₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,724 members, 8,423,413 topics. Date: Tuesday, 09 June 2026 at 05:45 PM

Toggle theme

Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him - Politics (4) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsNnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him (15744 Views)

1 2 3 4 5 6 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Exousiang01(m): 1:19pm On Oct 27, 2025
LCling:
facts when a lower high court like the high court defies a higher court unvacated judgement like the appeal court judgement their is an appeal court verdict judgement on the same issue unvacated I'm sorry for the high court judge ,govt biding and justice will clash, the accused may decide to stand on his rights and refuse the illegality then put Nigerian judiciary to public scrutiny and test. The accused have no right to stand defence on same issue before the lower court. The judge and the high court today is advertising illegality to Nigerian people trying to force justice on illegality. While the federal government of Nigeria is advertising kidnapping looking at Kenya court judgement, compensation and Kenya govt calls that Nigerian government violated their sovereignty by conducting state kidnapping on Kenya Soil without due process . Today the Nigerian public is watching the media houses, judge,the court,the judiciary,the security agencies,the federal government, as they to push this country to chaos by forcing illegality in name of justice. Public eyes are open
You are speaking from ignorance.
It's was the supreme court that sent him back to the high Court. The supreme court is higher than the appeal court. So your angle is completely wrong.
There is no problem here.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by DomPerignon: 1:20pm On Oct 27, 2025
chiagozien:
And it should be done in 6 days as ordered by your injustice judge?
He has all the time to review the charges, evidence and witnesses brought before the court by the prosecution.

His legal team even cross examined the witnesses and have studied the evidence brought to the court's knowledge by the prosecution.

He has more than ample time to review and present his own counter argument.

This is what his lawyers would have done on his behalf but he has sacked them and said he will be handling the case on his own.

By handling his case ,we know he just wants to use the court as a stage to air his politics and warped views and this is evidence in his initial list of compellable witnesses whom he wanted to drag to the court as if the court is his radio Biafra studio.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Racheal45: 1:22pm On Oct 27, 2025
If Una won jail am mak Una jail am
If he would have been sentence to 10yrs in imprisonment in 2021 by now he go know say na next year he dey comot
Because prison na morning and night dem Dey count
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by mastermaestro(m): 1:24pm On Oct 27, 2025
Nwaikpe:
This man should be treated as a mentally challenged person.
He talks like, acts like, and proves continually that he is a mentally challenged person.

He should be transfered to a mental assylum and left there to heal.
Pure and simple. Dude is not well mentally.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by sparko1(m): 1:25pm On Oct 27, 2025
Adisa44:
One day , he will be freed . soon
After spending his 100th years in jail, he will be released so he can be buried.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by OnyeObowo1: 1:38pm On Oct 27, 2025
koladata:
No, he knows he has committed crimes, but he doesn't want to plead guilty.

If you've ever listened to radio biafra, you will understand the extent of laws that this guy has broken
Which law?
Do u ever think at all?
What of those who killed and did drugs and we're pardon?
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Mrexcell(m): 1:44pm On Oct 27, 2025
Willy2025:
But the court said that he has a case to answer and should open his defence. This means a prima case has been established against him requiring an answer. With this time wasting, the court should overrule him and ask him to open his defence. Thereafter, he should be shut out and sentenced accordingly. The penalty for his offences is 20 to 25yrs imprisonment with hard labour. He is getting nothing less than that
It's alright mr supreme judge.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Mrexcell(m): 1:56pm On Oct 27, 2025
OnionBandit:
Confused hunchback terrorist

"I can play God when I want to. I choose who lives and who dies. I can destroy anywhere I want, I have destroyed". These were the words from the now humbled Nnamdi Kanu when he was hiding somewhere faraway from Nigeria instigating people against the government and committing crime against humanity
You guys are always very quick to remind the public of all nmk's statements but will never also talk about how buhari ordered the military to massacre thousands of unarmed ipob members who are only holding processions in the streets of igboland.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Ugwuoke347(m):
Our Leader has done the right thing. He has tendered the truest submission given the circumstances surrounding his trial.

‎What is there to be tried?

‎There is no valid case against him.

‎What valid case does the government of Nigeria have against a man for what he said in far away Britain but not for what he did anywhere near or within any state in Nigeria?

‎Did anybody in Nigeria see Nnamdi Kanu carrying machine gun or assault rifle like the Trans-Sahara Bandits terrorizing the towns and villages of Northern Nigeria?

