₦airaland Forum

joseph1832:
I'd be nice to see a Frankenstein in 21st century. I mean with his superpowers and the likes.

joseph1832:
Frankenstein

Bloody good movie. I wonder why they havent adapted this movie into pop culture. All we keep seeing is the old Frankenstein and the likes.

I'd be nice to see a Frankenstein in 21st century. I mean with his superpowers and the likes.

samistry:
Except they did and it was crap

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXc5epxOH_c?si=y_xNbR5LWpNJmhAG

abduleez1:
Because that's actually the setting of the universe. Old and gothic. 19th-early 20th century settings at most.
Deviate too much from that and fans will revolt and avoid such.

You might probably see something more "modern" in upcoming M@ggi£ G¥llenh@@l The Bride! movie.

samistry:
Madam no use am, she said he's not a perv hence she feels safe with him.
I still never even grasp concept of that intimacy coordinator job. It's like one of them fancy new employment gimmicks.
Wetin do director and crew members wey you no you feel safe on set?

GloriousGbola:
don't bother neither you nor the woman would be able to see him.

abduleez1:
Okay....let's go... I'm hyped.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9gSuKaKcqM?si=WU1v901gDa0B6rhy

armadeo:
This guy star keeps blasting

armadeo:
This guy star keeps blasting

pu7pl3:
Tyler the Creator abi? Dude is super talented.

oyaskii:
RE: First Man (2018)

“One small step for man... one giant leap for mankind.”

I don’t think there’s a piece of history that fascinates me more than the "Moon Landing". Recently, I went down a rabbit hole on YT suggesting that the whole thing might have been staged, so I decided to revisit what is perhaps my favourite dramatization of the event.

Damien Chazelle and Ryan Gosling have such a great filmmaker actor bond, and here, Ryan plays Neil Armstrong the first man to set foot on the moon. The film focuses more on Neil’s personal story than the moon landing itself, his struggles, family tragedy, and the weight of his mission. He wrestles with the reality that he might never return, and even NASA was aware of that risk, reportedly planning a “burial at sea,” just in case.

It’s such a technically brilliant film. The way it switches between Neil’s family life and the Apollo mission preparations is top-tier. The moon landing sequence itself is a thing of beauty , visually stunning, emotional, and tense. And what’s a Damien Chazelle film without a Justin Hurwitz score? He worked his magic once again. The track, aptly named “The Landing”, played during the lunar module’s approach to the moon, remains one of my favourite film scores ever.

Now, to the elephant in the room: the moon landing hoax theories. The evidence presented by the “moon landing hoax” brigade seems, at first glance, almost irrefutable. They argue that humanity wasn’t yet capable mathematically or technologically of achieving such a feat at the time. Some even claim that Stanley Kubrick directed the whole thing on a Hollywood set, especially since he had just made 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) a year prior.

NASA hasn’t done much to silence these claims either. These brothers were so eager to reach the moon at a time when the fastest computer on Earth probably had less than 2MB of RAM. Yet today, with our advanced technology and spacecraft capable of deep-orbit missions, a return to the moon is considered too evasive, expensive, and risky? The lack of urgency to go back definitely raises questions.

Anyway, this remains one of my favourite films ever, and if you’re interested in this topic, it’s an easy recommend. 🌑🚀

8/10

pu7pl3:
When I watched this it was very boring. A snooze fest.
I prefer the YouTube videos covering the hoaxes, I'm an avid Why files viewer among others.

oyaskii:
I can totally see how it gets boring with all the build up prior to the moon landing from neutral standpoint, but therein lies the greater thrill for me.

Bruhhh...These YouTube hoax videos are out of control and they are completely armed with facts 😭😭, but then again, there isn't a greater story teller or film maker than a YouTuber trying to sell you a conspiracy theory for clicks, mann, i was dangerously close to believing a "man travelling through time hoax" one time, even i, had to applaud the dedication put into creating the illusion.

BankyGee:
Basic Instinct (1992) - 9.4/10 🔵
Genre: Mystery, Thriller, Romance


I'd recommend this anytime, any day, anywhere! It's a masterpiece! 💯 abdul, thanks mi hermano 😁😁

DieRich5:
Good Fortune 4/10

Galapagous:
Hillbilly elegy 8/10

A memoir of a family and culture in crisis.

Where we come from is who we are, but we choose every day who we become.

oyaskii:
A surprisingly good film but ciritcs tore it up for reasons i can't fathom.

Imagine him going from this memoir to becoming the Vice President of the most powerful nation on earth... talking about some grass to grace issh

itscalebmark:
I watched Good Fortune starring Aziz Ansari, Keanu Reeves & Seth Rogen. Watched it for Seth rogen as I find him really funny. So liked it but my rating will be 4.5/10