U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says - Foreign Affairs (6) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Foreign Affairs › U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says (21168 Views)
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by CaseSensitive(m): 10:12am On Aug 02, 2025*. Modified: 11:04am On Aug 02, 2025 |
Chienex24:So let me get this straight, you’re calling Putin a coward for reacting to NATO’s encroachment, but you’re perfectly fine with the U.S. crossing red lines it explicitly promised not to? Ukraine may have handed over its nukes, but it also willingly became a pawn in a geopolitical chess game, choosing to align with a bloc that has a proven history of regime change, proxy wars, and broken promises. You say, “fight the U.S. or NATO” as if that’s some casual bar fight and not a potential nuclear Armageddon. That’s not cowardice, that’s called realpolitik, something your cheerleader logic clearly doesn’t grasp. Russia is actually fighting NATO through Ukraine. You grab that? No? Ukraine wasn’t attacked for “allying” with the West. It was armed, trained, and baited by the West, while NATO expanded inch by inch toward Russian borders, knowing full well it would provoke a response. If you poke the bear long enough and place missiles near its den, don’t act shocked when it roars. And by the way, Russia is struggling to defeat Ukraine? Really? With what? Western arms, satellite intel, and $100+ billion in NATO funding? That’s not weakness on Russia’s part, that’s proof Ukraine isn’t even fighting its own war anymore. It’s a proxy war, and everyone knows it. Ukraine is just the stage, the real players are in Brussels and Washington. Call it cowardice if that helps you sleep at night, but what you’re really describing is a global power dynamic, not a playground brawl. This ain't no Wizkid FC vs 30BG gang. If you know little or nothing about history and geopolitics, there's a plastic chair for you at the back, the very back. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Johncarlo07: 10:33am On Aug 02, 2025 |
lightwind:Small boy wit small brain 🤣🤣🤣 U expoused exactly wat I said d Oda tym "children full Nairaland 🤣🤣. D same USA wit ova 33 trillion dollars debt? Wu are dose dying to join d USA military. Mercenaries soldiers are everywhere! As long as u can pay dem, dey will join nd fight for u. Tell me any warfare instruments d USA has, dat Russia doesn't. U tink it's by coming online flexing ur muscle u av d best military in d world, yet ur recent military adventures in Afghanistan, Yemen, Vietnam, Libya etc ended in a mess, even wit allied supports. Russians dnt brag. Dey fight silently, nd re very dogged fighters. Let ur USA attack dem first let's c. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by JuanDeDios: 10:53am On Aug 02, 2025 |
Chienex24:
|
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Zeebuy: 10:55am On Aug 02, 2025 |
lightwind:You do realize the only reason why NATO (which is a conglomeration of 20+ countries) was formed was to counter USSR, which is now Russia? If the US of A is as strong as you think it is, why do they have to gather other strong countries? Let me tell you something; the Russian military is among the top 3 strongest militaries on the planet. Even the USA knows not to mess with them |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by mp3ree: 12:34pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
enoks:You that's knowledgable ,are submarines stationary military weapons? |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by TenQ: 1:29pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
mfm04622:How do you know? They were rehearsing for Taiwan BUT Siberia panther more. Russia is now weak, it is just the right time for them to take action. mfm04622:Yes! But no difference. China has been building their Army. USA is their standard. mfm04622:China is number three, They want number ONE With Russia overspent, China is now number TWO If China gets Siberia, they have all the Oil USA can use to sanction them. They will become militarily much stronger! |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Mattswaggz: 1:34pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
JuanDeDios:What is he doing to the country?. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Mattswaggz: 1:36pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
Empresa:Hollywood fanboy. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Leonardo4(m): 1:46pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
WritterNg:Keep quiet they have almost the same number of submarines |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by WritterNg: 1:49pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
