₦airaland Forum

Benbellamor:
l have warned you not to use words like polygamy.....it's not found in the bible
So I have help you to confiscate your illegal use of phrase...it's confusing your narrative

As long as a married person is marrying again whilst still married, it is polygamy. So no need to deceive yourself

Benbellamor:
really? Ok let me dig it up
Here is what doesn't add up...you said " If you say"" below



Am l the one who wrote Exodus 21:10?

10) If he takes another wife, he must not reduce the food, clothing, or marital rights of his first wife.


So what's the connection with what you wrote below..


Pure distraction....

I have already pointed out the connection in asking you whether you would say tha stealing an ox or sheep in Exodus is permitted since both of them started with "if'?

Exodus 22:1
"If a man steal an ox, or sheep and..."

And you cannot answer

MaxInDHouse:
Is incest approved by the mosaic law?
Who did Cain marry?

My own response:
God permitted incest because Adam's children must reproduce before having to fill the earth but after the earth has been filled with families God told his worshipers not to practice it anymore. But in God's law it's abominable for children born by the same mother to have sex.

Did God's word approve prostitution and adultery?
Was Judah's child with Tamar approved under the mosaic law?

My response:
God permitted it because Judah wanted to send the girl away since his two sons died while trying to raise children through Tamar. But in God's law it is forbidden for a man to have sex with his own daughter in-law.

So there are certain things God permitted until the law came therefore anyone who committed such ignorantly is not judged until the law forbids it.
Polygamy was permitted until the Christ told us that it wasn't what God purposed in the beginning!

Don't mix incest with polygamy.

In the beginning we can see everyone had one wife until the the grandson of the child of unrighteousness set the world record.

And from the lineage of righteousness, you can see all of them had one wife.

And this is why Christ was completely right and accurate when He expressly pointed out that polygamy was never something God would approve.

And this is where you are making the error of judicial precedent of because God judged right fully in a specific case then you now think that that that judgement is applicable across board.

No.
All these cases are exceptional and they met the standard where the just is, landed on this side so that evil is condemned and righteousness upheld.

Even in the judiciary there are many judgements which courts have in righteousnes but courts are warned not to take them as precedent. Therefore, every case must be decided on their own merits.

And that is why there is a thing called "Exceptions".

Exceptio est strictissimae applicationis - :“An exception is of the strictest application.”

An exception does not undermine the general rule....

Benbellamor:
Laughable!! you suggests that Zipporah does not want the Marriage, But to Bust your Lie, Zipporah Followed her father with her 2 sons to live with Moses...to even burSt your insinuation, the bible verse refered to Jethro Throughout as Moses father-inlaw (Not Former in-law)

Exodus 18: 5 Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, together with Moses’ sons and wife, came to him in the wilderness, where he was camped near the mountain of God. 6 Jethro had sent word to him, “I, your father-in-law Jethro, am coming to you with your wife and her two sons.”
7 So Moses went out to meet his father-in-law and bowed down and kissed him. They greeted each other and then went into the tent.

(imagine Zipporah returning to Moses tent (house) finally.... how can a woman left her marriage only to come back to live in the house of the man he had left no be Juju be that?

and to confirm that Zipporah came back to live with her husband after she left due to protection of their children, this time around, only Zipporah's father jethro returned back, Jethro left Ziporrah and her children in the house of Moses. (read verse 27 of Exodus 18 below
The fact that Jethro did Not go back with Zipporah alone has shattered your childish insinuation read verse 27 of Exodus 18.
27 And Moses let his father in law depart; and he went his way into his own land.

Even you must see that you are talking rubbish.

Yes, Jethro brought Zipporah and children to Moses, yet, first you see that Jethro does not accuse Moses of wrongdoing.

Secondly, you see the bible shows that Moses gladly received Jethro but did not receive Zipporah.

And thirdly, you see that Moses and Jethro have a great time together but Zipporah is not there. This should have told you that when Moses rejected and boned her, she then went back home as she must do.

Then to crush your immature imaginations, even from Jethro's visit to Miriam, no where is Zipporah mentioned. And then finally, it is seen that Miriam did not say "why are you taking a wife when your wife and children are at home"

Dtruthspeaker:
Even you must see that you are talking rubbish.

Yes, Jethro brought Zipporah and children to Moses, yet, first you see that Jethro does not accuse Moses of wrongdoing.

Secondly, you see the bible shows that Moses gladly received Jethro but did not receive Zipporah.

And thirdly, you see that Moses and Jethro have a great time together but Zipporah is not there. This should have told you that when Moses rejected and boned her, she then went back home as she must do.

Then to crush your immature imaginations, even from Jethro's visit to Miriam, no where is Zipporah mentioned. And then finally, it is seen that Miriam did not say "why are you taking a wife when your wife and children are at home"

who did you offend?

Benbellamor:
who did you offend?

See, you don't have anything to say