₦airaland Forum

Owon:
Osu HOlori buruku
Not all foóls are Christians, but you can't be a Christian and not be a foól.
Unfortunately for you, this act of terrorism was executed be a CHRISTIAN TERRORIST.
Shame on you

Same ways you imans and Alphas are bursting ass hole of young Boyz ,


Come let me confirmed yours has been bastardized because you sound terrorists and pained

Ndenomy:
This is why y’all get what you deserve. You insult people’s religion whence no Muslim will insult Jesus christ. Its better to let y’all wallow in your ignorance jare.

Let me remind you that if your parents were to be Muslims you won’t be here spewing trash about others prophet. What else do you expect from people born my mistake?/accident?

FYI;

Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) Was a Peacemaker

He was persecuted for 13 years in Mecca but never ordered war against his oppressors.

When he conquered Mecca, he forgave his enemies instead of seeking revenge.

He made treaties with non-Muslims (e.g., the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah) to maintain peace.

What About Battles?

Islam permits self-defense, just like any other civilization or religion in history.

The battles in his lifetime were defensive, fought after Muslims were attacked, expelled, or persecuted.

He strictly forbade harming civilians, women, children, and even trees and animals during war.

But as i said earlier, you can wallow in your ignorance and choose to believe whatever.. but facts are there

While I like your allusions but you can't take away the gargantuan evidence to the contrary!!!

If I am wrong, you are free to correct me, your Quran initially said that the Torah and Injeel were credible or to accurately put the "Jews and christians should live by what was revealed in them" then changed stance later on that the books were corrupt.

From these books, we see that Muhammad can never be a prophet of God🤦🏾‍♂️ which you are already familiar with as the Islamic dilemma!!!

Now to quote history!
Your prophet was seeking to perform syncretism that's why the early revealed verses were 'soft' towards the Jews and christians because he was soliciting their acceptance 🤔.

As a matter of fact, he faced Jerusalem when he prayed 👀 but later on he couldn't gather much followers because of his message, he had to do the old switcheroo 🤨 by preaching about the three W's, promising great reward related to these three in heaven for his followers, then suddenly Islam boomed🤨.

While your dawahgandists might have fed you with such premises, we also can't ignore his actions!!!

Also, there's no comparison or yardstick you can use to compare Jesus with Muhammad, there is always a great difference!!!

I will love to go on but time and space won't permit me.
Irrespective, I am happy for your beloved faith but its actions can't be dismissed 🏙️ 💣.

Even if it's not immigrants, some groups are ready to frame it as such, ensuring Europe further closes its doors to legitimate immigration.

Ndenomy:
This is why y’all get what you deserve. You insult people’s religion whence no Muslim will insult Jesus christ. Its better to let y’all wallow in your ignorance jare.

Let me remind you that if your parents were to be Muslims you won’t be here spewing trash about others prophet. What else do you expect from people born my mistake?/accident?

FYI;

Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) Was a Peacemaker

He was persecuted for 13 years in Mecca but never ordered war against his oppressors.

When he conquered Mecca, he forgave his enemies instead of seeking revenge.

He made treaties with non-Muslims (e.g., the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah) to maintain peace.

What About Battles?

Islam permits self-defense, just like any other civilization or religion in history.

The battles in his lifetime were defensive, fought after Muslims were attacked, expelled, or persecuted.

He strictly forbade harming civilians, women, children, and even trees and animals during war.

But as i said earlier, you can wallow in your ignorance and choose to believe whatever.. but facts are there

but you insult jesus everyday by calling him a prophet when in reality he is God

Ndenomy:
This is why y’all get what you deserve. You insult people’s religion whence no Muslim will insult Jesus christ. Its better to let y’all wallow in your ignorance jare.

Let me remind you that if your parents were to be Muslims you won’t be here spewing trash about others prophet. What else do you expect from people born my mistake?/accident?

FYI;

Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) Was a Peacemaker

He was persecuted for 13 years in Mecca but never ordered war against his oppressors.

When he conquered Mecca, he forgave his enemies instead of seeking revenge.

He made treaties with non-Muslims (e.g., the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah) to maintain peace.

What About Battles?

Islam permits self-defense, just like any other civilization or religion in history.

