₦airaland Forum

Levels1:
She can't be allow into the assemble gate as she's still on suspension. She needs to do the needful by following the court order, part of the judgment says she should apologise in two dayly paper and on her FB page also payment of 5m ,she needs to shown us the evidence of her compliance first.

and the good thing is that she was even the petitional as this makes it even more complicated for her.

The apology does not stop her form resuming

She can quickly resume while returning representation to her people and follow the court instructions during the week.

Tbanjtech:
This woman, I hope she learnt her lessons already...
The Legislative especially the Senate, is an institution not for showbiz.
She should face her primary assignment and rep her people well.
Natasha has potential definitely and I'm sure she'll govern Kogi State one day....

She won bro, are you sure you have been following the case?

Wake up from your sleep and get information.

Olumaeme:
The apology does not stop her form resuming

She can quickly resume while returning representation to her people and follow the court instructions during the week.

You really think she will comply with the court order if she is allowed to resume ahead of compliance.

That woman's pride and ego is too big to humble her. She is naturally egoistic.

Olumaeme:
She won bro, are you sure you have been following the case?

Wake up from your sleep and get information.

How did she win?

You are so inept to the extent that you can't comprehend that the consequences of every human actions sticks with us, it becomes reputation in her case and a lot wouldn't want to associate with her.

Wallade:
You really think she will comply with the court order if she is allowed to resume ahead of compliance.

That woman's pride and ego is too big to humble her. She is naturally egoistic.

She must comply, it's a no brainer and she will also resmune because resumption is also part of compliance to court order.

There's nothing egoistic about court judgement.

Olumaeme:
Abi some of you don't understand English.

Why will she apologize to Senate?

She will apologize and pay 5m to the court.

It was a contempt of court and not contempt of senate. Senate does not have the power to bar her from posting on social media, as they are a party to the matter.

Use your number 2 nau.

You forgot that the Senate requested her to tender an apology to the Senate and Senate President for her unruly, disrespectful and disorderly behavior in the first place.

The apology is even the condition upon which the 6 months suspension will be reviewed.

Furthermore, failure to tender the apology within the 6 months would still translate to an extension of the 6 months suspension.

We shall see.

Wallade:
How did she win?

You are so inept to the extent that you can't comprehend that the consequences of every human actions sticks with us, it becomes reputation in her case and a lot wouldn't want to associate with her.

She won because she won.

The court judgement was in her favor that the action of the senate is illegal., that's why she's resuming.

You didn't read the news?

Wallade:
You forgot that the Senate requested her to tender an apology to the Senate and Senate President for her unruly, disrespectful and disorderly behavior in the first place.

The apology is even the condition upon which the 6 months suspension will be reviewed.

Furthermore, failure to tender the apology within the 6 months would still translate to an extension of the 6 months suspension.

We shall see.

She cannot tender apology to the senate. All those have been overtaken by events

If the senate felt she should or must apologize they should approach the court.

She was told to apologize so they recall her back from suspension but she choosed to go to court instead of issuing any apologies and she won, clearly.

Olumaeme:
She must comply, it's a no brainer and she will also resmune because resumption is also part of compliance to court order.

There's nothing egoistic about court judgement.

You will be abreast with the news as it breaks:

The Senate will not reduce or terminate the suspension.

I can bet that the Senate will file an appeal. The Senate will:

1. First refuse her entry into the chamber or resumption in office.
2. Take almost 3 months to study the judgement.
3. Appeal the Judgement in a court of appeal, if need be, or assume there was no binding order of the court on the Senate to terminate the suspension.

This case may run till the end of Natasha's tenure as a senator of the FRN, except she does the expected - humbly apologize, become more diplomatic and respectful towards her colleagues and constituted authority of the Senate, irrespective of the private lives involving her family and any Senate leaders.

We honestly just want the senators to face their duty in the interest of the people and stop the drama and sensationalization of sex or rape or sexual harassment in the Senate.


