₦airaland Forum

Nazgul:
It would take an extremely massive rigging for APC to win the presidential election in 2027. Cos with the kind of hardship they've put Nigerians in, only a brain dead person would willingly vote for them.

Dokitto001:
That was actually an irrefutable fact.
Whether that Rivers state result alone could change the whole result of the election was what the Supreme court decided.
As for Rivers State. Nobody refuted that Obi won it hands down

Image123:
He's playing psychology on you, but the message is clear. Edo is getting more APC votes in 2027, they now have an APC governor. Please be reasonable and realistic, not emotional.

lexy2014:
your reply is a reply of questions. did I ask you to ask questions?

how will tinubu "definitely" get more votes in virtually every state than 2023?

NB: emphasis is on the highlighted in my question.

do you not know the meaning of the word "how"?

highchief1:
he is the one being unrealistic accompanied by you.a wise politician will say edo is in the bag for tinubu.without mentioning figures.u know the governor na mugu he doesn’t know how to talk.Ganduje and some apc leaders that have sense said 2027 was a work over for tinubu they didn’t have to tell him they will give him 1billion votes .

DIVINEEVIDENCE:
Kwankwaso really overrated himself that year.

His delusion was on an alien level.

If he had agreed to deputize Obi, they would have swept the elections fair and square.


Even though the administration would have been marred with a quarrelsome VP obsessed with delusions of importance and a horde of ronu miscreants who would have been disturbing us everyday about the presidential capabilities of the odiegwu builder of Lagos.

I'm not angry at these politicians.

I'm only angry at loser voters who believe having their tribesman in Aso Rock makes them immune from the effects of bad government policy; who believe that they can feed on a paint of rice, a tuber of yam, a litre of kerosene, a length of stockfish and N10, 000 cash for the next four years.

We are not here because of bad politicians.
We are here because of our greed, selfishness and myopia.

Tjra:
What we should think about now is who's is gonna succeed Tinubu in 2031? 🤔

IBB007:
lol…I know for a fact that Yoruba people will never tried what they did in the last election..,these tribalists wan dey play on our intelligence

Image123:
Tinubu is winning hands down, except there's an act from God Himself.

Image123:
Click the link i referred you to.

toogbasky:
Imagine writing this long episode without sense in it,, before 2023 where there no Igbo men contesting, the one time this people believed someone from their region is the most qualified then you are pushing a narrative,, No region is more Nigerian than the Igbos when you reference voting in presidential election

ProudlyLagos:
yam ree and hypocrisy be like 5&6 mention a state won by either Tinubu or Atiku in your 5plot of land? But the same ronu voted for him in Lagos and he won and yet they are tribalist while you that voted 100% for your tribe man is not a tribalist don’t worry, we will show you the true meaning of tribalism come 2027, everybody don wise now

loffyloffy:
You seems to have forgotten the Nigerian Political permutation.

The 2031 president will be a core Northerner, yet you failed to mention even one among your possible options.

You are just engaged in childish wishful thinking not a political discussion.

12inchess:
Obidient logic this is.


Yeye People

lexy2014:
I didnt ask you for link. I asked a very straightforward question.

how will tinubu "definitely" get more votes in virtually every state than 2023?

NB: emphasis is on the highlighted in my question.

do you not know the meaning of the word "how"?

tunapawizzy:
This stats put to bed the argument about which region votes for only someone from their region

Interesting Observations-
In the South West, Tinubu had 2,279,407 votes, Obi had 849,423 votes, Atiku had 941,941 ---> To put it in relatable terms, if we consider other candidates as neglible(and yes their number shows they are), For every 100 votes in the South West, Tinubu had approximately 56 votes, Obi had 21 votes, Atiku had 23 votes
In the South East, Tinubu had 66,406 votes Obi had 2,021,788 votes Atiku had 91,198 votes ---> To put it in relatable terms, if we consider other candidates as neglible(and yes their number shows they are), For every 100 votes in the South East, Tinubu had approximately 3 votes, Obi had 93, Atiku had 4 votes

Let that sink in again Atiku+Tinubu = 7 over 100 in the SE, meanwhile Obi+Atiku = 44 over 100 in the SW

-93% of votes from the SE was cast for someone from the SE
-56% of votes from the SW was cast for someone from the SW

Now let us assume 250k votes out of the Obi votes from Lagos is from people from the SE(and that is even an exaggerated assumption) and those 250k people decided to go and cast their votes in the SE. that will increase Tinubus percentage in the SW to 60%(60 out of 100 votes), Obis percentage will reduce to 15%(15 out of 100 votes) BUT then that additional 250k will go to Obi in the SE which will further supports the fact that for the 2023 presidential election, SE was the master of Vote for your brother, vote for ur tribe

Look at the states that gave Atiku and Tinubu the least number of votes...Look at the last 6, you will find the 5 SE states there. How the SE decide to cast their vote is not my issue, The real issue is that you guys come online, open ur mouth anyhow without looking at data and say Yoruba people and SW region vote based on tribe and ethnicity.

A lot of Yorubas know Tinubu is crap, A lot of Yorubas are supporting, voted for and will still vote for Obi if he is on the ballot come 2027, but you guys online should stop letting your emotion get the better of you and start distorting facts that data can support.

Image123:
The link is me answering the same poor question, i don't have the desire to repeat myself to a bot.

004gist:
A lot of yoruba really believed in obi

A lot of northerners also believed in obi.

