On The Origin of Evil - Christianity Etc (10) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Christianity Etc › On The Origin of Evil (7254 Views)
1 2 3 ... 7 8 9 10 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by MaxInDHouse(m): 4:12pm On Feb 28, 2025 |
LordReed:Ọmọ no man from a tribe can speak in defense of another tribe if he is not related to them at least he or she must be MARRIED to them before he or she can vouch for them. And as for you how are you defending me? ![]() Ọmọ you're getting back at someone who has hurt you in the past doesn't mean you are defending me nah. ![]() Your enemy's enemy somehow becomes your friend automatically does not mean you are defending JWs! Na wah o, LordReed (a diehard atheists) defending Max (a JW) you're really funny walahi talahi! ![]() |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by TheDevilsBride(f): 6:09pm On Feb 28, 2025 |
triplechoice:Nawa .Oga triplechoice, if any of my posts with this moniker have been written with AI, please present convincing proof and quit shedding crocodile tears in my mentions. Why is that such an uphill task for you, hmmm? Smh, I'm bitter, but you're the one desperately trying to pin a tail on the donkey, except you don't even have the tail in the first place, lol. Tsk. I never denied any past wrongdoings, and I have already laid out the full history of my engagements with this forum on this very thread, and I have demonstrated both presently, and even at some points in the past that I can generate responses with or without AI and/or any other external assistance/s. That being said, I can't know everything, so I do refer to blogs and news articles when I've reached a dead end, but I never copy them verbatim. I read, understand, become better informed of the given subject and figure out how it applies particularly to the conversation I'm having. I've used AI quite a lot in the past, so probably why my posts seem to be formatted as such, even when I don't actually use it. But run it through the best AI detectors, and you'll discover that it ain't no AI, lol. I've been writing IRL, for long before AI even came into the picture, just so you know. Anyways, I'm just repeating myself at this point, because I've already shared a bulk of the entire history, as well as my reasons to Deep Sight Z. I don't need you to believe me though. In fairness to you, you have every right to be skeptical, based on past antecedents. My only gripe is that if you're going to accuse someone publicly, in an entirely separate context, you should care about the evidence, instead whinging like a petulant child over elaborate, unevidenced conspiracies, lmao. |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by LordReed(m): 6:30pm On Feb 28, 2025 |
MaxInDHouse:Any excuse to remain stupíd. Dumdum you just showed my defending you had nothing g to do with religion or being your brother! Ain't you a special kinda stupíd. Yes I defended JWs because a lie was being told against them which every human should do in the circumstance. But your brain is rotted na, you can't even think properly. |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by iamteegee(m): 6:30pm On Feb 28, 2025 |
Hi good day , are you on Twitter? we are having Katalambano by 7pm as we talk about the higher Life and we invite you to join us, don't miss it as it will change your life forever https://x.com/i/spaces/1mrGmPXLqgdKy |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by triplechoice(m): 8:02pm On Feb 28, 2025*. Modified: 9:34pm On Feb 28, 2025 |
TheDevilsBride:At the moment ,It's not about the content but the style which made it very easy for me to identify you again as Jessicarabbit .Past evidences from your comments shows you're still cloning the writing style of the person you copied verbatim from. Smh, I'm bitter, but you're the one desperately trying to pin a tail on the donkey, except you don't even have the tail in the first place, lol. Tsk. I never denied any past wrongdoings, and I have already laid out the full history of my engagements with this forum on this very thread, and I have demonstrated both presently, and even at some points in the past that I can generate responses with or without AI and/or any other external assistance/s. That being said, I can't know everything, so I do refer to blogs and news articles when I've reached a dead end, but I never copy them verbatim. I read, understand, become better informed of the given subject and figure out how it applies particularly to the conversation I'm having..1. The bolded is another lie. There are evidences that you copied extensively another's write up verbatim . I already shared a link here to one of the threads where you were exposed. Go through it again and see for yourself and come back to explain how it wasn't verbatim. 