The battles in his lifetime were defensive, fought after Muslims were attacked, expelled, or persecuted.

He strictly forbade harming civilians, women, children, and even trees and animals during war.

But as i said earlier, you can wallow in your ignorance and choose to believe whatever.. but facts are there

but your holy book called christains and Jews the worst creatures and you expect us to respect you.

Botragelad:
Source;
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14543609/Mass-stabbing-Amsterdam.html

Reason immigration should be tightened. On same note Angela Merkel put Germany in harms way because of f00lish immigration policy.

Enwhen:
Same ways you imans and Alphas are bursting ass hole of young Boyz ,


Come let me confirmed yours has been bastardized because you sound terrorists and pained

Weyrey
Have you ever heard of gay bishops and Reverend fathers in other religion apart from Christianity.
Even though one part of your Bible is against it, they Christians openly practicing it will still use the same Bible to justify it.
Shame on you senseless evil hypocrites.

Fkmodhi:
This Hamas Muslim terrorist don strike again

no motive has been identified but your islamophobia don show imself

Owon:
Weyrey
Have you ever heard of gay bishops and Reverend fathers in other religion apart from Christianity.
Even though one part of your Bible is against it, they Christians openly practicing it will still use the same Bible to justify it.
Shame on you senseless evil hypocrites.

Good you acknowledged the Holy Bible condemnation of such devilish act outrightly even as a terrorist.
But
Can that be said for your terrorists activities, cruel homosexual act, child abused , underage marriage... in the voilent book called Quran which all terrorists take inspiration from ?

Enwhen:
Good you acknowledged the Holy Bible condemnation of such devilish act outrightly even as a terrorist.
But
Can that be said for your terrorists activities, cruel homosexual act, child abused , underage marriage... in the voilent book called Quran which all terrorists take inspiration from ?

As a retardeɗ hypocrite that you are, I know you'll ignore that part that supports it that the Christians who practices it use to justify it. Keep foóling yourself.
Where did you see child marriage?
That the prophet married a 4 years old, right?
Very idiotíc foól

Even if we use that as argument, there are still proves that Aisha was never a child.
Unlike in your Bible where Isaac of 40 married Rebecca of 3 years old. And where Joseph of almost 90 married the mother of your god at just 12 years old.
For your information, Aisha was even in a relationship with another man, before being promised to the prophet. Go check it out. She was never a child and the prophet even waited for 3 years before consummating the marriage.
You will argue now that Rebecca of 3 years according to your Bible was not a child too, right? Because she fetched water from the well for some men to drink and a 3 years old can't do that...
But you believe Aisha was truly 4 or 6

Owon:
As a retardeɗ hypocrite that you are, I know you'll ignore that part that supports it that the Christians who practices it use to justify it. Keep foóling yourself.
Where did you see child marriage?
That the prophet married a 4 years old, right?
Very idiotíc foól

Even if we use that as argument, there are still proves that Aisha was never a child.
Unlike in your Bible where Isaac of 40 married Rebecca of 3 years old. And where Joseph of almost 90 married the mother of your god at just 12 years old.
For your information, Aisha was even in a relationship with another man, before being promised to the prophet. Go check it out. She was never a child and the prophet even waited for 3 years before consummating the marriage.
You will argue now that Rebecca of 3 years according to your Bible was not a child too, right? Because she fetched water from the well for some men to drink and a 3 years old can't do that...
But you believe Aisha was truly 4 or 6

Baba sorry, I don't reference Bible alone , I use reality to reference the Bible .
I also use reality to reference the Quran .

I know you will never agree with me o, because you are a fanatic which will not help you but can you be realistic for once ?

