₦airaland Forum

Truthseeker10:
Why did kjv and other translators not insert "the" if you claim it is there?

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

As a researcher that you are

Emusan:
You don't have question.

Am I the translator of KJV and others translations?

Na God give you the tablet of Bible translation

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂you are not a translator but you are claiming it might be due to grammatical accuracy. Na wa for this man oo. Oga tell me the possible grammatical error if kjv adds "the" in John 1:1 just like you added "The man" in your grammtically correct analogy below.

Since you know it's a claim, you can research and debunk the claim.

Emusan:
Yes!

@red-color shows you lack comprehension.

You asked me and I said "IT MIGHT BE"

Which is just my own opinion and I've repeated this times without number.



The grammatical error is "a god"

Even if I removed "THE" from my illustration the fact still remains that MAN(GOD) is about NATURE which makes it accurate that "The woman(man) can be with man"

What I'm expecting from you is to proof me wrong "HOW THE WOMAN(man) can't be with man".

Oga we have gone past the error of "a god" since it does not appear in the kjv.

Why would you claim that "The" is absent from the kjv because it might be due to grammatical accuracy but your analogy contains "the" and you claim it is grammatically correct. Is that not hypocrisy😂😂?

Truthseeker10:
Oga we have gone past the error of "a god" since it does not appear in the kjv.

Where are we now?

Why would you claim that "The" is absent from the kjv because it might be due to grammatical accuracy but your analogy contains "the" and you claim it is grammatically correct. Is that not hypocrisy😂😂?

I've said I used "THE" for explanation purpose.

Is that rocket science for you to understand?

Also, I said whether I used the definite article "The" or not, it doesn't change the fact that "it's about NATURE"

In conclusion, it's evident that "The word(God) can be with God" this already answered your question.

Now, you're just chasing shadow because you're already lost in your own POV.

Your initial thought about that diagram was that "God" at the central of that triangle is about PERSON and not NATURE(if you ever hear such word before).

Now, you read my point which you can't refute and you are hooked.

achorladey:
Since you know it's a claim, you can research and debunk the claim.

It that not what a supposed educated person should have done in the first place?

It's evident he's just chasing shadows.

achorladey:
This discussion just open two other areas I didn't notice before about their teachings about Jesus Christ

1. Jesus serve as the Word

Jesus is the Word not serve as the Word

2. Jesus name is the Word they decide to call it personal title

Their using Jehovah and saying others don't know God by name is as good as a fraud of a doctrine when the Bible categorically say the name of an individual is this and they choose to call it title yet the one that don't even exist in the Bible is picked as God's name

They pulled this lie in other to justify the reason why they claimed Jesus is the SPOKEMAN of God.

because if Jesus didn't serve as the word of God and they agreed that Jesus is THE WORD OF GOD. it means without Jesus God can't speak.

But where their delusions really exposed their lies is when they linked the same WORD OF GOD to the creation account in Genesis 1.

Which means, Jesus isn't just SPOKEMAN of God but the VERY WORD OF GOD Himself as the Bible says.

Emusan:
Where are we now?



I've said I used "THE" for explanation purpose.

Is that rocket science for you to understand?

Also, I said whether I used the definite article "The" or not, it doesn't change the fact that "it's about NATURE"

In conclusion, it's evident that "The word(God) can be with God" this already answered your question.

Now, you're just chasing shadow because you're already lost in your own POV.

Your initial thought about that diagram was that "God" at the central of that triangle is about PERSON and not NATURE(if you ever hear such word before).

Now, you read my point which you can't refute and you are hooked.

You used "The" because you said it appeared in Greek.
I asked you why it didn't appear in kjv English, you said it might be due to grammatical accuracy. Kindly tell us why you used 'the" in your analogy and claim it was grammatically correct but assert that the absent of "the" In the kjv might be because of Grammatical accuracy. So what would be the possible error if "the" appears in the kjv?

Emusan:
They pulled this lie in other to justify the reason why they claimed Jesus is the SPOKEMAN of God.

because if Jesus didn't serve as the word of God and they agreed that Jesus is THE WORD OF GOD. it means without Jesus God can't speak.

But where their delusions really exposed their lies is when they linked the same WORD OF GOD to the creation account in Genesis 1.

Which means, Jesus isn't just SPOKEMAN of God but the VERY WORD OF GOD Himself as the Bible says.

One thing I know they love doing is manipulating words and when one don't look or read closely one will not get how far gone they are misrepresenting certain things.

Chai!

Emusan:
It that not what a supposed educated person should have done in the first place?

It's evident he's just chasing shadows.

I see someone who possibly had the discussion elsewhere and feels or thought he has a good hold about the diagram. He wants to repeat the whole thing with you and he is stucked on regurgitating what you have explained times over.

