₦airaland Forum

IkpuMmadu:
Anioma and their identity crisis and confusion are legendary


I’m genuinely surprised by the amount of misunderstanding surrounding this issue.

The primary reason for proposing the creation of an additional state is simple: the South East has only five states, while other zones have six—and one has seven. The goal is to bring the South East in line with the others. That is the main argument behind the entire campaign.

So when people argue that Anioma should not be part of the South East, they completely undermine the very reason the state is being proposed in the first place. If Anioma is excluded, the core objective is lost.

It’s also unrealistic to assume other regions would simply accept another zone gaining a new state without opposition. Other regions also desire additional states, so what exactly is the justification for creating an extra one in the South-South instead? Why would that be any more acceptable nationally?

What makes this even more puzzling is that some seem willing to abandon the chance of having a state of their own simply because they do not want to be associated with the South East. Many argue that this is because they are “not Igbo.” But they currently exist in a zone alongside Benin, Ijaw, Ibibio, and several other distinct ethnic groups.

This raises a deeper question: what real power do geopolitical zones actually have over the internal identity or culture of individual states? Zones are administrative groupings, not ethnic labels. An Isoko person does not suddenly become Efik by sharing a zone, just as an Igala person does not become Nupe for the same reason.

The confusion comes from treating geopolitical zones as ethnic identities, when in reality they are not. Until this distinction is understood, the conversation will continue to miss the point.

IkpuMmadu:
Anioma and their identity crisis and confusion are legendary


I’m genuinely surprised by the amount of misunderstanding surrounding this issue.

The primary reason for proposing the creation of an additional state is simple: the South East has only five states, while other zones have six—and one has seven. The goal is to bring the South East in line with the others. That is the main argument behind the entire campaign.

So when people argue that Anioma should not be part of the South East, they completely undermine the very reason the state is being proposed in the first place. If Anioma is excluded, the core objective is lost.

It’s also unrealistic to assume other regions would simply accept another zone gaining a new state without opposition. Other regions also desire additional states, so what exactly is the justification for creating an extra one in the South-South instead? Why would that be any more acceptable nationally?

What makes this even more puzzling is that some seem willing to abandon the chance of having a state of their own simply because they do not want to be associated with the South East. Many argue that this is because they are “not Igbo.” But they currently exist in a zone alongside Benin, Ijaw, Ibibio, and several other distinct ethnic groups.

This raises a deeper question: what real power do geopolitical zones actually have over the internal identity or culture of individual states? Zones are administrative groupings, not ethnic labels. An Isoko person does not suddenly become Efik by sharing a zone, just as an Igala person does not become Nupe for the same reason.

The confusion comes from treating geopolitical zones as ethnic identities, when in reality they are not. Until this distinction is understood, the conversation will continue to miss the point.

IkpuMmadu:
Anioma and their identity crisis and confusion are legendary


I’m genuinely surprised by the amount of misunderstanding surrounding this issue.

The primary reason for proposing the creation of an additional state is simple: the South East has only five states, while other zones have six—and one has seven. The goal is to bring the South East in line with the others. That is the main argument behind the entire campaign.

So when people argue that Anioma should not be part of the South East, they completely undermine the very reason the state is being proposed in the first place. If Anioma is excluded, the core objective is lost.

It’s also unrealistic to assume other regions would simply accept another zone gaining a new state without opposition. Other regions also desire additional states, so what exactly is the justification for creating an extra one in the South-South instead? Why would that be any more acceptable nationally?

What makes this even more puzzling is that some seem willing to abandon the chance of having a state of their own simply because they do not want to be associated with the South East. Many argue that this is because they are “not Igbo.” But they currently exist in a zone alongside Benin, Ijaw, Ibibio, and several other distinct ethnic groups.

This raises a deeper question: what real power do geopolitical zones actually have over the internal identity or culture of individual states? Zones are administrative groupings, not ethnic labels. An Isoko person does not suddenly become Efik by sharing a zone, just as an Igala person does not become Nupe for the same reason.

The confusion comes from treating geopolitical zones as ethnic identities, when in reality they are not. Until this distinction is understood, the conversation will continue to miss the point.