Me and you know what the Quran said about marriage to girls , once she sees puberty, she is good for marriage, and as such , many Muslims including clerics marry under age , and you all supports them to cover up for Islam... No one is prone to mistake , even prophet Muhammad (may his soul RIP , don't belief him) made many errors and mistakes which the Quran acknowledges , but all you still cover up for it , thats why many Muslims called terrorists today take reference from to perpetuate evilz and you cover up for them in the name of freedom fighters ... Walahi , no christian or Christian group can carry out evil today and not get condemnation from all genuine Christians ...If your life style doesn't reflect that of Jesus(you call prophet Isa) , you are not a Christian. Check your Quran about prophet Isa(Jesus ) and point out anyone or Christian group following the life style of Jesus(Prophet Isa) and doing evil today ...they were first called Christian because they live a chris-like life(Life of Jesus Christ , whom you people call prophet Isa)
Christianity is a way of life , not just a religion

But can that be said for today's Muslims and prophet Muhammad ?, the things these terrorists Muslims are doing today is it completely different from what prophet Muhammad did ? no Muslims have been able to answer this question for me , rather they take offence, if I am wrong , correct me , because these guys quote the Quran wth reference to prophet Muhammad act to do all these things , are they wrong or correct ?

Ramadan sacrifice... Religion of p.......

Ndenomy:
Do your self good and google. I don’t do religious argument cause its of no point if you are gonna be doing it with an ignorant like you.

I said Jesus, because it is Jesus that I follow, same way if I use hadith to judge your religion which most of you deny that it is only quoran that you believe in, so show me where Jesus supported violence not bible olodo.

Owon:
As a retardeɗ hypocrite that you are, I know you'll ignore that part that supports it that the Christians who practices it use to justify it. Keep foóling yourself.
Where did you see child marriage?
That the prophet married a 4 years old, right?
Very idiotíc foól

Even if we use that as argument, there are still proves that Aisha was never a child.
Unlike in your Bible where Isaac of 40 married Rebecca of 3 years old. And where Joseph of almost 90 married the mother of your god at just 12 years old.
For your information, Aisha was even in a relationship with another man, before being promised to the prophet. Go check it out. She was never a child and the prophet even waited for 3 years before consummating the marriage.
You will argue now that Rebecca of 3 years according to your Bible was not a child too, right? Because she fetched water from the well for some men to drink and a 3 years old can't do that...
But you believe Aisha was truly 4 or 6

what Hadith can this be found?

Are you sure it's Sahih grade?🤨
Why would you say such awful lies?

Rebecca was never three!
You lots like to borrow from the Talmud, even there they advised 12years🤨 which condemns both you and your prophet!!!

Aisha was a child!
It's scholarly consensus that she was that young!

No need to sugarcoat your lies!

Gabrielshow24:
what Hadith can this be found?

Are you sure it's Sahih grade?🤨
Why would you say such awful lies?

Rebecca was never three!
You lots like to borrow from the Talmud, even there they advised 12years🤨 which condemns both you and your prophet!!!

Aisha was a child!
It's scholarly consensus that she was that young!

No need to sugarcoat your lies!

Oloriburuku daft soul
So you want me to bring out reference from the Bible that Rebecca was 3? As if you don't know or you want wow to betide you and your generations forever.
Was Aisha 6-9 or she was a child? Dear retārd please answer that first.

Owon:
Oloriburuku daft soul
So you want me to bring out reference from the Bible that Rebecca was 3? As if you don't know or you want wow to betide you and your generations forever.
Was Aisha 6-9 or she was a child? Dear retārd please answer that first.

Your curses return upon your head!

As far as the bible is concerned there is no single verse that purports Rebecca as a three year old.

If you want to lie, at least Lie with dignity!
Your best reference is to a Jewish rabbi which made an error in his interpretation of such verse!!! —external biblical writing—which was widely condemned by other rabbis of his own time!!!

It just goes to show, how desperate you are to make your pathetic prophet a saint!

Your very Hadith confirms Aisha as 6 and Mohammed waited 3 years before he slept with her!!!

Pathetic bunch!!!

Gabrielshow24:
Your curses return upon your head!

As far as the bible is concerned there is no single verse that purports Rebecca as a three year old.

If you want to lie, at least Lie with dignity!
Your best reference is to a Jewish rabbi which made an error in his interpretation of such verse!!! —external biblical writing—which was widely condemned by other rabbis of his own time!!!

It just goes to show, how desperate you are to make your pathetic prophet a saint!

Your very Hadith confirms Aisha as 6 and Mohammed waited 3 years before he slept with her!!!

Pathetic bunch!!!

