₦airaland Forum

ovieigho:
Lol,you are clever by half? Usa has never been into war with any country in recent years... They were searching for taliban in the midst of innocent people and decorum is needed! If it's a full scale war like your putin has embarked on since over 4yrs without winning then believe me Afghanistan won't take a day before they are leveled


U can't be in a war with a country and still protect it's citizens

WritterNg:
He's right.

Russia is the largest country on earth. No army on earth can cover an area that size. Not even 80 million troops. The US can barely mobilize 2 million troops.

Russia has the largest mineral reserves on earth. Rare earth metals and others in abundance.

Russia has the largest missile arsenal on earth. And the largest and most diverse nuclear arsenal.

Russia is backed by China & India and the rest of Asia (4 billion people). All nuclear armed btw.

So how on earth do you expect the US to win against Russia? Even with the help of NATO.

lexy2014:
Tnx but how does that answer what I asked.

1. how is NATO using Ukraine as a pawn?

2. when did NATO start using Ukraine as a pawn?

3. what is Russia trying to achieve by attacking Ukraine?

Salowise:
Who goes are invading bushes, attack cities with drones and missiles, giving Ukraine advance weapons to strike into Russia will cause Russia lots of damage, imagine Finland, Sweden and Poland Russia's neigbbor joining the fight will be very brutal. If you add some NATO countries like France, Germany and Turkey, it's a done deal. While the US provide them with intels, Russia won't survive 2 weeks of massive bombardment.

iwadobo:
Maybe you have not been following the war. Who are those supplying Ukraine with all the weapons and money to fight the war? US alone has spent over 150bn dollars on this war , in weapons and medicine, the Europeans allies has equally made huge supplies ,yet Russia remains unscathed . Their intention for this war was to use it wear down Russia in order for them to attack and finish off Russia. This was to alloy them a monopoly of power to control the world. But instead of Russia, it is the west that is crying of depleted arsenal.

Salowise:
Who goes are invading bushes, attack cities with drones and missiles, giving Ukraine advance weapons to strike into Russia will cause Russia lots of damage, imagine Finland, Sweden and Poland Russia's neigbbor joining the fight will be very brutal. If you add some NATO countries like France, Germany and Turkey, it's a done deal. While the US provide them with intels, Russia won't survive 2 weeks of massive bombardment.

ovieigho:
Lol,you are clever by half? Usa has never been into war with any country in recent years... They were searching for taliban in the midst of innocent people and decorum is needed! If it's a full scale war like your putin has embarked on since over 4yrs without winning then believe me Afghanistan won't take a day before they are leveled


U can't be in a war with a country and still protect it's citizens

Salowise:
Who goes are invading bushes, attack cities with drones and missiles, giving Ukraine advance weapons to strike into Russia will cause Russia lots of damage, imagine Finland, Sweden and Poland Russia's neigbbor joining the fight will be very brutal. If you add some NATO countries like France, Germany and Turkey, it's a done deal. While the US provide them with intels, Russia won't survive 2 weeks of massive bombardment.

lexy2014:
Do you understand the questios I asked?

1. how is NATO using Ukraine as a pawn?

2. when did NATO start using Ukraine as a pawn?

3. what is Russia trying to achieve by attacking Ukraine?

WritterNg:
Full scale war with only 195k troops? That was what Russia deployed to fight Ukraine.

How many troops did the US use to invade Afghanistan again? Over 500k troops including NATO troops.

Please let them stick to fighting ragtag Houthis, that's what their army is good for.

tunary:
Putin is an oppressor and he wants to gets the land with full force, it's obvious no one can make him change his mind. This is the man alot of people prefer to US president.

Russians and Chinese and both very wicked just like that short fat man in North Korea

WritterNg:
Just to beat ragtag Taliban in Afghanistan, the US needed help from all 30 NATO members, including some gulf states. Afghanistan, the poorest country in the world without any support or backing like Ukraine.

And guess what? They still lost after fighting for 20 years with $4 trillion wasted.

Shebi Iran, North Korea = 30 countries??

runningriot:
Ok let me unequivocally state how the US will win Russia with all the aforementioned that you said because overtime there is a transitional process in war from conventional to unconventional. Firstly, war is not fought and won on the tenets of population if not the recent outburst between India and Pakistan the 6 days war between Israel and her Arab nation wouldn't have happened rather is fought and won through intelligent gathering, logistics, technology and etal. Secondly, having abundant rare earth minerals does not translate to winning wars if not we would have Russia winning Ukraine in the war as mentioned by Putin to end in two weeks then the dumb of all is land mass! Prior to this time China was conquered by Japan Nigeria threatened to invade Niger which would have happened like ABC Germany alone during Adolf Hitler invaded almost all her neighboring countries which if they are put together is thrice the size of his country. So bro it is highly inconsequential to say war is warn through rare earth minerals, population or land mass. Modern warfare is won through intelligence gathering, logistics, espionage, technology and the power of projection from land, air and sea! I hope you are convinced beyond reasonable doubt with proper and in-depth analysis free from biasness rather base on objectivity and transcend of events that has neutralized and liquidated your submission that US can't win Russia in a war!

WritterNg:
Incapable?? For a war that is barely 3 years old? Ukraine is the second largest country in Europe after Russia. Ukraine had the second largest ground army in Europe after Russia, before the war. Ukraine had more weapons than France before the war.

Ukraine has received over $450 billion in weapons, that's more than 100 countries GDP.

The Ukrainian regions that caused the war are already under Russian control. Together with 70% of Ukrainian mineral resources and rare earth metals.

