₦airaland Forum

https://youtube.com/shorts/m4bgdcQF4yQ?si=ZlRBWj4hbmL_jjGk

Job 30.8 (KJV) 8They were children of fools, yea, children of base men: They were viler than the earth.

Hoodrat:
https://youtube.com/shorts/m4bgdcQF4yQ?si=ZlRBWj4hbmL_jjGk

😂😂😂
Hoodrat.
HOODRAT.
Let me get this straight.
You called my sources fabricated colonial propaganda. I produced Wikipedia. Talbot. Vanguard. Punch. National Daily. Pulse Nigeria. The Cable. Multiple court cases. Named victims. Named suspects. Named convictions. Seven year olds. Ten year olds. Sixteen year olds with organs harvested in Ogun state. Nigerian journalists. Nigerian police. Nigerian judges. Nigerian courts. Nigerian convictions. Your own country's own press reporting on your own country's own crimes.
You produced a YouTube Short.
Not even a proper video mate. A SHORT. Sixty bastard seconds. The format specifically invented for people who find TikTok too intellectually exhausting. AI generated by the look of it, that synthetic geography teacher voice reading bullet points over stock footage that some bloke assembled between his afternoon nap and his evening prayers.
THAT is your evidence standard.
THAT is what you're deploying against a century of independent ethnographic records from British, French, German and Belgian sources who never met each other, all documenting identical practices across different tribes in different territories across different decades.
You used words like "dismantle" and "cleanly" like something impressive was coming. You called me intellectually inadequate. You diagnosed my insecurity. You lectured me about evidence and historical methodology.
Then you linked a sixty second AI slop video.
That's not a counter argument Hoodrat. That's a confession dressed up with a thumbnail.

Hoodrat:
You’ve written a long racist monologue pretending to be historical analysis,but all you’ve done is expose yourself as someone who doesn’t know history, doesn’t understand civilisation, and doesn’t realise how loudly your insecurity is screaming through every paragraph.

Let’s dismantle your claims cleanly.

1. Civilisation is not white. It is global. Always has been.
Your entire argument collapses instantly because you assume If you use something invented by someone else, you can’t critique anything about them. That logic is really childish for supposed to be older man ranting in such manner calls for question regarding IQ and emotional maturirty.

Every civilisation on earth uses inventions from others: Europeans use algebra (Dark Skinned Moors/Islamic Golden Age).
Europeans use numerals (India). Europeans use paper, printing, gunpowder, compass (China).
Europeans use coffee, palm oil, sorghum, millet, yams (Africa).
Europeans use vaccination concepts that existed in Africa and Asia long before Jenner.
Europeans use architecture, astronomy, medicine from Egypt and the Middle East.
If using another culture’s inventions means you lose your voice,then Europe would be mute.
Civilisation is cumulative not racial property.

2. Many white inventions were not invented by white people at all. Your list is a museum of half-truths and stolen credit.

Computing?
The first programmable machine concepts came from Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace, yes but the modern computer revolution was built by global collaboration, including Black, Indian, Asian, and Arab engineers.

Bill Gates didn’t invent anything he bought, copied, and licensed existing systems.
Microsoft’s core architecture was built by Indian engineers, including the man who became Microsoft’s CEO.

Internet?
The internet was built by global researchers, including Africans and Asians.
The World Wide Web runs on protocols developed by international teams, not a single race.

Facebook? Zuckerberg didn’t invent social networking he stole from indian students,also copied existing platforms like MySpace, Friendster, and Harvard’s own student directories and he was fined hefty cost for such theft.

Medicine? Surgery, bone-setting, and early medical systems existed in Africa, India, and China thousands of years before Europe left the medieval era.

Europe’s medical leap only happened after absorbing knowledge from Africa, Persia, and the Islamic world.

Your argument is not history it’s colonial propaganda rooted in yt supremacy unfounded ideology.

3. Yoruba history was misrepresented in your rant. Your attempt to smear Yoruba people with fabricated claims is not only false it exposes your ignorance. Yoruba societies had strict taboos against cannibalism.
Yoruba civilisation had urban planning, sanitation, metallurgy, philosophy, and governance long before Europe industrialised.