2. I never said you were bitter. You were the one who accused me of bitterness. Go back and read. 3. And after owning up to your past, you think the coast is now clear for you to continue with the same dishonest activity undetected? l I've used AI quite a lot in the past, so probably why my posts seem to be formatted as such, even when I don't actually use it. But run it through the best AI detectors, and you'll discover that it ain't no AI, lol. I've been writing IRL, for long before AI even came into the picture, just so you know. Anyways, I'm just repeating myself at this point, because I've already shared a bulk of the entire history, as well as my reasons to Deep Sight Z.There's a thread on this forum were someone accused you of using AI to reply him very quickly .You replied and admitted to using it to type sometimes. If you admitted to that, then it's also very possible given your past antecedents that you're using it to clone other people's writing style to impress.Yes. It's said that, tell a lie once,then your other truths becomes very doubtful. But in your case , your have told a thousand lies in the past. So, it's now very very difficult to trust you again to engage you in any conversation. Nobody is there with you to know what you're actually doing to reply them . You reaping the consequences of your past actions. If you truly have changed,just ignore me and continue with your business and allow time to prove you right. That's all. Don't worry yourself too much. There's nothing I can do to you whether you have changed or not. I don't need you to believe me though. In fairness to you, you have every right to be skeptical, based on past antecedents. My only gripe is that if you're going to accuse someone publicly, in an entirely separate context, you should care about the evidence, instead whinging like a petulant child over elaborate, unevidenced conspiracies, lmao.Yes ,once bitten twice shy. No conspiracies at all. My behavior is in perfect order and shouldn't be described the way you just describe it.If you're going to be employed anywhere, your past activities must be looked into and not dismissed or downplayed before you're considered. But here, you're acting like a religious person (a new convert to Christianity ) who has deluded himself into thinking that since he has confessed his sins, automatically he is now a new person. "All old things have past away and everything has become new" That's certainly not true. It's not easy for an adult like yourself to change their behavior overnight. The science says so ,not me. Neural pathways which controls your habits are firmly rooted in your brain and it's not something you can remove easily by merely declaring you have changed. I think I know what you don't know about what's actually controlling your behaviour. If you know the same thing you will not address me arrogantly about your current situation. It's was only late last year you abandoned your Jessicarabbit moniker and this is February. So based on that it will take some time for you to completely change and earn the trust of those you cheated. Just give it time and don't try to rush it. Use your creativity to develop your own style of writing so nobody connects you with your past. Let's forget this unless you still have something to say. |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by TheDevilsBride(f): 9:52pm On Feb 28, 2025*. Modified: 8:16am On Mar 01, 2025 |
triplechoice:This type of reasoning doesn't even make any sense, smh. Whose writing style am I cloning exactly, hmmm? Why don't you go ahead, and carry out a linguistic analysis of all my writings, and actually demonstrate that I'm cloning any anybody, within or without this forum, huh? Can you listen to yourself? With all due respect, don't you see how dumb you sound? I do a massive amount of reading, FYI, be it academic, fictional and whatnot, online and offline, so is it entirely out of the realm of possibility, that I can develop cadences, vocabulary, and argumentative and even sentence structures, by constant reading of similarly structured content? 1. The bolded is another lie. There are evidences that you copied extensively another's write up verbatim . I already shared a link here to one of the threads where you where exposed. Go through it again and see for yourself and come back to explain how it wasn't verbatim.I was talking of this moniker only, first of all, so you weren't paying attention. I have stated that this moniker is blameless, when it comes to any form of blatant intellectual theft, and your inability to actually prove any wrongdoing with this moniker is further proof of my point. I hope you're starting to see why I called you a bitter, slanderous troll? It's not out of disrespect, it is merely my observation of how you're moving, whether you realize it or not. 2. I never said you were bitter. You were the one who accused me of bitterness. Go back and read.I've gone back to read, and it was you who tried to flip my accusations of you being bitter, by saying it was I who actually felt that way. Perhaps you think you never made such claims because you didn't state them explicitly, but it was obviously implied with your response. 