Leonardo4:Shut your trap. Russia has more Submarines. Russia has commissioned more submarines the last 2 years than the US has in 6 years. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Chienex24(m): 3:09pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
CaseSensitive:All you do is to throw tantrums like a child without making any point. Why is your lord Putin doing business with India that is obviously more aligned to the west than him? Oh I forgot, India is a powerful country too!! Turkey too that is double faced once shot down a Russian fighter jet that crossed its borders. What did Russia do? Nothing!! Why? Oh I forgot too, Turkey is also a powerful nation. My point is Countries have the right to choose who they want as friends or do business with, period!! If your definition of global power dynamics is to war weaker nations and grab their lands when they choose who their friends are, then you should bear in mind how it ended for the "almighty" Hitler. His approach was all shades of wrong, to kill thousands of innocent living peaceful in their homes because their leaders chose the west, not him. He is obviously not smart enough. I am waiting for him to also invade Finland and Sweden, more stable countries who are very much close to his borders because of his reckless action and are now officially NATO members!! And lest I forget, I thought Russia always threatened the West with nuclear weapons, I didn't know Putin is afraid of nuclear Armageddon. He actually should not be afraid, but rather face his enemies l, the USA and NATO, head on, not some innocent country to prove a point!! Lastly No one armed and trained Ukraine!! That is a hogwash you rushed to believe!! If it is about war, the west have enough friends close to Russia borders already without Ukraine. They have weapons pointed to the east and west of Russia since the cold war. Putin did not like the outcome of the last election that brought zelensky, who is more aligned to the west and he used it as a pretext to war with Ukraine so as to bring his main objective, which is to take charge of Ukraine rich mineral resources and bring back the Soviet Republic in the long run, period!! |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Empresa: 3:12pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
Mattswaggz:How many times have you seen US come out to display a new weapon or test it publicly? I'm sure many of your likes don't know the US have a Bunker buster until it surfaced against Iran. Let me allow you to live in your Dreamland until your Russia bites more than it can chew. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by lightwind(m): 3:35pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
Johncarlo07:Then go and join the Russian military i wan check something. Bro Russia is nothing close to USA. The Americans have gone far very far in terms military might and power name them. Just forget all those Vietnam, Afghanistan wars you people always come up with everytime we talk about USA military might etc |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by lightwind(m): 3:41pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
Empresa:No mind them o.... They didn't even have any clue weda USA has bunker busters untill they used it on Iranian nuclear facilities. 😀😀. Everytime de go de hype Russia, Russia weh follow USSR fall... Nothing is in Russia, they're still living the life of 1940-1950s while USA have gone very far in life. Na just China de push de grow de wan be like USA but they still have long way to go.... How many people from all over the world are willing to join the Russian federation military or how many people from all over the world is willing to join the Chinese military ? None. But check USA military members, they all citizens from different countries of the world. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by CaseSensitive(m): 3:47pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
Chienex24:So now you’ve shifted from calling Russia a coward to admitting it doesn’t act recklessly toward powerful countries. That’s not cowardice, that’s strategic calculus. It’s called power balancing, not “tantrums,” but I wouldn’t expect someone who sees the world as Disney vs. villains to understand that. Yes, Russia does business with India and Turkey, both countries that maintain strategic autonomy and don’t blindly follow what the West dictates. India buys Russian oil, weapons, and even partners with BRICS, that’s hardly the behaviour of a “Western-aligned puppet.” Turkey? A NATO member that blocked Sweden’s entry for months, bought Russian S-400 missiles, and is playing both sides to its advantage. You just proved my point: sovereignty means picking sides in your own interest, something Ukraine forfeited when it turned itself into a frontline for NATO. Now, let’s talk about your ridiculous Hitler comparison. Hitler sought global