Ifá is one of the most sophisticated knowledge systems on earth mathematics, ethics, psychology, governance, all encoded.
Meanwhile, the Europe you’re glorifying: lived in filthy, unsanitary conditions for centuries
suffered mass death from plagues like bubonic and black death due to lack of hygiene had no sewage systems
had no scientific medicine, had no literacy for the majority of its population
was still burning witches while Africa had universities Your attempt to rewrite history is not only wrong it’s embarrassing.


4. Your rant exposes you as an intruder, not a participant.
You speak like someone who doesn’t understand African societies

doesn’t respect African people

doesn’t know African history

doesn’t belong to the community he’s lecturing

and is deeply threatened by African self-awareness

You didn’t come to debate. You came to assert racial dominance in a space that doesn’t belong to you.

That’s why your entire argument is built on superiority fantasies, colonial talking points, selective history, insecurity masked as confidence
and a desperate need to feel above Africans, You exposed yourself more than you exposed anyone else.

5. The biggest hypocrisy: you use African inventions daily,If you want to play the who invented what game:

You eat crops domesticated in Africa.

You use metallurgy techniques pioneered in Africa.

You use agricultural systems developed in Africa.

You use mathematics influenced by African civilisations.

You use medical knowledge that originated in Africa.

You use cultural forms (music, language, art) shaped by Africa.

You are as dependent on African contributions as anyone else is on European ones.

Civilisation is shared.
Your ideology is not.

6. The real issue: your rant is fear disguised as pride, People who are secure in their identity don’t need to list 200 inventions
rewrite history,insult entire cultures, cling to racial superiority myths, attack Africans on African platforms
Your entire message is a confession, You are terrified of a world where Africans know their history, their worth, and their contributions.
That’s why you’re here.

You didn’t write history you wrote insecurity.
And the moment you stepped into African conversations with colonial propaganda, you exposed yourself as an intruder, not an authority.

https://youtube.com/shorts/l0OzXgX6RiI?si=7CSiGOY_eUBCMM9m

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/m4bgdcQF4yQ

YouTube shorts
YouTube shorts
Not academic evidence but AI shorts

Right Hoodrat. Let's go.
Your entire rebuttal was four hundred words of historical theatre designed to avoid two questions you cannot answer.
Question one. Name one thing you touch in your daily life in 2026 that was invented by Africans. Not cultivated. Not philosophically influenced. Not contributed to somewhere along the way. Invented. Engineered. Deployed as functional modern technology by Africans for modern daily life. The phone. No. The road. No. The electricity. No. The medicine. No. The vehicle. No. The fuel. No. The building. No. The concrete. No. The glass. No. The internet. No. The network. No. The screen. No. The generator you run when NEPA fails which is always. No. The NEPA infrastructure that fails. Also no. One. Just give me one. You couldn't. So you talked about algebra from the Islamic golden age like that's what's powering your 4G signal tonight in Lagos.
It isn't.
Question two. Your cannibalism rebuttal. I produced Wikipedia. Talbot's ethnographic records. The Cable. Pulse Nigeria. Vanguard. National Daily. Punch. Multiple court cases. Multiple arrests. Multiple convictions. Children. Named. Aged. Seven year olds. Ten year olds. Sixteen year olds with their hearts and genitals removed and left in Ogun state by people your courts convicted. Nigerian journalists. Nigerian police. Nigerian courts. Nigerian newspapers reporting on Nigerian crimes.
Your counter evidence was the word "fabricated."
That's it. No sources. No academic rebuttal. No alternative anthropological record. No explanation for why British, French, German and Belgian colonial records independently invented identical stories about different tribes across a century. No explanation for why Punch and Vanguard are apparently running colonial propaganda against their own people in 2025. Just "fabricated" delivered with the confidence of a man who has never once been asked to prove anything he says.
And then the beautiful part. The part that makes this whole performance collapse into itself like a Lagos building with fake columns and paint designed for Manchester winters. You made a thread about killing mixed race children. Four years ago. Still up. Never deleted. Never apologised for. And you're here diagnosing MY racism. You used the language of African dignity and liberation to defend a position that your own philosophy should find monstrous because mixed race children are the literal human product of exactly the cross cultural connection you claim to celebrate.
You didn't address it. Not one syllable. Because you can't. So you buried it under history lessons hoping nobody noticed.
A man who actually believed in African dignity would have led with "I was wrong and here's why." You led with algebra.
That's not a debater. That's a man hiding behind a bookshelf hoping the bookshelf looks impressive enough that nobody checks what's behind it.
It doesn't. We checked.

