₦airaland Forum

Kaliningrad:
Trump Offers Putin Alaska’s Rare Earth Minerals In Exchange For Ending War


Telegraph UK || Pravda Ukraine

Chubhie:
Trump belongs to the theatre. Putin has learnt not to be deceived again. Russia position remains unchanged. If Europe and America continue to play hardball, it will eventually be decided at the battlefield.

CodeTemplarr:
Ukraine is Europe's second largest country after Russia. Thats many times the aize of Lagos.

Militarily, ukraine is like Lagos but not in terms of landmass.

gassbee:
Chai see how a whole US president Trump dey beg Putin to end d war,

Father4all:
This man can even offer Putin the whole of America

WriteerNg:
You said the tanks are immobile, motionless. That is they don't move.

What I'm reading in the article is that they miss their target while they move. Which is quite normal for older tanks.

Russia has far newer tanks used on the battlefield that don't have that issue (T-90, T-80).

LordReed:
That is not what I said. I said they can't fire while moving. They have to be immobile to fire.

They have practically run of the newer tanks to throw at the war.

Father4all:
Oga, why can't your Almighty American fight them?

Commentor:
No, he didn't.

He created a deal that Trump cancelled and has now fallen back to.

Stop eating up BS propaganda.

JuanDeDios:
Ha. Wetin black man come do you now? Lol.

WriteerNg:
Even with US it'll still be difficult.

The US is NATO. Everything revolves around them in NATO.

jaxxy:
with US they will crush Russia unless other Russia allies intervene. Russia is not invisible.

jaxxy:
with US they will crush Russia unless other Russia allies intervene. Russia is not invisible.

WriteerNg:
Lol. So if you were Russia you'll use your newer tanks while the older ones sit in storage right?

You're a Russian weapon inspector that have seen newer tanks run out from their inventory right?

LordReed:
What have they been using up to this point where they are bringing out the older tanks?

LordReed:
What have they been using up to this point where they are bringing out the older tanks?

WriteerNg:
Can US/NATO survive a Russia, China, India, North Korea, Iran combined attack?

Not in the next 10 lifetimes.

WriteerNg:
Crush with what?

In terms of conventional weapons, Russia has more ICBMS missiles than the rest of the world combined.

In terms of nukes, Russia has more than the whole NATO.

So wetin dem go use crush ehnnnn? Oga crusher.

You must be really slow to think the US will bring it's gang to war and Russia won't come with their own gang.

DeepSight:
Reed, are you half Russian?

LordReed:
Nope.

lightwind:
USA is AVOIDING WORLD WAR111. Can't you people just use your initiatives

jaxxy:
Russia that cannot defeat Ukraine after 3 years?? Bro besides nuclear weapons Russia is as venerable as any moderate/Average super power.

Nothing spectacular.

DeepSight:
Alright.

Pls don't bother with the Russian Tanks thing.

There are better things to think about.

WriteerNg:
The US that could not defeat ragtag goat herders in Afghanistan for 20 years is who you think can crush Russia?

Is Afghanistan more powerful than Ukraine?

Did Afghanistan receive the same amount of support as Ukraine?

It was even the US receiving support from all NATO members. Yet they lost.

The same US that was chased away from the Red Sea by the barefooted Houthis?

In the history of the world the US have never fought a country with the same military strength as Ukraine.

The US is the only country to use nukes to win a war. Against Japan.

LordReed:
WriteerNG is such a Russian propaganda hog it's bewildering.

WriteerNg:
They've always used older tanks. Right from day one of the war.

Research before embarrassing yourself.

DeepSight:
Probably works for the embassy.

Jeezuzpick:
The worst part of it is, Biden and Boris Johnson caused the war and helped fuel its escalation by advising Zelenskyy to spurn an earlier peace deal offered by Putin's Russia.

Biden helped cause Ukraine war and also gave money to Iran and to terrorist organizations all over the world.