₦airaland Forum

Chibuezem:
I am just glad that I was tagged

Loooool

Please translate: πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο καὶ χωρὶς αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο οὐδὲ ἕν ὃ γέγονεν

To translate the Greek text πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο καὶ χωρὶς αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο οὐδὲ ἕν ὃ γέγονεν based strictly on Greek syntax and vocabulary, without invoking religious context, we’ll analyze each component and provide a literal translation.


"All things came to be through it, and without it not even one thing came to be that has come to be."

Explanation

πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο: Indicates that everything that exists came into being through the agency or mediation of αὐτοῦ (the Word, assuming continuity with ὁ Λόγος from the prior text). διά with the genitive suggests instrumentality or means.

καὶ χωρὶς αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο οὐδὲ ἕν: Reinforces that no single thing came into existence without αὐτοῦ, emphasizing its essential role in all creation or coming-to-be.

ὃ γέγονεν: The relative clause clarifies that the statement applies to everything that has come into existence, using the perfect tense to denote a completed state of being.

Note: αὐτοῦ is translated as "it" to maintain neutrality, as the pronoun could refer to ὁ Λόγος as either a personified entity (masculine) or an abstract principle (neuter, though Λόγος is grammatically masculine).

So we can also say
"All things came to be through him, and without him not even one thing came to be that has come to be."

So is the it referring to the logos or the deity
?

To determine whether αὐτοῦ (it/him) in the Greek text πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο καὶ χωρὶς αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο οὐδὲ ἕν ὃ γέγονεν refers to ὁ Λόγος (the Word) or τὸν Θεόν (the deity), we’ll analyze the text based strictly on Greek syntax and vocabulary, maintaining continuity with the prior text

Analysis

Context from Prior Text:

The earlier text establishes two key entities: ὁ Λόγος (the Word/Reason) and τὸν Θεόν (the deity). ὁ Λόγος is described as existing in the beginning, being with τὸν Θεόν, and having divine qualities (Θεὸς ἦν ὁ Λόγος, "the Word was divine". The final clause uses Οὗτος (this, masculine), referring explicitly to ὁ Λόγος, reinforcing its distinct yet associated relationship with τὸν Θεόν.


ὁ Λόγος is the primary subject, consistently referenced with pronouns (Οὗτος) and described in detail, making it the focal entity.

Pronoun αὐτοῦ in the Current Text:

αὐτοῦ is the third-person dative pronoun (masculine or neuter), meaning "him" or "it." Its referent depends on the preceding context, as Greek pronouns often refer to the most prominent or recently mentioned noun.
In the prior text, Οὗτος (this, masculine) explicitly refers to ὁ Λόγος (the Word, grammatically masculine). This makes ὁ Λόγος the most likely antecedent for αὐτοῦ in πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο, as it continues the focus on the Word’s role.
τὸν Θεόν (the deity, accusative of ὁ Θεός, masculine) is less likely as the referent because it is not the subject of the preceding clauses, and the pronoun Οὗτος already points to ὁ Λόγος. Greek syntax typically maintains pronoun reference to the primary subject unless otherwise indicated.

Syntax of δι' αὐτοῦ and χωρὶς αὐτοῦ:

δι' αὐτοῦ ("through it/him" and χωρὶς αὐτοῦ ("without it/him" indicate agency and indispensability. The entity referenced by αὐτοῦ is the means through which πάντα (all things) came into being...

If αὐτοῦ referred to τὸν Θεόν, the text would imply that all things came through the deity itself, but the prior text’s emphasis on ὁ Λόγος as distinct from τὸν Θεόν (via πρὸς τὸν Θεόν, "with the deity" suggests ὁ Λόγος is the mediating entity, not τὸν Θεόν.

Conclusion

The pronoun αὐτοῦ in πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο καὶ χωρὶς αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο οὐδὲ ἕν ὃ γέγονεν refers to ὁ Λόγος (the Word/Reason), not τὸν Θεόν (the deity).

gohf:
Note: αὐτοῦ is translated as "it" to maintain neutrality, as the pronoun could refer to ὁ Λόγος as either a personified entity (masculine) or an abstract principle (neuter, though Λόγος is grammatically masculine).

So we can also say
"All things came to be through him, and without him not even one thing came to be that has come to be."