Every time you complain about how I write, just remember, not my fault your attention span makes a goldfish look like a philosophy professor.

budaatum:
Vikings is not the equivalent of Africa. Europe is. Here in blighty we are aware the history is whatever we decide to write or not erase in our books.

A better argument might be, Europe changed their ways earlier than some. But a counter could be that slavery was the cannibalistic eating of the might of others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannibalism_in_Europe

Awww, you almost had it little man. He said my ancestors. Im not British. I posted documented academic evidence naming each specific tribe? You can back with British and vague Europe and completely missed the point. And how are neanderthals relevant? Different species.

Fenrir:
YouTube shorts
YouTube shorts
Not academic evidence but AI shorts

Right Hoodrat. Let's go.
Your entire rebuttal was four hundred words of historical theatre designed to avoid two questions you cannot answer.
Question one. Name one thing you touch in your daily life in 2026 that was invented by Africans. Not cultivated. Not philosophically influenced. Not contributed to somewhere along the way. Invented. Engineered. Deployed as functional modern technology by Africans for modern daily life. The phone. No. The road. No. The electricity. No. The medicine. No. The vehicle. No. The fuel. No. The building. No. The concrete. No. The glass. No. The internet. No. The network. No. The screen. No. The generator you run when NEPA fails which is always. No. The NEPA infrastructure that fails. Also no. One. Just give me one. You couldn't. So you talked about algebra from the Islamic golden age like that's what's powering your 4G signal tonight in Lagos.
It isn't.
Question two. Your cannibalism rebuttal. I produced Wikipedia. Talbot's ethnographic records. The Cable. Pulse Nigeria. Vanguard. National Daily. Punch. Multiple court cases. Multiple arrests. Multiple convictions. Children. Named. Aged. Seven year olds. Ten year olds. Sixteen year olds with their hearts and genitals removed and left in Ogun state by people your courts convicted. Nigerian journalists. Nigerian police. Nigerian courts. Nigerian newspapers reporting on Nigerian crimes.
Your counter evidence was the word "fabricated."
That's it. No sources. No academic rebuttal. No alternative anthropological record. No explanation for why British, French, German and Belgian colonial records independently invented identical stories about different tribes across a century. No explanation for why Punch and Vanguard are apparently running colonial propaganda against their own people in 2025. Just "fabricated" delivered with the confidence of a man who has never once been asked to prove anything he says.
And then the beautiful part. The part that makes this whole performance collapse into itself like a Lagos building with fake columns and paint designed for Manchester winters. You made a thread about killing mixed race children. Four years ago. Still up. Never deleted. Never apologised for. And you're here diagnosing MY racism. You used the language of African dignity and liberation to defend a position that your own philosophy should find monstrous because mixed race children are the literal human product of exactly the cross cultural connection you claim to celebrate.
You didn't address it. Not one syllable. Because you can't. So you buried it under history lessons hoping nobody noticed.
A man who actually believed in African dignity would have led with "I was wrong and here's why." You led with algebra.
That's not a debater. That's a man hiding behind a bookshelf hoping the bookshelf looks impressive enough that nobody checks what's behind it.
It doesn't. We checked.

Every time you complain about how I write, just remember, not my fault your attention span makes a goldfish look like a philosophy professor.

Your entire message is built on two assumptions that collapse the moment they’re touched.... that Africans must justify their existence to you and that you get to decide what counts as real invention Both assumptions expose exactly what you’re trying to hide you’re not debating you’re policing.

1. Your name one invention challenge is not a question it’s a colonial test of inferiority.
You’re not asking for information, You’re demanding submission. You want Africans to stand in front of you and perform a ritual of prove your worth,while you sit on a throne built from selective history and racial ego.

That’s not intellectual inquiry, it’s the same old hierarchy dressed in 2026 vocabulary.
And the moment someone refuses to kneel, you panic and start listing household objects like a man trying to win an argument with a kitchen catalogue.

Civilisation is cumulative.
No group invented everything.
No group owns modernity.
No group gets to claim exclusive authorship of the world.

Your question is not profound it’s outdated.

2. Your cannibalism argument collapses because you’re not using evidence you’re using obsession.
You listed: colonial ethnographies,sensationalist headlines,crime reports,isolated cases, and Wikipedia summaries …as if they prove a cultural identity. They don’t. Crime is not culture, Colonial writing is not scripture, Isolated atrocities are not anthropology. And your refusal to distinguish between, historical context, colonial distortion, modern crime and cultural identity …reveals your motive:
you’re not trying to understand you’re trying to degrade.