‎Did anybody see Nnamdi Kanu detonating explosives at crowded places like Boko Haram and the Islamic terrorists who have brought frightening carnage and horrifying bloodbath in the North Eastern parts of Nigeria?

‎Did anybody see Nnamdi Kanu anywhere in Nigeria carrying out terrorist raids on schools, villages and communities and kidnapping hundreds of school children and hapless villagers like ISWAP and all the other Islamic terrorists destroying lives and destinies in the towns and communities of Northern Nigeria?

‎Did anybody see Nnamdi Kanu anywhere in any state of the South Eastern Zone raiding police and military checkpoints and gunning down men and officers in the fashion of the Unknown Gun Men killer squad which itself is an undercover creation of the federal government of Nigeria in her desperate move to generate false narratives against IPOB (the peaceful movement led by Mr Kanu) in order to justify the terrorist tag she placed on IPOB and gain global outrage against innocent men and women of IPOB?

‎Did anybody see Nnamdi Kanu anywhere in any state in the South Eastern Zone invading police stations and correctional facilities, shooting down men and officers, breaking the keys of the police cells and prisons wards and burning down the structures?

Did anybody see Nnamdi Kanu herding hundreds of cattles into farmlands, destroying crops, slaughtering farmers and villagers in cold blood and sacking whole villages and communities in Benue State and many states spread across the North Central, the South Eastern and the South Western Zones of Nigeria?

‎How exactly does the government of Nigeria plan to condemn a man for what he said but never for what he did?

‎How on earth does the government of Nigeria intend to make it to make sense in common sense that she is painstakingly boxing the "shadows" and insinuations of "terrorism" in one hand when she has been known for aiding and abetting; promoting and patronizing the objectives of Islamic terrorism in the other hand?

‎How should an intelligent person make it sit logically in his rational understanding that a man is being tried for terrorism in the Nigerian courts for the things he said over the airwaves in the United Kingdom of Great Britain but not for the terrorist acts he actually carried out in real space and time within Nigeria or anywhere near Nigeria?

‎How should we rationalize the fact that the same government of Nigeria who has been trying so hard to figure out a case against Mr Kanu proudly parades a notoriety for openly and repeatedly granting advanced amnesty to members of the Boko Haram terrorist sect as precondition for them to lay down their arms and be assimilated into the armed forces of the Nigerian State?

‎What moral background does such a shamelessly hypocritical, unconscionably primitive and ignobly prejudiced government have to make a case of terrorism against a man who said only what he said in far away Britain about the state-sponsored Islamic Agenda, the state-enabled Fulani Expansionist Jihad and the state-run political subjugation waged against the lands and fortunes of his own people?

Is it justifiable in any way and by any standard, does it make moral sense to consider that the same Nigerian State who has persistently shortchanged Nnamdi Kanu's people with her sectional bigotries and cruel political doctrines is trying very hard to crucify Nnamdi Kanu for courageously raising an ideological resistance against the state-enabled injustice directed against his own people: the Biafran people?

‎There is really no case from the beginning.

‎It is all dress rehearsal in a comic judicial theatre set on a predetermined outcome.

‎Our leader would rather not play a role.

‎He has already seen the fraud and has pointed it out very clearly and in unmistakable terms: there is no case here. What has happened so far is state-sponsored prejudice, state-sponsored hatred, state-sponsored madness, state-sponsored blind rage and state-sponsored bigotry. That is what Nigeria holds against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

There is practically no case here, except in the bigoted and warped political imagination of the primitive-minded authority figures of the false federation of Nigeria.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Misterone: 2:13pm On Oct 27, 2025
chiagozien:
Go sit down.



What do you know
What I know is that MNK is a clown and a puppet master pulling the strings of his puppets
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by chiagozien(m): 2:38pm On Oct 27, 2025
Misterone:
What I know is that MNK is a clown and a puppet master pulling the strings of his puppets
You talk as your mind reach.



So no wahala
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Kdon2: 2:42pm On Oct 27, 2025
Nwaikpe:
This man should be treated as a mentally challenged person.
He talks like, acts like, and proves continually that he is a mentally challenged person.

He should be transfered to a mental assylum and left there to heal.
Gbamu! You nail it😁
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by erniok(m): 2:46pm On Oct 27, 2025
chiagozien:
And the judge is just by giving him 6 days to defend himself after those accused him took 5 years to come up with their lies and false accusations?
Last I checked, he sacked his legal team. He can actually ask for a longer adjournment to prepare his defence.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by chiagozien(m): 2:49pm On Oct 27, 2025
erniok:
Last I checked, he sacked his legal team. He can actually ask for a longer adjournment to prepare his defence.
Last I checked he have not committed any crime known by laws.