Mark my words!

Olumaeme:
She cannot tender apology to the senate. All those have been overtaken by events

If the senate felt she should or must apologize they should approach the court.

She was told to apologize so they recall her back from suspension but she choosed to go to court instead of issuing any apologies and she won, clearly.

The court has no such jurisdiction to determine the activities of the Senate.

Make no mistake about that, the Senate has its rules and regulations, if a senator goes contrary to the rules, there will be consequences, that is the fate of Natasha.

She must take responsibility for her actions and pay the penalty.

Did the court excuse her offence?
Did the court say the Senate can't punish the disorderly senators?

Take some time to think objectively on the subject and stop being emotional about it.

advocatejare:
Season 2 is about to begin


Politicians like to cherry-pick the court judgement they feel like obeying


We shall be here watching as the event unfolds!

hahhaaa, asin

Wallade:
The court has no such jurisdiction to determine the activities of the Senate.

Make no mistake about that, fbe Senate has its rules and regulations, if a senator goes contrary to the rules, there will be consequences, that is the fate of Natasha.

She must take responsibility for her actions and pay the penalty.

Did the court excuse her offence?
Did the court say the Senate can't punish the disorderly senators?

Take some time to think objectively on the subject and stop being emotional about it.

Lol, the court has done that already by saying that she should resume her duties and that the senate does not have power to suspend her for six months.

Yes, the court can rule on those rules if they are contrary to the provisions of the constitution.

You seems to be ignorant of the law. Read up.

Olumaeme:
She won because she won.

The court judgement was in her favor that the action of the senate is illegal., that's why she's resuming.

You didn't read the news?

It is you and some media organizations, maybe sponsored ones, that think it is in her favor.

In my opinion, the court didn't opine that she can't be punished. The court expressly recognized the powers of the Senate to punish disorderly senators.

The judge only said that power to punish should not be overreaching. The judge went ahead to state that those powers as stated in the Senate rules and regulations should have specified punishment period rather than leave it open. The judge felt that 6 months is too long for punishment for reasons explained by the judge.

Go and read the court judgement

Wallade:
You will be abreast with the news as it breaks:

The Senate will not reduce or terminate the suspension.

I can bet that the Senate will file an appeal. The Senate will:

1. First refuse her entry into the chamber or resumption in office.
2. Take almost 3 months to study the judgement.
3. Appeal the Judgement in a court of appeal, if need be, or assume there was no binding order of the court on the Senate to terminate the suspension.

This case may run till the end of Natasha's tenure as a senator of the FRN.


Mark my words!

OK, senate lawyer. But they have not appealed yet. If they do, they will loose again.

It's established already, you cannot suspend a legislature for more than 14 days, the court has declared severally.

Dino VS house of Reps
Omo Agege VS senate
Ali Ndume VS Senate

Etc.

She's resuming already, the issue of terminating suspension is out of the way. Find something meaningful to say

Olumaeme:
Lol, the court has done that already by saying that she should resume her duties and that the senate does not have power to suspend her for six months.

Yes, the court can rule on those rules if they are contrary to the provisions of the constitution.

You seems to be ignorant of the law. Read up.

Did you read the court judgement? Obviously you didn't.

Please quote the part of the court judgement where the judge said she should resume back to the Senate.

Please note, I want you to quote the court judgement.

Wallade:
It is you and some media organizations, maybe sponsored ones, that think it is in her favor.

In my opinion, the court didn't opine that she can't be punished. The court expressly recognized the powers of the Senate to punish disorderly senators.

Go and read the court judgement

Did you read the judgement? What did the court say?

Olumaeme:
OK, senate lawyer. But they have not appealed yet. If they do, they will loose again.

It's established already, you cannot suspend a legislature for more than 14 days, the court has declared severally.

Dino VS house of Reps
Omo Agege VS senate
Ali Ndume VS Senate

Etc.

