called UN terrorist enablers because the UN accused Israel of blocking supplies to Palestinians now they are doing same because their workers are being detained by the Houthis terrorist. That is what we call double standard

can you show me where I said anyone said that I called the UN terrorist enablers?

do you even know what you are saying?

I thought you have understanding?

how has what you said answered the questions I asked?

1. did you read the post I responded to?

2. was there any mention of "double standard"?

3. if you say that the Houthis are "another flank of terrorists", how then did the post I responded to call the UN "Terrorist enablers" for halting its activities in Yemen?

lexy2014:
can you show me where I said anyone said that I called the UN terrorist enablers?

do you even know what you are saying?

I thought you have understanding?

how has what you said answered the questions I asked?

1. did you read the post I responded to?

2. was there any mention of "double standard"?

3. if you say that the Houthis are "another flank of terrorists", how then did the post I responded to call the UN "Terrorist enablers" for halting its activities in Yemen?

Now I know you lack insight in decoding words written. No wonder WAEC called it Comprehension. I rest my case

Sicklebear28:
Now I know you lack insight in decoding words written. No wonder WAEC called it Comprehension. I rest my case

what are the words that you wrote that require "decoding"?

so WAEC told you that decoding written words is comprehension?

when did WAEC call decoding written words comprehension?

do you even know what it means to decode written words?

Sicklebear28:
Who said you called the UN terrorist enablers? The writer was the one who called UN terrorist enablers because the UN accused Israel of blocking supplies to Palestinians now they are doing same because their workers are being detained by the Houthis terrorist. That is what we call double standard

can you show me where I said anyone said that I called the UN terrorist enablers?

do you even know what you are saying?

I thought you have understanding?

how has what you said answered the questions I asked?

1. did you read the post I responded to?

2. was there any mention of "double standard"?

3. if you say that the Houthis are "another flank of terrorists", how then did the post I responded to call the UN "Terrorist enablers" for halting its activities in Yemen?

lexy2014:
what are the words that you wrote that require "decoding"?

so WAEC told you that decoding written words is comprehension?

when did WAEC call decoding written words comprehension?

do you even know what it means to decode written words?



can you show me where I said anyone said that I called the UN terrorist enablers?

do you even know what you are saying?

I thought you have understanding?

how has what you said answered the questions I asked?

1. did you read the post I responded to?

2. was there any mention of "double standard"?

3. if you say that the Houthis are "another flank of terrorists", how then did the post I responded to call the UN "Terrorist enablers" for halting its activities in Yemen?

Weed is in your system. Go and sort it out. I counted more than five people who quoted you to correct your response but to no avail.

Sicklebear28:
Weed is in your system. Go and sort it out. I counted more than five people who quoted you to correct your response but to no avail.

Hahaha,LoL at weed in the system lexy2014 , Una go kill person with laugh for nairaland, Hahahaha 😂

Sicklebear28:
Who said you called the UN terrorist enablers? The writer was the one who called UN terrorist enablers because the UN accused Israel of blocking supplies to Palestinians now they are doing same because their workers are being detained by the Houthis terrorist. That is what we call double standard

Gbamsulotely, well said and spot on, this is a simple English sentence that Lexy2014 couldn't decipher , Haha 😆

They are bunch of shits doing the biddings of the mischievous US and Israeli govt.

Iranian strategy. Take important hostages and ask for millions and also ask for the release of your dangerous spy abroad.

Sicklebear28:
Weed is in your system. Go and sort it out. I counted more than five people who quoted you to correct your response but to no avail.

can you mention the "more than 5 people"?

since weed is not in your system, how come you are unable to answer the simple questions I have asked you so far?

what are the words that you wrote that require "decoding"?

so WAEC told you that decoding written words is comprehension?

when did WAEC call decoding written words comprehension?

do you even know what it means to decode written words?

Sicklebear28:
Who said you called the UN terrorist enablers? The writer was the one who called UN terrorist enablers because the UN accused Israel of blocking supplies to Palestinians now they are doing same because their workers are being detained by the Houthis terrorist. That is what we call double standard

can you show me where I said anyone said that I called the UN terrorist enablers?

do you even know what you are saying?

I thought you have understanding?

how has what you said answered the questions I asked?

1. did you read the post I responded to?

2. was there any mention of "double standard"?

3. if you say that the Houthis are "another flank of terrorists", how then did the post I responded to call the UN "Terrorist enablers" for halting its activities in Yemen?

Nahunger:
The guy brainlessness dey on another level entirely 😂😂😂😂

It baffles me that people still responds to lexy2014😁

Poormanpikin:
It baffles me that people still responds to lexy2014😁

They don't know him that's why 😂😂😂

Poormanpikin:
It baffles me that people still responds to lexy2014😁

does it not baffle you that you cant stop talking about lexy2014 despite being baffled that people still respond to lexy2014?

lexy2014:
does it not baffle you that you cant stop talking about lexy2014 despite being baffled that people still respond to lexy2014?

Away with your lunatic questions. And if you don't stop mentioning me, I won't dignify you with one. I'm not the type to stoop low to your brain malfunction.

Poormanpikin:
Away with your lunatic questions. And if you don't stop mentioning me, I won't dignify you with one. I'm not the type to stoop low to your brain malfunction.

you have already responded. why are you unhappy because you responded?

Poormanpikin:
It baffles me that people still responds to lexy2014😁

does it not baffle you that you still responded to lexy2014 despite saying that you are baffled that people still respond to lexy2014?