₦airaland Forum

monex:
Bolded is not totally correct. Kashmir is split between India, Pakistan and China. India considers the part administered by Pakistan to be Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK). Pakistan considers the part administered by India to be Indian Occupied Kasmir (IOK), India considers the part occupied by China to be Chinese Occupied Kashmir (COK). Pakistan and India agree on a line of control which divides the IOK from the POK.

Please note that Kashmir was a Sikh kingdom (although with a Muslim majority populace) before the western Kahmir rebelled against the maharaja as they wanted to join Pakistan rather than being an independent kingdom as earlier agreed. Today Kashmir territories have some level of autonomy in both countries.

themosthigh:
Why this Islamophobia online? All Muslim want is peace in the world. Islam means peace, and peace is good for everyone.

koffi1995:
Unfortunately some people's idea of "peace" means domination & suppression of all opposing ideas

Boko Haram, Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic State, Taliban, al-Qaeda, al-Shabaab, JNIM, TTP, Houthis, etc. would probably claim that they want "peace" - peace to be obtained by conquering or killing anyone who disagrees with them

Empiree:
Low IQ like you should be ignored. You are probably Christian and you don't see beyond religion.

Empiree:
thank you. Remember, technically if you look at Indians, Pakistan and Bangladesh they are look the same. Ofcourse with some differences. It was the British that sold Kashmir to India warlord in 1800s. Forget about Sikh. Sikhism is a religion not tribe. The people could come religion but they can't change their geographic location. Just like Yorùbáland. Yoruba were once majority traditionalists and later became Muslims and Christians majority. This doesn't change their tribe and location.

Again, it is very simple. India should allow kashmir to decide who they want to merge with(India or Pakistan). UN should force India to allow referendum. Simple

monex:
India agreed to Kashmir's independence originally until Pakistan invaded an independent Kashmir and Kashmir sought help from India. India agreed to help on the condition that they join India. Pakistan has invaded (crossed the agreed Line of Control) the Indian administered Jasmir multiple times and have allegedly supported terrorist attacks in the region.

Most of the militant attacks in the region actually kill Kashmiri hindus (pandits) and have driven most of them from the valley. Pakistan are far from innocent my friend.

Empiree:
I am not saying Pakistan is innocent. My point is since Kashmir doesn't want to join India, they want either Independence or be part of Pakistan. I think India needs to respect that. India can not force them to be Indians. After all majority of them today are Muslims which I believe wants to make them join majority Pakistan Muslim country rather than Hindu majority India country.

Regardless of what transpired in 1947, the people of Kashmir should be allowed to choose where they want to belong. They clearly don't want India.

British caused this problem just like they did in Palestine, Venezuela and Guyana and many places like them.

Just a matter of time before Venezuela and Guyana start throwing 💣💥💣💣 at each other. They have already started having land dispute because the said land that was partitioned by the British recently determined to be oil rich region just like Kashmir has trade and tourism potentials. It is clear why India doesn't want to give it up

monex:
I agree most of them want independent state. There is a growing islamophobia among Hindus so i imagine they wouldn't want to be in a state that would increasily discriminate against them. My point is they had independence from the beginning until Pakistan invaded them. They actually asked to be part of India.

Empiree:
No sir/ma. Kashmir was member am independent State. It was a region of Pakistan sold by the British to Indian Warlord in 1800s. So you can see the rain why Pakistan invaded Kashmir. I'm glad you are aware of Hindutva extremists. I see their activities online all the time

monex:
It was a princely state. British gave Princely states the option to join India, Pakistan or stay independent. They chose independence but were attached days later by Pakistani militants

Empiree:
this is 3rd time I'm saying this. It was not independent. British sold the land to India warlord. Under the terms of the Treaty of Amritsar that followed in March 1846, the British government sold Kashmir for a sum of 7.5 million Nanakshahee rupees to Gulab Singh. So you see how British started the mess.

The came there from their own country in Europe and conquered Sikh people and sold the land. Who gave them right to do that?. Similar to what they did to Palestine.

Botragelad:
Why are you typing rubbish?
The 1846 treaty was more of a Settlement.
The Treaty of Amritsar didn't "sell" Kashmir like property.

The states b]

In your
In
decided on accession?

Empiree:
Mr. ZioNazist

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1ApfSVnicN/

Botragelad:
Spot on. Haha. Exactly what I expected from an islamist. Aside propaganda what else can you come up with? 😂

Couldn't even provide an answer to any of my questions. Go cry elsewhere boy. No one is going to fall for your Islamic lies!! 😂😂