₦airaland Forum

ELsmile:
9ja and politiz ehhhh...
just wen Akpabio is to ans to X harassment accusation, they wan confuse us.

Una doh

God1000:
Sycophants, I don't know why women don't like supporting each other

God1000:
Sycophants, I don't know why women don't like supporting each other

tooth4tooth:
Are you saying her 3 other female colleagues in the house too were paid to taint her They voted unanimously to get her suspended. One of the women in the panel is even a Labour party member. Natasha overdo abeg.

Before you support someone, it has to be based on truth and fairness

God1000:
Sycophants, I don't know why women don't like supporting each other

GistMedia0:
Amidst the ongoing controversy surrounding suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s allegations against Senate President Godswill Akpabio, female legislative aides of the 10th Senate have publicly expressed their appreciation for Akpabio’s leadership, describing him as gender-friendly, inclusive, and fair.

The aides emphasized Akpabio’s commitment to women’s empowerment within the legislative arm of government. They highlighted his efforts in ensuring female aides and lawmakers receive equal opportunities, adding that his leadership has fostered a more inclusive working environment in the National Assembly.

“We acknowledge and appreciate the Senate President’s unwavering support for women in politics and governance. His tenure has seen increased inclusivity, and we stand by his efforts in promoting fairness and equity,” the statement read.

This comes as Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan faces suspension over what the Senate described as gross misconduct. While her allegations against Akpabio have stirred political tension, the show of support from female legislative aides suggests a divided perspective on the matter within the Senate.

God1000:
Sycophants, I don't know why women don't like supporting each other

tooth4tooth:
It is not a gender war. You want women to support each other even when the woman in question has a questionable character Come on now!

tooth4tooth:
It is not a gender war. You want women to support each other even when the woman in question has a questionable character Come on now!

naijaking1:
Questionable character is not the issue here! Don't you understand logic, or are you biased?
The issue here is whether her allegations are true or not. The process has to drill down to the end in order to assess the truth.
We can't be in a hurry to terminate the case because of her character, history, or political affiliations. If we do, another person will suffer under the same circumstances in the future.

God1000:
Sycophants, I don't know why women don't like supporting each other

naijaking1:
Questionable character is not the issue here! Don't you understand logic, or are you biased?
The issue here is whether her allegations are true or not. The process has to drill down to the end in order to assess the truth.
We can't be in a hurry to terminate the case because of her character, history, or political affiliations. If we do, another person will suffer under the same circumstances in the future.

jubrilELsudan:
OBVIOUSLY HE DEY FVCK THIS ONES STEADY

CSTRR:
So the Senate is now a beacon of integrity and honesty?

The same Nigerian Senate we all know?

It didn't occur to you that these women wanted to be sycophants because they were scared of being scapegoated by akpabio?

If someone as big as Natasha can face gender inequality at the highest pinnace of Nigerian politics, is it the daughters of peasants like you that they will not lure and coerce in politics or in private business?

Continue supporting madness.

Can you explain what you mean by "gender inequality" and how it relates to this Natasha brouhaha?