₦airaland Forum

nnamdi640:
What do you want him to do, Russia invaded his country and you expected him not to fight back, how will you feel if your neighbour invade your house just because you decided to dine with your neighbour's enemy. Does your neighbour have the right to tell you who to dine with? Russia is overriding Ukraine just because they believe they have more advantage in winning the war

fman:
So na casket u dey produce?
Bury ya dead over there.
Oberi

Tjra:
Zelensky is not a coward but he is a certified fool.

Fighting a senseless war he can never win even in 100 years to come.

You think he is wise to keep wasting the lives of his people?

Maybe when Putin bombs his family, hin head go correct.

Tjra:
Zelensky is not a coward but he is a certified fool.

Fighting a senseless war he can never win even in 100 years to come.

You think he is wise to keep wasting the lives of his people?

Maybe when Putin bombs his family, hin head go correct.

lokoloko84:
You are delusional to think the death of Putin will lead to a leader that is less aggressive.
Putin is the only sane leader left in Russia.
The next set of leaders in that country will be more radical in their approach.

MaziObinnaokija:
ZELENSKY is a man with IRON DRONE HAIRY THICK BALLS .

Nor gree for that STUPID IDIOT.Nah everybody he wan control .

Bastard

Tjra:
Zelensky is not a coward but he is a certified fool.

Fighting a senseless war he can never win even in 100 years to come.

You think he is wise to keep wasting the lives of his people?

Maybe when Putin bombs his family, hin head go correct.

WriterNig:
The US have a history of switching to the winning side so they can partake in the glory.

Russia won WW2 against Hitler, killing 85% of the Nazis and capturing Hitler's bunker before he shot himself. The US killed only 3% of the Nazis but took all the credit.

In future US history textbooks, they might even claim they backed Russia from the beginning to win against a vicious "monster" Zelensky. They're good at twisting history.

To be an enemy of the US is dangerous but to be a friend is fatal.

The US have only 2 friends, money and interests.

WriterNig:
The US have a history of switching to the winning side so they can partake in the glory.

Russia won WW2 against Hitler, killing 85% of the Nazis and capturing Hitler's bunker before he shot himself. The US killed only 3% of the Nazis but took all the credit.

In future US history textbooks, they might even claim they backed Russia from the beginning to win against a vicious "monster" Zelensky. They're good at twisting history.

To be an enemy of the US is dangerous but to be a friend is fatal.

The US have only 2 friends, money and interests.

WriterNig:
The US have a history of switching to the winning side so they can partake in the glory.

Russia won WW2 against Hitler, killing 85% of the Nazis and capturing Hitler's bunker before he shot himself. The US killed only 3% of the Nazis but took all the credit.

In future US history textbooks, they might even claim they backed Russia from the beginning to win against a vicious "monster" Zelensky. They're good at twisting history.

To be an enemy of the US is dangerous but to be a friend is fatal.

The US have only 2 friends, money and interests.

WriterNig:
The US have a history of switching to the winning side so they can partake in the glory.

Russia won WW2 against Hitler, killing 85% of the Nazis and capturing Hitler's bunker before he shot himself. The US killed only 3% of the Nazis but took all the credit.

In future US history textbooks, they might even claim they backed Russia from the beginning to win against a vicious "monster" Zelensky. They're good at twisting history.

To be an enemy of the US is dangerous but to be a friend is fatal.

The US have only 2 friends, money and interests.

EdiskyHarry:
just like your useless father

MaziObinnaokija:
ZELENSKY is a man with IRON DRONE HAIRY THICK BALLS .

Nor gree for that STUPID IDIOT.Nah everybody he wan control .

Bastard

stanluiz:
Can Trump and his idiotic Vp call Vance talk to Putin like that ? No

They asslick Putin ass and say it is so sweet.

seunmsg:
I watched the video of the intense and very disrespectful exchange between Trump, Vance and Zelensky and I felt very very bad for Zelensky and Ukraine. Trump literally told him to shut up and accept whatever deal they are offering him.

Again, I think it’s time for EU leaders to reassess their position in NATO and relationship with both America and Russia. With what America is doing to Ukraine, I really don’t think there is any benefit for Europe’s continued loyalty to America and NATO. It’s time to restart a friendly relationship with Russia and discard NATO. Ukraine is learning this is a very hard way.


EU and America pushed Ukraine into this war. Now, after over a million deaths and half of Ukraine destroyed, American is demanding for almost all of Ukraine’s natural resources in exchange for their continued support. So, what exactly is Ukraine getting from the war?

Amayabor1:
Open mouth waaaah!. World War 2 was basically a war between the axis powers (Japan, Germany and Italy) vs the allies (US, USSR, UK, France).