And your Nigeria government have not given any valid law they are using to trial him.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by themanderon: 2:51pm On Oct 27, 2025
A court has ruled that he was snuggled back illegally so cannot stand trial so he may be right. You cannot build legality on an illegality.
As far as the law is concerned he was not properly extradited. That alone nullifies any charges against him.
He must be returned to Kenya and properly repatriated before he can be tried.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by chiagozien(m): 2:52pm On Oct 27, 2025
Ugwuoke347:
‎Our Leader has done the right thing.
‎He has tendered the truest submission given the circumstances surrounding his trial.

‎What is there to be tried?

‎There is no valid case against him.

‎What valid case does the government of Nigeria have against a man for what he said in far away Britain but not for what he did anywhere near or within any state in Nigeria?

‎Did anybody in Nigeria see Nnamdi Kanu carrying machine gun or assault rifle like the Trans-Sahara Bandits terrorizing the towns and villages of Northern Nigeria?

‎Did anybody see Nnamdi Kanu detonating explosives at crowded places like Boko Haram and the Islamic terrorists who have brought frightening carnage and horrifying bloodbath in the North Eastern parts of Nigeria?

‎Did anybody see Nnamdi Kanu anywhere in Nigeria carrying out terrorist raids on schools, villages and communities and kidnapping hundreds of school children and hapless villagers like ISWAP and all the other Islamic terrorists destroying lives and destinies in the towns and communities of Northern Nigeria?

‎Did anybody see Nnamdi Kanu anywhere in any state of the South Eastern Zone raiding police and military checkpoints and gunning down men and officers in the fashion of the Unknown Gun Men phenomenon which itself is an undercover creation of the federal government of Nigeria in her desperate move to generate false narratives against IPOB (the peaceful movement led by Mr Kanu) in order to justify the subsisting terrorist tag and gain global outrage against innocent men and women of IPOB?

‎Did anybody see Nnamdi Kanu anywhere in any state in the South Eastern Zone invading police stations and correctional facilities, shooting down men and officers, breaking the keys of the police cells and prisons wards and burning down the structures?

‎How exactly does the government of Nigeria plan to condemn a man for what he said but never for what he did?

‎How on earth does the government of Nigeria intend to make it to make sense in common sense that she is painstakingly boxing the "shadows" and insinuations of "terrorism" in one hand when she has been known for aiding and abetting; rearing and caressing; cuddling and harvesting the condensed reality of Islamic terrorism in the other hand?

‎How should an intelligent person make it sit logically in his rational understanding that a man is being tried for terrorism in the Nigerian courts for the things he said over the airwaves in the United Kingdom of Great Britain but not for the terrorist acts he actually carried out in real space and time within Nigeria or anywhere near Nigeria?

‎How should we rationalize the fact that the same government of Nigeria who has been trying so hard to figure out a case against Mr Kanu proudly parades a notoriety for openly and repeatedly granting advanced amnesty to members of the Boko Haram terrorist sect as precondition for them to lay down their arms and be assimilated into the armed forces of the Nigerian State?

‎What moral background has such a shamelessly hypocritical, unconscionably primitive and ignobly prejudiced government have to make a case of terrorism against a man who said only what he said in far away Britain about the state-sponsored Islamic agenda, the state-enabled Fulani Expansionist Jihad and the state-run political subjugation waged against the lands and fortunes of the Biafran people?

‎There is really no case from the beginning.

‎It is all dress rehearsal in a comic judicial theatre set on a predetermined outcome.

‎Our leader would rather not play a role.

‎He has already seen the fraud and has pointed it out very clearly and in unmistakable terms: there is no case here. What has happened so far is state-sponsored prejudice, state-sponsored hatred, state-sponsored madness, state-sponsored blind rage and state-sponsored bigotry. That is what Nigeria holds against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

There is practically no case here, except in the bigoted and warped political imagination of the primitive-minded authority figures of the false federation of Nigeria.
Well said
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by erniok(m): 2:55pm On Oct 27, 2025
chiagozien:
Last I checked he have not committed any crime known by laws.


And your Nigeria government have not given any valid law they are using to trial him.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by sparko1(m): 3:09pm On Oct 27, 2025
chiagozien:
Last I checked he have not committed any crime known by laws.


