₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
Can you prove i first called johnw47 any name before he started calling me Mad Max all over the forum?

lost false jw mad max

max you are mad, who but a mad man would say:
i can defeat six fully armed military combatants single handed
^^ that's when you were bragging about being a military intelligence officer

and who but a mad man would say for all to read:
my wife loves to play with my penis

you are as mad as they come mad max

1Co 14:33  For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints

Emusan:
Did you use a word that is CHRISTIAN in nature?

This is your post just this evening in response to my post: "From a believer o!"

That is why you can't answer the simple question, when did you repent in abusing people?

Hypocrite!

Hypocrisy, self righteousness and delusion dey worry am seriously. Imagine projecting his terrible ways on you by saying you are a believer ooooo.

Emusan:
Provide the person begging for response.



Yes! It was after your lies that you started looking for escape route

The Bible: "And the WORD became flesh"

Which means the person is already exists with that name THE WORD.

Watchtower article also said "The word was agent during the creation citing Gen 1"

Why did you lie that Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission?

That your tears must flow heavily tonight.

Looooool

MaxInDHouse:
His blood is always hot anytime he sees a JW it's as if we must not talk at all but i will never take that from anyone, i only attend to them at my leisure whenever i have a serious person to chat with i will quickly ignore them!

Deflection

MaxInDHouse:
That post was directed at johnw47 who always call me names he is not open for any discussion yet he keeps mentioning me and calling me names.
The other man realized what is happening so he told me what makes me feel it's not needed.

cannot ever stop lying, lost false jw mad max

your post was directed at StillDtruth, read the posts here:
https://www.nairaland.com/8350194/freewill-pertains-religion-illusion/3#134298566

Joh 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. WHENEVER HE SPEAKS A LIE, THAT IS HIS NATURAL WAY OF SPEAKING, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

Emusan: A Christian!

Do you not also call people names?

MaxInDHouse:
I don't!

cannot ever stop lying, lost false jw mad max
you claim you don't call peope names
but you called StillDtruth: "mad boy" and "idiot"
you also said to him: "Your parents are Mad!"

look here:
https://www.nairaland.com/8350194/freewill-pertains-religion-illusion/3#134298566

Joh 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. WHENEVER HE SPEAKS A LIE, THAT IS HIS NATURAL WAY OF SPEAKING, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

MaxInDHouse:
What do you call (johnw47) who always call me names when he is not open for any discussion?
A Christian or pagan?

lost false jw mad max

any names i call you are true.
i don't have discussions with u satan's mob,
and so according to you that makes me a pagan

you are as dum as they come, aren't you,
probably one of the reasons false jw org. discourage further education, is to keep you dum,
so that you will swallow all that they tell you, isn't that so oh false accuser like the devil:

Rev_12:10  Then I heard a loud voice in heaven, saying, "Now the salvation, and the power, and the kingdom of our God and the authority of His Christ have come, for the accuser of our brethren has been thrown down, he who accuses them before our God day and night.




false jw, the devil is the father of lies, but i reckon you could teach him some, couldn't you:

Joh 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. WHENEVER HE SPEAKS A LIE, THAT IS HIS NATURAL WAY OF SPEAKING, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

nas Rev 2:2  'I know your deeds and your toil and perseverance, and that you cannot tolerate evil men, and you put to the test those who call themselves apostles, and they are not, and you found them to be false;

kjv Rev_2:2  I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars:

johnw47:
cannot ever stop lying, lost false jw mad max

your post was directed at StillDtruth, read the posts here:
https://www.nairaland.com/8350194/freewill-pertains-religion-illusion/3#134298566

Joh 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. WHENEVER HE SPEAKS A LIE, THAT IS HIS NATURAL WAY OF SPEAKING, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

Indeed cannot stop lying and adding lies to lies

achorladey:
Indeed cannot stop lying and adding lies to lies

when his lies are pointed out to him he just goes right on lying,
he cannot help it, lying is his nature just like it's the devil's nature:

mad max is exactly like his father the devil:
Joh 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him WHENEVER HE SPEAKS A LIE, THAT IS HIS NATURAL WAY OF SPEAKING, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂Oga you claim there might be a grammatical error if "The God" is added to the king James version.

Yes! What is your point?

The error your analogy brought out was "a man" in which "a god" is not present in the king James version.

Good, so why are you displaying your ignorance by asking me; "WHICH grammatical error will it added to the KJV by adding the THE GOD"?

Like I said, it's evident I've already answered your question but because you're too daft and already lost in your own POV, you begin to sink in your own confusion.

