₦airaland Forum

franugo:
Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

Reeks of partiality! You are not impartial at all but one sided already ☹️

iLoveYouToo:
“EriMoss” admit with your full chest that you’re partial, it stinks from afar.

You can believe whatever you want to believe, that's your opinion and it certainly doesn't affect me in any way.

Kdon2:
Reeks of partiality! You are not impartial at all but one sided already ☹️

If you have something to counter, then counter with evidence. Why claim I'm one sided without an evidence?

franugo:
Hello, if you look at my op, I Stated that I was unimpressed by all politicians bar one, he is the one I'm impressed by but that does not make me an attack dog for him. He is not part of this issue so I didn't mention him.

Saint Obi right? I’m not impressed. I saw hypocrisy and thought to point it out. We can never agree, shit stinks, there’s no exception, credibility my ass.

At the end of the day, you’re entitled to your opinions, same here, we’re also at liberty to fool ourselves

Abbeytoy:
As much as I wanted to be neutral about these Duru ex-Natasha, I have some questions to ask.Has anyone researched the phone number and doesn’t match Natasha?Is the voice note from the WhatsApp number or AI?Before you support or oppose, have you done good research to be sure of who’s lying or not?What’s Natasha’s stand on this?Has she been treating her with court as usual (I remember the yes, Daddy case, and no one has yet to be sued)? I will advise we all try to be careful with our emotions when it comes to politicians and their employers, as they’re all playing a superiority game with our lives.

Bro all these have been done. The phone number is Natasha and so is the voice. People were doing it while the program was going on live.

iLoveYouToo:
Saint Obi right? I’m not impressed. I saw hypocrisy and thought to point it out. We can never agree, shit stinks, there’s no exception, credibility my ass.

At the end of the day, you’re entitled to your opinions, same here, we’re also at liberty to fool ourselves

That's fine by me. Though I'm not sure how Obi came into this discussion tho, why did you bring him up?

franugo:
Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

Your conclusion goes to both of them as they are both politicians as u said. So let's see how far.

Truth234:
Bro all these have been done. The phone number is Natasha and so is the voice. People were doing it while the program was going on live.

I didn't know this before I made the post, do you have a link I could use to check this out?

Okeona:
What was prof video about? She claimed Natasha denied of knowing or having conversations with her and she brought evidences of their conversations.

You as an objective reviewer that you claimed to be, we expect you to highlight all prof points and flaw them one after the other maybe you can make sense

Hello Okeona,

Honestly, I have not seen their original back n forth where Natasha claimed not to know the prof, I made my review strictly on parts of the video I watched.

Why not call natasha line if the number is real or not.....me i already called the number and Natasha picked. Sadly she can't come to my house for us to have a good time.....😁

Says she is busy working on another dirt to dish to Akpabio.

franugo:
I'll ignore your insults because you brought up some fine points and I'll like to respond to them.
Firstly, I stated already in my op that politicians bore and irritate me, all of them bar one so I have no vested interest in which way the case finally ends up, only the truth interests me.
Secondly, I do not know Natasha's number, I cannot confirm if the number shown on Prof's phone is actually Natasha's contact. Prof says she has VN evidence but I didn't hear any VN in the video so I can't speak on that.
Thirdly, I agree that most activists are paid attack dogs, it's a known fact actually and totally not unexpected.
Fourthly, I did not speak about Natasha's allegations because they're just mere allegations with no evidence presented so far, same reason I didn't talk about Prof Mgbeke's VN claim.

Nobody asked you for your life story . Address the subject matter all the rest is noise.


You say you don’t know if it is Natasha’s number despite her showing you the name and the number with 2 digits obscured for privacy purposes but somehow you know it is the SP calling with only name and no number shown? Does that sound objective to you? We objective people can acknowledge it is the Sp calling and we acknowledge it is Natasha’s number because Natasha has not denied it. We can acknowledge because unlike you we are objective and what we are focused on is the voice of Natasha.

You see just like a Natasha and the Sandra woman, agenda will always be exposed. What cannot be disputed is evidence. Is the voice in the voice calls Natasha or not? If you haven’t listened to the voice calls then perhaps you should before you make comments and sound a biased commentator.