No wonder they are trying to use ethnicity to divide Nigeria.


If only the result was transmitted but INEC it shall not be we11 with u

DeepSight:
What do you mean the effects of subsidy removal and naira floatation are already showing. Expatiate. Where and how are the effects showing, if not in greater hardship and reduced GDP.

moscow007:
Honestly I don't blame you all, it's Igbo people that I blame.

For 16 years Igbos have overwhelming voted for other tribes who they think is most competent to lead the country.
Even when tribalists like you rejected Obasanjo, Igbos were there giving him over 90% of their votes despite having Ojukwu on the ballots.

Igbos closed businesses to line up and vote Yaradua becos they believed he was d best candidate.
By the laws of equity and natural fairness it's now Igbos turn to produce president and they pick the most competent, tested and trusted candidate... turned up and voted for him just the same way they voted for other tribe's best candidates and slow nitwits will write gibberish chestising them.

SouthEast is currently the only region that hosts the 4 major political parties in Nigeria.

It's not about tribalism or Political party...it's about competence!

Had APC presented Osibanjo despite being Southeast turn to Govern, they would've dropped Peter Obi and overwhelming voted for him.

tunapawizzy:
This stats put to bed the argument about which region votes for only someone from their region

Interesting Observations-
In the South West, Tinubu had 2,279,407 votes, Obi had 849,423 votes, Atiku had 941,941 ---> To put it in relatable terms, if we consider other candidates as neglible(and yes their number shows they are), For every 100 votes in the South West, Tinubu had approximately 56 votes, Obi had 21 votes, Atiku had 23 votes
In the South East, Tinubu had 66,406 votes Obi had 2,021,788 votes Atiku had 91,198 votes ---> To put it in relatable terms, if we consider other candidates as neglible(and yes their number shows they are), For every 100 votes in the South East, Tinubu had approximately 3 votes, Obi had 93, Atiku had 4 votes

Let that sink in again Atiku+Tinubu = 7 over 100 in the SE, meanwhile Obi+Atiku = 44 over 100 in the SW

-93% of votes from the SE was cast for someone from the SE
-56% of votes from the SW was cast for someone from the SW

Now let us assume 250k votes out of the Obi votes from Lagos is from people from the SE(and that is even an exaggerated assumption) and those 250k people decided to go and cast their votes in the SE. that will increase Tinubus percentage in the SW to 60%(60 out of 100 votes), Obis percentage will reduce to 15%(15 out of 100 votes) BUT then that additional 250k will go to Obi in the SE which will further supports the fact that for the 2023 presidential election, SE was the master of Vote for your brother, vote for ur tribe

Look at the states that gave Atiku and Tinubu the least number of votes...Look at the last 6, you will find the 5 SE states there. How the SE decide to cast their vote is not my issue, The real issue is that you guys come online, open ur mouth anyhow without looking at data and say Yoruba people and SW region vote based on tribe and ethnicity.

[b]like your analysis. really pol-mathematical
[/b]

kedeojo:
it was a result of the Muslim Muslim ticket. Most Christian voted out of fear and that won't repeat it again. Obi has seen it and that is the reason he want to join coalition and he will still not be picked as the presidential candidate. Atiku will take it.

MightySparrow:
SE is doing wrong politics. It is the only region where opposition cannot have 10,000 votes. This pattern of voting is a thing to worry about as others will not trust them. I understand they complain about marginalization. What is the root cause of marginalization?

Image123:
We've had GDP growth, not reduced GDP.

States get more than double their allocation

Image123:
We've had GDP growth, not reduced GDP.
Like the picture i sent you from Dangote, no more frequent scarcity, drain on national resources, massive smuggling and subsidy abuse. Naira is not more performing badly against the dollar but now stable. States get more than double their allocation, foreign reserves improved, IMF loan paid off including other 'senseless' debts. Hardship was expected regardless of the person or party that removed subsidy, which they all promised to do.

Image123:
We've had GDP growth, not reduced GDP.
Like the picture i sent you from Dangote, no more frequent scarcity, drain on national resources, massive smuggling and subsidy abuse. Naira is not more performing badly against the dollar but now stable. States get more than double their allocation, foreign reserves improved, IMF loan paid off including other 'senseless' debts. Hardship was expected regardless of the person or party that removed subsidy, which they all promised to do.

ProudlyLagos:
yam ree and hypocrisy be like 5&6 mention a state won by either Tinubu or Atiku in your 5plot of land? But the same ronu voted for him in Lagos and he won and yet they are tribalist while you that voted 100% for your tribe man is not a tribalist don’t worry, we will show you the true meaning of tribalism come 2027, everybody don wise now

Atlantis585:
These are nothing but fraudulent numbers.

They make no sense or difference.

In the North children under 10 years were allowed to register and vote.

Non-Nigerians were brought in from Niger and Chad to register and vote too

In the SW Emilokan people were snatching, grabbing and running away with ballots.

So what is the use of all these nonsense numbers when actual votes do not count.

DIVINEEVIDENCE:
We voted for the best candidate.
That's how the average Igbo brain functions.

If Yemi Osinbajo, Akinwumi Adesina, Raji Fashola et al had been on the ballot, we would have voted for them instead of Obi.

You all would have been telling us how we don't love ourselves and don't know how to play politics, because you never see the picture.

Show me any general election in Nigeria where a candidate secured Igbo block votes and I'll prove to you that among the top contenders, that candidate was the best.