₦airaland Forum

Nickshrapnel:
Have you forgotten Hulk has been nerfed to professor hulk in the mcu?

BlackManta:
Brand new day.

Brand new suit.

A much darker and serious film...(my answered prayers).

Yeah I'm excited.

This is the only Marvel movie I'm looking forward to next year, yes I know there's an Avengers movie coming but nothing about that excites me as much this.

Samistry2:
You dey fall for them dark and serious bait?

abduleez1:
Sheesh..... Fantastic Drop. 👀🌚

oyaskii:
The next Avengers movie is the utmost litmus test for this franchise, even that is on shaking legs, i mean they got so spooked that they had to cast a beloved hero in the successful period, as a villain, just to got some sort of fan service going... doesn't bode well at all.

Nickshrapnel:
Spideman will do okay

Nickshrapnel:
Spideman will do okay

oyaskii:
That period after "Endgame" (2019), when Kevin Fiege was greenliting every slop that came through his doors, did irreparable damage to the MCU, i mean filth like "She Hulk", "Secret Wars" and Antman: Qantumlovmbiaxx and The Marvels were their response to as a follow up to a hugely successive period, so people just got tired of shît, so it's no surprises that the wave for their slops, dwindles after opening weekend.

The next Avengers movie is the utmost litmus test for this franchise, even that is on shaking legs, i mean they got so spooked that they had to cast a beloved hero in the successful period, as a villain, just to got some sort of fan service going... doesn't bode well at all.

DieRich5:
I’m happy for DC, it’s been long back to back losing anyway 99% sure dem ain’t topping next year

oyaskii:
That period after "Endgame" (2019), when Kevin Fiege was greenliting every slop that came through his doors, did irreparable damage to the MCU, i mean filth like "She Hulk", "Secret Wars" and Antman: Qantumlovmbiaxx and The Marvels were their response to as a follow up to a hugely successive period, so people just got tired of shît, so it's no surprises that the wave for their slops, dwindles after opening weekend.

The next Avengers movie is the utmost litmus test for this franchise, even that is on shaking legs, i mean they got so spooked that they had to cast a beloved hero in the successful period, as a villain, just to got some sort of fan service going... doesn't bode well at all.

DieRich5:
I’m happy for DC, it’s been long back to back losing anyway 99% sure dem ain’t topping next year

DieRich5:
I’m happy for DC, it’s been long back to back losing anyway 99% sure dem ain’t topping next year

abduleez1:
From Dusk Till Dawn......3/10

Premium trashy 90s vampire fare. The most ridiculous and hideous looking Vamps I've ever seen. If they were tagged werewolves I would be more agreeable. Slow vampire, weak ass punks with the strength of a child. Ridiculous power scaling that people who just turned vampires several minutes ago could even have more strength than people who've been Vampires for far longer time and even years of vampirehood.

Trashy watch and mostly unbearable to watch. Asides the slight ridiculous comedy, it was gratuitously USELESS.

The first half of the film was the good part. The second half just descended onto shambolic comedic fare. The fun parts of the film was when Quentin Tarantino was still on-screen and the scene he wrote for himself "feet" Salma Hayek.

The third act just totally spoils the whole thing going on. Classic example of a movie, so bad it's good. I would have scored it better but the silliness was just too much to bear at the final 30mins.

It's actually funny watching this now and remembering hearing people say SINNERS plagiarized from this. The only thing they share are a few surface level similarities. While SINNERS was refined and methodical and a far better film it's even nonsensical to compare both, this one just excels in shittiness and not taking itself too seriously.
How different can they be?

joseph1832:
Seriously?

Anyway, if I watched this particular movie now, I probably would have rated it the same way you just did. But, seeing as I watched it back when DBN Night Shift was in vogue, I must have to tell you: guy, you fvck up for this your rating. Lol

abduleez1:
From Dusk Till Dawn......3/10

Premium trashy 90s vampire fare. The most ridiculous and hideous looking Vamps I've ever seen. If they were tagged werewolves I would be more agreeable. Slow vampire, weak ass punks with the strength of a child. Ridiculous power scaling that people who just turned vampires several minutes ago could even have more strength than people who've been Vampires for far longer time and even years of vampirehood.

Trashy watch and mostly unbearable to watch. Asides the slight ridiculous comedy, it was gratuitously USELESS.

The first half of the film was the good part. The second half just descended onto shambolic comedic fare. The fun parts of the film was when Quentin Tarantino was still on-screen and the scene he wrote for himself "feet" Salma Hayek.

The third act just totally spoils the whole thing going on. Classic example of a movie, so bad it's good. I would have scored it better but the silliness was just too much to bear at the final 30mins.

It's actually funny watching this now and remembering hearing people say SINNERS plagiarized from this. The only thing they share are a few surface level similarities. While SINNERS was refined and methodical and a far better film it's even nonsensical to compare both, this one just excels in shittiness and not taking itself too seriously.
How different can they be?

abduleez1:
TF is with this guy's face....

Omo see beauty ...😍😍

joseph1832:
Seriously?

Anyway, if I watched this particular movie now, I probably would have rated it the same way you just did. But, seeing as I watched it back when DBN Night Shift was in vogue, I must have to tell you: guy, you fvck up for this your rating. Lol

abduleez1:
Yeah, maybe the times we watched ours may be a key differential.....but still quality shines through nonetheless. I might not enjoy something but I can appreciate the qualities and technicalities it took to bring something to life.

But this? This is pure trash. Maybe I would have enjoyed it the time it came out but that doesn't excuse it from being subpar at best.

I've watched 1950s movies older than Nigeria as a country itself and they were some of the best thing I've ever seen. But this? Nah.... This is just objectively rubbish guilty pleasure.

abduleez1:
Yeah, maybe the times we watched ours may be a key differential.....but still quality shines through nonetheless. I might not enjoy something but I can appreciate the qualities and technicalities it took to bring something to life.

But this? This is pure trash. Maybe I would have enjoyed it the time it came out but that doesn't excuse it from being subpar at best.

I've watched 1950s movies older than Nigeria as a country itself and they were some of the best thing I've ever seen. But this? Nah.... This is just objectively rubbish guilty pleasure.

armadeo:
Exactly.