You lack credibility and objectivity and I would advise you to stop digging a deeper hole for yourself. Hired goons also exist on Nairaland. You are beginning to sound like 1.


Let me make it clear as others have noted there is nothing objective in your analysis.

Just in:

lapintoz:
Why not call natasha line if the number is real or not.....me i already called the number and Natasha picked. Sadly she can't come to my house for us to have a good time.....😁

Says she is busy working on another dirt to dish to Akpabio.

franugo:
Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

I am not in support of any one of them. Nigeria polithievians are all the same. Senator Natasha should just drop a snippet of some of her evidences... Fire for Fire... EVIDENCE FOR EVIDENCE.

hatchy:
It will never be well with them and their families. The so called men of God, the foolish professor, the politicians....all of them who protested and lied against a good man because he is from the minority. They succeeded in removing him from power and installed a religious and tribal bigot, now installed their own son, a known drug lord and corrupt man. They all have lost their voices to protest while hunger and starvation ravaged the land.

As of this morning, a loaf of Bread is now 2k. Bought it 1,800 on Monday.
Same bread used to be sold for 280 naira in 2013/14

And you think it will be well with you and yours?

😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

OOOKEWALE:
And you think it will be well with you and yours?

Wale please get off my mention, I didn't call your name in my comment.
I did not stop you from supporting your kinsman.

I hope you have eaten breakfast today

alpamo6:
I find it hard to believe that Natasha would open up to a stranger on the phone and make derogatory remarks about everything. If this woman is telling the truth, then someone may have cloned Natasha’s phone.

Really? The way you guys push a narrative however ridiculous needs to be studied.. what? You only need to have heard Natasha once to know she was the one speaking on the other side… I’m not saying Akpabio is a saint… but it’s obvious the issue of sexual harassment never happened.

I think Natasha just got played in her own game… from the man that introduced her to Dr Sandra to Sandra herself… they just played her… got her to confess!!!

emkz:
Extremely brilliant review.

Let us also review your review.



My own thoughts on your review.

Your review reeks of fallacy of ad hominem. Instead of addressing the issues raised, you veered into an attack on the personality of Professor Mgbeke. This strategy mirrors Natasha's strategy from day 1, and speaks of disturbing unintelligence. Instead of addressing the matter of shouting in the senate and behaving like a thug, she brought up an unrelated matter of sexual allegations. When the senate ethics committee sat to hear the matter, Oby Ezekwesili launched a marauding attack on Onyekachi Nwaebonyi which caused the ethics committee to postpone the hearing indefinitely. Whenever Natasha is asked for evidence, she raises her voice. Now, Professor Mgbeke has submitted evidence, and the best Natasha could do was submit links saying Professor Mgbeke is a scammer, was thrown out by her landlord and co. If Professor Mgbeke is indeed a scammer, Natasha contacting her also establishes that fact on Natasha, because "show me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are".

Finally, your review falls short of academic standards. You reviewed Professor Mgbeke, but did not review what she said. Your strategy is to discredit Professor Mgbeke, so that by so doing, no one would believe what she said. This would automatically prevent you from defending what Professor Mgbeke said against Natasha. If you want to toe that line, Natasha lied in the past against Reno Omokri and deleted all the evidence when Reno exposed her lie. Someone close to her paid Reno compensation to abandon the matter. If Professor Mgbeke is discredited, please can you explain to us why we should believe Natasha, given her antecedents?

Good one ....You are a deep thinker.
Don't mind that fool that's seeking unnecessary attention.

TenQ:
If you were Natasha, would you have posted your evidences so that Akpabio will have enough time to manufacture counter-evidences and defence to it
OR
Wait till court hearings where Akpabio would be forced to answer to those evidences on the fly?

Which makes better sense?

What is she going from one platform to another instead shutting up and wait for court case ?

In recent times you know number of footballers getting destroyed by false accusations from ladies E.g Mendy of Manchester City at long last the guy was innocent .


Now why are people like you siding the accuser even without evidence on what basis are you siding her , over just a claim she made ? Don’t you know anyone can make a claim even against you ? I thought there’s a saying that you’re innocent until proven guilty?


I can side with the accused until proven guilty. Someone like Natasha if she has any iota of evidence would’ve posted it even before court case .


You’ll see that in the end this lady will never provide anything called evidence since there’s none .should we bet ?