IkpuMmadu:
Anioma and their identity crisis and confusion are legendary


I’m genuinely surprised by the amount of misunderstanding surrounding this issue.

The primary reason for proposing the creation of an additional state is simple: the South East has only five states, while other zones have six—and one has seven. The goal is to bring the South East in line with the others. That is the main argument behind the entire campaign.

So when people argue that Anioma should not be part of the South East, they completely undermine the very reason the state is being proposed in the first place. If Anioma is excluded, the core objective is lost.

It’s also unrealistic to assume other regions would simply accept another zone gaining a new state without opposition. Other regions also desire additional states, so what exactly is the justification for creating an extra one in the South-South instead? Why would that be any more acceptable nationally?

What makes this even more puzzling is that some seem willing to abandon the chance of having a state of their own simply because they do not want to be associated with the South East. Many argue that this is because they are “not Igbo.” But they currently exist in a zone alongside Benin, Ijaw, Ibibio, and several other distinct ethnic groups.

This raises a deeper question: what real power do geopolitical zones actually have over the internal identity or culture of individual states? Zones are administrative groupings, not ethnic labels. An Isoko person does not suddenly become Efik by sharing a zone, just as an Igala person does not become Nupe for the same reason.

The confusion comes from treating geopolitical zones as ethnic identities, when in reality they are not. Until this distinction is understood, the conversation will continue to miss the point.

IkpuMmadu:
ANIOMA STATE CREATION: DELTA NORTH LEGISLATORS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT CHAIRMEN REJECT PROPOSAL FOR ANIOMA STATE IN SOUTH-EAST; REAFFIRM COMMITMENT TO SOUTH-SOUTH GEOPOLITICAL ZONE

We, the undersigned elected Honourable Members of the Delta State House of Assembly from the Delta North Senatorial District and the Executive Chairmen of the nine (9) Local Government Areas that constitute the District, having deliberated extensively on the renewed national discourse and legislative processes for the creation of new states in the Federal Republic of Nigeria, hereby issue this definitive statement of our collective position.

Our quest for a distinct and autonomous Anioma State is not a fleeting political venture but a legitimate aspiration deeply rooted in history, championed by our revered forebears and leaders. This dream for a state of our own, where our unique cultural identity, language, and developmental aspirations can be fully realized, has been a constant pursuit for generations. We stand on the shoulders of these giants and reaffirm their vision.

We hereby state, in the strongest possible terms, our unequivocal and total support for the creation of Anioma State comprising the present nine Local Government Areas of Delta North Senatorial District. We are united in the belief that the creation of Anioma State is a matter of justice, equity, and a necessary step towards fulfilling the political and developmental destiny of the Anioma people. We pledge our full political weight and mandate to actively lobby and support every legitimate effort towards the realization of this goal.

The Anioma our fathers envisaged and which we support is the Anioma that is made up of the 9 local government areas of Delta North with it's capital in Asaba. For the avoidance of doubt, these local governments are:
A. Aniocha North
B. Aniocha South
C. Ika North-East
D. Ika South
E. Ndokwa East
F. Ndokwa West
G. Oshimili North
H. Oshimili South, and
I. Ukwuani.

Anioma is, and Must Remain, in the South-South.
While we are unwavering in our support for the creation of Anioma State, we make it unequivocally clear that we vehemently oppose any proposed move or merger with any part of the South-East geopolitical zone. The Anioma people are historically, geographically, and administratively aligned with the South-South. This position is deeply rooted in our heritage and is non-negotiable.

gidgiddy:
I believe that's its everyone's right to decide where they want to be. However, it makes no sense to destroy your chances of getting your own state because of where you may be zoned

If Anioma State is created, whether its in the South South or South East, people will still regard it as an Igbo state because there is no way you will manage to convince anyone that your name is Igbo, your language is Igbo, your tradition is Igbo, but you are something else other than Igbo

IkpuMmadu:
Anioma and their identity crisis and confusion are legendary
I’m genuinely surprised by the amount of misunderstanding surrounding this issue.

The primary reason for proposing the creation of an additional state is simple: the South East has only five states, while other zones have six—and one has seven. The goal is to bring the South East in line with the others.

