₦airaland Forum

Didijiji:
Trying to cover lie with lies

Nigeria was destroyed at Ojota in 2012

some SW elites (pastors, politicians, professors, media) connived to stage a protest, succeeded in removing a progressive government and installing witches that have impoverished over 70% of the masses while giving daily EXCUSES

It will never be well with them and their families. The so called men of God, the foolish professor, the politicians....all of them who protested and lied against a good man because he is from the minority. They succeeded in removing him from power and installed a religious and tribal bigot, now installed their own son, a known drug lord and corrupt man. They all have lost their voices to protest while hunger and starvation ravaged the land.

As of this morning, a loaf of Bread is now 2k. Bought it 1,800 on Monday.
Same bread used to be sold for 280 naira in 2013/14

We know she is.... She's here in nairaland and part of the 20k Whatsapp group

anonimi:
So why did you open the thread

Is there a law against opening any thread on Nairaland?

alobright17:
Have you reviewed Natasha's claimed and also asked why she's not posting evidence? Or your duty is just to review one side of the devide?

If you were Natasha, would you have posted your evidences so that Akpabio will have enough time to manufacture counter-evidences and defence to it
OR
Wait till court hearings where Akpabio would be forced to answer to those evidences on the fly?

Which makes better sense?

Natasha give the OP some money, he has done well.

franugo:
Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

Are you a useful eed iot too or are you auditioning for the role?

Look it is clear there is something suspicious about the woman. I also noticed some of the things you mentioned. I just put it down the the elevation of chartalans into our public space.

You claim you are being objective, you are not.

You are attacking her character and maybe rightly so but you have not addressed the substance of what she posted.

I believe the calls happened and there is evidence. Why focus on the call from the SP but ignore the interaction with Natasha on the same phone? Natasha denied knowing or ever talking to her. The same phone that you use rightly to question the involvement of the SP is the same phone that proves there were interactions with Natasha.


What I think happened is this: All these activists are paid attack dogs. Sandra was contacted by Natasha to play a role but for some reason she decided against it. It could be because she developed a conscience or more likely because she decided her interests were better served by taking the info to the SP. So she contacted the SP and was paid a higher fee and double crossed Natasha. The fact that she changed sides and now has a relationship with the SP does not mean her info is not real…..focus of the evidence not on the characters.


All parties in this are dubious characters. What an objective person should do is deal with the evidence!

The fact that I am a habitual liar or a fraudster does not mean I am not telling the truth. It is up to you if you are truly objective to look beyond the characters involved and look at the evidence.

I don’t think Sandra is clean but I believe the recording I heard and I believe the evidence of contact with Natasha which she denies.


Natasha has made claims claims she has evidence of sexual harassment but all she has done is muddy the waters and whipping up sentiment without showing any evidence. All she has done is frustrate any efforts to present her case. Whatever the shadowy nature of this Sandra woman, like I have said all these activists and NGOs are shadowy characters, she claimed to have evidence and released the evidence. Is the evidence real and damaging…to me it is. Can you prove her evidence is manufactured that the recorded voice calls are fake or the callhistory with Natasha is fake? That is all that matters…. Everything else is immaterial.

RaySimran:
So much depth on you little analysis.

How she manage to brought in Tinubu was my greatest surprise

Hmmmm

franugo:
Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

Where una see this number 1? I have seen the video severally and never saw this. Can we see the screenshot please

franugo:
Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

You have tried but yo huaven't done justice t the issue. Do you remember those armed robbers who sometime years ago robbed a bank in Kwara State, when Hon. Saraki was still SP and it was found out that in the mobile phones of one of the robbers, he had the SP contact details in it, the SP denied knowing them and investigations was done and I can't remember what happened after. But Nigerians stood on the side of Saraki because he was fighting the President of the he FRN as at that time and a majority of us the masses saw it as a plot by the FG.
Can you liken it to that of Prof. Ngbeke claiming not know Akpabio.
I do hope you know many of us have in our phones contact of people we can't truly say we know them or have any relationship with them whatsoever.

Now, back to the issue of Sen. Natasha...
I keep wondering why she brought up a sexual harassment allegation against the SP and she has refused to take the issue to Court!!!

Why did Sen. Natasha have to wait for how many months or years before bringing up the sexual harassment issue just because her seat was changed and she refused to abide by the rules of the legislative house !!!


So many things are really off about Sen. Natasha and judging by her past, she seems to flaunt her beauty to drag potential men into blackmail if they don't do her bidding....

alpamo6:
I find it hard to believe that Natasha would open up to a stranger on the phone and make derogatory remarks about everything. If this woman is telling the truth, then someone may have cloned Natasha’s phone.

cloned Natasha's voice too?
abi u go say na AI

Natasha is one of the most dangerous women to mess up with in Nigeria. And Akpabio knows. She is always calm when provoked like this. She's only looking for a statutory platform to let out what she has on Akpabio. Akabio knows that and would do everything to stop the matter from getting to court, especially when his efforts to settle out of court have failed. This loose-mourhed woman blackmailing Natasha is one of the options to preclude appearing in court.

franugo:
Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

have you reviewed Natasha allegations against akpabio,
She said her husband were behind them when akpabio were sexually harrasing her with words, without touching her or raping her in the presence of her husband,
You supporting Natasha should be ashamed for stupidity,
Such allegations shouldn't be mentioned at all

TenQ:
If you were Natasha, would you have posted your evidences so that Akpabio will have enough time to manufacture counter-evidences and defence to it
OR
Wait till court hearings where Akpabio would be forced to answer to those evidences on the fly?

