₦airaland Forum

If she loves her constituents. & She knows and believes that she is working for them.

Then she should write a an apology To the Senate

So that she can continue in the Senate, she can not keep on putting the people of kogi state in a state of non-representation.

For the sake of her constituents.

Let her do the right thing.

It is not her mandate, it is the mandate of the people that she represents.....

Or the people of kogi needs to recall her and put someone else in her position because she has refused to represent them properly..

By not following house rules, talking unruly to the Senate president, not standing up for the Senate president (breaking house rules).
Submitting a petition (breaking house rules again).

Accusing the senator on TV with no evidence. And it's been weeks now she hasn't come up with the evidence of the Sexual Harassment.

Lastly, she also has a court case by the senate president 's wife that she is definitely going to spend money on because she can't win.

If you are reading this Natasha Akpoti-Uduagan.

You lost, apologize and move on. It's not worth the wait.

There was a senator with Arthur Nzeribe, a very rich man who refused to apologize to the Senate and was suspended for two years. This is the precedent that the Senate is following.

You are not powerful than the Senate. If you don not apologize before six months, your suspension will continue.

Forget about your advisers and do the needful so that you will continue in the Senate because once they don't pay you for a sitting and your cream finishes.... I don't want to look at you when your cream finishes. I love you Natasha.
I have supported you in this platform several times, I love when you pass me and I say good morning Ma, I love the smell of your perfume too.
But please Ma, do the needful so that we can move on.

the senate is a tool for the people of Kogi, not for Natasha to fight her personal battles.

FP worthy.

No
An apology now means admission of guilt, you forget it’s a case in court.

Thelannister:
No
An apology now means admission of guilt, you forget it’s a case in court.

A case she can't prove? What evidence is she bringing up?
She has no witnesses. She said on TV she didn't tell her husband.
Akpabio 's witness said they (she and her husband ) were sitting in the parlour when akpabio was showing them round the house.

Nobody is representing anybody anywhere... it's all man for himself

Charleys:
A case she can't prove? What evidence is she bringing up?
She has no witnesses. She said on TV she didn't tell her husband.
Akpabio 's witness said they (she and her husband ) were sitting in the parlour when akpabio was showing them round the house.

Can't prove in Nigeria not in developed Countries. We all know the truth.

SHE HAS NO CHOICE. SHE IS SIMPLY PROVOCATIVE AND RECKLESS.

Alex80s:
Can't prove in Nigeria not in developed Countries. We all know the truth.

Remember that Akpabio's wife defamation lawsuit is still on and if she can't prove that she was sexually harassed because there's no witnesses, no documentation or recording she may be ordered to pay the sum of 250 billion or less plus an apology on two national newspapers.


And she Akpabio's wife could pursue a criminal case for false accusations under Nigeria’s Criminal Code (e.g., Section 391, defamation, or Section 125A, spreading false information).

.

If Ekaette’s evidence is just her denial and emotional distress claims, and Natasha produces nothing tangible, it’s a toss-up—courts might lean toward Ekaette due to Natasha’s burden to justify her public statements. But if Natasha has even minimal proof (e.g., a consistent timeline or a witness), Ekaette’s case could collapse. Without seeing court filings or evidence, it’s 50-50 legally, but politically, both sides are already entrenched

Yes

Charleys:
A case she can't prove? What evidence is she bringing up?
She has no witnesses. She said on TV she didn't tell her husband.
Akpabio 's witness said they (she and her husband ) were sitting in the parlour when akpabio was showing them round the house.

Did they try to investigate or just expect her to dance to whatever they present.

Hyperchi:
Did they try to investigate or just expect her to dance to whatever they present.

She did not appear before the committee that was about to investigate her...


Where do you live? Have you not been following the story?

.

Hyperchi:
Did they try to investigate or just expect her to dance to whatever they present.

But you want them to beg her to come for investigation . When she refused to Honour the invitation extended to her through the committee?

Yes

adekolaelect:
But you want them to beg her to come for investigation . When she refused to Honour the invitation extended to her through the committee?

Why move the date forward, so she can prepare, the hearing was supposed to be yesterday, but was shifted. Pls research

We need more ideas