₦airaland Forum

wetdick:
i never wrote that white people were smarter than black people, what I wrote basically if put in the same condition they will better, and that is true.

there are a lot of articles to prove my claim on the left war on science, everybody presently is called a racist, white supremacist and sexist once they intend to research a controversial field, as i wrote earlier, I have given you links of different researchers who concluded on this subject.

Many scientists have lost their jobs or their funding? vital research has been corrupted or suppressed? scientific debate has been silenced just because of the left, what the left wants to promote is pseudoscience not real science, you keep writing that my claims are false when they are all in Wikipedia, and also how the media manipulate and distort information to suit their narrative and affiliation.

it was journalist and the media, civil right organisations who came out to call the man racist and all other names. don't forget that not only Lynn did this research many other scientists also did similar research and came to the same conclusion and here we are going around the bush.

This is an example, when erasmus university did a research on the subject and came out with result that men are more intelligent than women, who called the report stupid and sexist, a science journalist, what does a science journalist know about the subject matter.Anybody who doesnt accept the status quo is called everytype of names by the media, that is the normal tactics so that the truth will not prevail.

You keep saying they were flaws in the research and that other scientist blasted the research but you didn't bring out facts rather you spread your rumour

now back to the debate, for Lynn to admit that he omitted some data, it means that he agreed that the research was some how bias and he admitted to it and apologise but on the gender issue, which he came out to talk about,many scientists supported his claim but you are trying hard to ignore their reports and findings.

you wrote that most scientist from the netherland have rejected lynn idea but what about the research which i showed you and was done in netherland by Dimitri van der Linden of Erasmus university who also wrote that men are more intelligent than women, will you also call him a sexist? it is true thatalmost all scientist who believes in gender equality are leftist and many times feminist, who are fighting war against science you can search that for yourself.

are you also gonna dismiss these:
Jackson and Philipe Rushton found that males aged 17–18 years had an average of 3.63 IQ points in excess of their female equivalents on the Scholastic Assessment Test or this A 2005 study by Ian Deary, Paul Irwing, Geoff Der, and Timothy Bates, focusing on the ASVAB showed a significantly higher variance in male scores, resulting in more than twice as many men as women scoring in the top 2%. or this Another study by researcher Jianghong Liu also found 3 points higher male scores on the WISC, i will like to ask are they all sexist too?

You keep blaming religion for the oppression of women, even in Scandinavian countries which is the most feminist place to live in this world, women are still going to subjects which have to do with interpersonal relations while men on the other side, are going with subject that has to do with thing, you see few women in STEM but more women in PR, there is even a research done by an independent researcher in the US, he concluded that the more female-dominated a college major is, the lower the average IQ of the students studying in the major.
Girl, you are very selective when reading post and choosing only informations you like, i stand with my idea that different race think differently because of culture and environment, presently, we are evolving, for instance in Nigeria, women are now in the workplace, they are now in the universities, are you still trying to say that it is the men that are pulling them back? in arab world, we have female parliamentarians, in iran alone, any women are doctors and nurses.
you basically not coming to terms that many women want kids and they will leave the work place to achieve that, is it religion fault for that or rather biological reasons.

And on the cold winter theory, colder countries are more developed than hotter countries, you can take the map and check that your self, there is a reason, why they have to survive or they will die unlike us here, why is their innovation in colder climates than hotter climates, why is Sweden more developed than brazil, all these questions when you answer them, everything still points to environment and climate, the more an individual stay in colder climates, the more he has to find all ways to survive or he will die of cold, if there was no winter jacket, or heater or some other innovation that will make them survive the cold and make them plan ahead. do you think they will be alive today. Do you know why japan is the best in structural engineering, because of the frequency in earthquakes in that region, as they say, necessity is the mother of invention
I will conclude that i never said whites are smarter than blacks, you cherrypicked my information and took the one that favours you without reading what I wrote and what might have led to decreasing in IQ and i, in fact,i wrote that many scientists propose that we should not use european standard to judge Africas.