Truthseeker10:
You used "The" because you said it appeared in Greek.
I asked you why it didn't appear in kjv English, you said it might be due to grammatical accuracy. Kindly tell us why you used 'the" in your analogy and claim it was grammatically correct but assert that the absent of "the" In the kjv might be because of Grammatical accuracy. So what would be the possible error if "the" appears in the kjv?

Pay attention to how you listen.....

Truthseeker10:

Kindly tell us why you used 'the" in your analogy and claim it was grammatically correct

Emusan:

1.

I've said I used "THE" for explanation purpose

2.

Also, I said whether I used the definite article "The" or not, it doesn't change the fact that "it's about NATURE"

Truthseeker10:

but assert that the absent of "the" In the kjv might be because of Grammatical accuracy.

Achorladey: This is no longer an assignment for Emusan but for you Truthseeker10 to find. You can choose to share your findings with him after you are done. For now I don't expect you to repeat your questions I showed how Emusan responded to it accordingly.

Your repetition of it from here on means where intend to lead him towards is not working and you had to keep regurgitating the question to make it look like he hasn't responded to it to project circular reasoning.

Truthseeker10:
You used "The" because you said it appeared in Greek.

Yes! To show you that I didn't go out of my limit in my explanation.

I asked you why it didn't appear in kjv English, you said it might be due to grammatical accuracy.

let me put it in capital so that your blind eyes can see it "IT MIGHT BE"

Kindly tell us why you used 'the" in your analogy and claim it was grammatically correct[ but assert that the absent of "the" In the kjv might be because of Grammatical accuracy.

I used THE for explanation purpose.

How many times should I repeat this for your dull brain.

I have even removed the definite article "THE" in my explanation.

Yet it's still correct just as it was in the KJV.

So what is your excuse now?

So what would be the possible error if "the" appears in the kjv?

The possible error is a god.

This is what I've repeated several times.

What is your next line of excuse?

achorladey:
Pay attention to how you listen.....

Truthseeker10:



Emusan:

1.


2.




Truthseeker10:



Achorladey: This is no longer an assignment for Emusan but for you Truthseeker10 to find. You can choose to share your findings with him after you are done. For now I don't expect you to repeat your questions I showed how Emusan responded to it accordingly.

Your repetition of it from here on means where intend to lead him towards is not working you had to keep regurgitating the question to make it look like he hasn't responded to it to project circular reasoning.

Him keep repeating the same question for the past three days shows he has lost in his own POV.

He didn't know where to turn to.

Emusan:
Yes! To show you that I didn't go out of my limit in my explanation.



let me put it in capital so that your blind eyes can see it "IT MIGHT BE"



I used THE for explanation purpose.

How many times should I repeat this for your dull brain.

I have even removed the definite article "THE" in my explanation.

Yet it's still correct just as it was in the KJV.

So what is your excuse now?



The possible error is a god.

This is what I've repeated several times.

What is your next line of excuse?

Is "a god" In the kjv? If no, what is the possible grammatical error that you asserted if "the" is added in the kjv since you added "the" in your analogy and claimed there was no error?

Truthseeker10:
Is "a god" In the kjv? If no, what is the possible grammatical error that you asserted if "the" is added in the kjv since you added "the" in your analogy and claimed there was no error?

Why are you talking about KJV?

Did I quote KJV?

Is KJV your own translation of the English version?

Emusan:
Why are you talking about KJV?

Did I quote KJV?

Is KJV your own translation of the English version?

Oga is kjv not a bible?

Is "a god" In the kjv? If no, what is the possible grammatical error that you asserted if "the" is added in the kjv since you added "the" in your analogy and claimed there was no error?

Truthseeker10:
Oga is kjv not a bible?
Is "a god" In the kjv? If no, what is the possible grammatical error that you asserted if "the" is added in the kjv since you added "the" in your analogy and claimed there was no error?

You really know how to deal with him, he always hings on something that's out of point each time he is hooked.
Imagine quoting our publication that Jesus has been serving as the word of God before coming to the earth and this is the same thing i told him before that he kept asking where we got it from now he hings on that claiming he's saying something meaningful.
Abeg is there not a difference between someone acting as president and the one elected or appointed to rule as president?

Truthseeker10:
Oga is kjv not a bible?

Yes, KJV is a Bible.

Is "a god" In the kjv? If no, what is the possible grammatical error that you asserted if "the" is added in the kjv since you added "the" in your analogy and claimed there was no error?

I've repeated this times without number just that you're blind.

I have also removed the definite article "THE" from my analogy.

So what is your point exactly?

Emusan:
Yes, KJV is a Bible.



I've repeated this times without number just that you're blind.

I have also removed the definite article "THE" from my analogy.