domination, exterminated millions based on race, and launched invasions without provocation. Comparing that to Russia reacting to 30 years of NATO expansion and military encirclement is not just historically lazy, it’s intellectually dishonest. You also said: “Nobody armed and trained Ukraine.” Do you actually know anything at all, apart from cheerleading? The U.S. and UK trained Ukrainian forces for years, look up Operation UNIFIER (Canada), Joint Multinational Training Group-Ukraine (U.S.), and the billions in arms, way before 2022 when Russia invaded Ukraine. If that’s hogwash, it’s publicly documented hogwash. As for Putin’s objectives, was it mineral resources, or was it nostalgia for the Soviet Union? You can’t even pick one, you’re that confused. You repeat headlines, no analysis. The truth is Russia’s red lines were ignored, NATO called its bluff, and now we’re watching the fallout of Western overreach and Eastern resolve. That’s not about liking Zelensky or not (Even though Putin bore personal hatred for the comedian-turned-president) it’s about strategic depth and national security, the same logic the U.S. used in Cuba in 1962. (If you know anything about history). So yes, countries can pick their friends but choices have consequences, especially when those friends are installing missile systems, biolabs, and troops near your borders. If you can’t grasp that, then sit back in that plastic chair at the back where “CLUELESS” sign is at. While at it, grab a book, start with a history one. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Johncarlo07: 5:04pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
lightwind:Mtchewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!! |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by lightwind(m): 10:48pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
Johncarlo07:Go join Russian military |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Amayabor1: 11:06pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
WritterNg:You make me laugh so much. Speak facts please. This is not Hollywood. Lol. The last time Russia sent a submarine to Cuba was in June 2024. The US was informed beforehand and the submarines carried no nuclear weapons. (It was a nuclear powered submarine, but not nuclear armed). The previous visit of a Russian submarine to Cuba was in 2008. 16 years later (2024) was when they sent another submarine to Cuba. Saying Russia submarines have been docking in Cuba is a lie 😅🤣. Have you read of the Cuban missile crisis? I will give you a summary. USSR chickened out of a confrontation with the US. They hurriedly removed every weapons they have placed in Cuba. Ever since then, Russia hasn't placed any weapons in Cuba. Maybe you don't realize Nato's border with Russia increased last year when Finland and Sweden joined Nato. The US has Russia encircled. The US submarines are more in number, more advanced with stealth, more payload than their Russian counterparts. What if I tell you that before Trump and his loud mouth, the US constantly has submarines that encircles Russia and China. One got damaged some years ago while patrolling the south China Sea undetected close to China. It put great fear in the minds of the Chinese. Funny enough, I went to YouTube for something else and I saw an interview Bolton (former national security adviser to Trump in his first term) did with CNN few hours ago. Listen to the interview here. Just listen to the first 3:05 minutes of the video. Mind you, Bolton and Trump are enemies o. So you don't think he is saying this to hype Trump. He stated reality. The US has Russia encircled and Russia knows this. The reason they want to prevent more encirclement by saying Ukraine can't join Nato. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VytpOgHKxiI?si=BEMvYHt1cjbWZhpH |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Amayabor1: 11:09pm On Aug 02, 2025 |
WritterNg:Let's not derail the discuss with two many talk here and there. We are on which country have more advanced warheads. Just mention me once and I will respond. No need mentioning me 4 times. It makes responding to your points difficult. I will discuss all other things you said, but let me start with this. Now, you seem not to understand the difference between when a weapon system was developed and upgrades of such systems. For example, the B 52 bomber was introduced in 1955. From that time till now, the bomber fleet has undergone numerous upgrades in avionics, weapons payload, engines, radar systems etc. So, if you assume because the b52 bomber was introduced in 1955, it is no longer relevant in today's warfare, you would be mistaken. So, I will list old ussr era nuclear weapons that are still in active service today and you tell me what advanced upgrades have been made. Also, we are talking about land based systems now. When we are done, we will talk about air based (nuclear bombers) and sea based (submarines) and compare between the US and Russia. 