3. And after owning up to your past, you think the coast is now clear for you to continue with the same dishonest activity undetected?As I said earlier, you have the right to your opinions of my character, and nothing I can say or do can change that perception. The only fact I've established here, is that I have committed no wrongdoing with this moniker, and that is my truth. You don't have to believe it for it to be any more or less true for me. It's entirely your prerogative. There's a thread on this forum were someone accused you of using AI to reply him very quickly .You replied and admitted to using it to type sometimes. If you admitted to that, then it's also very possible given your past antecedents that you're using it to clone other people's writing style to impress.Yes.Well, if you feel that way, then it's fine. I know I'm not using any assistance to respond to you. But it's funny you brought up that exchange I had sometime ago. I'm curious to know what your opinion is on writers and journalists who readily admit to using AI for correction of their scripts, checking their grammar, transcriptions etc. Are they illegitimate writers? Are they frauds to you? It's said that, tell a lie once,then your other truths becomes very doubtful. But in your case , your have told a thousand lies in the past. So, it's now very very difficult to trust you again to engage you in any conversation. Nobody is there with you to know what you're actually doing to reply them .So you know "nobody is actually here with me", but still you sound so sure about what I'm doing, or not doing, in the comfort of my own room .You reaping the consequences of your past actions. If you truly have changed,just ignore me and continue with your business and allow time to prove you right. That's all. Don't worry yourself too much. There's nothing I can do to you whether you have changed or not.Take heed to your own advice, my dear, and quit shedding crocodile tears on my mentions, undermining your own principles about time, by repeated accusations that don't do anything, according to you. Yes ,once bitten twice shy. No conspiracies at all. My behavior is in perfect order and shouldn't be described the way you just describe it.If you're going to be employed anywhere, your past activities must be looked into and not dismissed or downplayed before you're considered.Not a terrible analogy, except: 1> Some background checks are restricted to specific time periods. 2> Some offices have rehabilitation principles, and don't just outrightly disqualify all potential employees. But here, you're acting like a religious person (a new convert to Christianity ) who has deluded himself into thinking that since he has confessed his sins, automatically he is now a new person. "All old things have past away and everything has become new" That's certainly not true.I haven't acted like anything. I have only insisted that as far as this moniker is concerned, I'm sufficiently blameless. That's all. Of course, this doesn't wipe away the past, obviously, and I have already alluded to this when I earlier said that the internet never forgets. It's not easy for an adult like yourself to change their behavior overnight. The science says so ,not me. Neural pathways which controls your past habits are firmly rooted in your brain and it's not something you can remove easily by merely declaring you have changed. I think I know what you don't know about what's actually controlling your behaviour. If you know the same thing you will not address me arrogantly about your current situation.That's fine. I believe I'm making sufficient progress, through conscious effort and practice. You talk about neural pathways, but you forgot about the science of neuroplasticity. I won't even attempt to belabor the point though. Thanks for the veiled condescension, all the same. It's was only late last year you abandoned your Jessicarabbit moniker and this is February. So based on it will take some for you to completely change and earn the trust of those you cheated.Dude, you've made up your mind already. I get it. You've made it perfectly clear that nothing I can say will prompt your reconsideration, even in the absence of current evidence. Just give it time and don't try to rush it. Use your creativity to develop your own style of writing so nobody connects you with your past.This is my style now, sorry. I can't alter natural expression. If it reads inauthentic to you, then that's your kettle of fish. This is how I write and structure my posts, and I couldn't change it even if I tried, lol. Let's forget this unless you still have something to say.I've been ready to forget this ever since you brought it up, but you're the one hell bent on reopening old wounds. So you can drop the pretentious facade of tacitly claiming the moral high ground here. Thank you. |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by MaxInDHouse(m): 10:28pm On Feb 28, 2025 |