She's resuming already, the issue of terminating suspension is out of the way. Find something meaningful to say

This statement of yours that I highlighted - is that what the judge said?

Did you even read the judgement of the court as pronounced by the judge? Obviously you didn't.

We shall wait to see her resume this week. She can try but she best be careful not to misbehave in her effort to force herself into the chambers because one or few law enforcement officers may take advantage to embarrass or humiliate her.

Tell Natasha to respect herself once she is ordered to return from the gate of the Senate.

Olumaeme:
Did you read the judgement? What did the court say?

I asked you to read it, it is available on the internet and you have the data to do WhatsApp, Facebook and other things on internet but you don't create the time to educate yourself before misleading and misinforming other people on internet.

If you want to remain illiterate about some matters, that is up to you but to come on public platform to argue about something you lack information about is ridiculous and despicable, to say the least.

If you are expecting me to copy and paste it here for you, you are wasting your time.

Olumaeme:
The apology does not stop her form resuming
She can quickly resume while returning representation to her people and follow the court instructions during the week.

It seems you don't understand the legal language as you just gallivant to suit your purpose - ala supporters,who thought everything is just to be noisy.
Talk is Cheap Indeed!

Lolz 😂😂😂😂
I'm starting to think this Natasha is a comedian and just using her mumu supporters head.
Resume where exactly?
Has she apologized to the senate for her suspension to be lifted?
Till this moment she has yet to provide a single evidence for accusing Akpabio of sexual harassment. How can you accuse someone without evidence?
And also coming from a person who has accused someone before and it turns out to be a big lie. How sure are we she wasn't lying again?
Also she only mentioned that after she was corrected to seat in her proper place.
She's nothing but a serial and unrepentant liar.
She even went abroad and on TV bringing Nigeria and the National Assembly to disrepute.

She will resume at her husband's house on Tuesday.
Nonsense and Ingredients

You don't read or you read but you can not comprehend, obviously.


Now read this and try to comprehend:

"
The Federal High Court in Abuja has delivered a verdict on Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan's suspension from the Senate. Here's a breakdown of the court's decision ¹ ² ³:
- *Reinstatement*: The court has ordered the Senate to reinstate Senator Natasha, ruling that her six-month suspension was excessive and unconstitutional. The suspension was initially imposed due to her alleged misconduct during a Senate plenary session.
- *Contempt of Court*: However, the court also found Senator Natasha guilty of contempt for violating a gag order by publishing a satirical apology to Senate President Godswill Akpabio on her Facebook page. As a result, she has been ordered to:
- *Pay a fine*: Senator Natasha must pay a fine of N5 million.
- *Publish an apology*: She must publish an apology in two national dailies and on her Facebook page within seven days.
- *Ruling on Senate's Power*: The court emphasized that while the Senate has the power to punish its members, such sanctions must not be excessive and must not deprive constituents of their right to representation.
- *Next Steps*: Senator Natasha has vowed to return to the Senate, stating she will resume her legislative duties following the court's order ⁴.
"

Wallade:
This statement of yours that I highlighted - is that what the judge said?

Did you even read the judgement of the court as pronounced by the judge? Obviously you didn't.

We shall wait to see her resume this week. She can try but she best be careful not to misbehave in her effort to force herself into the chambers because one or few law enforcement officers may take advantage to embarrass or humiliate her.

Tell Natasha to respect herself once she is ordered to return from the gate of the Senate.

KingOfPeaceJoy:
You don't read or you read but you can not comprehend, obviously.