HugoBoss10:
You can as well do that and publish your findings

since he’s in the job of reviewing let him review both sides , so that we the readers will read both sides unless he’s a one sided person.

Besides one remains innocent until proven guilty.

franugo:
You guys seem to think I'm on Natasha's side of this divide, I couldn't care less about her tbh. I watched prof Mgbeke's video, saw some irregularities and pointed them out. Natasha has not provided any evidence to backup her claims and she was photographed smiling sheepishly with the SP, a man she publicly accused of unwarranted sexual advances.... they're all unserious characters in the comic that is the Nigerian political space. They're both of a similar frame in my mind.

Did you wrote a review on all her appearances, claims and accusation too ?


What is the one sided review tend to accomplish? Oh to say the number isn’t hers or she’s not the one that is on the other side of the chat ?


If I review even the acclaimed holy books I’ll find many inconsistency on them . A good reviewer do it on both sides not just looking for fault on one side . Do away with your bias and accept the fact.

Let stop this unnecessary review and allow Senator Natasha to come out and disputes all these allegations with facts.
If she failed to do so she should keep quiet and apologize to those she is trying hard to malign because of her actions and inactions.
and if she is found quilty she should b disgraced out of the senate and she should be relegated politically.

Mgbeke feeling funky

Bosman17:
Really? The way you guys push a narrative however ridiculous needs to be studied.. what? You only need to have heard Natasha once to know she was the one speaking on the other side… I’m not saying Akpabio is a saint… but it’s obvious the issue of sexual harassment never happened.

I think Natasha just got played in her own game… from the man that introduced her to Dr Sandra to Sandra herself… they just played her… got her to confess!!!

My take: How could Natasha say so much to someone over the phone—denying sexual harassment, plotting to remove SP, insulting her followers, and claiming she gave money to Ezekwesili—all in call? If she had accomplices, I doubt she'd reveal such evil plans to even them, let alone a stranger. This feels like calculated manipulation. Something doesn’t add up.

franugo:
There's no evidence to review in Natasha's case. She made an allegation against the SP and didn't provide any evidence, what am I supposed to review there? Did you see their recent photograph together where they're both smiling with their teeth out? Don't stress yourself for any of these politicians at all, you'll get burned

You created a narrative and a thread, I didn’t

I’m only asking you do same to Natasha

Does her allegations make sense, despite being known as a serial liar and manipulator

This your review na about this same Sandra or na another Sandra.


https://www.thenigerianvoice.com/news/253217/open-letter-to-sandra-duru-the-lady-who-scammed-me.html

Even a complete idiot knows that Akpabio hired her to deal with Natasha.

It's easier for a brilliant woman to finish another brilliant woman and hence Akpabio dropped Nwaebonyi for her.

So far she is doing a good job great Liar vs sensational Liar.

Game on

franugo:
Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

Franugo, have you reviewed all the allegations Natasha has made to be true, starting from Reno Omokri's case??

TenQ:
If you were Natasha, would you have posted your evidences so that Akpabio will have enough time to manufacture counter-evidences and defence to it
OR
Wait till court hearings where Akpabio would be forced to answer to those evidences on the fly?

Which makes better sense?

Which court did Lietasha sue Akpabio for sexual harassment if she was telling the truth??

frankson1:
Which court did Lietasha sue Akpabio for sexual harassment if she was telling the truth??

Which makes better sense?

alobright17:
What is she going from one platform to another instead shutting up and wait for court case ?

In recent times you know number of footballers getting destroyed by false accusations from ladies E.g Mendy of Manchester City at long last the guy was innocent .


Now why are people like you siding the accuser even without evidence on what basis are you siding her , over just a claim she made ? Don’t you know anyone can make a claim even against you ? I thought there’s a saying that you’re innocent until proven guilty?


I can side with the accused until proven guilty. Someone like Natasha if she has any iota of evidence would’ve posted it even before court case .


You’ll see that in the end this lady will never provide anything called evidence since there’s none .should we bet ?

I am not sliding anyone!

Is Akpabio a saint?

It is not ethically wrong for Akpabio to want to date Natasha, it is only ethically wrong if he is punishing Natasha for not agreeing to his whims!
Neither of them are saints!