So what is your point exactly?

But when "The" was in your analogy, tou claim it was correct without any error.

Is "a god" In the kjv? If no, what is the possible grammatical error that you asserted if "the" is added in the kjv since you added "the" in your analogy and claimed there was no error?

MaxInDHouse:
You really know how to deal with him, he always hings on something that's out of point each time he is hooked.
Imagine quoting our publication that Jesus "has been serving as the word of God before coming to the earth and this is the same thing i told him before" that he kept asking where we got it from now he hings on that claiming he's saying something meaningful.
Abeg is there not a difference between someone acting as president and the one elected or appointed to rule as president?

@1st underlined to 2nd underlined-color is the reason why I do say, you're a lying liar like your father the Devil.

You lied that "Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth"

I have to proof from the Bible that Jesus has been the Words of God before CREATION.

When you're still priding in your ignorance and refused to accept the scripture, I have to provide evidences from your own organization to support my claim that Jesus didn't became the Word of God after his mission on earth but has been the very Word of God before coming to Earth.

Cai...see broad day lie

@achorladey
@gabrielshow24

Come and see this shameless lying liar.

Truthseeker10:
But when "The" was in your analogy, tou claim it was correct without any error.

The analogy was correct not because of the definite article "THE" when you asked about the definite article "THE" it was then I told you it's in the original Greek but KJV didn't add.

So, what is your point at this junction?

Is "a god" In the kjv? If no, what is the possible grammatical error that you asserted if "the" is added in the kjv since you added "the" in your analogy and claimed there was no error?

Already answered times without number.

Emusan:
@1st underlined to 2nd underlined-color is the reason why I do say, you're a lying liar like your father the Devil.

You lied that "Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth"

I have to proof from the Bible that Jesus has been the Words of God before CREATION.

When you're still priding in your ignorance and refused to accept the scripture, I have to provide evidences from your own organization to support my claim that Jesus didn't became the Word of God after his mission on earth but has been the very Word of God before coming to Earth.

Cai...see broad day lie

@achorladey
@gabrielshow24

Come and see this shameless lying liar.

After lying they allow some days to pass then come back and deny that they lie then point accusations at you that you are lying against them

Emusan:
The analogy was correct not because of the definite article "THE" when you asked about the definite article "THE" it was then I told you it's in the original Greek but KJV didn't add.

So, what is your point at this junction?



Already answered times without number.

I really hope you get his point

Bugaa wọn!

Emusan:
The analogy was correct not because of the definite article "THE" when you asked about the definite article "THE" it was then I told you it's in the original Greek but KJV didn't add.

So, what is your point at this junction?



Already answered times without number.

😂😂😂The analogy was correct not because of "The" but "The" is absent in the kjv because it might be due to grammatical accuracy? Please shed more light on this grammatical accuracy since the kjv does not use "a god"?

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂The analogy was correct not because of "The" but "The" is absent in the kjv because it might be due to grammatical accuracy? Please shed more light on this grammatical accuracy since the kjv does not use "a god"?

The lost voice of a confuse being.

The grammatical accuracy is "...and the Word was God"

How many times should I knocked this on your dull head?

MaxInDHouse:
Bugaa wọn!

Lori irọ́

Shameless lying liar.

So, you want to swallow your lie and agree that Jesus was actually The Word of God long before creation happened, right?

I know the reason you made that ante-Bible statement is because of the way you were confused after so much screwed about Michael's position and life after leaving heaven

Without politeness shey?

Ọmọ Bugaa wọn!

achorladey:
After lying they allow some days to pass then come back and deny that they lie then point accusations at you that you are lying against them

Regular trademark🙃

Emusan:
Lori irọ́

Shameless lying liar.

So, you want to swallow your lie and agree that Jesus was actually The Word of God long before creation happened, right?

I know the reason you made that ante-Bible statement is because of the way you were confused after so much screwed about Michael's position and life after leaving heaven

Michael ended 🤕 his life, possible cause of death, Suicide👀!!!

Or maybe his spirit was recycled 🤔?
Object.Destroy()🤔 style

Well we will never know🤔, Michael must have been an interesting character.

Bully in Heaven🤔,bullied on Earth👀
One thing Michael couldn't escape was "KARMA" 🤔

Emusan:
The lost voice of a confuse being.

The grammatical accuracy is "...and the Word was God"

How many times should I knocked this on your dull head?

😂😂😂😂so it was because of the "....and the Word was God" that "The" was absent in the kjv?

If "The" is added to the kjv, will ".....and the word was God" become a grammatical error?

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂😂so it was because of the "....and the Word was God" that "The" was absent in the kjv?
If "The" is added to the kjv, will ".....and the word was God" become a grammatical error?

You like wahala o!