and bout flynn, you can check that on wikipedia were he worte that the press has exgerrated his claim, except you want to make the arguement favour your beliefs

The way, i see it This argument is going No where. you mission is to prove that you are smart.

i didn't say white are smarter, but we need to ask yourself this question, why does the average Nigeria do better in the developed world than in Nigeria, it because he was put in the same condition as whites, he compete with them and wins. so dont twist my words.[quote]

you called him a racist, pls show me a video or an article were he said racists stuff other than his research works. Now if you think racial bias and prejudice is dying out then you haven't encountered real racists in real life.[quote]

I quoted mine which proved that men are smarter than women, but you also dismissed my point. yours was leftists because of the political views of your researchers, most were left and very bias against men.[quote]

I dont have to show you proofs, you just have to look around and see how the lefts have politicalise science and also stop fundings for researches that goes against their beliefs. even in the science world, the scientists from the left are trying hard to sell the idea that been gay is biological and that a transgender woman and man are real woman and man.[quote]

really,you have come with your socioeconomic discrimination narratives, pls tell why there are more women in the Health Professions, Education
and Psychology, in the US alone, more women attend college than men? even in Nigeria it is almost the same, the only profession you will see less women are in STEM, so your socioeconomic discrimination is false narrative. for instance in the Us, women are the highest receiver of affirmative actions for jobs and college entrance, so that not discrimation against men. the facts is this, women are more likely to be teachers, and men are more likely to be computer engineers[quote]

really a repetition, the only people who critized this research are journalists not scientists
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/erasmus-university-men-more-intelligent-women-gender-sexist-science-journalists-misogyny-a7820531.html

and this what Joseph devlin said "this is a well-researched study but the evidence is not strong enough to prove that larger male brains are more intelligent than smaller female brains, which makes it a leap of faith, using a measure of general intelligence which has little basis" he further wrote that “Men and women’s brains are different and we know spatial navigation is slightly better in men than women, while women tend to have a better vocabulary.[quote]

what you are saying is not traditional wisdom, if we have to use that wisdom, and look at history, it will prove my point that men are smater than women, because in reality, men create civilization, women are spectators in it. until recently, when women are allowed to vote and also go to university. infact Conventional wisdom tells us that male and female brains are wired in such a way that each sex has advantages over the other when it comes to certain tasks. Men, for example, are often said to be better at math and scientific reasoning while women are better at reading and empathizing.I have explained the bell curve thousands of time to you, and the result is in the favour of men, if you are using that for your arguement, you have failed, in the bell curve men were in the extreme high and end, while women were in the average. to further point out, there are more male geniuses in society than women because men are subject to more variability in terms of IQ. In other words, while men had more people at the top and tail ends of the IQ bell curve, women were more likely to have average IQ scores. [quote]

it is a repetition, which, i have already explained above.



I never said men held women back for anything, stop twisting my words, I said religion and tradition traditional values held women back.
You cannot deny the fact that religion and socioeconomic disadvantages have negatively affected women for centuries,
its not just biology. Religion and society has a huge role to play in it.
it wasn't until 1893 that women first got the right to vote in New Zealand and that right didn't extend to the UK and U.S. until 1918 and 1920. Women were still fighting for their fundamental rights.
It wasn't until the 20th century began before women were granted full degrees in many of the world's universities. In a certain university in Oxford, they didn't allow women to become full members of engineering societies until 1920, but many others were even slower than that.
Europe's scientific academies were even worse. Marie Curie won two Nobel Prizes, and was still rejected by the French Academy of Sciences in 1911. So we have to remember that women are only just catching up from a long legacy of deliberate exclusion. It's only been a few generations since they've even had access to the same educational opportunities as men.
In the past, if women wanted to practice science, they sometimes became assistants to their scientist husbands or fathers, their contributions subsumed under their names.
many forms of discrimination and eligious brainwashing have not completely been eliminated from society that's why you have more women preferring to stay at home rather than work. We are talking about centuries of religious brainwashing here, you cannot just expect its effect to disapear overnight.
It will take time but it will happen. [quote]You are indirectly blaming men because men are the gate keepers in all what you mentioned above, if you think men are the cause of feale oppression, we should not forget, Dr. Earle Cleveland Haas who invented tampon,Muruganantham the tampon king of india or Gregory Goodwin Pincus, who invented the birth control pill, all these men free women and made them have a better life.