He or It?:

αὐτοῦ can be translated as "him" (masculine, implying a personified entity) or "it" (neutral, implying an abstract principle). Since ὁ Λόγος is grammatically masculine but often represents a philosophical concept (reason/principle) rather than a person in classical Greek, "it" is appropriate to avoid implying personhood without textual evidence. However, "him" is also valid if ὁ Λόγος is interpreted as a personified entity, though the text itself does not explicitly confirm personhood

So is the logos the creator or the means of creation?

Creator vs. Means of Creation:

Creator: In Greek, a creator is typically the primary source or originator of creation, often implied by verbs like ποιέω (to make) or κτίζω (to create) with the subject as the active agent. The text does not use such verbs or directly attribute creation to ὁ Λόγος as the source. Instead, ἐγένετο (came to be) is a middle/passive form of γίνομαι, suggesting a process of coming into existence rather than active creation by ὁ Λόγος.

Means of Creation: The preposition διά with the genitive (δι' αὐτοῦ) explicitly indicates instrumentality, meaning ὁ Λόγος is the means, medium, or agency through which all things came into being. This implies ὁ Λόγος is not the primary source but the channel or principle facilitating the process.

The distinction between ὁ Λόγος and τὸν Θεόν (the deity) in πρὸς τὸν Θεόν ("with the deity" suggests τὸν Θεόν could be the ultimate source, while ὁ Λόγος acts as the intermediary. However, the text does not explicitly state τὸν Θεόν as the source, leaving the focus on ὁ Λόγος’s role.

Implications of χωρὶς αὐτοῦ:
The phrase "without it not even one thing came to be" emphasizes the indispensability of ὁ Λόγος, but it does not necessarily make it the creator. Instead, it reinforces that ὁ Λόγος is essential to the process of existence, further supporting its role as the means rather than the originator.

Conclusion
The text portrays ὁ Λόγος (the Word/Reason) as the means of creation, not the creator itself...

Thus, ὁ Λόγος is the means through which all things came to be, not the creator itself.

I know some of your translation especially of John 1:10 of KJV states the world was made BY him and not through him. Even though the claim is KJV is the main one that uses textus receptus (if you don't know what TR is pls find out, and note NKJV uses through and not by)

Let's ask Grok to interpret the Greek text

ἐν αὐτῷ ζωὴ ἦν, καὶ ἡ ζωὴ ἦν τὸ φῶς τῶν ἀνθρώπων καὶ τὸ φῶς ἐν τῇ σκοτίᾳ φαίνει καὶ ἡ σκοτία αὐτὸ οὐ κατέλαβεν Ἐγένετο ἄνθρωπος ἀπεσταλμένος παρὰ Θεοῦ, ὄνομα αὐτῷ Ἰωάνης· οὗτος ἦλθεν εἰς μαρτυρίαν ἵνα μαρτυρήσῃ περὶ τοῦ φωτός ἵνα πάντες πιστεύσωσιν δι’ αὐτοῦ οὐκ ἦν ἐκεῖνος τὸ φῶς ἀλλ’ ἵνα μαρτυρήσῃ περὶ τοῦ φωτός Ἦν τὸ φῶς τὸ ἀληθινόν ὃ φωτίζει πάντα ἄνθρωπον ἐρχόμενον εἰς τὸν κόσμον ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ ἦν καὶ ὁ κόσμος δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο καὶ ὁ κόσμος αὐτὸν οὐκ ἔγνω εἰς τὰ ἴδια ἦλθεν καὶ οἱ ἴδιοι αὐτὸν οὐ παρέλαβον

gohf:
I know some of your translation especially of John 1:10 of KJV states the world was made BY him and not through him. Even though the claim is KJV is the main one that uses textus receptus (if you don't know what TR is pls find out, and note NKJV uses through and not by)

Let's ask Grok to interpret the Greek text

ἐν αὐτῷ ζωὴ ἦν, καὶ ἡ ζωὴ ἦν τὸ φῶς τῶν ἀνθρώπων καὶ τὸ φῶς ἐν τῇ σκοτίᾳ φαίνει καὶ ἡ σκοτία αὐτὸ οὐ κατέλαβεν Ἐγένετο ἄνθρωπος ἀπεσταλμένος παρὰ Θεοῦ, ὄνομα αὐτῷ Ἰωάνης· οὗτος ἦλθεν εἰς μαρτυρίαν ἵνα μαρτυρήσῃ περὶ τοῦ φωτός ἵνα πάντες πιστεύσωσιν δι’ αὐτοῦ οὐκ ἦν ἐκεῖνος τὸ φῶς ἀλλ’ ἵνα μαρτυρήσῃ περὶ τοῦ φωτός Ἦν τὸ φῶς τὸ ἀληθινόν ὃ φωτίζει πάντα ἄνθρωπον ἐρχόμενον εἰς τὸν κόσμον ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ ἦν καὶ ὁ κόσμος δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο καὶ ὁ κόσμος αὐτὸν οὐκ ἔγνω εἰς τὰ ἴδια ἦλθεν καὶ οἱ ἴδιοι αὐτὸν οὐ παρέλαβον

