₦airaland Forum

An 11-man Independent Judicial Accountability Panel, whose membership included three retired justices, has on Friday, March 14, 2025, faulted the Supreme Court over its judgement on the protracted political crisis in Rivers State.

The panel, headed by retired Justice Mojeed Owoade of the Court of Appeal, said in a statement following its inaugural meeting in Abuja that it was worried that the apex court’s judgement on appeals emanating from legal disputes in Rivers state descended into live issues.

According to the panel, which said it carried out an exhaustive analysis of some recent cases of public interest, “the judgement of the Supreme Court in the consolidated appeals leaves a gap as to whether the issue of the alleged defection of 27 members of the Rivers State House of Assembly is still alive or has been settled.

“This is because the court made comments on the issue of defection without actually addressing it.”

Highlighting that though the apex court had nothing before it, as at the time of the judgement, to establish that the 27 lawmakers were no longer bonafide members of the Rivers Assembly, the panel maintained that the apex court should not have commented on the issue at all since there were pending litigations on the matter.

However, it ruled out the possibility of any of the parties filing an application for judicial review of the judgement, saying, “As far as the case is concerned, the Supreme Court has become functus-officio in the matter.”

“Complex and lengthy judgements of courts defy easy comprehension and therefore undermine public trust,” the Justice Owoade-led panel noted, even as it urged judicial officers “to be mindful of their oath of office at all times.”

As part of its recommendations, the panel held that “politicians should generally avoid undue influence on the judiciary and be more accommodating of each other in the interest of their people.”

It also urged the government at all levels to obey court orders and respect the fundamental rights of citizens in a democracy, decrying that over nine months after the ECOWAS Court awarded damages to victims of the October 2020 End SARS protest, the Federal Government had yet to comply with the judgment.

“IJAP recommends that the Federal Government of Nigeria obey orders not only of our domestic courts but also those of International Courts, in line with its obligations under various treaties. The panel recognises that concerted citizen action will be necessary for achieving this.

“Citizens should show more interest and get involved in activities that hold the judiciary and other government agencies accountable.

“The media should be more courageous, factual and non-partisan in investigating and reporting the role of the judiciary in our democracy,” the panel added.

Other members of the panel are two retired Justices of the Court of Appeal, Justices Chinwe Iyizoba and Oloduton Adefope-Okojie, as well as Prof. Okechukwu Ibeanu, Prof. Jummai Audi, Mr. Mac Imoni Amarere, Barr. Sechap A. Tsokwa, Andrew Mamedu, Judith Gbagidi, Barr. Funmi Olukeye and Celestine Okwudil.

The panel is a fallout of an expanded project that the ActionAid Nigeria and Citizens’ Led Engagement on Judicial Accountability in Post-Election Justice Delivery in Nigeria (CLEAP-Justice) has been implementing since July 2023.

The Country Director of ActionAid, Andrew Mamedu, said the project had evolved into one that supports citizens’ actions towards judicial accountability, which is not limited to electoral matters.

Welcum:

Of what use is a judicial panel set up by an NGO in a Supreme Court judgement? Can this declaration reverse the judgement? Those who are more familiar with the judicial process can help me to answer because I've always thought that Supreme Court judgements are final.

valentineuwakwe:
Wike will call another live press conference on this judicial panel by Monday morning

ddippset:
I know some people will ask if they know more than the Supreme Court justices and I will say "Yes there is a possibility"

The Supreme Court does not necessarily comprise the most brilliant judges in the country, it is basically a panel of the most senior judges in the country.

We all went to school and we all know that for instance the most brilliant student in SS 2 might be more intelligent than at least 90 percent of the students in SS3.

So yes there are very many Appeal Court and High Court judges who could be more intelligent than some of the Supreme Court judges.

If you read carefully what this panel of 11 judges has said, you will understand that the Supreme Court was clearly biased in it's judgement.

b3llo:
Wike n Wahala

robosky02:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanguardngr.com/2025/03/rivers-crisis-judicial-panel-faults-supreme-court-judgement/amp/