LordReed:This is how you often resort to abusive speeches when you failed to understand yourself. First of all i said whatever makes anyone claiming atheists wants to engage people who are claiming believers means you guys are protesting but you said that was stupid because the OP mentioned atheists. OK i asked if you now agree with me that you're a religionists since only religionists speaks up whenever someone malign their religion, you still said that's stupid because udoma can defend the Yorùbás if someone accuse the later of stealing. I told you it's impossible to defend those to whom you're not related you can only vouch for someone related to you because you must have stayed with the person if you don't know it's not safe to defend someone accused of stealing otherwise people may take you for a thief too. You first said you defended me which is totally out of point because there is no correlation between you and i so that is a lie. Now you're saying you have been defending Jehovah's Witnesses. Ọmọ please leave this case just admit that whatever makes you rush to defend a school of thought where neither your dad, mum, brother, sister, uncle, auntie or those related to you belongs that is RELIGION. Today i'm always speaking about jw.org and no family member of mine is a JW because it's my choice of religion just as atheism is your choice of religion too! ![]() |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by LordReed(m): 8:33am On Mar 01, 2025 |
MaxInDHouse:Cue the crocodile tears when your idiocy is shown to be glaring. You used insulting words to refer to atheists but now you are crying. LoLz. Look and this ogbonge liar. You response is still on here,show where you said it was a lie that I defended you. Why do you lie so prolifically? What gain do you get from lying so blatantly? You even tried to suggest that I only did it because the person was my enemy now you are resorting to lies. Liar liar pants on fire don't twist my words. I defended JWs on specific threads that were incorrect don't make like I said I have always been defending JWs. I see that I am dealing with someone whose brain has been so enfeebled by religion he thinks defending an unrelated human being must be about religion. What an idìot. |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by MaxInDHouse(m): 2:38pm On Mar 01, 2025 |
LordReed:The way you are crying is funny walahi talahi! Please where have you defended Jehovah's Witnesses? Is it not you LordReed who always speak against anything faith in God? ![]() Your story is unrelated jọọ here you are not defending any human being o ọmọ you are defending a religion: ATHEISM! ![]() |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by triplechoice(m): 2:48pm On Mar 01, 2025*. Modified: 3:12pm On Mar 01, 2025 |
TheDevilsBride:My friend use your head and understand why made that comment, and drop the insult and patronizing talk. It's inappropriate for you to talk down and insult the intelligence of those whom you cheated in the past . If it were offline, would you dare open your mouth to insult past victims of your fraudulent activities when confronted ? The defence you just came up as nothing whatsoever to do with your past misdeeds or what I believe you're currently doing to evade detection . I already provided evidences of how you used more than 3 monikers in a single thread to duplicate another's persons write up in another forum and use it here to reply to those you were arguing with. You copied verbatim. So don't lie and pretend. And stop trying to divorce your past crooked behavior from whatever you doing now. Allow your followers to judge you by your actions . Action speaks louder than voice. And also don't forget to respect deepsight, the only person charitable enough to tolerate your nonsense. Before now , once you noticed nobody wants to engage you after been found out, ,the next thing is to create another account and continue with the same thing. Now you think you can insult your way back to relevance .That won't work. Yes, when you read very wide, it influences how you express yourself. Everyone who can express his or herself very well has benefited from that. But in your case there are enough evidences you copied verbatim in the past and so based on that nobody can guarantee you haven't found a way to evade detection so you can continue cloning. Unless you're pretending not to know, some chatbot possess the feature to help you rewrite what you copied elsewhere so nobody knows it's AI generated. If you get it directly from chatbot it's easy to detect that. But when you steal it from elsewhere and ask it to rewrite for you in a style you have programmed into it , it's difficult to detect I have never used chatbot for anything and I don't intend until I can be sure that using it doesn't reduce my capacity to think for myself. But I know what it's capable of from experts and some of my family and friends currently using it. Please respect yourself and don't think you can fool somebody like me. I said," tell a lie once, and your other truths becomes doubtful". You have been living a lie for years and you now expect what? I was talking of this moniker only, first of all, so you weren't paying attention. I have stated that this moniker is blameless, when it comes to any form of blatant intellectual theft, and your inability to actually prove any wrongdoing with this moniker is further proof of my point. I hope you're starting to see why I called you a bitter, slanderous troll? It's not out of disrespect, it is merely