Now read this and try to comprehend:

"
The Federal High Court in Abuja has delivered a verdict on Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan's suspension from the Senate. Here's a breakdown of the court's decision ¹ ² ³:
- *Reinstatement*: The court has ordered the Senate to reinstate Senator Natasha, ruling that her six-month suspension was excessive and unconstitutional. The suspension was initially imposed due to her alleged misconduct during a Senate plenary session.
- *Contempt of Court*: However, the court also found Senator Natasha guilty of contempt for violating a gag order by publishing a satirical apology to Senate President Godswill Akpabio on her Facebook page. As a result, she has been ordered to:
- *Pay a fine*: Senator Natasha must pay a fine of N5 million.
- *Publish an apology*: She must publish an apology in two national dailies and on her Facebook page within seven days.
- *Ruling on Senate's Power*: The court emphasized that while the Senate has the power to punish its members, such sanctions must not be excessive and must not deprive constituents of their right to representation.
- *Next Steps*: Senator Natasha has vowed to return to the Senate, stating she will resume her legislative duties following the court's order ⁴.
"

Man wey dey read and comprehend, please can you tell us your source: what document are you quoting?

I mean where did you get this extracts?

Tbanjtech:
This woman, I hope she learnt her lessons already...
The Legislative especially the Senate, is an institution not for showbiz.
She should face her primary assignment and rep her people well.
Natasha has potential definitely and I'm sure she'll govern Kogi State one day....

dis one govern kogi... It will be very hard for her to return to the Senate in 2027. Dem go show am shege.

theophorus:
She think say na SM post she wan make again.
No worry, carry your ring light go there go do another post for your fans cos those Men no go allow you enter chamber until you do normal.

let me ask...you guyz will say it is good if a country has rule of law..does it mean the court order is useless or shouldn't be respected?

Like I am honestly asking ?...

The hear the Senate is appealing to Appeal Court tomorrow morning and also asking for the postponement of her resumption until Appeal Court finishes the case. From their to Supreme Court and 4 years is over for her.

Wallade:
You really think she will comply with the court order if she is allowed to resume ahead of compliance.

That woman's pride and ego is too big to humble her. She is naturally egoistic.

That woman is wiser than you think.....she's a lawyer, got her seat back through the courts and you think she'd act the manner you described her?

Ekaka14:
That woman is wiser than you think.....she's a lawyer, got her seat back through the courts and you think she'd act the manner you described her?

Let's wait and see how she acts on this.

She has been acting unintelligent for some time.

Her challenges could have been solved by being humble, apologetic, diplomatic and cooperative with her colleagues.

She chose to be unruly, disrespectful, disruptive, combatant and toxic with her colleagues and in such an esteemed environment of the Senate.

It is disappointing to watch her exhibit poor level of emotional intelligence which could derail her career in politics.

Good for her ,she is a defender of freedom and women right, she fight predators and won.
Congratulations senators Natasha may God continue blessing and empowering you Amen .

Congratulations
Congratulations

Wallade:
I asked you to read it, it is available on the internet and you have the data to do WhatsApp, Facebook and other things on internet but you don't create the time to educate yourself before misleading and misinforming other people on internet.

If you want to remain illiterate about some matters, that is up to you but to come on public platform to argue about something you lack information about is ridiculous and despicable, to say the least.

If you are expecting me to copy and paste it here for you, you are wasting your time.

Lol, now I catch you.

The judgement has not been released yet.

The judges gave a brief of the judgement in court but the full judgement is not out until this week.

Lmao.

Olumaeme:
Lol, now I catch you.

The judgement has not been released yet.

The judges gave a brief of the judgement in court but the full judgement is not out until this week.

Lmao.

Really!

Stop being confused and uninformed. It is okay if you don't know much about legal proceedings, just ask about what you don't understand so it can be explained to you.

The judgement is out already.

The judge must have read the judgement out to everyone listening in the court on that day.

Upon the final judgement, both parties lawyers can request for the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the judgement, by applying to court to print and issue the CTC copy to them, for them to study and understand the extent of the judgement and determine if an appeal is needed or accept the judgement.

The unsatisfied party has 3 months to appeal the judgement after which the judgement becomes binding on both parties.

Point of information: the judgement is pronounced and out already. It is the CTC that the parties involved can apply for subsequently.

However, from that brief that you probably read, what did you deduce?

Or would you want to laugh at your own ignorance and ineptitude now?