Literal Translation

"In him was life, and the life was the light of men, and the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it. A man came to be, sent from a deity, his name was John. This one came for testimony, to testify about the light, so that all might trust through him. He was not the light, but to testify about the light. The light was the true one, which illuminates every man coming into the world. He was in the world, and the world came to be through him, and the world did not know him. He came to his own, and his own did not receive him."

With simple answers How many characters or persons have been mentioned so far?

Three: the Word (ὁ Λόγος), the deity (τὸν Θεόν), and John (Ἰωάνης).

Explain roles further

1. ὁ Λόγος (the Word):

Role: The primary entity, described as a principle or agent with divine qualities, central to existence and illumination.

Details:

Existence: Exists "in the beginning" (Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν, "was in the beginning", indicating timeless or primordial presence.

Relationship: Is "with the deity" (πρὸς τὸν Θεόν), suggesting a close but distinct association with τὸν Θεόν.

Nature: Is "divine" (Θεὸς ἦν, anarthrous, implying divine qualities or essence).

Means of Creation: Acts as the means through which "all things came to be" (πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο) and without which "not even one thing came to be" (χωρὶς αὐτοῦ οὐδὲ ἕν), indicating an instrumental role in the process of existence, not the originator.

Source of Life and Light: Contains "life" (ἐν αὐτῷ ζωὴ ἦν), which is "the light of men" (ἡ ζωὴ ἦν τὸ φῶς τῶν ἀνθρώπων), symbolizing vitality and knowledge/illumination that persists against darkness (τὸ φῶς ἐν τῇ σκοτίᾳ φαίνει).

Presence in the World: Is "in the world" (ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ ἦν), which came to be through him (ὁ κόσμος δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο), but is not recognized or received by the world or "his own" (ὁ κόσμος αὐτὸν οὐκ ἔγνω, οἱ ἴδιοι αὐτὸν οὐ παρέλαβον).

Summary of Roles

ὁ Λόγος (the Word): The central, divine-natured entity, existing from the beginning, serving as the means through which all things come to be, and embodying life and light (knowledge) that illuminates humanity but is not recognized by the world.

τὸν Θεόν (the deity): A distinct divine entity, associated with ὁ Λόγος and the source of John’s mission, but with a less active role in the text.

Ἰωάνης (John): A human sent to testify about the light (linked to ὁ Λόγος), facilitating trust in its significance, but not the light itself. (but a witness to it, clarifying his subordinate role).

ὅσοι δὲ ἔλαβον αὐτόν ἔδωκεν αὐτοῖς ἐξουσίαν τέκνα θεοῦ γενέσθαι τοῖς πιστεύουσιν εἰς τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ οἳ οὐκ ἐξ αἱμάτων οὐδὲ ἐκ θελήματος σαρκὸς οὐδὲ ἐκ θελήματος ἀνδρὸς ἀλλ' ἐκ θεοῦ ἐγεννήθησαν Καὶ ὁ λόγος σὰρξ ἐγένετο καὶ ἐσκήνωσεν ἐν ἡμῖν καὶ ἐθεασάμεθα τὴν δόξαν αὐτοῦ δόξαν ὡς μονογενοῦς παρὰ πατρός πλήρης χάριτος καὶ ἀληθείας

Grok not only interpreted by stated roles

Literal Translation
"But as many as received him, he gave to them authority to become children of a deity, to those trusting in his name, who were born not from bloods, nor from the will of flesh, nor from the will of a man, but from a deity. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld his glory, glory as of an only one from a father, full of grace and truth."


Roles in Context

Building on the prior text’s roles

(ὁ Λόγος, τὸν Θεόν, Ἰωάνης):ὁ Λόγος (the Word):

Role: A divine-natured entity that becomes embodied and enables transformation.