my observation of how you're moving, whether you realize it or not.Please shut up and don't dictate for me what I should think or not think about you. I still see you as a fraud. You cannot convince me otherwise and your latest antics of demanding I focus on ",this" moniker is senseless and stupid . And who's trolling you? Do you even know what it means to troll? It's too early to separate yourself from you dubious and ignoble past . Something you did for years which became part of your character is what you want to casually dismiss as unimportant in less than 3 months after disappearing from that thread.? You cannot whitewash it or make seem as if it is of no relevance. What you did before wil continue to follow you everywhere on this board until it's seen you have completely changed I've gone back to read, and it was you who tried to flip my accusations of you being bitter, by saying it was I who actually felt that way. Perhaps you think you never made such claims because you didn't state them explicitly, but it was obviously implied with your response..No . Your interpretation is wayward. It's very far from what I meant. As I said earlier, you have the right to your opinions of my character, and nothing I can say or do can change that perception. The only fact I've established here, is that I have committed no wrongdoing with this moniker, and that is my truth. You don't have to believe it for it to be any more or less true for me. It's entirely your prerogative.You're not making sense. I think the facelessness of this forum is influencing how you're reacting . You're not really thinking. When you hide behind a phone you say things unconsciously you dare not say offline. Nobody in their right senses would do business with you if they found out you have been changing your phone number like you have been changing your monikers. It's a huge red flag . US and American embassies will never ever approve your Visa application because of that suspicious behavior. It's fraudulent behaviour. and everybody knows that except you who's pretending not to know. Or you think you can defend yourself in any law Court with all the nonsense you keep repeating. " My Lord I'm not guilty because I have changed.. Please pardon me. " The least you can get from that is a reduced sentence but you will surely serve time. Well, if you feel that way, then it's fine. I know I'm not using any assistance to respond to you. But it's funny you brought up that exchange I had sometime ago. I'm curious to know what your opinion is on writers and journalists who readily admit to using AI for correction of their scripts, checking their grammar, transcriptions etc. Are they illegitimate writers? Are they frauds to you?.. How can it be the same. First of all, they admit, unlike you, how exactly they use it. And not copying verbatim another person's write up like you have done and asking AI to rewrite so nobody can detect you stole the original. So you know "nobody is actually here with me", but still you sound so sure about what I'm doing, or not doing, in the comfort of my own room .The reason is because you past antecedents is making difficult to trust you. Take heed to your own advice, my dear, and quit shedding crocodile tears on my mentions, undermining your own principles about time, by repeated accusations that don't do anything, according to you. .Im not shedding any such tears and stop calling me your dear. I don't want to be a "dear" to a fraudster. You in the habit of making reckless statements. Name calling and insults won't erase your past shameful behavior that is firmly fixed round your neck like an albatross. People will continue to use it to judge you unless you respect yourself Not a terrible analogy, except:1. But yours is too close . Someone who has been defrauding other businesses is not immediately employable anywhere in the world. Anybody who risk employing such a person is either taking a huge risk of or is into something shady so he needs a criminal like himself to work with. 2. You only said that because it concerns you. If it has to do with financial matters, forget it, nothing like rehabilitation. Go and rehabilitate yourself and look for employment elsewhere where you're not known. Would you rehabilitate a paedophile and then employ him to take care of your female children in your absence.? I haven't acted like anything. I have only insisted that as far as this moniker is concerned, I'm sufficiently blameless. That's all. Of course, this doesn't wipe away the past, obviously, and I have already alluded to this when I earlier said that the internet never forgets..Please forget this talk It's cheap manipulation. . That's fine. I believe I'm making sufficient progress, through conscious effort and practice. You talk about neural pathways, but you forgot about the science of neuroplasticity. I won't even attempt to belabor the point though. Thanks for the veiled condescension, all the same.I never said it not possible to change but not overnight. I'm certain you will to go back to your vomit from time to time whenever you need to get something out quicky or don't