₦airaland Forum

Sleekfingers:
No wonder Desmond Elliot called you and your likes children on social media platforms....
What's my business with what is happening in Rivers state.. they can burn their state to the ground .

You can only burn down state like plateau etc but not River state, push it deep inside your brain and stop dreaming

Gandrova:
So you have agreed finally little kid

Agree what? your lord and savior Tinubu the druggie has not liver to dare try nonsense in River state, all na mouth

Gandrova:
So you have agreed finally little kid

Wike will chop beating in River state soon

writetopoker601:
Your family is a complete shame, because u are a waste of human resources

You keep sounding like a child eat time you speak.
This is how your parents taught you to speak to people?
Your parents are doing a very terrible job at parenting.
You are not behaving any different from a mad lost puppy

Penguin2:
It’s a Supreme Court judgment.

Fubara has little to no escape.

He should just go and present the 2025 Budget to the House and allow Rivers people deal with the House Members if they dare to frustrate the passage of the bill.

At the end, what the House will do is to ensure Fubara accounts for every penny in the budget.

In the end, Fubara no go chop but they too no go chop.

But Fubara will complete his 4 years even if it means the heavens falling.

Rivers is not Lagos State.

We don’t play Baba Sope politics here.

This time na mouth you get.. Tinubu no be hausa wey dey look una o

If you are from rivers and your head still dey pain you.. Tinubu is jagaban for a reason.. No put body o...

Sundaymessi:
Some of you can be a very big joke. No state of emergency can make you to remove an elected governor. The governor got his mandate the same way Tinubu got his mandate.

Who b dis

writetopoker601:
Brigadier general from your village abi?

Where has that happened before

you started following politics in 2015 or 2023?

There have been state of emergencies in states where Governors were replaced with military administrators. In 2006, Ekiti state had one.

helinues:
Toh

This stage should have been avoided by all means but Fubara refused to listen

Annoyingly , those who are pushing him to fight this, fight that are just inconsequential in the scheme of things

You were previously asking whether there are no elders in Rivers to help resolve the issue, and now you're expressing a different opinion. Your views seem quite inconsistent.

helinues:
I still remember vividly about your empty noise about PEPT which is not different from this

Na them push Funbara enter the red oil wey him dey now.

Penguin2:
It’s a Supreme Court judgment.

Fubara has little to no escape.

He should just go and present the 2025 Budget to the House and allow Rivers people deal with the House Members if they dare to frustrate the passage of the bill.

At the end, what the House will do is to ensure Fubara accounts for every penny in the budget.

In the end, Fubara no go chop but they too no go chop.

But Fubara will complete his 4 years even if it means the heavens falling.

Rivers is not Lagos State.

We don’t play Baba Sope politics here.

U seem not to understand that this is an end game for Fubara. The house want to gain his legitimacy by that representation. Once that is done, they will commence impeachment proceedings against him. There is no way he could come up to argue that the house is illegitimate because he can't blow hot and cold.

Did u go to school at all?

Sundaymessi:
Some of you can be a very big joke. No state of emergency can make you to remove an elected governor. The governor got his mandate the same way Tinubu got his mandate.

The governor don't know his powers

writetopoker601:
If na me be fubara, I go declare war for Rivers, and make sure that the war go last for like 6 months until the Rivers Highcourt go declare there judgement on the detection matter

But you can blame APC where as you guys are infants, politics is not played on victim card so therefore if your stupid boy Gov try shit , I myself will call Oyetola Tinubu brother to tell Daddy Jagaban to declare state of emergence and we will make Martin Amahwhule the Governor then . Mumu boy Born by Mumu parents

Penguin2:
It’s a Supreme Court judgment.

Fubara has little to no escape.

He should just go and present the 2025 Budget to the House and allow Rivers people deal with the House Members if they dare to frustrate the passage of the bill.

At the end, what the House will do is to ensure Fubara accounts for every penny in the budget.

In the end, Fubara no go chop but they too no go chop.

But Fubara will complete his 4 years even if it means the heavens falling.

Rivers is not Lagos State.

We don’t play Baba Sope politics here.

Na baba won you and you papa join mama Join your girlfriend family oooo


Dindinrin you’re too small to know Wike will always be welcome to us because he’s a loyal person unlike betrayal junior brother of Obi Agulu

Who’s the father that gave birth to you this goat who can’t discuss without abusing

Well, only a goat can give birth to a goat like you

😹😹

Xisnin:
How old are you?
It happened in Plateau and it happened in Ekiti.

when our eyes never opened for democracy. Democracy is governments for the civilian not military

It's quite unfortunate that the political atmosphere in Nigeria seem to be like this. Why can't individuals who have been mandated by the people simply do their work, but instead they glorify a so called godfather.

LACK OF GOOD LEADERS IS THE BANE OF THE NIGERIAN NATION

Dicoomoba:
But you can blame APC where as you guys are infants, politics is not played on victim card so therefore if your stupid boy Gov try shit , I myself will call Oyetola Tinubu brother to tell Daddy Jagaban to declare state of emergence and we will make Martin Amahwhule the Governor then . Mumu boy Born by Mumu parents

I know you were born by a prostitute and a drunkard gamblers who raped your stupid mother. I even wonder why am responding to you.