Details: Grants "authority to become children of a deity" to those who "receive" him and "trust in his name," suggesting influence over human transformation or status.

Becomes "flesh" (σὰρξ ἐγένετο), taking on a physical or human form.

Dwells "among us" (ἐσκήνωσεν ἐν ἡμῖν), indicating presence among humans.

Displays "glory" (δόξαν), likened to that of a "unique one from a father," characterized by "grace and truth."



τὸν Θεόν/θεοῦ (the deity/a deity):

Role: The divine source or origin, associated with ὁ Λόγος and human transformation.

Details:Previously described as distinct from ὁ Λόγος (πρὸς τὸν Θεόν) and the source of John’s mission (παρὰ Θεοῦ).
Here, the source from which "children" are born (ἐκ θεοῦ ἐγεννήθησαν), indicating a divine origin for those who receive ὁ Λόγος.

New Group: Those Who Received the Word:

Role: Humans who accept ὁ Λόγος and gain a new status.

Details:Those who "receive" (ἔλαβον) and "trust in his name" (πιστεύουσιν εἰς τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ) are given "authority to become children of a deity" (τέκνα θεοῦ).

Their "birth" is not from physical means ("bloods," "will of flesh," "will of a man" but from a deity (ἐκ θεοῦ), suggesting a transformative process.

Will those who receive a different form or type of logos described in this text also be transformed? A simple yes or no if possible

No

gohf:
Will those who receive a different form or type of logos described in this text also be transformed? A simple yes or no if possible

No

It's not just for arguments sake or about who is right and who is wrong, it's about life, eternal life and the salvation of our souls. I get it that some argue to catch cruise or show they are wise and right but at the end of the day what reward is there for that.


Tags: Arian, FxMasterz,
jimRohn or Kobojunkie , maynman, Dtruthspeaker, Image123, JessicaRabbit, DeepSight, SIRTee15, TheSourcerer, Busybrain2233, Fourthpredator,
bobestman, Lorrayne, HardMirror, Hahn, SlawG, albreezy4eva, Muslim, Dominique, Mrbroke, EnemyofGod2, Wilgrea7, A001, Maynthemayn, achorladey, Jozzy4, MightySparrow, NowYouKnow, TemmyT002, johnw47, Emusan, Gabrielshow24, rottennaija, Janosky, LordReed, DeepSight,
tctrills, Dtruthspeaker, Everyday247, Ruke1990, sonmvayina, MeetDx DrJones109, Jesusjnr2022, Jaephoenix, Knownunknown, BBIA HellVictorinho6, SIXFEETUNDER, OkpaNsukkaisBae, Bacteriologist, FRANCISTOWN, Aemmyjah, 1Sharon, TakeNigeriaBack,
Botragelad, isan,
seun, hopefullandlord, bobestman, Lorrayne, HardMirror, Hahn, SlawG, albreezy4eva, Muslim, Dominique, Mrbroke, EnemyofGod2, kkins25, Wilgrea7, Maynthemayn, Ken4Christ, Steep, Chibuezem. gohf, TenQ, Ohyoudidnt, WeirdAlien, Linaloca7, Explore2xmore, armchairscholar, BIBLESPEAKS,

Steep:
If only you people could properly settle and learn what the trinity properly is.

John was pointing us back to Genesis 1, in the beginning of creation the word was already present, he didn't come into existence but he was already present meaning he is uncreated.

"The word was with The God and the word was God
Theos means the very essence of deity. While "The God" refers to a person who is the father.
In Greek the definite article "The" is used to specify.
So it is something like this, In the beginning(start of time) was ( already present) the word and the word was with (face to face) The God (The person of the father) and the word was God (the state of being God, Godhood)

.

gohf:
It's not just for arguments sake or about who is right and who is wrong, it's about life, eternal life and the salvation of our souls. I get it that some argue to catch cruise or show they are wise and right but at the end of the day what reward is there for that.