1. US B-61: it came in the 1960s but it has undergone so many upgrades. There is a newer and more advanced version (the B61-12). This one comes with precision guidance. It is a more advanced nuclear weapons 2. B-83: you are mentioning this. Lol. As a matter of fact, the US is planning on replacing the B-83 because it is too powerful. You mentioned the Tsar bomb. Lol. Do you know that the Tsar bomb wasn't a practical bomb?. They just made a large bomb and detonated it. Lol. It was too large and too heavy for military use. It also showed the US that those kind of large bombs can't be used for military purposes. It shows you the mentality of the 2 countries. One created a bomb they can't use, detonated it while the other only test bombs they know they will use. The B-41 was the most powerful nuclear bomb the US built. It was in military service (unlike Russia's Tsar bomb). Even at that, it had to be retired and replaced with smaller, more effective bombs. So, that Russia detonated the Tsar bomb is of no military advantage in today's warfare. Even Russia saw they can't really use it in combat. Na just detonate am, video am and use am show off. It didn't and doesn't give Russia any military edge or advantage over the US. The US can even develop a more powerful bomb than the Tsar bomb. But what's the need? Detonate it, video it, and show it to the world as a show off? Lol. Why would they do that when they are already the world's number 1 military power. Who they want try convince? You? 😁 |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by WritterNg: 3:18pm On Aug 03, 2025 |
Amayabor1:US Minuteman missiles are silo (land) based. And what makes you think the US will upgrade their nuclear missiles/bombs and Russia wouldn't? Russia we know, regularly upgrades their missile platforms. The Tsar bomba is the most powerful nuclear weapon detonated in history. Go and argue with the scientists who recorded the seismic data on their seismometer. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Mattswaggz: 4:05pm On Aug 03, 2025 |
Empresa:Lol, it's only people like u who aren't updated that doesn't know that US has bunker busters. All you typed here erks of a brainwashed Hollywood fanboy mentality.....so according to your logic, US is the only country that might have secret top class weapons while every other country is displaying their own right. .Secondly, no matter how advanced a country is weapons wise so far they haven't gotten what can easily repel nuclear weapons or reverse their effects significantly then they're yet to achieve anything of weight when they're up against a nuclear arm state in a do or die conflict. Seek informations on both sides and from every angle and stop spewing thrash. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Empresa: 5:30pm On Aug 03, 2025 |
Mattswaggz:You make me laff. You're the one who really needs to make findings not me. Pray Russia bites more than it can chew then you will understand modern warfare is way beyond using GPRS to navigate in Ukraine. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Amayabor1: 3:39am On Aug 04, 2025 |
WritterNg:You are stating what is not part of the argument. Nobody said US Minuteman missiles (MMM) are not land based. Even the MMM have received advanced upgrades. Nobody said the Tsar bomb was not the most powerful nuclear weapon detonated in history. The summary of what I want you to know is this; 1. When it comes to nuclear weapons, the US beats Russia in nuclear weapons that are more advanced and precised. It is not about detonating the most powerful nuclear bomb that you can't use today. How advanced and precise are Russia's nuclear weapons? 2. Under the sea, the US has more deadly and more powerful submarines (all nuclear powered) than Russia. 3. In the air, the US is the only country that has stealth nuclear bombers (the B-2). And a new nuclear bomber (B-21 raider) to replace the B-2 is underway. All these are not up for debate. They are facts that even Russia knows. When it comes to conventional warfare, the US beats Russia hands down; advanced fighter jets, nuclear powered aircraft carriers and surface battle ships. When it comes to encirclement, the US has been encircling Russia since the days of USSR. There are constant nuclear submarines under the sea that are at striking distance from Russia. The US has access to land and sea through Nato that are very close to Russia. This is why they will do anything not to allow Ukraine join Nato because the encirclement is now too much for them. Did you read about the Cuban missile crisis? Even with all of these, there is a current 1.5 trillion dollars nuclear weapons modernisation program going on in the US as we speak. Can't even delve into this here. However, the only area Russia is ahead of the US is in hypersonic missiles. Even at that, the US army long range hypersonic weapon, the navy's conventional prompt strike and the airforce hypersonic attack crusie missile are all expected to enter service in 2027. Let's be sincere with ourselves. Russia doesn't have the kind of money US has to spend on their military. Imagine Iran helping Russia with drones to fight Ukraine. 