Noneroone:
that's not the full story. The so-called south east stakeholders opted for a settlement by altering Anioma state. Including territories from Anambra and Imo and moving the capital to Orlu. They even changed the name to Anim oma. This is generating resentment from Anioma people. The problem is that the other Anioma stakeholders are more interested in following Okowa instead focusing on negotiation with the southeast.

IkpuMmadu:
Anioma and their identity crisis and confusion are legendary


I’m genuinely surprised by the amount of misunderstanding surrounding this issue.

The primary reason for proposing the creation of an additional state is simple: the South East has only five states, while other zones have six—and one has seven. The goal is to bring the South East in line with the others. That is the main argument behind the entire campaign.

So when people argue that Anioma should not be part of the South East, they completely undermine the very reason the state is being proposed in the first place. If Anioma is excluded, the core objective is lost.

It’s also unrealistic to assume other regions would simply accept another zone gaining a new state without opposition. Other regions also desire additional states, so what exactly is the justification for creating an extra one in the South-South instead? Why would that be any more acceptable nationally?

What makes this even more puzzling is that some seem willing to abandon the chance of having a state of their own simply because they do not want to be associated with the South East. Many argue that this is because they are “not Igbo.” But they currently exist in a zone alongside Benin, Ijaw, Ibibio, and several other distinct ethnic groups.

This raises a deeper question: what real power do geopolitical zones actually have over the internal identity or culture of individual states? Zones are administrative groupings, not ethnic labels. An Isoko person does not suddenly become Efik by sharing a zone, just as an Igala person does not become Nupe for the same reason.

The confusion comes from treating geopolitical zones as ethnic identities, when in reality they are not. Until this distinction is understood, the conversation will continue to miss the point.

IkpuMmadu:
Anioma and their identity crisis and confusion are legendary


I’m genuinely surprised by the amount of misunderstanding surrounding this issue.

The primary reason for proposing the creation of an additional state is simple: the South East has only five states, while other zones have six—and one has seven. The goal is to bring the South East in line with the others. That is the main argument behind the entire campaign.

So when people argue that Anioma should not be part of the South East, they completely undermine the very reason the state is being proposed in the first place. If Anioma is excluded, the core objective is lost.

It’s also unrealistic to assume other regions would simply accept another zone gaining a new state without opposition. Other regions also desire additional states, so what exactly is the justification for creating an extra one in the South-South instead? Why would that be any more acceptable nationally?

What makes this even more puzzling is that some seem willing to abandon the chance of having a state of their own simply because they do not want to be associated with the South East. Many argue that this is because they are “not Igbo.” But they currently exist in a zone alongside Benin, Ijaw, Ibibio, and several other distinct ethnic groups.

This raises a deeper question: what real power do geopolitical zones actually have over the internal identity or culture of individual states? Zones are administrative groupings, not ethnic labels. An Isoko person does not suddenly become Efik by sharing a zone, just as an Igala person does not become Nupe for the same reason.

The confusion comes from treating geopolitical zones as ethnic identities, when in reality they are not. Until this distinction is understood, the conversation will continue to miss the point.

DomPerignon:
Your began this your self contradicting post by first attacking Anioma people for refusing to join SE zone as having suffering from identity crisis.

But in your concluding sentence , you stated that geopolitical zones are not created based on an ethnic considerations but simply for administrative purposes.
The post is simple to understand, I wonder why u are finding it difficult to comprehend.

Which is it?

Ikaeniyan0:
There's no time Delta north has ever been part of the south east, they were not even part of Biafra, I wander why Ned is trying to force them to where they do not belong

Felimax:
Ki

You can turn the hands of history as much as you can but where Anioma is Igbo does not exist. You should rather say Igbo is drawn out of Anioma and not the other way round.

80% of Southeast draws their ancestry to Anioma land. Look carefully and you will see.

Solsix:
Nobody is forcing, ned saw an opportunity and he's grabbing it two two hands, but in this like this there will be opposition

Solsix:
You have said it all nothing to add. If they don't want to join South East they should remain in delta state. I just pity ned nwoko they have succeeded in rubbishing his hard work.