presently, are women not in the work place now, they can now vote, more enrollment of women in the universities, more women driving now, not to forget, they are still the worst drivers, i wonder the discrimination you are talking about, infact, thanks to birth control, a women can control her sexual lives, there are more women providers, more women entrepreneurs, i see no discrimination rather most women have decided to limit themselves, what about the successful women, should we also say that they are also discriminated against them.[quote]

i understood what flynn said clearly, and i will write the full statement of what he wrote down."Flynn announced that the media had seriously distorted his results and went beyond his claims, revealing that he had instead discovered that the differences between men and women on one particular test, the Raven's Progressive Matrices, had become minimal in five modernised nations (whereas before 1982 women had scored significantly lower). Women, he argued, caught up to men in these nations as a result of exposure to modernity by entering the professions and being allowed greater educational access. Therefore, he claimed, when a total account of the Flynn effect is considered, women's closing the gap had moved them up in IQ slightly faster than men as a result.[quote]

My mission is not to prove I am smart, my mission is to prove that there is no smarter or dumber gender.
You are the one posting controversial links to researches that favour your claim because you want to prove you are smart.

ok, in your heart you know the truth, you must be saying to yourself, i wont back down and i wont give up until he stops.

really a repetition, the only people who critized this research are journalists not scientists
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/erasmus-university-men-more-intelligent-women-gender-sexist-science-journalists-misogyny-a7820531.html
and this what Joseph devlin said "this is a well-researched study but the evidence is not strong enough to prove that larger male brains are more intelligent than smaller female brains, which makes it a leap of faith, using a measure of general intelligence which has little basis" he further wrote that “Men and women’s brains are different and we know spatial navigation is slightly better in men than women, while women tend to have a better vocabulary.

I dont have to show you proofs, you just have to look around and see how the lefts have politicalise science and also stop fundings for researches that goes against their beliefs. even in the science world, the scientists from the left are trying hard to sell the idea that been gay is biological.

CHoccolaTE:
Please stop lying to yourself.
I most certainly do not fvcking believe men are smarter than women.
All you have done on the thread is lift quotes supporting your views from other websites and claim that my views are biased because "leftist"
Mtscheew.

The overwhelming majority of scientists have gone against your claims of male superior intelligence but you keep combing different sites to bring only controversial findings that support your views.

There are three schools of thought on gender intelligence,
Those that support male superior intelligence
Those that support female superior intelligence
And
Those that say there is no difference in gender intelligence.

You lifted some quotes from wikipedia to support your argument, in the same wikipedia did you not see the other two schools of thought?
Did you not see the part that say there is no universally accepted theory on superior male intelligence or superior female intelligence and that

Majority of scientists have argued that there are no gender differences in intelligence?



In one sentence you say the only people that disproved the Erasmus research were journalists, in another sentence you say that Joseph Devlin also criticized Erasmus research. His full name is
Prof Joseph Devlin and he is a Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience, not a journalist.



Here we go with same leftist excuse he has been using to dismiss fundings that go against his views. Leftist or no leftist, thee has always been greater male variability in IQ test scores, slightly more men passed than women and slightly more men failed IQ tests than women. .

This is the reason why if you conduct IQ tests from now till Jesus comes back, you will always get more males at the very top and also more males at the very bottom, more men failing the test than women just as more men passed.