🤣😅. North Korea helping with soldiers. 😅🤣. If not for nuclear weapons, Russia wouldn't be in a discussion where military might is being discussed. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by WritterNg: 8:01am On Aug 04, 2025*. Modified: 8:41am On Aug 04, 2025 |
Amayabor1:You were born this morning. Russia has been a world power since the 1500's. Long before the US was even discovered. Russia is an ancient power that has existed in different forms and shapes. Russia have fought and won world powers in Europe before the founders of the US were even born. Sweden was a world power, Russia fought them in the 1700's and won. Sweden lost their world power status that day and present day St Petersburg in Russia was annexed from Sweden. Napoleon and France were the number 1 powers in the world... They challenged Russia and lost. France lost it's super power that day. Hitler had a formidable war machine. Unstoppable and brutal.... until they faced the Russians and lost. Nazi Germany was thoroughly stripped of its power and identity. The bloodiest and biggest war in human history. Russia defeated and occupied them for decades. The US got involved 2 years after the war started. After the Nazis have already been weakened by the Russians. In any of these battles, mention one where Russia had to win with Nukes. You think Nukes are what analysts use to judge military might? Russia/USSR was number one world power during the cold war, even before nukes existed. Imagine the US losing to goat herders in Afghanistan despite the entire backing of 32 NATO Nations. They still lost after 20 years of fighting. How is their "powerful" military faring against the ragtag rebel Houthi groups. Last I heard they were chased out of the Red Sea and the Houthis blockade the Red Sea. Ignorance is the only reason why you equate military budget to true power. The US spends over $2 trillion on it's military yearly. So why haven't they been able to figure out hypersonic weapons? Something Iran, North Korea and even poor Houthis have been using for years now. We saw these hypersonic weapons on display against Israel. More than 80% of the so called trillion dollar defense budgets goes to the top brass defense contractors pockets and also used in servicing their 800 bases worldwide. They have even admitted it themselves. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by WritterNg: 8:20am On Aug 04, 2025 |
Amayabor1:I bet you've never head of Russia's S-70 Okhotnik-B heavy stealth bomber drone. A super secretive project. Has longer range and better specs than the B-21 Raider. In terms of conventional warfare, Russia will beat the US hands down. Russia has a diverse array of missiles and systems. The US will have no breathing space to deploy troops or even land aircrafts or carriers. They'll get blown off before they even take off. No country possesses more conventional missiles than Russia. Russia has invested so much in long range missiles that they would sit right at home and deliver devastating strikes on US cities. While US will be scrambling jets here and there. Before those jets refuel and takeoff, Russia would have flattened 2 or 3 cities. Let's not even talk about the time it takes to maintain those jets. And currently Russia is producing over 3 million Kamikaze drones per year. These are battle tested drones that are currently being used in Ukraine. Russia is currently producing more weapons in 3 months than the entire NATO alliance is producing in a year. Look it up. You have no idea who the Russians are. They were made for this. War. They've only known war and nothing else. A country that lost 27 million people and still became the world's most powerful country is who you think will be a pushover. Hahahahaha. You'll learn a brutal lesson. The only advantage the US has against Russia is aircraft carrier and we both know those are easy targets. Sitting ducks waiting to be blown to bit. One strike and the US will lose both an aircraft carrier and 20 fighter jets all at once. Will you be the one to tell the Russians not to use the Tsar bomba in a war? Or what kind of backward reasoning is that? The Tsar bomba was even adjusted to 50 megatons because the Russians feared the fallout and destruction would be devastating and uncontrollable. That was 60 years ago. Imagine what they have now. And how they've perfected it. Even at the height of the cold war, Russia had over 60,000 nuclear bombs while the US had about 30,000 or so. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by WritterNg: 8:33am On Aug 04, 2025 |