Kindly tell me the possible grammatical error that might happen If "The God" is added to John 1:1 since "a god" was not used in the kjv... just like you added "The man" in your analogy of John 1:1.

Your question already answered but your confused mind won't see it.

Fact, there was "THE" in the original Greek of John 1:1, you haven't counter this point.

By the way, what do you want to proof from your diagram?

MaxInDHouse:
POLITENESS or nothing for you!

Shameless lying liar.

Below is a direct message from your own gods in Warwick.

Things to know!

1. The Title which asked: "What did Jesus do before he came to the Earth?"

2. The last part which says: "He served as the Word.

Now that your own organization claimed Jesus has been the WORD of God before coming to Earth.

Why did you lie that Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth?

Let's see the person his blood is getting hot right now

Emusan:
Shameless lying liar.

Below is a direct message from your own gods in Warwick.

Things to know!

1. The Title which asked: "What did Jesus do before he came to the Earth?"

2. The last part which says: "He served as the Word.

Now that your own organization claimed Jesus has been the WORD of God before coming to Earth.

Why did you lie that Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth?

Let's see the person his blood is getting hot right now

POLITENESS or keep on ranting!

Emusan:
Yes! What is your point?



Good, so why are you displaying your ignorance by asking me; "WHICH grammatical error will it added to the KJV by adding the THE GOD"?

Like I said, it's evident I've already answered your question but because you're too daft and already lost in your own POV, you begin to sink in your own confusion.



Your question already answered but your confused mind won't see it.

Fact, there was "THE" in the original Greek of John 1:1, you haven't counter this point.

By the way, what do you want to proof from your diagram?

If there was "The" in the original Greek, why is "The" reflective in your analogy but not reflective in English in the kjv since the kjv does not use "a god" which your analogy has claim to be the only error?

Revelation 19: 13 and he is clothed with an outer garment stained with blood, and he is called by the name The Word of God.

A personal title. “The Word” also appears in the Bible as a title for Jesus Christ, both as a spirit in heaven and as a human on earth.

A personal title or name?

Jehovah's Witnesses go about shouting Jehovah all over the place as God's name yet in the case of Jesus being called the Word it is a title

Truthseeker10:
If there was "The" in the original Greek, why is "The" reflective in your analogy but not reflective in English in the kjv since the kjv does not use "a god" which your analogy has claim to be the only error?

I've answered this several times, you already lost in your own POV.

You don't have a point anymore.

So, what do you want to proof from your diagram?

MaxInDHouse:
POLITENESS or keep on ranting!

Shameless lying liar!

You must beg for that politeness.

The screenshot below is directly from your own organization which is a direct message from your own gods in Warwick.

Things to know!

1. The Title which asked: "What did Jesus do before he came to the Earth?"

2. The last part which says: "He served as the Word.

Now that your own organization claimed Jesus has been the WORD of God before coming to Earth.

Why did you lie that Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth?

Let's see the person his blood is getting hot right now

achorladey:
Revelation 19: 13 and he is clothed with an outer garment stained with blood, and he is called by the name The Word of God.

A personal title. “The Word” also appears in the Bible as a title for Jesus Christ, both as a spirit in heaven and as a human on earth.

A personal title or name?

Jehovah's Witnesses go about shouting Jehovah all over the place as God's name yet in the case of Jesus being called the Word it is a title

To tell you how demonic and obsessed they are about Jesus.

Even their perverted NWT use "NAME" yet change it to TITLE.

Just that lying liar claimed Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth.

When the scripture says "...and The Words became flesh" not only that his own organization also said Jesus served as the Word of God before coming to Earth.

Just lie lie people confusing themselves up and down.

Emusan:
Shameless lying liar!

You must beg for that politeness.

The screenshot below is directly from your own organization which is a direct message from your own gods in Warwick.

Things to know!

1. The Title which asked: "What did Jesus do before he came to the Earth?"

2. The last part which says: "He served as the Word.

Now that your own organization claimed Jesus has been the WORD of God before coming to Earth.

Why did you lie that Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth?

Let's see the person his blood is getting hot right now

Bugaa wọn!

Emusan:
I've answered this several times, you already lost in your own POV.

You don't have a point anymore.

So, what do you want to proof from your diagram?

😂😂😂baba screenshot where you answered it.....after telling me to go and meet king James and other translators who did not add "The" in John 1:1? Lie small small na..😂

You claimed kjv did not add "The" because it might be due to grammatical accuracy that you've not been able to prove till now.

Following your logic, there is a possible grammatical error in your analogy below in the screenshot for adding "The man" in the sentence you claim to be grammatical correct.