Girls Make Higher Grades than Boys in All School Subjects, Analysis Finds

https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2014/04/girls-grades.aspx

"When then Harvard University president Lawrence Summers suggested in 2005 that innate differences between men and women may account for the lack of women in top science and engineering positions (and subsequently resigned), he was referring to the greater male variability hypothesis. Women, it holds, are on average as mathematically competent as men, but there is a greater innate spread in math ability among men. In other words, a higher proportion of men stumble mathematically, but an equally high proportion excel because of something in the way male brains develop. This supposedly explained why boys tend to dominate math competitions and why men far outnumber women in elite university math departments. Since then, scientists have put the variability hypothesis to the test, and it comes up short.

In the most ambitious study so far, mathematics professor Jonathan Kane of the University of Wisconsin–Whitewater and oncology professor Janet Mertz of the University of Wisconsin–Madison analyzed data on math performance from 52 countries, including scores from elite competitions such as the International Mathematical Olympiad. In particular, they examined variance—roughly, how spread out scores are. Two patterns emerged, they report in a paper in the January issue of the Notices of the American Mathematical Society. The first is that males’ and females’ variance is essentially equal in some countries. The other is that the ratio of males’ to females’ variance differs greatly from one country to another. These ranged from 0.91 to 1.52 (where a ratio of 1 means the two sexes’ variance is equal, and a number greater than 1 means males’ scores were more spread out than women’s).

The that males’ variance exceeds females’ in some countries but is less than females’ in others and that both range “all over the place suggests it can’t be biologically innate, unless you want to say that human genetics is different in different countries,” Mertz argues. “The vast majority of the differences between male and female performance must reflect social and cultural factors.”
One clue comes from the finding that a widely used measure of a nation’s gender equality, called the Global Gender Gap Index, correlates with the ratio of boys versus girls scoring in the top 5 percent on an international math competition called PISA. In some countries, such as the Czech Republic, the boys’ and girls’ distribution of math scores were nearly identical. Another clue that gender differences in math performance are not innate comes from the shrinking gender gap. In the U.S., the ratio of boys to girls scoring above 700 on the math SAT fell from 13:1 in the 1970s to 3:1 in the 1990s.
Psychology professor Stephen Ceci of Cornell University calls the new analysis “a very important argument” in the debate over the sources of sex differences in math careers."


This is the third research I am posting that shows that socioeconomic discrimination have negatively affected IQ test results.
This is the third one, but you keep telling yourself men are smarter because they are men.
There has always been variability in male IQ test scores right from the time of Charles Darwin and If you want to conclude that men are smarter because more men passed IQ tests then men are also more stupid because more men fail the same IQ tests.

wetdick:
@CHoccolaTE , i will advice you to openly minded search on youtube for (Yuri Bezmenov: Deception Was My Job) watch his videos and digest it, this has nothing to do with gender issues. try as much as much as possible to watch some of his lectures online and then use his experience to judge our present-day political situation

CHoccolaTE:
I have done longer with my alts

CHoccolaTE:
Yea thanks but I have better things to do with my time than to watch misogynists spouting nonsense

Daeylar:
I'm interested

CHoccolaTE:
Hehehe.

Sowiii

SourYoghurt:

Hey aunty pocohantas. I am trying to decorate my TV console and I think ornamental design will do just fine (cheap ones, my budget is 50k) and I used to see beautiful ones at the background of your pictures when you take a photograph and most importantly, I trust your opinion and judgement more(every suggestions you've made has never been wrong ). Please can you point me towards a great ID item seller, No, can you pick the ones that'll "slap" harder if I use it, I know you are very busy so I will wait as long as you want.

In addition, I am not a TV guy as I barely watch TV, I watch movies using my monitors. What can I put in the TV position as I feel like it's redundant getting a TV. I have attached a photo.

pocohantas:
Hey SY!
You crossed my mind recently. Why did you stop updating (us)? Hahaha!