You're nothing but a frustrated retārd.
Your Bible CLEARLY recorded Rebbeca's age as 3 and I won't waste my time to prove it to you because I know as a retardeɗ hypocrite that you are, you'll still lie or find something to twist it.
My question to you again is, WAS AISHA A CHILD OR SHE WAS REFERENCED AS 6-9 YEARS?

Owon:
You're nothing but a frustrated retārd.
Your Bible CLEARLY recorded Rebbeca's age as 3 and I won't waste my time to prove it to you because I know as a retardeɗ hypocrite that you are, you'll still lie or find something to twist it.
My question to you again is, WAS AISHA A CHILD OR SHE WAS REFERENCED AS 6-9 YEARS?

You are a fool, there's no biblical verse to support your foolish claims!

You made an assertion kindly provide where in the bible it's found but you can't!

Just like your pathetic prophet👀 claiming also that his name was found in the Torah and Injeel 🤕.

This is how they do, bloody liars!
Looking for how to make pedophilia morally good! 🧐

Thank God we don't have such a useless dude as prophet👀 Muhammad, the most visible false prophet ever!!!

And to answer your very daft question.
The Hadith condemns your stupid stance except you want to doubt a 'sahih' standard Hadith🤨.

Aisha was said to be 6years 🤨old!
With many commentaries adding of how she played with dolls and the 'prophet' allowed her friends to come over to play 🤨.

Bloody r£tard!
Next time, Have substantial proof before asserting false claims!!!!
Like slave like prophet, no one is surprised at this point!!!

Gabrielshow24:
You are a fool, there's no biblical verse to support your foolish claims!

You made an assertion kindly provide where in the bible it's found but you can't!

Just like your pathetic prophet👀 claiming also that his name was found in the Torah and Injeel 🤕.

This is how they do, bloody liars!
Looking for how to make pedophilia morally good! 🧐

Thank God we don't have such a useless dude as prophet👀 Muhammad, the most visible false prophet ever!!!

And to answer your very daft question.
The Hadith condemns your stupid stance except you want to doubt a 'sahih' standard Hadith🤨.

Aisha was said to be 6years 🤨old!
With many commentaries adding of how she played with dolls and the 'prophet' allowed her friends to come over to play 🤨.

Bloody r£tard!
Next time, Have substantial proof before asserting false claims!!!!
Like slave like prophet, no one is surprised at this point!!!

Bloody dimìt pig
Woe betide you till the end of time.
Frustrated retārd.

Here's your evidence MUMÚ pig


Biblical Account:

Genesis 24 describes Abraham sending his servant to find a wife for Isaac. The servant finds Rebecca (Rivkah) and brings her back to Canaan, where she marries Isaac.

Genesis 25:20 states that Isaac was 40 years old when he married Rebecca.


The Argument for Rebecca Being 3:

1. Sarah’s Death and Rebecca’s Birth:

Genesis 23:1 states that Sarah died at 127 years old.

According to a Midrashic interpretation (Talmud, Rashi), Rebecca was born around the time of Sarah’s death.

If Isaac was 37 years old at Sarah’s death (since he was born when Sarah was 90, per Genesis 17:17), and he married Rebecca at 40 (Genesis 25:20), then Rebecca would be 3 years old at the time of marriage.

Owon:
Bloody dimìt pig
Woe betide you till the end of time.
Frustrated retārd.

Here's your evidence MUMÚ pig


Biblical Account:

Genesis 24 describes Abraham sending his servant to find a wife for Isaac. The servant finds Rebecca (Rivkah) and brings her back to Canaan, where she marries Isaac.

Genesis 25:20 states that Isaac was 40 years old when he married Rebecca.


The Argument for Rebecca Being 3:

1. Sarah’s Death and Rebecca’s Birth:

Genesis 23:1 states that Sarah died at 127 years old.

According to a Midrashic interpretation (Talmud, Rashi), Rebecca was born around the time of Sarah’s death.

If Isaac was 37 years old at Sarah’s death (since he was born when Sarah was 90, per Genesis 17:17), and he married Rebecca at 40 (Genesis 25:20), then Rebecca would be 3 years old at the time of marriage.

Indeed, your argument is fundamentally flawed! Based on the Bible, you claim that Rebecca was three years old at the time of her marriage to Isaac. Now, please explain the 'connection' that led you to this conclusion.