Which makes better sense?

what evidence?

Sexual harassment in what way,
Did akpabio touch her or rape her in the presence of her husband?

SS PEOPLE ARE DEFENDING AKPABIO !
NIGERIANS ARE DEFENDING NATASHA !!

franugo:
Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

You were biased in your assessment.

Why didn't you ask Natasha to respond and bring out evidence to counter Prof assertions?

Natasha needs to come up with something stronger bcoz both of them actually chatted.

Yes, it's possible she may not have met Akpabio before now but common she might be asking for financial reward from him for the information she has about Natasha plan to bring him down.

The truth is Natasha and Prof fell out and she decided to blow everything. Just listen to the audio again.

Tinubu Apc government will sell as a movie honestly…it’s going to sell more as a comedy….Nigeria issues is now a social media movie than a democracy when the judiciary has turned to a comedy too…i think i read that a case in the court should be left for the court to handle so why is a woman that looks like a witch coming to the social media to support an accused senate president …if she has an evidence is she not suppose to take it to the court as evidencethese people are just been used to make Nigerian fools becomes more foolish 💯

Social media is now the supreme court of Nigeria….what a shame !

You didn't watch the full video but you are having an opinion, how foolish can you be

emkz:
Extremely brilliant review.

Let us also review your review.



My own thoughts on your review.

Your review reeks of fallacy of ad hominem. Instead of addressing the issues raised, you veered into an attack on the personality of Professor Mgbeke. This strategy mirrors Natasha's strategy from day 1, and speaks of disturbing unintelligence. Instead of addressing the matter of shouting in the senate and behaving like a thug, she brought up an unrelated matter of sexual allegations. When the senate ethics committee sat to hear the matter, Oby Ezekwesili launched a marauding attack on Onyekachi Nwaebonyi which caused the ethics committee to postpone the hearing indefinitely. Whenever Natasha is asked for evidence, she raises her voice. Now, Professor Mgbeke has submitted evidence, and the best Natasha could do was submit links saying Professor Mgbeke is a scammer, was thrown out by her landlord and co. If Professor Mgbeke is indeed a scammer, Natasha contacting her also establishes that fact on Natasha, because "show me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are".

Finally, your review falls short of academic standards. You reviewed Professor Mgbeke, but did not review what she said. Your strategy is to discredit Professor Mgbeke, so that by so doing, no one would believe what she said. This would automatically prevent you from defending what Professor Mgbeke said against Natasha. If you want to toe that line, Natasha lied in the past against Reno Omokri and deleted all the evidence when Reno exposed her lie. Someone close to her paid Reno compensation to abandon the matter. If Professor Mgbeke is discredited, please can you explain to us why we should believe Natasha, given her antecedents?

You are simply brilliant. As much as I hate anything Akpabio and Natasha simply because they are politicians and they are all the same bunch of corrupt elements irrespective of party must say you did a good job on that half baked slowpoke

emkz:
Extremely brilliant review.

Let us also review your review.



My own thoughts on your review.

Your review reeks of fallacy of ad hominem. Instead of addressing the issues raised, you veered into an attack on the personality of Professor Mgbeke. This strategy mirrors Natasha's strategy from day 1, and speaks of disturbing unintelligence. Instead of addressing the matter of shouting in the senate and behaving like a thug, she brought up an unrelated matter of sexual allegations. When the senate ethics committee sat to hear the matter, Oby Ezekwesili launched a marauding attack on Onyekachi Nwaebonyi which caused the ethics committee to postpone the hearing indefinitely. Whenever Natasha is asked for evidence, she raises her voice. Now, Professor Mgbeke has submitted evidence, and the best Natasha could do was submit links saying Professor Mgbeke is a scammer, was thrown out by her landlord and co. If Professor Mgbeke is indeed a scammer, Natasha contacting her also establishes that fact on Natasha, because "show me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are".

Finally, your review falls short of academic standards. You reviewed Professor Mgbeke, but did not review what she said. Your strategy is to discredit Professor Mgbeke, so that by so doing, no one would believe what she said. This would automatically prevent you from defending what Professor Mgbeke said against Natasha. If you want to toe that line, Natasha lied in the past against Reno Omokri and deleted all the evidence when Reno exposed her lie. Someone close to her paid Reno compensation to abandon the matter. If Professor Mgbeke is discredited, please can you explain to us why we should believe Natasha, given her antecedents?

If you are intelligent and understand the meaning of order, you would have been interested to ask why the Senate will wake up and change the sitting arrangements without pre information.