know what else to respond with.Poverty makes some people sucuum easily to temptation. Merely declaring you have changed won't automatically change the structure of your brain. Neural plasticity is not achievable that way. Dude, you've made up your mind already. I get it. You've made it perfectly clear that nothing I can say will prompt your reconsideration, even in the absence of current evidence.Yes ,I believe you. The real you is coming out. But it's not the same quality as the one you produced for deepsight which I followed. Your latest replies are lacking certain key elements like the ones I said you cloned. I will mention just one. The unnecessary and sometimes ridiculous insertion of LMAO nearly everywhere in your write up made it appear not natural. I will keep the others to me self, and observe you with them. I've been ready to forget this ever since you brought it up, but you're the one hell bent on reopening old wounds. So you can drop the pretentious facade of tacitly claiming the moral high ground here. Thank you.it was deepsight quoted I mentioned if not I was done with you. After now, no note no matter what you reply with. One final thing you're not female but male. Don't ask me how I know. Nairaland is not as faceless as you think. . |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by LordReed(m): 3:19pm On Mar 01, 2025 |
MaxInDHouse:LoLz. Shameless liar. Bwahahahahaha! |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by MaxInDHouse(m): 3:26pm On Mar 01, 2025 |
LordReed:I have told you several times that in the intelligence we won't say "you are lying" neither do we call anyone a liar but it's you that will become extremely uncomfortable when the seat is🔥. You are not defending anyone you know rather you are defending ATHEISM: the religion of your choice! ![]() |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by TheDevilsBride(f): 5:05pm On Mar 01, 2025*. Modified: 5:31pm On Mar 01, 2025 |
triplechoice:I've read your latest write-up, and while there's a whole basketful of funny claims and statements [like how I choose to use "lol" and "lmao", or the false assumption that texts rewritten by chat bots cannot be detected], along with outright personal insults, that you've intentionally made here, that I'd take pleasure ripping apart, or firing back at, on a really good day, I'm going to fall on my sword here, to end this farce of an exchange, as I frankly see no point dragging this issue any further. I have only myself to blame, for all this. I started all of this really, many years ago, and that's why I really have no legs to stand on now, to judge someone else. So on that front, you're right. I can't divorce the past from the present. I'm stupid, I'm a liar, I'm a cheat, I steal, I have no moral compass, and I can never change, and even when I do, it won't matter because of sins past. I hope this is good enough for you. On that note, I'll be retiring permanently from this website, and will not re-emerge in any form or fashion in the future. I was getting frustrated and bored with this forum anyways, on many fronts, so I hardly see myself returning. You probably won't believe any of this anyway, because I'm a serial liar after all. I mean you know me just too well, don't you. You know the day I was born. You know what type of food I eat. You know the type of clothes I wear. You probably know where I am right at this very moment. I would deactivate this moniker, and a slew of others, but many of them were registered with throwaway emails I can't retrieve. I would swear too, but I'm not spiritual, so I think it's pointless. If you want me to, I would though. Or don't bother. You'll probably have another response anyway, still throwing more shots, so at this point, I simply cannot be arsed. I hope my e-death serves you well. I'm sorry for burdening you with my existence on this forum. Take this final post from me anyway you wish to. |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by triplechoice(m): 7:56pm On Mar 01, 2025 |
TheDevilsBride:At the end of the day, you're still a shameless lying fraud. Continue to take undue advantage of the magnanimity of the person who's still interested in giving you a second to prove your worth and to also demonstrate you have truly changed as you claimed. Scammers don't regret anything. |
| Re: On The Origin of Evil by triplechoice(m): 7:57pm On Mar 01, 2025 |
TheDevilsBride:At the end of the day, you're still a shameless lying fraud hiding behind your phone to spew nonsense. Continue to take undue advantage of the magnanimity of the person who's still interested in giving you a second to prove your worth and also to demonstrate you have truly changed as you claimed. Scammers don't regret anything or ever admit to wrong. doing. |
The Origin Of Freemasonry Is North Africa Sex Worship And Human Sacrifice • What Is Your View As To The Origin Of Life? • Atheist Is An Open Declaration Of Evil Intent? Discuss? • 2 • 3 • 4
Thoughts, Gross Matter, Ethereal Matter, And Etc. For Deepsight And Etc • TB Joshua: It Takes Insanity To Deny This Resemblance • The Beast (666) Is Here Already!!!

.