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂baba screenshot where you answered it.....after telling me to go and meet king James and other translators who did not add "The" in John 1:1? Lie small small na..😂

You claimed kjv did not add "The" because it might be due to grammatical accuracy that you've not been able to prove till now.

Following your logic, there is a possible grammar error in your analogy below in the screenshot for adding "The man" in the sentence you claim to be grammatical correct.

So, what do you want to proof from your diagram?

MaxInDHouse:
Bugaa wọn!

Yes oooo buga in lying liar

Emusan:
So, what do you want to proof from your diagram?

My Diagram have proved that you don't know what you are talking about concerning John 1:1. Your explanation of "with God" in John 1:1 is not consistent. You claim there is a "The" in the original Greek. But the kjv does not have it.

Truthseeker10:
My Diagram have proved that you don't know what you are talking about concerning John 1:1.

Your diagram shows The Father, The Son & The HOLY Spirit are GOD(singular)

Your diagram leads to your question "How can the Word(God) be with God"

My illustration using the first man & woman shows "The woman who is also MAN can be with man"

So, it means your wrong understanding of "GOD" as used in that diagram leads to that your question.

Your explanation of "with God" in John 1:1 is not consistent.

It is and very clear!

You claim there is a "The" in the original Greek. But the kjv does not have it.

Yes! There's definite article "THE" in the original Greek and KJV and even many translations didn't insert it.

The point is that, "The woman(man) can be with man"

What do you want to proof from your diagram?

Emusan:
Your diagram shows The Father, The Son & The HOLY Spirit are GOD(singular)

Your diagram leads to your question "How can the Word(God) be with God"

My illustration using the first man & woman shows "The woman who is also MAN can be with man"

So, it means your wrong understanding of "GOD" as used in that diagram leads to that your question.



It is and very clear!



Yes! There's definite article "THE" in the original Greek and KJV and even many translations didn't insert it.

The point is that, "The woman(man) can be with man"

What do you want to proof from your diagram?

Why did kjv and other translators not insert "the" if you claim it is there?

Truthseeker10:
Why did kjv and other translators not insert "the" if you claim it is there?

You don't have question.

Am I the translator of KJV and others translations?

Emusan:
You don't have question.

Am I the translator of KJV and others translations?

😂😂😂you are not a translator but you are claiming it might be due to grammatical accuracy. Na wa for this man oo. Oga tell me the possible grammatical error if kjv adds "the" in John 1:1 just like you added "The man" in your grammtically correct analogy below.

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂you are not a translator but you are claiming it might be due to grammatical accuracy. Na wa for this man oo.

Yes!

@red-color shows you lack comprehension.

You asked me and I said "IT MIGHT BE"

Which is just my own opinion and I've repeated this times without number.

Oga tell me the possible grammatical error if kjv adds "the" in John 1:1 just like you added "The man" in your analogy below.

The grammatical error is "a god"

Even if I removed "THE" from my illustration the fact still remains that MAN(GOD) is about NATURE which makes it accurate that "The woman(man) can be with man"

What I'm expecting from you is to proof me wrong "HOW THE WOMAN(man) can't be with man".

Emusan:
To tell you how demonic and obsessed they are about Jesus.

Even their perverted NWT use "NAME" yet change it to TITLE.

Just that lying liar claimed Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth.

When the scripture says "...and The Words became flesh" not only that his own organization also said Jesus served as the Word of God before coming to Earth.

Just lie lie people confusing themselves up and down.

This discussion just open two other areas I didn't notice before about their teachings about Jesus Christ

1. Jesus serve as the Word

Jesus is the Word not serve as the Word

2. Jesus name is the Word they decide to call it personal title

Their using Jehovah and saying others don't know God by name is as good as a fraud of a doctrine when the Bible categorically say the name of an individual is this and they choose to call it title yet the one that don't even exist in the Bible is picked as God's name

achorladey:
This discussion just open two other areas I didn't notice before about their teachings about Jesus Christ

1. Jesus serve as the Word

Jesus is the Word not serve as the Word

2. Jesus name is the Word they decide to call it personal title

Their using Jehovah and saying others don't know God by name is as good as a fraud of a doctrine when the Bible categorically say the name of an individual is this and choose to call it title yet the one that don't even exist in the Bible is picked as God's name

Lies, lies and more lies😂😂😂.
Using lies to cover up lies😂, how will that work out 🤨?

Gabrielshow24:
Lies, lies and more lies😂😂😂.
Using lies to cover up lies😂, how will that work out 🤨?

That's what they do to push through cooked doctrines or traditions of men.

Emusan:
Yes oooo buga in lying liar

Looool