Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case - Politics (5) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case (10197 Views)
Poll: Do You Agree That The South East Contributes Meaningfully To Nigeria's Economy Other Than Through VAT?
Yes
64% (211 votes)
No
35% (115 votes)
This poll has ended |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by lawani(m): 12:17pm On Feb 01 |
Gajagojo:You know the population of NW to SE. It is 3 to 1. You can calculate the per Capita VAT and it will show you the SE is higher than the NW. |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Gajagojo: 1:01pm On Feb 01 |
lawani:You go explain explain explain No evidence |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Gajagojo: 1:11pm On Feb 01 |
ariesbull:So in your mind these pictures prove something? They prove nothing I ha e been to Onitsha Some areas cannae described as RURAL most of these storey buildings you are showing tell us where there get water from? Do they have running water with sewage systems It is only a person who has not been there you can bamboozle The built up area in Onitsha is Tiny . What is the size of Onitsha? Name the higher institutions there Onitsha is a filthy place These storey buildings STINK repeat they smell foul very bad air with very fifty stress full of garbage and wait for it PIGs So when you say people don't travel we know Onitsha inside out . There are pigs everywhere Ibadan is about 80% The size of Anambra state You cannot compare Ibadan to Enugu which is the best best city In the region followed by Owerri All these storey buildings mean nothing They are filthy and stinking No water no sewage management |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by ariesbull: 1:26pm On Feb 01 |
Gajagojo:Where is rural in Onitsha.... Even the whole Anambra there is no rural areas... Abeg where is your state let's compare the picture ...at least I know oat states in southern Nigeria Be proud call your state |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Gajagojo: 1:32pm On Feb 01 |
ariesbull:Lol a place in a so called town with no electricity? Does everyone have electricity in Onitsha Does every community have roads Imagine claiming there is no rural area Your level of conceit is amusing |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by ariesbull: 1:47pm On Feb 01 |
Gajagojo:You are using your village to compare Anambra ....Anambra is the second most urbanised state in Nigeria after Lagos Not only Onitsha...every place has electricity in Anambra ...no dey argue wetin you don't know ...even till now Shane no let you call your state I no even talk your village ... This is Onitsha ,not even the state capital
|
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by UrVillageChief: 1:48pm On Feb 01 |
Akwamkpuruamu:...... and the people are economically buoyant enough to pay the taxes. In most cases, people don't pay what they don't earn as taxes. You are taxed based on your financial level. We both know none of you would be playing this prime Sergio Ramos if the tables were turned and it was the North that were the 'parasites' feeding on the sweat of other regions . Yes, high VAT ultimately connotes high economic growth and activities and efficient tax-collection system and isn't this just common sense? . It's no coincidence that places like the New York, Lagos, Oyo, Kano and Rivers all have high VATs and what exactly do these places have in common? The answer is that they are all Economic giants and Powerhouses. Make your region welcoming to investors. Make it secure and stop being hostile. Hostility is the greatest enemy of economic progress. Also, educate your people on the importance of staying back home to develop home. Mass emigration from a place is a pointer to the fact that it's a barren land while immigration shows prosperity. People naturally troop to places and lands that promise prosperity and growth and the SW and the Northern Nigeria States of Kano and Kaduna are perfect examples. |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by ariesbull: 1:51pm On Feb 01 |
Gajagojo:As of today this is the Lagos that stinks ...thank lord that NYSC corp member said that Lagos stinks even IsoSpeed demonstrated the stickiness stinking Lagos ...bro leave story
|
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by ariesbull: 1:51pm On Feb 01 |
Akwamkpuruamu:exactly... |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Gajagojo: 1:59pm On Feb 01 |
ariesbull:What is the size of Onitsha? Those pictures are not impressive to me They prove nothing There are pigs on those streets Pigs Onitsha is the dirtiest place on earth Anyone from Onitsha or Aba should come and deny that they don't live with pigs |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by ariesbull: 2:54pm On Feb 01 |
Gajagojo:Yoruba cities that is noted for being dirty ....