This highlights the hypocrisy in your reasoning. You readily cite the ages of Isaac, Abraham, and Sarah, but when it comes to providing a single verse that clearly indicates Rebecca's age in relation to theirs, you fall silent.

Your reliance on a Midrashic interpretation from a rabbi whose work was criticized by his contemporaries only weakens your position. Such external writings lack the authority of the biblical text itself and cannot be used as definitive evidence.

You’ve inadvertently reinforced my point: there is no biblical evidence to support the claim that Rebecca was three years old at the time of her marriage. Instead of engaging with the text directly, you resort to speculative interpretations that lack solid grounding. If we are to have a meaningful discussion, we must base our arguments on clear and credible evidence from the scriptures themselves.

Bloody fool!

Gabrielshow24:
Indeed, your argument is fundamentally flawed! Based on the Bible, you claim that Rebecca was three years old at the time of her marriage to Isaac. Now, please explain the 'connection' that led you to this conclusion.

This highlights the hypocrisy in your reasoning. You readily cite the ages of Isaac, Abraham, and Sarah, but when it comes to providing a single verse that clearly indicates Rebecca's age in relation to theirs, you fall silent.

Your reliance on a Midrashic interpretation from a rabbi whose work was criticized by his contemporaries only weakens your position. Such external writings lack the authority of the biblical text itself and cannot be used as definitive evidence.

You’ve inadvertently reinforced my point: there is no biblical evidence to support the claim that Rebecca was three years old at the time of her marriage. Instead of engaging with the text directly, you resort to speculative interpretations that lack solid grounding. If we are to have a meaningful discussion, we must base our arguments on clear and credible evidence from the scriptures themselves.

Bloody fool!

Daft hypocrite retārd
You didn't read the part where it says Rebecca was born after Sarah's death?
Ekwensu bastarɗ

Owon:
Daft hypocrite retārd
You didn't read the part where it says Rebecca was born after Sarah's death?
Ekwensu bastarɗ

Where exactly does it say that Rebecca was born after Sarah's death? 🤨

You truly are misguided! In your desperate attempt to defend your flawed beliefs, you only expose yourself and your religion as dishonest.

What I see is someone making baseless claims without any substantial evidence! Back up your assertions with biblical verses that connect Rebecca's age to Sarah's age—oh wait, you can’t! Instead, you rely on dubious external sources, much like your prophet, who couldn’t even tell the difference between authentic Jewish texts and apocryphal tales.

It’s almost comical how you flounder in your arguments. Perhaps you should take a break and reflect on your position. After all, even Al Dilya would have a hard time justifying the absurdity of your claims, much like your prophet struggled to maintain credibility!

So, do us all a favor and go to bed, you misguided fool! Your attempts at reasoning are as misguided as your prophet’s understanding of scripture!

Gabrielshow24:
Where exactly does it say that Rebecca was born after Sarah's death? 🤨

You truly are misguided! In your desperate attempt to defend your flawed beliefs, you only expose yourself and your religion as dishonest.

What I see is someone making baseless claims without any substantial evidence! Back up your assertions with biblical verses that connect Rebecca's age to Sarah's age—oh wait, you can’t! Instead, you rely on dubious external sources, much like your prophet, who couldn’t even tell the difference between authentic Jewish texts and apocryphal tales.

It’s almost comical how you flounder in your arguments. Perhaps you should take a break and reflect on your position. After all, even Al Dilya would have a hard time justifying the absurdity of your claims, much like your prophet struggled to maintain credibility!

So, do us all a favor and go to bed, you misguided fool! Your attempts at reasoning are as misguided as your prophet’s understanding of scripture!

Lol
See hopeless retārd talking about flawed beliefs
Foól that practice a religion that many of the same worshippers don't even believe in the senseless trinity, some don't believe Jesus is God, some worship Mary etc.
A religion that have OPEN GAY REVEREND FATHERS AND PASTORS...

Like I use to say:
NOT ALL FOÓLS ARE CHRISTIANS, BUT YOU CAN'T BE A CHRISTIAN AND NOT BE A FOÓL.

