₦airaland Forum

NNAMDI KANU'S 23 WITNESSES TRICKERY UNVEILED BY TONY NNADI OF NINAS!!!!

IT IS STARK IGNORANCE TO THINK THAT AN ACCUSED PERSON CAN CALL IN ANY WITNESSES OF HIS CHOICE WHO ARE NOT CONSIDERED NECESSARY WITNESSES BY THE COURT, TO DEFEND THE SPECIFIC CHARGES PENDING BEFORE THE COURT.
Tony Nnadi, LNC-NINAS
NINAS Movement News
26 October 2025


This line of idiotic propaganda by IPOB and its demented sympathizers, using AI-Generated audiovisuals only diminishes the Igbo worldwide and adds absolutely nothing to the proceedings before the Court.

Nnamdi Kanu’s attempt to buy time and trigger confusion by calling 23 Witnesses who are totally irrelevant to the charges against him; at a time the Court has given specific dates to present his defence has already been shut down by the Court which cautioned him to use what is left of the 6-day time window stipulated by the Court, to present his defense.

For the enlightenment of those who wish to learn, it is the Court, in its discretion, that can summon witnesses by way of Subpoenas on behalf of any Party that so requests. However, to invoke the power of subpoenas, the Court must be satisfied that such witnesses are NECESSARY to establish the case of the party requesting the subpoena.

It is also on account of being a NECESSARY Witness that the person to be so subpoenaed can be COMPELLABLE.

Unfortunately for the accused person here, Nnamdi Kanu, the charges before the court against him relate only to WHETHER OR NOT he made the inciting statements prohibited by the Terror Prevention and Prohibition Act of 2022 (TPPA-2022), as presented by the Prosecution by way of audiovisual evidence. Nothing else other than establishing that the voice on the audiovisuals belong to Nnamdi Kanu, is required by the Prosecution to prove their case and secure conviction.

None of the 23 so-called witnesses listed by Nnamdi Kanu are required to establish whether or not the voice on the various audiovisuals presented by the Prosecution belongs to Nnamdi Kanu.

This means that none of them is a necessary Witness and so none is a compellable witness that can be subpoenaed by the Court to testify at the request of the accused.

The Court already dismissed the ignorant request of the accused, reminding him in the proceedings that the 6-day window stipulated by the Court for him to present his defense will not be extended.

When the Trial comes to a conclusion and a verdict is pronounced, it will be self-evident that a dishonest, ignorant, and arrogant accused person was aided by his greedy, dishonest and mediocre lawyers to plunge himself into the outcome represented by the Verdict.



https://ninasmovementnews.substack.com/p/it-is-stark-ignorance-to-think-that

Allow KANU to dey deceive himself

DeltaFire:
NNAMDI KANU'S 23 WITNESSES TRICKERY UNVEILED BY TONY NNADI OF NINAS!!!!

IT IS STARK IGNORANCE TO THINK THAT AN ACCUSED PERSON CAN CALL IN ANY WITNESSES OF HIS CHOICE WHO ARE NOT CONSIDERED NECESSARY WITNESSES BY THE COURT, TO DEFEND THE SPECIFIC CHARGES PENDING BEFORE THE COURT.
Tony Nnadi, LNC-NINAS
NINAS Movement News
26 October 2025


This line of idiotic propaganda by IPOB and its demented sympathizers, using AI-Generated audiovisuals only diminishes the Igbo worldwide and adds absolutely nothing to the proceedings before the Court.

Nnamdi Kanu’s attempt to buy time and trigger confusion by calling 23 Witnesses who are totally irrelevant to the charges against him; at a time the Court has given specific dates to present his defence has already been shut down by the Court which cautioned him to use what is left of the 6-day time window stipulated by the Court, to present his defense.

For the enlightenment of those who wish to learn, it is the Court, in its discretion, that can summon witnesses by way of Subpoenas on behalf of any Party that so requests. However, to invoke the power of subpoenas, the Court must be satisfied that such witnesses are NECESSARY to establish the case of the party requesting the subpoena.

It is also on account of being a NECESSARY Witness that the person to be so subpoenaed can be COMPELLABLE.

Unfortunately for the accused person here, Nnamdi Kanu, the charges before the court against him relate only to WHETHER OR NOT he made the inciting statements prohibited by the Terror Prevention and Prohibition Act of 2022 (TPPA-2022), as presented by the Prosecution by way of audiovisual evidence. Nothing else other than establishing that the voice on the audiovisuals belong to Nnamdi Kanu, is required by the Prosecution to prove their case and secure conviction.

None of the 23 so-called witnesses listed by Nnamdi Kanu are required to establish whether or not the voice on the various audiovisuals presented by the Prosecution belongs to Nnamdi Kanu.

This means that none of them is a necessary Witness and so none is a compellable witness that can be subpoenaed by the Court to testify at the request of the accused.

The Court already dismissed the ignorant request of the accused, reminding him in the proceedings that the 6-day window stipulated by the Court for him to present his defense will not be extended.

When the Trial comes to a conclusion and a verdict is pronounced, it will be self-evident that a dishonest, ignorant, and arrogant accused person was aided by his greedy, dishonest and mediocre lawyers to plunge himself into the outcome represented by the Verdict.



https://ninasmovementnews.substack.com/p/it-is-stark-ignorance-to-think-that

You see how life is and how time exposes all hidden truths. This was the same Tony Nnadi who was carrying files here and there some years ago claiming to be agitating for Biafra, now kanu whom everyone knows is truly fighting for Biafra is now in detention and Tony Nnadi is wishing and actively pushing for kanu to be convicted.

So that means Tony Nnadi was not truly working to actualize Biafra then. He probably started his agitation then for government to settle him and also for him to use it and raise money from people. Cux if he is truly working for Biafra, there is no way he will be pushing for kanu to be convicted... Omo Tony really scammed people. Tufiakwa

banom:
You see how life is and how time exposes all hidden truths. This was the same Tony Nnadi who was carrying files here and there some years ago claiming to be agitating for Biafra, now kanu whom everyone knows is truly fighting for Biafra is now in detention and Tony Nnadi is wishing and actively pushing for kanu to be convicted.

So that means Tony Nnadi was not truly working to actualize Biafra then. He probably started his agitation then for government to settle him and also for him to use it and raise money from people. Cux if he is truly working for Biafra, there is no way he will be pushing for kanu to be convicted... Omo Tony really scammed people. Tufiakwa

Can’t believe i actually listened to the fool and was excited by his postulations on ‘Lower Niger whatever’! I noticed his negativity (some may even call it envy) towards Mazi Kanu way before the Kenya kidnapping! Till today i can’t say I’ve seen the man move from talking to actually doing something tangible to realise whatever aspirations he may have for a country separate from Nigeria! You can tell the hegemonic establishment doesn’t take him seriously and they go to bed and sleeps soundly when it comes to the Tony Nnadi ‘agitation’! It’s Mazi Kanu that scares the hell out of them and keeps them awake at night!

Incase you forget, let this video be your reminder:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XU2JtlUF6M&t=58s&pp=2AE6kAIB

All of you in the jungle called Nigeria better go get international education

The government can't backdate a law passed in 2022 for crimes committed in 2015. Whoever wrote this article is a joke.

WHETHER OR NOT he made the inciting statements prohibited by the Terror Prevention and Prohibition Act of 2022 (TPPA-2022), as presented by the Prosecution by way of audiovisual evidence.