And your Nigeria government have not given any valid law they are using to trial him.
Really, he hasn't but he has spent over 3 years in jail now, he is even afraid of the law, but somehow you can't find his crime.

Don't worry, once he is sentenced, you will read and understand his crime.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by chiagozien(m): 3:20pm On Oct 27, 2025
sparko1:
Really, he hasn't but he has spent over 3 years in jail now, he is even afraid of the law, but somehow you can't find his crime.

Don't worry, once he is sentenced, you will read and understand his crime.
You mean the crime and the law your Nigeria judge couldn't read out today when kanu questioned him?
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Spandau: 3:34pm On Oct 27, 2025
RollinTNDA:
DIKE DIKE OHAMA DIKE!!

THE LION OF THE PEOPLE
Una mumu never do? You folks praised him when he pulled that mumu stunt of calling witnesses that don't give a hoot about him. Upon realizing that that move was mumuish, he changed his mind and went back to his old argument. Still you're applauding him. I ask again, una mumu never do?
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Cj4charles(m): 3:41pm On Oct 27, 2025
Nwaikpe:
Me?

Don't worry. Keep the "I be man," I don't need it.

The last guy that I knew was trying to be a man and was exported from Kenya like a bag of secondhand okrika bale. grin grin grin
Mandela was also a man of Steel even while in prison..... even if he dies today, he died a great man whom will forever be remembered. Let me ask, who will remember you tomorrow??
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by loffyloffy:
chiagozien:
He's very right, what is there to defend?

Accusing someone of terrorism without providing ingredients of terrorism found on him.



They real Case should be first court settle the jurisdiction of him to face trial, no saying he should add that among the written defense after his defense.



It shows they are not out for justice.






God bless Mazi Nnamdi Kanu
I am 100% sure that if Kanu were to come out tommorrow and say exactly the opposite of what he said today, you will still come here to say he is right.

You don't have an oppinion, all you have is sentiments and the people that you are rooting for will always be right to you.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Nwaikpe: 3:57pm On Oct 27, 2025
Cj4charles:
Mandela was also a man of Steel even while in prison..... even if he dies today, he died a great man whom will forever be remembered. Let me ask, who will remember you tomorrow??
Hamas equated Sinwar to Madela
Mxslxms equated Osama bn Ladan to Mandela
Buhari equated Shekau to Mandela

You don't know the difference between fame and noteriety.
I'd rather remain unknown than be known as a loonatic who was shipped down in a ghana must go like okrika clothes.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by jaszplus12(m): 3:59pm On Oct 27, 2025
Jayhome24:
Haaa!!! I said it's likely Kanu is depressed or showing early sign of mental instability or likely early sign of dementia this is no more a joke.

I may sound a bit raw but someone with a stable mindset can't be displaying these much pendulated mental syndrome
When you're quick to fly off the handle, you regret your actions! He shut everyone up thinking he was smarter than all, now he had found time to sit and ponder....
He really needs to think and be humble, else he had a long way to go, even at leading people!!
The drama continues...
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Tareq1105: 4:18pm On Oct 27, 2025
Gotocourt:
Barr. Nnamdi KANU Esq

A.k.a lamidi
Mazi kanu is joking with this Case. He's not serious about the rope around his neck.
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by gigabyte13: 4:19pm On Oct 27, 2025
😂😂😅🤣🤣🤣😅
😂🤣🤣😅😅🤣🤣
If l talk say, prison dey sweet this werey
Him fellow online/offline werey go dey cry
Yen yen yen
Make Dem just forget am there
The place dey sweet the werey
Re: Nnamdi Kanu Backtracks On Defense, Says No Valid Charge Against Him by Tareq1105: 4:23pm On Oct 27, 2025
Spandau:
Una mumu never do? You folks praised him when he pulled that mumu stunt of calling witnesses that don't give a hoot about him. Upon realizing that that move was mumuish, he changed his mind and went back to his old argument. Still you're applauding him. I ask again, una mumu never do?
Mumu doesn't have limitations.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Reply

IPOB Files Terror Criminal Charge Against Simon Ekpa In Finland (Pix)Insecurity In Edo: Obaseki Backtracks On Government Providing Land For HerdersWike Backtracks, Addresses EndSARS Protesters234

Judith Amaechi Commiserates With Patience Jonathan Over Death Of Her MumFalana To FG: Propose Money Bill Before Implementing Increase In VATGovernor Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi Named 2019 "Governor Of The Year"