The US took 20 years and $4 trillion to fight a ragtag Taliban group only to lose to them. The poorest nation on earth. Did the Taliban receive the same support as Ukraine is receiving? In fact it was the reverse. The US was supported by the whole NATO countries.

No Russian official has ever said the war will be won in a short time. Infact Putin has said so many times that they're prepared to fight forever, if that's what It'll take. Prove me wrong and show us links.

Russia fought Sweden for 21 years and captured territories. St Petersburg of today's Russia is one of those territories.

The difference between Russia and the U.S is that when the Russians capture any territory, it is lost forever. No force on earth can return it back.

That has always been their history. That's how Russia got bigger in the first place.

Tjra:
What would you do if you were the President of the US?

Keep fueling the fight? Keep sanctioning Russia? Wait.. Has either worked so far?

See, Ukraine and NATO can never defeat Russia. Not even in the next 100 years.

US itself CANNOT win an all out war against Russia.

If asslicking the ass of Putin is what would end the war, then it's a fair deal.

WritterNg:
He's right.

Russia is the largest country on earth. No army on earth can cover an area that size. Not even 80 million troops. The US can barely mobilize 2 million troops.

Russia has the largest mineral reserves on earth. Rare earth metals and others in abundance.

Russia has the largest missile arsenal on earth. And the largest and most diverse nuclear arsenal.

Russia is backed by China & India and the rest of Asia (4 billion people). All nuclear armed btw.

So how on earth do you expect the US to win against Russia? Even with the help of NATO.

JagabanBorgu:
U all think war is a straight line until it starts, if Germany could run through Europe during world war II and it took a huge coalition spending blood and sweat to stop them.
Don't think this will be different, China will mostly likely team up with Russia, same as Iran and a few others, this will be more terrible than what the Germans, Japanese and Italians did during world war II.
Those in power knows this, that's why they are not outrightly àttàcking Russia.

WritterNg:
He's right.

Russia is the largest country on earth. No army on earth can cover an area that size. Not even 80 million troops. The US can barely mobilize 2 million troops.

Russia has the largest mineral reserves on earth. Rare earth metals and others in abundance.

Russia has the largest missile arsenal on earth. And the largest and most diverse nuclear arsenal.

Russia is backed by China & India and the rest of Asia (4 billion people). All nuclear armed btw.

So how on earth do you expect the US to win against Russia? Even with the help of NATO.

WritterNg:
He's right.

Russia is the largest country on earth. No army on earth can cover an area that size. Not even 80 million troops. The US can barely mobilize 2 million troops.

Russia has the largest mineral reserves on earth. Rare earth metals and others in abundance.

Russia has the largest missile arsenal on earth. And the largest and most diverse nuclear arsenal.

Russia is backed by China & India and the rest of Asia (4 billion people). All nuclear armed btw.

So how on earth do you expect the US to win against Russia? Even with the help of NATO.

iwadobo:
You asked how and I told you how . Fighting Russia through Ukraine. What does that mean to you ? Maybe you have issue with semantics.

iwadobo:
Maybe you have not been following the war. Who are those supplying Ukraine with all the weapons and money to fight the war? US alone has spent over 150bn dollars on this war , in weapons and medicine, the Europeans allies has equally made huge supplies ,yet Russia remains unscathed . Their intention for this war was to use it wear down Russia in order for them to attack and finish off Russia. This was to alloy them a monopoly of power to control the world. But instead of Russia, it is the west that is crying of depleted arsenal.

Salowise:
Who goes are invading bushes, attack cities with drones and missiles, giving Ukraine advance weapons to strike into Russia will cause Russia lots of damage, imagine Finland, Sweden and Poland Russia's neigbbor joining the fight will be very brutal. If you add some NATO countries like France, Germany and Turkey, it's a done deal. While the US provide them with intels, Russia won't survive 2 weeks of massive bombardment.

muyico:
Putin isn't Christian

9japride:
[color=#006600][/color]

Are you really serious? It's like saying one of those South American countries will defeat USA.
Russia is just being lenient with Ukraine in this war.
Those who want the war to continue have an agenda.

Watcharena:
The people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam,Libya, Yugoslavia disagree with you

tunary:
these are Muslim nations and they are all very wicked just like Russia and China. Like Lucifer like abbadon

xareal:
lol.. Lenient ke?? The only weapon left for them to use in that small Ukraine na nuclear weapons, they boasted about capturing Kiev after 48 hours, three years don pass, but somehow you think they can defeat nato, take away their nuclear weapons and nothing dey there

Nicoddemus:
Are you indirectly supporting Putin invading Ukraine?

WritterNg:
Incapable?? For a war that is barely 3 years old? Ukraine is the second largest country in Europe after Russia. Ukraine had the second largest ground army in Europe after Russia, before the war. Ukraine had more weapons than France before the war.

Ukraine has received over $450 billion in weapons, that's more than 100 countries GDP.

The Ukrainian regions that caused the war are already under Russian control. Together with 70% of Ukrainian mineral resources and rare earth metals.

The US took 20 years and $4 trillion to fight a ragtag Taliban group only to lose to them. The poorest nation on earth. Did the Taliban receive the same support as Ukraine is receiving? In fact it was the reverse. The US was supported by the whole NATO countries.

No Russian official has ever said the war will be won in a short time. Infact Putin has said so many times that they're prepared to fight forever, if that's what It'll take. Prove me wrong and show us links.

Russia fought Sweden for 21 years and captured territories. St Petersburg of today's Russia is one of those territories.

The difference between Russia and the U.S is that when the Russians capture any territory, it is lost forever. No force on earth can return it back.

That has always been their history. That's how Russia got bigger in the first place.