₦airaland Forum

creativejagaban:
You got it all wrong. You cited the wrongest example.

Barcelona vs Chelsea match is not the same as political parties on one hand and Nigeria as a country on the other hand.


Are you saying that the referee cannot, after officiating the match according to you, go ahead and serve the UK government, or what are you saying.

You love to deceive your fellow travelers simply because of hatred for the Jagaban of Africa.

Yakubu was a referee of the match between APC, LP, PDP, etc, but is now to work for the COUNTRY, not APC. Get that into your medula oblongata.

Tinubu till 2031.

Dijita:
It is the Nigeria way. Loose election claim rigging. Win lection claim God's will

SixSeven:
..This is about public trust. Even if there’s no legal conflict, the optics matter. Citizens could perceive that the electoral process is “rewarded” or politicized, undermining trust in both elections and...

Eriokanmi:
...and appoint the head of an unbiased umpire like the INEC boss by the ruling party and supporters claiming its a normal thing to do

creativejagaban:
Who is asking the question about public trust Is it the fans of losers LP and PDP or the greater Nigeria populace.

It is the norm the world over that anyone can be appointed to serve the country in any capacity. Even former presidents like Jonathan are usually engaged on diplomatic duties.

So there is no fuss at all.

Obidients can continue to cry blue or red murder, the Jagaban of Africa is not bothered.

Yakubu is going to be an ambassador. Amen.

SixSeven:
When you grow up, you will love your COUNTRY more than the PARTY. I can see that you are more interested in politics than governance so I am afraid, this discussion stretches beyond the bounds you typically engage with.

Brendaniel:
Imagine a referee who officiated the final match of a champions league battle between Barcelona and Chelsea then gave controversial penalties to Chelsea which helped them win the title becoming a brand ambassador for Chelsea 2 years later.

jogojogo:
If you read clearly with understanding; you will be ashamed to post the myoooopiic content

ogugwa1992:
RE: ADC’S CLAIM THAT AMBASSADORIAL NOMINATION
“CONFIRMS” PARTISANSHIP — A CONTRADICTION OF THEIR OWN
RECORD AND A MISREADING OF GLOBAL DEMOCRATIC NORMS




https://leaders.ng/2025/12/01/re-adcs-claim-that-ambassadorial-nominationconfirms-partisanship-a-contradiction-of-their-ownrecord-and-a-misreading-of-global-democratic-norms/

SixSeven:
The conflict does not have to be direct. The appearance of or the thought that it can be is why you don't eat all food. I don't have time, let AI help me compose the rest of my response. It is not a good nomination, given the recent election. This is why judges are not seen in some places, mostly social events. Not because they cannot party and drink but they don't want to create that perception of bias. AI starts from here:

A conflict of interest generally occurs when someone’s personal interests or prior roles could improperly influence their current responsibilities, creating a risk of bias, undue advantage, or perception of unfairness.

Key principle: The conflict is not just about actual impropriety but also about the appearance of impropriety, which is crucial for trust in governance.

In this case:

1. Yakubu no longer runs elections. His official duties as INEC chair have ended.


2. His ambassadorial role is representing Nigeria abroad, not regulating elections, appointing officials, or influencing domestic electoral outcomes.


3. Therefore, technically there’s no direct conflict of interest, because his prior role has no formal overlap with his new duties.

However, from an ethical perspective:

Public perception may see a potential problem: the same person who declared the current president winner is now rewarded with a prestigious government post, which can appear as patronage or quid pro quo.

This is about public trust. Even if there’s no legal conflict, the optics matter. Citizens could perceive that the electoral process is “rewarded” or politicized, undermining trust in both elections and diplomatic appointments.

AI ends here.

Even for parents, they are taught to be impartial and not show one child more favor than the other. It's not what they do but the kids start to observe them and can sense bias. Do not forget, Yakubu was an ELECTORAL JUDGE. Out of principle, if he has, I will be happy if he rejects it. This was how they justified the pardon list until they were told this doesn't make any sense. It reeks of bias and political maneuvering. Perception matters.

BreconHills:
Public perception is over rated. Any leader - from a boys scout leader to a corporate CEO understands thst trying to address perception is a race to the bottom. Especially when you are 100% convinced.

What people want is results.

I love this Ebenezer Obey record and I have found it very instructive through life.

BreconHills:
Public perception is over rated. Any leader - from a boys scout leader to a corporate CEO understands thst trying to address perception is a race to the bottom. Especially when you are 100% convinced.

What people want is results.

I love this Ebenezer Obey record and I have found it very instructive through life.

SixSeven:
Let me help you and the readers with another recent real life situation. You will see that gra gra no do anything for life.



Martin Bally, an executive who allegedly made comments to a former employee that disparaged Indian workers and said the company's products were for "poor people," has left the company.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgCG355ywcw

In a statement, Campbell's said it determined that a recording that captured the purported conversation involving Bally is authentic. The company said Bally, a vice president in information technology at the food manufacturer, "is no longer employed by the company."

The alleged comments came to light last week in a lawsuit filed by Robert Garza, who was hired by Campbell's as a cybersecurity analyst in September 2024. In the complaint, Garza claimed Bally made the offensive remarks during a November 2024 meeting to discuss his salary.

According to the suit, Bally made several comments about Indian workers and said Campbell's makes "highly [processed] food" for "poor people."

The discussion between Garza and Bally was recorded, according to Runyan Law Group, which is representing Garza. That recording captured comments, allegedly by Bally, that claimed the company's soup uses "bioengineered meat" and that denigrated the abilities of Indian workers.

"The comments were vulgar, offensive and false, and we apologize for the hurt they have caused," Campbell's said in its latest statement. "This behavior does not reflect our values and the culture of our company, and we will not tolerate that kind of language under any circumstances."

The company added that it learned about the lawsuit and first heard "segments" of the recording on Nov. 20, noting that neither Garza nor his attorney had notified Campbell's about the audio recording's existence.

According to Garza's lawsuit, he informed his manager about the comments on Jan. 10, and further alleged he wasn't encouraged to report the incident to human resources. Garza was then "abruptly terminated from employment" shortly afterwards, the lawsuit alleges.

Garza's suit alleges he suffered stress, humiliation, embarrassment and mental anguish as a result of Bally and his manager's actions. He is seeking compensation for emotional, reputational and economic harm, as well as attorneys' fees, according to the complaint.

Edited by Alain Sherter
Source: CBS
Or should we talk about Ezra? Public perception is overrated, no problem

BreconHills:
You've spoken about lot of nonsense.

How does a man who clearly insulted a group of people compare with appointing as ambassador an INEC boss who has not been found guilty of any offence? This is not perception this is a crime.

In Yakubus case His only guilt was that he presided over an election in which some people lost and one person won. The case went all the way to the SC but some dead ender can't let it go.

Ezra?

You are flailing and failing. Is there anything remotely similar to this case?

Go and find an example worthy of the name and then we will talk about public perception. And I will show you the hypocrisy behind it and why strong leaders dont rule by optics.

BreconHills:
Public perception is over rated. Any leader - from a boys scout leader to a corporate CEO understands thst trying to address perception is a race to the bottom. Especially when you are 100% convinced.

What people want is results.