Owon:
Lol
See hopeless retārd talking about flawed beliefs
Foól that practice a religion that many of the same worshippers don't even believe in the senseless trinity, some don't believe Jesus is God, some worship Mary etc.
Like I use to say:
NOT ALL FOÓLS ARE CHRISTIANS, BUT YOU CAN'T BE A CHRISTIAN AND NOT BE A FOÓL.

Ah, the classic deflection! Instead of addressing the points I've made, you resort to mocking my beliefs. It’s amusing how you call me a 'hopeless fool' while failing to recognize the inconsistencies within your own arguments.

You mention that many Christians have differing beliefs about the Trinity, the divinity of Jesus, and the veneration of Mary. But this only highlights the diversity within Christianity, not a flaw in its core teachings. Unlike your rigid adherence to a single interpretation, Christianity encompasses a wide range of beliefs and practices, which can lead to rich discussions and interpretations.

Your statement, 'NOT ALL FOOLS ARE CHRISTIANS, BUT YOU CAN'T BE A CHRISTIAN AND NOT BE A FOOL,' is not only a digression but also a weak attempt to undermine my position. It’s ironic that you would label others as fools while you cling to a narrative that lacks solid evidence and relies on external sources that even your prophet struggled to validate.

Instead of engaging in meaningful dialogue, you choose to throw insults and generalizations. If you want to have a serious discussion, I encourage you to focus on the arguments at hand rather than resorting to name-calling. Let’s stick to the facts and see where that leads us, rather than getting lost in baseless claims and distractions.

Gabrielshow24:
Ah, the classic deflection! Instead of addressing the points I've made, you resort to mocking my beliefs. It’s amusing how you call me a 'hopeless fool' while failing to recognize the inconsistencies within your own arguments.

You mention that many Christians have differing beliefs about the Trinity, the divinity of Jesus, and the veneration of Mary. But this only highlights the diversity within Christianity, not a flaw in its core teachings. Unlike your rigid adherence to a single interpretation, Christianity encompasses a wide range of beliefs and practices, which can lead to rich discussions and interpretations.

Your statement, 'NOT ALL FOOLS ARE CHRISTIANS, BUT YOU CAN'T BE A CHRISTIAN AND NOT BE A FOOL,' is not only a digression but also a weak attempt to undermine my position. It’s ironic that you would label others as fools while you cling to a narrative that lacks solid evidence and relies on external sources that even your prophet struggled to validate.

Instead of engaging in meaningful dialogue, you choose to throw insults and generalizations. If you want to have a serious discussion, I encourage you to focus on the arguments at hand rather than resorting to name-calling. Let’s stick to the facts and see where that leads us, rather than getting lost in baseless claims and distractions.

How is it possible to dialogue to with a foól?
There's absolutely nothing anyone can use to defend the irrational, errors, inconsistencies m, hypocrisy and the evils of or in your Bible and religion.

Christianity (cult) alone has caused and done more evil to this world than all of all other religions put together: from slavery, to war, to colonialism etc. Even the current trend of this generation of gay and homosexualities, it's your religion that openly accepts and practice it. That's why you have gay bishops and pastors.

Owon:
How is it possible to dialogue to with a foól?
There's absolutely nothing anyone can use to defend the irrational, errors, inconsistencies m, hypocrisy and the evils of or in your Bible and religion.

Christianity (cult) alone has caused and done more evil to this world than all of all other religions put together: from slavery, to war, to colonialism etc. Even the current trend of this generation of gay and homosexualities, it's your religion that openly accepts and practice it. That's why you have gay bishops and pastors.

This is digression, kindly bring evidence for your allusions!!! Your 'airbending' skills, which I must say is exceedingly remarkable, will be constituted as defeat! 🤨

Also, I have no business with whatsoever you wrote, all I have come to disprove is your pathetic "problem statement". If you can't provide evidence to substantiate your baseless claims then go to bed, you have nothing useful to say!

Enwhen:
they are fighting for Biafra nation and they aren't killing musims , Christians and traditional worshipers


What are your Muslims
Boko Haram
Hamas
ISWAP
AL-SHABAAB
Hezbollah
Al-Qadea.


Fighting for ?

America and Israel interest!


Thank God for having Iran 🇮🇷 on the planet