Okay, I understand why you don't need to ask this question because you and I know very well that THIS IS A GOVERNMENT OF AGBEROS AND MOTOR PARK URCHINS and at the motor parks in Nigeria anything is allowed.


🤣🤣🤣🤣

buhariguy:
what evidence?

Sexual harassment in what way,
Did akpabio touch her or rape her in the presence of her husband?

You should have answered the question rather than ask "What evidence!?"

What will you do if you have Evidence?

TempleHouse:
SS PEOPLE ARE DEFENDING AKPABIO !
NIGERIANS ARE DEFENDING NATASHA !!

Which Nigerians?

franugo:
Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

Bro, that's a very good review of professor Sandra Duru's claims there but a crucial part where her evidence (recorded conversation) was mentioned was left out. Why?

Also left out was Natasha's part of the story where she made an allegation but unable to produce an evidence of her allegations. Why?

I don't want to believe this is deliberate!

Your review has to be balanced for us to know you are not writing based on sentiments or emotions.

I've not said any of them is right or wrong but a balanced review and presentation of proofs will do Justice to this matter without biases.

Peace!

It's easy to debunk Mgbeke's evidence if truly she's lying. Natasha denied ever calling her: the call log from the service providers will shed light on this. Since Mrs Duru's live video, Natasha has crawled into her shell, she only released a lame press statement buying time on how to counter the allegations and thinking on how to come out with another manipulation of her H&G

2mch:
Which Nigerians?

The usual suspects who like to gaslight others.

franugo:
Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

The headless mob are fighting back.

The movie go long.....


Just because Natasha is on to destroy 'yoruba' government, as she calls it, the useful idiots gang are happy and will go to any length to support the agenda.


But remember, Tinubu till 2031.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South South.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South West.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South South.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South West.
...
Till year 3,000

You trust Natasha with all her inconsistencies and track record of talking any how, but you don't trust Dr Sandra due to inconsistencies you pointed out. Even Reno Omokri pointed out his encounter with Natasha and how she apologized and settled him. He even dared her to refute his claim on blackmail and settlement, but she carefully dodged that.

Natasha is just a regular babe, hustling in Abuja and found her way to the top through the help of this same people she was dining with. We know their type in Abuja. Character zero, integrity zero, decency zero, morals zero and so on and so on.

Just a regular shisha smoking babe in Abuja that rose through the ranks ending up occupying unmerited political and high positions

Smartcitizen:
If you are intelligent and understand the meaning of order, you would have been interested to ask why the Senate will wake up and change the sitting arrangements without pre information.

Okay, I understand why you don't need to ask this question because you and I know very well that THIS IS A GOVERNMENT OF AGBEROS AND MOTOR PARK URCHINS and at the motor parks in Nigeria anything is allowed.


🤣🤣🤣🤣

Seats were changed following the defection of some senators, I think Senator Ned Nwoko and someone else.

It was a routine change, and those affected simply complied without noise. Senate rule book also empowers the senate presiding officer to change any senator's seat should the need arise.

Historically, we have seen that children called "Wisdom", "Best" and "Brian" are extremely dull. Please consider changing your username from SmartCitizen. I will pay you 100k if you agree.

adioolayi:
Senator Natasha has been exposed ..

I am saying this because, her rebuttal is weak...just few lines and this is very strange.

Senator Natasha is has been a fearless woman, outspoken and bold...If this Prof. Mgbeke has nothing on her..one would have seen the real Senator Natasha we know.... surprisingly, she has been somewhat docile.

This is why I think this Prof truly has something on her.

Drama continues

you are wise

gabbasin:
It's easy to debunk Mgbeke's evidence if truly she's lying. Natasha denied ever calling her: the call log from the service providers will shed light on this. Since Mrs Duru's live video, Natasha has crawled into her shell, she only released a lame press statement buying time on how to counter the allegations and thinking on how to come out with another manipulation of her H&G

Okay, you don't know me and I don't know you. Let us quickly play a fast one.



Guy, you stole my generator set. I want to know your response.

jiz:
Akpabio mean business

It's not that Akpabio mean business. When you're in the situation Akpabio found himself, someone somewhere who have evidence against your tormentor would reach out to you. That's my assessment of the issue.

And you know that Ebira Natasha can go any length even though she doesn't seem to have any concrete evidence.

Now, Prof has come up with evidence, whether genuine or not people are analyzing it but Natasha hasn't come up with anything to analyze.

So, who's unserious here?

creativejagaban:
The headless mob are fighting back.

The movie go long.....


Just because Natasha is on to destroy 'yoruba' government, as she calls it, the useful idiots gang are happy and will go to any length to support the agenda.


But remember, Tinubu till 2031.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South South.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South West.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South South.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South West.
...
Till year 3,000

Don't be foolish pls, I couldn't care less who leads you guys. I'll be leaving the country soon anyway and have never voted for presidential election before. I'm comfortable enough that whoever leads the country won't affect me. I don't like the way the current leadership is panning out but I certainly do not wish him ill.