It's not your fault, but Glo that dashed you free data

Mugu

chinchum:
you started following politics in 2015 or 2023?

There have been state of emergencies in states where Governors were replaced with military administrators. In 2006, Ekiti state had one.

Following politics in 2015 means completely nothing, because this account might be my 10th account due to ban, if u know u know.

Secondly, who told u am not aware of the 2 states initial taken over by military under Obasanjo regime?
The question is, the take over by the military is it legit in our Constitution? That Obasanjo did it as a military man, and remember we just had a change of military to civilian recently then.

Anyway, I only responded to you because your write-up is devoid of any insults.

So military takeover is alien to our constitution and currently can not happen

Omozeez1:
Did u go to school at all?

Do not mind some idiats, they only depend on AI and the next thing is abuse.

Don't just mind them, most of them can't level up to up, it's just free data from glo that caused these rubbish

Dicoomoba:
But you can blame APC where as you guys are infants, politics is not played on victim card so therefore if your stupid boy Gov try shit , I myself will call Oyetola Tinubu brother to tell Daddy Jagaban to declare state of emergence and we will make Martin Amahwhule the Governor then . Mumu boy Born by Mumu parents

The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why:

1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency

Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as:

- War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety.
- The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities.
- A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention.

However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended.

2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors

- In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose).
- Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are:
1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188).
2. Resignation or death of the governor.
3. A court ruling nullifying an election.
- The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law).

3. Was It Officially Justified?

- The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed.
- However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power.
- The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent.

Conclusion

While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional.


Mumu idiat, that can't do a common research no be your fault, naa Glo and AI fault
Idiat

chinchum:
you started following politics in 2015 or 2023?

There have been state of emergencies in states where Governors were replaced with military administrators. In 2006, Ekiti state had one.

The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why:

1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency

Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as:

- War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety.
- The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities.
- A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention.

However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended.

2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors

- In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose).
- Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are:
1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188).
2. Resignation or death of the governor.
3. A court ruling nullifying an election.
- The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law).

3. Was It Officially Justified?

- The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed.
- However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power.
- The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent.

Conclusion

While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional.


Mumu idiat, that can't do a common research no be your fault, naa Glo and AI fault
Idiat

Judolisco:
it happened in Ekiti under obasanjo.... Ekiti state house of assembly impeached fayose and his deputy, the state speaker wanted to take over the state, Obasanjo declared a state of emergency, suspended d house for 6 months and appointed a fmr military officer Tunji Olurin as state administrator for a year, dem flood ekiti with police and soldiers..... So it is very possible

The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why:

1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency

Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as:

- War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety.
- The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities.
- A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention.

However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended.

2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors

- In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose).
- Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are:
1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188).
2. Resignation or death of the governor.
3. A court ruling nullifying an election.
- The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law).

3. Was It Officially Justified?

- The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed.
- However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power.
- The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent.

Conclusion

While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional.

Gandrova:
Wawa it was done during Obj's regime little kid

The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why:

1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency

Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as:

- War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety.
- The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities.
- A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention.

However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended.

2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors

- In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose).
- Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are:
1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188).
2. Resignation or death of the governor.
3. A court ruling nullifying an election.
- The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law).

3. Was It Officially Justified?

- The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed.
- However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power.
- The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent.

Conclusion

While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional.


Mumu idiat, that can't do a common research no be your fault, naa Glo and AI fault
Idiat. Who's the child now, bastard

I don't blame you, but those guys that raped your prostitutional mother who gave birth to you. Mugu

Incrediblekutty:
Look at this fool!

The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why:

1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency

Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as:

- War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety.
- The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities.
- A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention.

However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended.

2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors

- In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose).
- Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are:
1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188).
2. Resignation or death of the governor.
3. A court ruling nullifying an election.
- The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law).

3. Was It Officially Justified?

- The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed.
- However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power.
- The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent.

Conclusion

While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional.


Mumu idiat, that can't do a common research no be your fault, naa Glo and AI fault
Idiat. Who's the child now, bastard

I don't blame you, but those guys that raped your prostitutional mother who gave birth to you. Mugu

Gandrova:
Small piking thinking

Mugu

The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why:

1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency

Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as:

- War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety.
- The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities.
- A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention.

However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended.

2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors

- In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose).
- Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are:
1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188).
2. Resignation or death of the governor.
3. A court ruling nullifying an election.
- The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law).

3. Was It Officially Justified?

- The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed.
- However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power.
- The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent.

Conclusion

While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional.


Mumu idiat, that can't do a common research no be your fault, naa Glo and AI fault
Idiat. Who's the child now, bastard

I don't blame you, but those guys that raped your prostitutional mother who gave birth to you. Mugu