₦airaland Forum

A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April 23 for the arraignment of former Governor of Kaduna State Nasir El-Rufai on allegation of cybercrime and breach of communication brought against him by the Department of the State Service (DSS).

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik on
Wednesday adjourned the matter after El Rufai failed to appear in court.

Counsel for the DSS, Oluwole Aladedoye (SAN), informed the court that the former governor was still with the Independent Corrupt and Practices Commission (ICPC) for investigation on other matters.

He said that DSS has no control over the sister agency and requested an adjournment to March 23.

Although, counsel to El-Rufai, Oluwole Iyamu, did not oppose adjournment, but he vehemently demanded for bail for the former governor.
He cited several authorities to back up the request for bail.

However, the DSS lawyer vehemently opposed the bail request on the ground that it was premature, adding that the issue of bail can only be raised after the formal arraignment.

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik after taking the arguments declined to grant the bail request, adding that her court was not yet seized of the matter.

In the three-count charge, the federal government in the charge stated that El Rufai, on February 13, while appearing as a guest on Arise TV Station’s Prime Time Programme in Abuja, admitted during the interview that he and his cohorts unlawfully intercepted the phone communications of the National Security Adviser (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 12 (1) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Amendment, Act, 2024.

In count two, El Rufai was accused of stating on Arise TV Station’s Prime Time Programme in Abuja “during the interview that you know and relate with certain individual, who unlawfully intercepted the phone communications of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, without reporting the said individual to relevant security agencies and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 27(b) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Amendment, Act, 2024.”

In count three, the federal government alleged that El Rufal, and others at large did use technical equipment or systems which compromised public safety, national security and instilling reasonable apprehension of insecurity among Nigerians by unlawfully intercepting the phone communications of the NSA Ribadu, “to which you admitted during an interview on 13th February, 2026, on Arise TV Station’s Prime Time Programme in Abuja and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 131 (2) Nigerian Communications Act 2003.”

Richtaiwo:
Even with my modest grasp of the law, I know that intercepting phone calls is a serious offence. Intercepting the NSA’s calls? That’s not just bold, that’s auditioning for a courtroom drama.

When the narrative eventually upgrades to phrases like “terrorism financing” and “sensitive intelligence,” the penny will drop.

Which makes one wonder, how does a former governor and minister miss something this obvious? Was he on drugs?

Richtaiwo:
Even with my modest grasp of the law, I know that intercepting phone calls is a serious offence. Intercepting the NSA’s calls? That’s not just bold, that’s auditioning for a courtroom drama.

When the narrative eventually upgrades to phrases like “terrorism financing” and “sensitive intelligence,” the penny will drop.

Which makes one wonder, how does a former governor and minister miss something this obvious? Was he on drugs?

AMINDA:
Tinubu’s water carriers have taken strategic positions on this thread. Elrufai is ready to meet you and your masters in court but it's now the government refusing to appear in court to try the man that they claim is guilty without charge. On what charge is the ICPC currently holding onto the man without bail and why did they fail to present him in court? It will definitely come back around. This is certain.

Richtaiwo:
Even with my modest grasp of the law, I know that intercepting phone calls is a serious offence. Intercepting the NSA’s calls? That’s not just bold, that’s auditioning for a courtroom drama.

When the narrative eventually upgrades to phrases like “terrorism financing” and “sensitive intelligence,” the penny will drop.

Which makes one wonder, how does a former governor and minister miss something this obvious? Was he on drugs?

LegendHero:
El-Rufai is the first person in 2026 that his mouth put into trouble.

Guinness should just give him that world record.

AMINDA:
Tinubu’s water carriers have taken strategic positions on this thread. Elrufai is ready to meet you and your masters in court but it's now the government refusing to appear in court to try the man that they claim is guilty without charge. On what charge is the ICPC currently holding onto the man without bail and why did they fail to present him in court? It will definitely come back around. This is certain.

Richtaiwo:
Even with my modest grasp of the law, I know that intercepting phone calls is a serious offence. Intercepting the NSA’s calls? That’s not just bold, that’s auditioning for a courtroom drama.

When the narrative eventually upgrades to phrases like “terrorism financing” and “sensitive intelligence,” the penny will drop.

Which makes one wonder, how does a former governor and minister miss something this obvious? Was he on drugs?