That’s why you ignored every correction and doubled down on the same talking points.

3.Your hypocrisy is obvious you accuse others of lying while relying on outdated colonial tropes .
You claim to care about historical accuracy,yet, you ignore modern scholarship, you ignore African academic sources, you ignore global research, you ignore corrections from historians, you ignore context, you ignore nuance

You cling to century‑old colonial ethnographies as if they’re sacred scripture, while dismissing modern African journalism, modern African scholarship, and modern African voices.

That’s not objectivity.
That’s ideological selection.

You choose whatever supports your worldview and discard everything else.

You didn’t address it because you can’t. You buried it under paragraphs hoping the weight of your own words would hide it.
It didn’t. You exposed yourself as someone who uses African dignity as a costume, not a conviction.

4. Your entire performance is projection. You accuse others of, insecurity, evasion, fabrication, intellectual weakness …but every accusation you make is a mirror. You’re the one shifting the goalposts, drowning the thread in noise, policing African identity, demanding inferiority rituals
hiding behind selective history,collapsing into personal attacks when challenged

You’re not debating.
You’re defending a worldview that cannot survive scrutiny.

5. The real issue is simple: you’re angry that Africans no longer accept the script you’re reciting. You’re not upset about evidence.
You’re upset about autonomy, You’re upset that Africans today question colonial narratives, reject inferiority tests, understand global history
recognise propaganda, refuse to be intimidated by volume, and no longer need your approval to define themselves your anger is not about truth. It’s about losing control of the narrative.

Fenrir:
YouTube shorts
YouTube shorts
Not academic evidence but AI shorts

Right Hoodrat. Let's go.
Your entire rebuttal was four hundred words of historical theatre designed to avoid two questions you cannot answer.
Question one. Name one thing you touch in your daily life in 2026 that was invented by Africans. Not cultivated. Not philosophically influenced. Not contributed to somewhere along the way. Invented. Engineered. Deployed as functional modern technology by Africans for modern daily life. The phone. No. The road. No. The electricity. No. The medicine. No. The vehicle. No. The fuel. No. The building. No. The concrete. No. The glass. No. The internet. No. The network. No. The screen. No. The generator you run when NEPA fails which is always. No. The NEPA infrastructure that fails. Also no. One. Just give me one. You couldn't. So you talked about algebra from the Islamic golden age like that's what's powering your 4G signal tonight in Lagos.
It isn't.
Question two. Your cannibalism rebuttal. I produced Wikipedia. Talbot's ethnographic records. The Cable. Pulse Nigeria. Vanguard. National Daily. Punch. Multiple court cases. Multiple arrests. Multiple convictions. Children. Named. Aged. Seven year olds. Ten year olds. Sixteen year olds with their hearts and genitals removed and left in Ogun state by people your courts convicted. Nigerian journalists. Nigerian police. Nigerian courts. Nigerian newspapers reporting on Nigerian crimes.
Your counter evidence was the word "fabricated."
That's it. No sources. No academic rebuttal. No alternative anthropological record. No explanation for why British, French, German and Belgian colonial records independently invented identical stories about different tribes across a century. No explanation for why Punch and Vanguard are apparently running colonial propaganda against their own people in 2025. Just "fabricated" delivered with the confidence of a man who has never once been asked to prove anything he says.
And then the beautiful part. The part that makes this whole performance collapse into itself like a Lagos building with fake columns and paint designed for Manchester winters. You made a thread about killing mixed race children. Four years ago. Still up. Never deleted. Never apologised for. And you're here diagnosing MY racism. You used the language of African dignity and liberation to defend a position that your own philosophy should find monstrous because mixed race children are the literal human product of exactly the cross cultural connection you claim to celebrate.
You didn't address it. Not one syllable. Because you can't. So you buried it under history lessons hoping nobody noticed.
A man who actually believed in African dignity would have led with "I was wrong and here's why." You led with algebra.
That's not a debater. That's a man hiding behind a bookshelf hoping the bookshelf looks impressive enough that nobody checks what's behind it.
It doesn't. We checked.

Every time you complain about how I write, just remember, not my fault your attention span makes a goldfish look like a philosophy professor.