Tags: Arian, FxMasterz,
jimRohn or Kobojunkie , maynman, Dtruthspeaker, Image123, JessicaRabbit, DeepSight, SIRTee15, TheSourcerer, Busybrain2233, Fourthpredator,
bobestman, Lorrayne, HardMirror, Hahn, SlawG, albreezy4eva, Muslim, Dominique, Mrbroke, EnemyofGod2, Wilgrea7, A001, Maynthemayn, achorladey, Jozzy4, MightySparrow, NowYouKnow, TemmyT002, johnw47, Emusan, Gabrielshow24, rottennaija, Janosky, LordReed, DeepSight,
tctrills, Dtruthspeaker, Everyday247, Ruke1990, sonmvayina, MeetDx DrJones109, Jesusjnr2022, Jaephoenix, Knownunknown, BBIA HellVictorinho6, SIXFEETUNDER, OkpaNsukkaisBae, Bacteriologist, FRANCISTOWN, Aemmyjah, 1Sharon, TakeNigeriaBack,
Botragelad, isan,
seun, hopefullandlord, bobestman, Lorrayne, HardMirror, Hahn, SlawG, albreezy4eva, Muslim, Dominique, Mrbroke, EnemyofGod2, kkins25, Wilgrea7, Maynthemayn, Ken4Christ, Steep, Chibuezem. gohf, TenQ, Ohyoudidnt, WeirdAlien, Linaloca7, Explore2xmore, armchairscholar, BIBLESPEAKS,

one of the prophets in the Tanakh, i think Hosea or so stated 'My people perish for lack of knowledge' this was made because the jews where worshiping the Baal and the Asherahs, that is the gods and goddess of those around them thinking it was the real GOD. Same thing is happening now, people worship Baal thinking they are doing worship to Creator.
The idea of the logos is a Greek philosophy. we can see how easily it came to be part of the christian theology. it was borrowed.
several times in the Tanakh, the prophet warned the Jews that there is only one God. no one beside or in front of him, not even a son., there is no devil or Satan that is a dual opposite of God, everything he created, is sovereign to him and under his will. whatever happens whether good or bad, happens because it is his will. NOT BECAUSE SATAN DID IT.
but as an insult to him, Christianity created a son and a Satan that is his rival......and people are drinking it.

sonmvayina:
one of the prophets in the Tanakh, i think Hosea or so stated 'My people perish for lack of knowledge' this was made because the jews where worshiping the Baal and the Asherahs, that is the gods and goddess of those around them thinking it was the real GOD. Same thing is happening now, people worship Baal thinking they are doing worship to Creator.
The idea of the logos is a Greek philosophy. we can see how easily it came to be part of the christian theology. it was borrowed.
several times in the Tanakh, the prophet warned the Jews that there is only one God. no one beside or in front of him, not even a son., there is no devil or Satan that is a dual opposite of God, everything he created, is sovereign to him and under his will. whatever happens whether good or bad, happens because it is his will. NOT BECAUSE SATAN DID IT.
but as an insult to him, Christianity created a son and a Satan that is his rival......and people are drinking it.

All I know is I believe in God the Father
God the Son
God the Holy spirit

Steep:
If only you people could properly settle and learn what the trinity properly is.

John was pointing us back to Genesis 1, in the beginning of creation the word was already present, he didn't come into existence but he was already present meaning he is uncreated.

"The word was with The God and the word was God
Theos means the very essence of deity. While "The God" refers to a person who is the father.
In Greek the definite article "The" is used to specify.
So it is something like this, In the beginning(start of time) was ( already present) the word and the word was with (face to face) The God (The person of the father) and the word was God (the state of being God, Godhood)

What is trinity?

Image123:
Lolz, people who just started using AI 2 months ago think we should drop everything else and worship AI. Lolz, the same AI that sometimes gets confused with simple arithmetic, and literally states that it makes mistakes and should not be taken seriously. Facepalm.

Someone who says that God the Father has a God is worse than any low budget AI.

gohf:
Okay let's test some simple things out

Did I tell you or anyone to worship AI? Yes or no

Did I tell you or anyone that an AI is always correct or perfect? Yes or no

Did I tell you or did anyone tell you I started using AI 2 months ago?

Is the AI, Grok's analysis of the Greek syntax and grammar excluding theologically view of same text, wrong? Yes or no

These are simple questions and a honest person easily answers these truthfully. I would be expecting your answers without deviation or long yarns

Don't mind him. See the same question and answer from ChatGPT and Grok. He and his AI have problem.

Boomark:
Don't mind him. See the same question and answer from ChatGPT and Grok. He and his AI have problem.

lol you had to type the truth to image123 in that picture there 😂😆

Boomark:
What is trinity?

ONE God (divine being, Godhood) three persons ( The Father, Son and spirit).

Chibuezem:
All I know is I believe in God the Father
God the Son
God the Holy spirit

well, you are wrong.
God is one and indivisible.......
he alone exist of himself....no partner .