They used to be affordable, 5k, 8k...until your uncle got into office and they became luxury. Going by the picture you need 6. 50k ÷ 6, hmmm, let me see. Please buy it physically in a store. You can thrift vintage pieces, small alarm clock, faux books, hour glass, even children toy cars.

By the way, Poco will do...😀 and I hope that your gf has stopped stressing you.

I am very busy these days to be honest and everything has been monotonous to an extent.

Thank you big big. I am doing great. I visited a physical store these people are calling 50k per piece. I promised to be back "soon" .

My problem is that I am in a dead town where there's nothing going on, the only thrift item here are over used "Japanese" size jeans and top and maybe old Mama bags. Nothing else. If you have anybody who's a great "lead" to get them I will really appreciate it, I would be willing to pay for shipping fee.

Okay noted. I resorted to "Aunty" because na Aunty dey pamper us with nuggets and hacks, I have learnt a lot from your post to be honest but make I no cast myself😁.

I have left that madam oh, she hold me for chest mehn, I go back to some voice message that she sent to me in the past and I can't see the difference between her and a pissed off bus conductor in Ring Road, Benin City just because I didn't pick her call(No I am not that carefree upcoming tech bro who doesn't respond to messages or calls) or press funds for food and data.

A few days ago I was checking my archive, I saw that she sent a message saying she missed me and she knows that I miss her too that we should be friends. Friends and miss me ke, I no dey keep exes as friends, that's something I have resolved to do(I know this might sound controversial) I don't think I have trained my mind to the point where I can just bounce without any bit of residual attachment so I don't want to be coming back.

My friend who knew about us said[b]: I treat her more than what's she worth[/b]. But bro didn't even fill me in.

SourYoghurt:


I am very busy these days to be honest and everything has been monotonous to an extent.

Thank you big big. I am doing great. I visited a physical store these people are calling 50k per piece. I promised to be back "soon" .

My problem is that I am in a dead town where there's nothing going on, the only thrift item here are over used "Japanese" size jeans and top and maybe old Mama bags. Nothing else. If you have anybody who's a great "lead" to get them I will really appreciate it, I would be willing to pay for shipping fee.

Okay noted. I resorted to "Aunty" because na Aunty dey pamper us with nuggets and hacks, I have learnt a lot from your post to be honest but make I no cast myself😁.

I have left that madam oh, she hold me for chest mehn, I go back to some voice message that she sent to me in the past and I can't see the difference between her and a pissed off bus conductor in Ring Road, Benin City just because I didn't pick her call(No I am not that carefree upcoming tech bro who doesn't respond to messages or calls) or press funds for food and data.

A few days ago I was checking my archive, I saw that she sent a message saying she missed me and she knows that I miss her too that we should be friends. Friends and miss me ke, I no dey keep exes as friends, that's something I have resolved to do(I know this might sound controversial) I don't think I have trained my mind to the point where I can just bounce without any bit of residual attachment so I don't want to be coming back.

My friend who knew about us said[b]: I treat her more than what's she worth[/b]. But bro didn't even fill me in.

pocohantas:
Nahhhhhhh! It is not as expensive as 50k each o. It has been a while I bought them, but I would check the vendors I used to buy from and send your way.

I can imagine how monotonous it must be in that town of yours. Some of us always have something going on to write about. Pretty eventful lives, lol! Some others are just minding their business.

She should remain in the past. I always recommend people go for someone with as much stake as them. I am not a preacher of Disney love. The least your woman can do is support you and show-up in her own way. But then, people have different needs in a partner, so I don't impose. Next time, stay woke. I believe you have done well for yourself to be entangled with a Ring-road-inspired-gf.

One day one day I go see/know wetin you done learn. I will quote you with the vendors before Friday, please. 🙏🙏

SourYoghurt:
Thank you very very much, I appreciate!!!

pocohantas:
Hey SY!
NL bot banned me, so I had to screenshot the post. I hope it helps...