|
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Gajagojo: 3:13pm On Feb 01 |
ariesbull:Dirtiest city on earth Onitsha and Aba |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by inoki247: 3:40pm On Feb 01 |
PHIPEX:Are the people paying the Tax crying so far the people celebrating it are paying there taxes and not complaining you don't have the right to tell them what they should celebrate... With how high UK tax are people still wants to die there.... For you to even be under any bracket of taxes it shows you're making a progress a jobless person can't pay tax.. |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by PHIPEX(m): 3:44pm On Feb 01 |
inoki247:The people who pay high taxes should not c9nsider themselves more progressive than those who paid less, that's the point. Do you get same value from Nigeria govt as similar person who paid high tax to UK govt. We are being short changed in Nigeria |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by inoki247: 4:09pm On Feb 01 |
PHIPEX:The people paying the high tax haven't had any reason to move to the one that pay lower. So why're you crying on there behalf.... With the lower tax people should be migrating in droves to the state that pay lower instead reverse is the case... And if truly the states that pays lower are doing a business turn over of 100m yearly they will still pay the tax.. You can't do 100m yearly and you calling that progressing and try to compare yourself with someone who makes the number easily... If truly is by lower tax SE should be filled up right now and not the other way.round... |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by lawani(m): 5:30pm On Feb 01 |
inoki247:How do you determine filled up? A region that is around the size of Oyo state but containing around 20 million people is filled up by Oyo state standards. |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Gajagojo: 6:16pm On Feb 01 |
lawani:Another explanation I don't know |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by UrPapa: 6:51pm On Feb 01 |
Igbophobia:my question is, what prompted you to ask those questions on your screenshot from AI “Which tribe is the wisest in Africa” |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by inoki247: 8:27pm On Feb 01 |
lawani:If we are to go by you people explanation Oyo state isn't supposed to have 20m people since they're over taxed by the Govt the state no suppose remain reach 1m like this.. The 19m suppose don move to the state with lesser tax... |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by lawani(m): 9:03pm On Feb 01 |
inoki247:You people demand too much from the SE when the total population is less than Kano state. NIN data shows clearly that the SE is 80 percent of Lagos in population. Oyo and Ogun have around the same population as the SE. If they have half of NW VAT it means they are doing well. |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by DeOTR: 9:47pm On Feb 01 |
lawani:Not only 80%, make it 95%. Do you guys even believe what you type? We have 5 Yoruba states, Kwara State is predominantly Yoruba and kogi West is about 20% of kogi state. All these states are less than 300 miles from Lagos, but you believe people that travel twice the distance are 80% of the total population of Lagos? If you think igbo people are much in Lagos, let me break your heart, you'll rarely find a single family in yorubaland where at least one person out of them is not in Lagos with his/her family. How do you reconcile this your bogus figure with the fact that we still have hausas and other ethnic groups in Lagos? Oga, the only reason Lagos can even be 50% igbo is if 40% of the SE population is emptied into the state. |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by lawani(m): 11:20pm On Feb 01 |
DeOTR:I didn't say Igbo population in Lagos. I said the population of the SE is eighty percent of Lagos population according to NIN data. If Lagos is 23 million then the 5 SE states will be less than 20 million. That will also be less than Kano state yet you people expect the region to do well in VAT generation. Oyo and Ogun together are about thesame population as the entire 5 states in the SE. |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Mrexcell(m): 5:25am On Feb 02 |
OnionBandit:Where did u get the data that the south east is unsafe for investment? The available statistics clearly shows the south east as the safest region in nigeria it currently has the lowest kidnapping rate compared to other regions one major factor the poster failed to take note of is the years of political and infrastructural marginalisation that have slowed development in the south east since after the biafran war. |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by lawani(m): 7:44am On Feb 02 |
Mrexcell:Lowest kidnapping incidence not rate |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by DeOTR: 8:56am On Feb 02 |
lawani:OK. Sorry I read that wrongly. |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by mandarin: 10:07am On Feb 02 |
AustineE1:Can I answer you? Yes let me try. 1. The southeast is the smallest region with landmass roughly the size of Oyo state and it receives five allocations from FGN meaning it receives more per square km more than any other region in Nigeria and have more money to build public infrastructure including schools, health centers , roads etc. So the current % to total population of the Southeast should be around 12%. 2. Its the region with net migration, so because a high % of its population are involved in Nigeria's supply chain, their remittance to population is very high and this is attested by the level of residential housing developments you can see. While this is good, it also means the region is dependent on consumers who are largely living outside of the region which is why the issue of relocating their businesses home may not work because others will occupy that vacuum and it will end in losses. 3. When you look at contribution to the economy in VAT etc, VAT captures formal areas of the economy but the informal sector is very huge above 40% in Nigeria(may be 60%) and VAT does not play into these e.g. when you buy pure water in traffic, no VAT is paid but if you buy same in eatery yo do pay VAT. If we are to include those segments, we may have something like below: Zone Share of National Consumption 3-Year Consumption ($bn) South West (incl. Lagos) 32% $320bn North West 21% $210bn North Central 14% $140bn South East 12% $120bn South South 11% $110bn North East 10% $100bn Nigeria Total 100% $1,000bn 4. The Southeast may have the highest per capital consumption due to a small share of the population just below the Lagos metropolitan areas however, the consumption values for NW is higher due to more population but far lower per capita capacity. 5. This shows that the SE businesses are less formal and their production capacity is about 10% of national output below Northcentral at about 11% due to large farm outputs and about 15% by Northwest due to largely farm and commerce around Kaduna and Kano. These estimates covers farm and non farm economic output. SS is second like 25% due to oil and gas. Data does not lie and its not emotional. VAT does not capture all consumptions but its a pointer to the money and consumption capacity, modernization and attracts capital because those are data investors can relate to. I hope this helps. |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by lawani(m): 11:40am On Feb 02 |
mandarin:Your analysis is sound but consumption in the SE can not exceed that of the SS. The population of the SS is more than 130 percent of the SE. Compare the cities in the two zones. Data shows that the North consumes more cement than the South. I therefore believe the SW can not be so much bigger than the NW in consumption |
| Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Putinofrussia: 12:57pm On Feb 02 |
These are pictures stolen by that guy upstairs saying that it is SE. It is not WE but Yaba Oyingbo axis built by Yorubas who dominate the place 98%.
|
Northern States Show Strong Economic Contribution In Latest VAT Report, Challeng • How Did Peter Obi Catapult A Barely Known Political Party in Nigeria? Case Study • ISWAP Training Child Soldiers In North-East Nigeria (Photo) • 2 • 3 • 4
At Least 50 People Killed By Terrorists On Bike In Zamfara • It Is The Hand Of God – Gov. Okorocha • Abiola's Family Has Forgiven Al Mustapha, Others
.