Steep:
ONE God (divine being, Godhood) three persons ( The Father, Son and spirit).

if you type boomark's question in Google, their AI would respond with

The Trinity is a core Christian doctrine stating that one God exists as three co-equal, co-eternal, and co-substantial divine persons: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit. This concept asserts that God is one in essence but three in person, a mystery of faith rather than a logical equation where 1+1+1=1. The doctrine is rooted in the New Testament's depiction of God's threefold activity as Creator, Incarnate Son, and indwelling Spirit, and was formally articulated in early Christian creeds, notably the Nicene Creed.

Do you notice that usually the AI attaches bible references to biblical questions but it doesn't do that for that question what is Trinity, it just links it with it's true origin the nicolatian doctrine that Christ Jesus hates.

Steep:
ONE God (divine being, Godhood) three persons ( The Father, Son and spirit).

1 Corinthians 8:4-6 NIrV
[4]...“there is only one God.” [5] There may be so-called gods either in heaven or on earth. In fact, there are many “gods” and many “lords.” [6] But for us there is only one God. He is the Father. All things came from him, and we live for him. And there is only one Lord. He is Jesus Christ. All things came because of him, and we live because of him.

Deuteronomy 6:4 LSB
[4] “Hear, O Israel! Yahweh is our God, Yahweh is one!


The bible made it clear that there is ONLY ONE GOD. Even though there are many who are called Gods. That "One God" is the Father.

What you defined as trinity is not in the bible. It is against the position of God the Father who the scripture declared as ONE GOD over all.


So tell us from the bible where you got your ONE GOD as 3 persons?

Chibuezem, Ken4Christ watch

gohf:
lol you had to type the truth to image123 in that picture there 😂😆

The thing tire me. Image123 is only interested in pushing negative views of AI. Even the AI later gave the correct answer.

But he, as a human, who said God the Father has a God, have not corrected his mistake of more than 2 weeks till date.

Boomark:
1 Corinthians 8:4-6 NIrV
[4]...“there is only one God.” [5] There may be so-called gods either in heaven or on earth. In fact, there are many “gods” and many “lords.” [6] But for us there is only one God. He is the Father. All things came from him, and we live for him. And there is only one Lord. He is Jesus Christ. All things came because of him, and we live because of him.

Deuteronomy 6:4 LSB
[4] “Hear, O Israel! Yahweh is our God, Yahweh is one!


The bible made it clear that there is ONLY ONE GOD. Even though there are many who are called Gods. That "One God" is the Father.

What you defined as trinity is not in the bible. It is against the position of God the Father who the scripture declared as ONE GOD over all.


So tell us from the bible where you got your ONE GOD as 3 persons?

and that's where their deception comes in by twisting it in saying yes of course there is only one God we believe that too, and Jesus and the Holy Spirit are part of that one God.

But they will say God the son instead of son of God, God the spirit instead of spirit of God.

Problem is, we children of God are also part of God but we don't yet hear God Francis, God Deborah, well some say are already saying we are gods self.

Being called a god mean they are fake, because there is only one true God and that's why we tell them they shouldn't call Jesus God it's like saying Jesus is fake seeing as we all seem to agree that there is only one true God.

Some of these trinitarians the innocent one don't know the implications of their believe in the Trinity and devil uses that ignorance to destroy them

Boomark:


The thing tire me. Image123 is only interested in pushing negative views of AI. Even the AI later gave the correct answer.

But he, as a human, who said God the Father has a God, have not corrected his mistake of more than 2 weeks till date.

because he is an image of his father like Jesus said in John 8:44

gohf:
if you type boomark's question in Google, their AI would respond with

The Trinity is a core Christian doctrine stating that one God exists as three co-equal, co-eternal, and co-substantial divine persons: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit. This concept asserts that God is one in essence but three in person, a mystery of faith rather than a logical equation where 1+1+1=1. The doctrine is rooted in the New Testament's depiction of God's threefold activity as Creator, Incarnate Son, and indwelling Spirit, and was formally articulated in early Christian creeds, notably the Nicene Creed.

Do you notice that usually the AI attaches bible references to biblical questions but it doesn't do that for that question what is Trinity, it just links it with it's true origin the nicolatian doctrine that Christ Jesus hates.

They teach falsehood as doctrine. Let me see where he will get One God as 3 persons in the bible.

This is what the enemy is using against the position of God the Father so people will not give him glory that is due to him.