₦airaland Forum

We aren't hearing the update on this arrogant lady today as I expect her supporters to have stations at the entrance of the national assemble singing before her arrival now. What changes ?

This woman will walk into a trap. The senate has not recalled her. She's not the enforcer of court judgement.

Person wey dem wan use do suya wey go pour oil ontop herself.

She better sit at home and let the senate formally recall her otherwise na for Kuje she go chop lunch

The Lady has humiliated Akpabio and his wife so badly that it's time to let them settle.
Akpabio will not do it again to any married woman

Wallade:
Really!

Stop being confused and uninformed. It is okay if you don't know much about legal proceedings, just ask about what you don't understand so it can be explained to you.

The judgement is out already.

The judge must have read the judgement out to everyone listening in the court on that day.

Upon the final judgement, both parties lawyers can request for the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the judgement, by applying to court to print and issue the CTC copy to them, for them to study and understand the extent of the judgement and determine if an appeal is needed or accept the judgement.

The unsatisfied party has 3 months to appeal the judgement after which the judgement becomes binding on both parties.

Point of information: the judgement is pronounced and out already. It is the CTC that the parties involved can apply for subsequently.

However, from that brief that you probably read, what did you deduce?

Or would you want to laugh at your own ignorance and ineptitude now?

Lol, you that dont know anything want to teach someone that is more intelligent, schooled and informed than you.

Its the audacity for me.

Let me take a little time to educate you, Judges don't necessarily need to read out all the judgement, they could give a summary of the judgment and then release the copy of the full judgment later which was what happened in this case. You are not informed and you don't want to admit that you are not.

Yes, the full judgement is not out, and that is why parties are contemplating on the exact thing that the judgment stated, they are not sure yet until they get hold of the judgement which of course includes what the judge considered to give judgment. This is the interview by the Lawyer of Natasha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVSWhUePhLk, this is the interview on channels between Senate lawyer and Natasha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvNrenAJYGE

Both lawyers are not 100% certain of what the judgement is because it was only a recap in court.

Olumaeme:
Lol, you that dont know anything want to teach someone that is more intelligent, schooled and informed than you.

Its the audacity for me.

Let me take a little time to educate you, Judges don't necessarily need to read out all the judgement, they could give a summary of the judgment and then release the copy of the full judgment later which was what happened in this case. You are not informed and you don't want to admit that you are not.

Yes, the full judgement is not out, and that is why parties are contemplating on the exact thing that the judgment stated, they are not sure yet until they get hold of the judgement which of course includes what the judge considered to give judgment. This is the interview by the Lawyer of Natasha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVSWhUePhLk, this is the interview on channels between Senate lawyer and Natasha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvNrenAJYGE

Both lawyers are not 100% certain of what the judgement is because it was only a recap in court.

I can bet you have never been to court room before and you don't even have a lawyer that advises you on legal matters. That explains your ignorance and ineptitude.

To make your situation even more ridiculous, you are on nairaland trying to prove that you are knowledgeable on legal matters but it is so obvious that you are shallow in the mind and know little or nothing about basic processes in litigation matters.

Okay back to the matter that you are trying to dodge.

What do you understand by the summary or brief of the judgement that you have seen or read.

Please quote the source of your summary version.

Don't dodge this one, if you do then you should shut up on this matter going forward.

Moreover, your madam Natasha Apoti did not show up at the Senate as promised yesterday. Did she start to reason properly owing to some brain reset or.......

Ometere1978:
the apology is to the court and not the Senate or akpabio.
The same applies to the #5m, she understand the judgement better and she will do the needful

I thought you'd escort her to the National Assembly yesterday.

E be like say you never get problem with "GOVERNMENT" before.

Wallade:
I can bet you have never been to court room before and you don't even have a lawyer that advises you on legal matters. That explains your ignorance and ineptitude.

To make your situation even more ridiculous, you are on nairaland trying to prove that you are knowledgeable on legal matters but it is so obvious that you are shallow in the mind and know little or nothing about basic processes in litigation matters.

Okay back to the matter that you are trying to dodge.

What do you understand by the summary or brief of the judgement that you have seen or read.

Please quote the source of your summary version.

Don't dodge this one, if you do then you should shut up on this matter going forward.

Moreover, your madam Natasha Apoti did not show up at the Senate as promised yesterday. Did she start to reason properly owing to some brain reset or.......

Madam Natsaha has since resumed her duties. She does not necessarily need to go the National Assembly, wherever she is, she is a senator, recognized by law, No permission required from internet urchins like you. She has already defeated you and your lords, and she maybe need to drink some water on the victory as you people go about to bury your heads in shame.

The matter was clear from the beginning, legal intellectuals like us already know where the pendulum will swing and yes, what the court said was not surprising at all.

As i have been schooling you, the judgement is not out, the judge only gave a recap which is not all clear but what is certain is that Natasha is going back to the senate and urchins have been put to shame. What more evidence are you looking for, this is how you people fail your exams, i have posted a video of the lawyers of both National Assembly and Natasha on National TV, what evidence are you looking for. They confirmed it was a summary as i said, but you are still arguing. Please learn to pause, listen when smart people are talking so you can pick one or two things to enrich yourself, don't be proud.

Natsaha has defeated your bosses, That is the most important thing.

flexyrule:
I thought you'd escort her to the National Assembly yesterday.

E be like say you never get problem with "GOVERNMENT" before.

it doesn't make any differences.
She is performing her duties to the people of KC.
check her projects flag off last week to her constituency

epainos:
Na you go bounce her after a court has reinstated her? Go bounce her na.

She attempted to enter last week and she was bounced and heavens did not fall.

Next!

Olumaeme:
Madam Natsaha has since resumed her duties. She does not necessarily need to go the National Assembly, wherever she is, she is a senator, recognized by law, No permission required from internet urchins like you. She has already defeated you and your lords, and she maybe need to drink some water on the victory as you people go about to bury your heads in shame.

The matter was clear from the beginning, legal intellectuals like us already know where the pendulum will swing and yes, what the court said was not surprising at all.

As i have been schooling you, the judgement is not out, the judge only gave a recap which is not all clear but what is certain is that Natasha is going back to the senate and urchins have been put to shame. What more evidence are you looking for, this is how you people fail your exams, i have posted a video of the lawyers of both National Assembly and Natasha on National TV, what evidence are you looking for. They confirmed it was a summary as i said, but you are still arguing. Please learn to pause, listen when smart people are talking so you can pick one or two things to enrich yourself, don't be proud.

Natsaha has defeated your bosses, That is the most important thing.

Shebi she don go and them pursue am.

Na people like una dey deceive that woman.

After this election cycle the will go into political oblivion, you can quote me on that!

MarkNsukkaBread:
Shebi she don go and them pursue am.

Na people like una dey deceive that woman.

After this election cycle the will go into political oblivion, you can quote me on that!

So, you support politics of witch haunting?

Olumaeme:
So, you support politics of witch haunting?

Who is witch hunting her?

Is she not the one throwing baseless accusations around?

When things were good between her and Akpabio and she was getting favours ahead of more ranking senators she did not complain, immediately she fell out with him the first thing she did was to accuse him of sexual harassment without a single shred of evidence!

Most of you people supporting her are only doing so because you hate Tinubu therefore you will support anything you feel will contribute to destabilizing his government!