Your entire rant collapses under one simple truth: you’re not here to discuss history you’re here to police Africans who refuse to see themselves through a colonial lens. Everything else is noise.

1. Your ideology is exposed it’s not history,it’s racial superiority dressed as analysis.
You didn’t present facts.

You presented a worldview where: one group is the builder of civilisation,everyone else is dependent,and therefore no one has the right to critique anything you identify with. That’s not history. That’s racial hierarchy ideology, the same script used for centuries to justify domination.

And the moment someone challenges it, you explode into a 3‑page tantrum about inventions, toilets, and mattresses. That’s not confidence that’s panic.

2. Your white man built everything narrative is already shattered publicly, globally, and permanently.You’re angry because Africans today can open a browser and see african ... global contributions to science, global contributions to engineering, global contributions to mathematics, global contributions to medicine, global contributions to architecture, global contributions to technology

You’re angry because the internet destroyed the monopoly on historical storytelling. You’re angry because people no longer swallow the old narrative that civilisation is the property of one group.

You’re angry because Africans now know, many European inventions were global collaborations many breakthroughs were built on knowledge from Africa, Asia, and the Middle East many founders simply commercialised or appropriated existing work
many white tech giants didn’t invent anything they acquired, copied, or repackaged.


3. The evidence is online nobody needs to flood the forum to prove anything. You’re demanding walls of text because you want the conversation to collapse under volume. But the truth is simple:, anyone can search, anyone can read, anyone can compare sources, anyone can see the contradictions in your narrative,there’s no need to overwhelm the forum to prove what is already public knowledge.

Your anger is not about evidence.
It’s about losing control of the narrative.

This isn’t conspiracy.
It’s public record.

And it terrifies you.

Fenrir:
Awww, you almost had it little man. He said my ancestors. Im not British. I posted documented academic evidence naming each specific tribe? You can back with British and vague Europe and completely missed the point. And how are neanderthals relevant? Different species.

How do you presume to know my size and gender?

Most tribes were cannibalistic at some time or the other, and Africa is not a tribe.

Hoodrat:
Africans who refuse to see themselves through a colonial lens.

I'm going to see this as semi-valid, if just for the African generalisation.

The below is from one of your own sources Fenrir, do note. Go far back enough in any culture and you'd likely find human sacrifice.

Human sacrifice is also predominant in Yoruba culture and religion. “This is a practice found in every race and culture throughout the world” Awolalu and Dopamu (1979).

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357830542_THE_CONCEPT_OF_SACRIFICE_IN_YORUBA_RELIGION_AND_CULTURE

budaatum:
I'm going to see this as semi-valid, if just for the African generalisation.

The below is from one of your own sources Fenrir, do note. Go far back enough in any culture and you'd likely find human sacrifice.

Human sacrifice is also predominant in Yoruba culture and religion. “This is a practice found in every race and culture throughout the world” Awolalu and Dopamu (1979).

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357830542_THE_CONCEPT_OF_SACRIFICE_IN_YORUBA_RELIGION_AND_CULTURE

I actually went through the link you quoted, line by line, and what you’re claiming simply isn’t there. The paper discusses Èbọ sacrifice in the general sense used across African traditional religions: food, animals, kola, palm oil, cloth, symbolic items, ritual offerings. Nothing in that text says Yoruba religion used human flesh or human sacrifice as a normative practice. Not one sentence.

1. Yoruba Ifá explicitly forbids human sacrifice.
Ifá cosmology is built on:

Ìwà (character)

Òfin (moral law)

Àṣẹ (order)

Ìbòwò (respect for life)

Human sacrifice violates all four,there is no Odu Ifá that prescribes killing a human being as an acceptable offering. There is no priestly tradition that normalises it, There is no historical Yoruba legal code that permits it. The paper you quoted talks about sacrifice, not human sacrifice, You added the human part yourself.


2. Sacrifice human sacrifice. Every culture on earth European, Asian, Middle Eastern, African has a history of ritual offerings.
Food, animals, symbolic items, objects of value.

Your own source says: Sacrifice occupies a fundamental place in African traditional religion. That is true. But it does not say: Yoruba ate humans,yoruba used human flesh, yoruba killed people for rituals

Hoodrat:
I actually went through the link you quoted, line by line, and what you’re claiming simply isn’t there.

Indeed, the link he posted spoke about sacrifices, and not cannibalism. So I am not at all making the same claim that Fenrir tried to make.