Amayabor1:Let me even add that the enriched uranium the US needs to build more nukes or even maintain old ones are supplied by Russia till this day. A country that supplies nearly half the world enriched uranium is who you think will be lacking in Nukes?? All these 5000 nukes bla bla are just guesses. Nobody knows the true amount in Russia's arsenal and that's what scares the west. A country that produces and supplies vast amounts of enriched uranium and nuclear fuel cannot have less or equal nukes to countries that don't. |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Amayabor1: 9:45am On Aug 04, 2025 |
WritterNg:Just running to goggle to pick up information that you don't even understand. First, I never said Russia is lacking in Nukes. Neither did I say Russia has 5000 nukes. Russia is a major supplier of enriched uranium to US for U.S. civilian nuclear power reactors. Do you understand this? There are many privately owned nuclear power plants in the US. In fact, most of the nuclear power plants in the US are privately owned and operated. They are used to generate electricity. They are the ones that import enriched uranium from Russia for their nuclear reactors for electricity generation. When it comes to nuclear bombs, the type of uranium used is highly enriched uranium (HEU). The US doesn't import HEU from any country for security reasons. They have large stock of Uranium. That you don't know the difference between HEU and other low enriched uranium used for civilian purposes shows you don't even know what you are talking about. And I even thought I was engaging with someone who was knowledgeable in this area. First it was lies about Russian submarines freqently docking in cuba. I had to prove that it is a lie. Now this. Fronting as though he knows something whereas he knows nothing. Lol Bye!
|
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by WritterNg: 10:26am On Aug 04, 2025*. Modified: 4:00pm On Aug 04, 2025 |
Amayabor1:Keyword "Specifically". Meaning not necessarily for military. Could be for civilian use too. They did not deny the fact that they import enriched uranium for military. They just said that's not the only reason they're imported. The screenshot you provided proves me right. Highly enriched uranium which Russia supplies is what is needed to make bombs.
|
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Mattswaggz: 11:18am On Aug 04, 2025 |
Empresa:Lol, this brainwashing is too strong....you mean the same modern warfare we've seen in Afghanistan,Vietnam or which one's. .If they're as good as you claimed they wouldn't made a direct attack on Russia together with the EU since the tenure of Biden but they were scared....they were even warning Ukraine not to strike deep into Russia with weapons they made provision of.....the days of western propaganda are over, go and feed those tales to kids in ur environment. . |
| Re: U.S Deploys 2 Submarines Near Russia After Ex-President Comments - Trump Says by Amayabor1: 5:05pm On Aug 04, 2025 |
WritterNg:Bro, stop the lies. Acknowledge you were wrong and move on. This was what you said just few hours ago. You said the enriched uranium the US needs to build more nukes or maintain old ones are supplied by Russia till this day. I already showed you that the type of enriched uranium the US imports from Russia is the type used for civilian nuclear reactors to generate electricity by private companies that operate nuclear power plants in the US. The highly enriched uranium the US use in making nukes are produced locally in the US. They are not imported. Why you shifting the goal post and lying like this. Omon. Accept you lied and move on. Russia doesn't supply the US Highly enriched uranium (HEU). You can't read? You didn't even know about HEU until I said it. You thought enriched uranium is what is used to make nukes. As for the second Picture. I already told you Russian submarine docked in cuba in June 2024. The US were informed well ahead before the submarine visited Cuba and the submarine wasn't carrying any nuclear weapons. Russia has no weapons systems permanently sitting in Cuba waiting to strike the US in the event of a war. But the US do have close to Russia. Na wa o
|
18 North Korean Soldiers Arrested In Russia After Deserting • 5 Most Powerful Submarines In The World (Photos) • Why France Is Angry About The US And UK Giving Australia Nuclear Submarines • 2 • 3 • 4
Wikipedia Now Banned In China, As It Affect All Languages • Trump Directs All Federal Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Staff to be put on Leave • Foreigners Targeted In Massive Police Raid In South Africa
.
.