Saying Russia (USSR) won WW2 against Hitler is like saying ww2 was a war between Russia and Germany alone. Which country dropped nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki that forced Japan to surrender?

Funny enough, If not for US support of USSR, they would have been defeated by Germany.

The funny thing is that the US wasn't even involved in Ww 2 at the beginning until Japan attacked the US (pearl Harbour attack) , forcing the US to enter the war.

Una go just come online dey vomit rubbish with no indepth knowledge of the issue at hand.

Read what the leaders of Russia said about US assistance that enabled them defeat Nazi Germany. Read about the lend and lease program during ww2.

Una hatred of the US go always make una vomit nonsense.

Abokinmanoma:
This life no balance aswear


Person wey first don tell you thanks for Everything na hin go still ask you "What have you done for me"?

America don use zalensky dump am like tissue paper

Olamila:
Trump thought he was a coward but his not

Gerrard59:
That's the fate of poorer countries. You think he can talk to China in such a manner?

CJStarz:
Zelensky was bold and fearless.
But the war got to stop.
Trump was diplomatic and fatherly..
Vance was a complete id.i. ota

Arrowhead71:
Does it now equal to kick out,

Federalis:
I hate this kind of moment. Donald Trump just why? Now I see reasons why America should not be trusted. I mean like, after everything? Hmm! What a betrayal.

Tjra:
Zelensky is a big fool

smokinloud:
The United States wasn’t merely a “major contributor” to victory in the Second World War—it was the linchpin that stopped the whole bloody mess from tipping into catastrophe. Let’s not indulge the tired cliché that this was all about Hitler, some lone maniac in a bunker. It wasn’t. It was a brutal slugfest between blocs of nations, a clash of ideologies and empires that stretched from the deserts of Africa to the Pacific’s edge. The U.S. didn’t just “destroy Japan”—it shattered an imperial war machine, culminating in the apocalyptic roar of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, leaving Tokyo no choice but surrender. And in North Africa? That was no solo American romp. The British had been grinding down Rommel’s Afrika Korps for years; the U.S. rolled in with Montgomery’s Eighth Army and the Allied juggernaut to finish the job—sand, sweat, and all.[b]
Then there’s the Soviet angle. The U.S. didn’t just toss Stalin a few rifles out of pity—it funneled a torrent of matériel through Lend-Lease: trucks, planes, guns that kept the Red Army from buckling under the Wehrmacht’s boot. Without that, and without the broader Allied effort—Britain’s defiance, America’s industrial might, the sheer bloody-mindedness of the coalition—the war’s ending could’ve been a grim rewrite. To suggest otherwise isn’t just naive; it’s a willful erasure of what held the line against the Axis.
This wasn’t a one-man show, nor a one-nation triumph. It was a collective hammer blow, with America swinging the heaviest fist. Pretending it was less risks turning history into a parlor game—and a dull one at that.

WriterNig:
The US have a history of switching to the winning side so they can partake in the glory.

Russia won WW2 against Hitler, killing 85% of the Nazis and capturing Hitler's bunker before he shot himself. The US killed only 3% of the Nazis but took all the credit.

In future US history textbooks, they might even claim they backed Russia from the beginning to win against a vicious "monster" Zelensky. They're good at twisting history.

To be an enemy of the US is dangerous but to be a friend is fatal.

The US have only 2 friends, money and interests.

smokinloud:
The United States wasn’t merely a “major contributor” to victory in the Second World War—it was the linchpin that stopped the whole bloody mess from tipping into catastrophe. Let’s not indulge the tired cliché that this was all about Hitler, some lone maniac in a bunker. It wasn’t. It was a brutal slugfest between blocs of nations, a clash of ideologies and empires that stretched from the deserts of Africa to the Pacific’s edge. The U.S. didn’t just “destroy Japan”—it shattered an imperial war machine, culminating in the apocalyptic roar of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, leaving Tokyo no choice but surrender. And in North Africa? That was no solo American romp. The British had been grinding down Rommel’s Afrika Korps for years; the U.S. rolled in with Montgomery’s Eighth Army and the Allied juggernaut to finish the job—sand, sweat, and all.[b]
Then there’s the Soviet angle. The U.S. didn’t just toss Stalin a few rifles out of pity—it funneled a torrent of matériel through Lend-Lease: trucks, planes, guns that kept the Red Army from buckling under the Wehrmacht’s boot. Without that, and without the broader Allied effort—Britain’s defiance, America’s industrial might, the sheer bloody-mindedness of the coalition—the war’s ending could’ve been a grim rewrite. To suggest otherwise isn’t just naive; it’s a willful erasure of what held the line against the Axis.
This wasn’t a one-man show, nor a one-nation triumph. It was a collective hammer blow, with America swinging the heaviest fist. Pretending it was less risks turning history into a parlor game—and a dull one at that.