₦airaland Forum

maidstone:
You must be mad

180 school girls in Iran nko?

Who in the first place started this unnecessary war?

Image123:
Those are facts, don't feel insulted by the truth.

Brendaniel:
This was the search result, I am against any civilian attacks whether from U.S or Iran, that is my point and I expect everyone to be against it too regardless of who you support...

Brendaniel:
Whose truth?

Nnamdipapa:
Yes, it does. It's called collateral damage in warfare. if you don't want your civilians killed, do not kill civilians of others, and that should be basic common sense. If i walk into your home and kill your wife and mother, are you going to let me walk out freely if you have a means to defend yourself?

Nnamdipapa:
I honestly don't understand why people support evil. Iranians are hard-working, smart people who have been demonized for years by the US propaganda machines. The same played out in Iraq with the US killing millions of locals and not finding any WMD in Iraq. Today, the US is busy selling the oil in Iraq, they are also reported to have stollen Iraqis gold.

This is 2026, and the greatest threat to world peace is the US and Israel. I have hard evidence of historical facts to back up my claims.

Image123:
The truth.

Brendaniel:
That you are lying...

Nnamdipapa:
Do you agree with the US and Israel killing innocent school girls and civilians in Iran? I need an answer from you before i decide if my time is being wasted in this conversation. Remember, Iran is not the aggressor but only defending itself.

Image123:
Get a friend to chat with.

Afolue:
no one is saying that. But the Iranian actions isn’t a signal calling for war with the uae.

Hitting their economy. That’s all.

No be people dey inside economy?

It’s a message for the UAE to back off assists against enemy forces.

What’s causing it is what is to be looked at

Brendaniel:
It's like they suspended you from your whatsapp group

descartes400:
Can you cite one example where Iran was shooting at civilians in other countries even before the incident under discourse?

In the battle between against Iran by the US and the Zionist State of israel, there's no way in hell i will blame Iran equally with US because Iran is not the Aggressor...thinking back to the 1953 cia coup in Iran

DeepSight:
+
Thank you and well said.

QuinQQ, Nwaikpe, Tctrills, I hope you all remember the Weapons of Mass Destruction hoax that led to the invasion of Iraq (Gulf War 2).

Moveittothem:
Muslims stand with Iran, but Iran is attacking Muslim countries who haven't done anything to them.

That place they hit, is it a US military base?

AnonPoet:
https://applesbite.com/nigerians-among-over-140-injured-after-missile-strike-on-uae/

tctrills:
Oga what's your point here?
At least the US has an excuse for their war with Iran. What is Iran's excuse for trying to crash the global economy and make you poor?
You and I and fighting then I turn around and start hitting everyone around including those sympathetic to me, how am I not a terrorist?

Again, nuclear weapons or not, Iran had this coming. Their first action after their revolution in 1979 was to kidnap 80 US embassy staff. Since then, they have sponsored bombing and killings of US citizens all across the middle east. The US had more than 10 reasons to take them out.

notobiafrababe:
It's obvious UAE is the Arab version of USA. UAE go explain taya. It's simple. Stop USA from launching attack on Iran via your air space and Iran will stop attacking you. Very simple equation

Brendaniel:
These are some of the reasons I refused involving myself with this Iran war discussion, I only expressed my observation, I might be wrong, I might be right, but I just don't support civilian attacks on any side...

Brendaniel:
These are some of the reasons I refused involving myself with this Iran war discussion, I only expressed my observation, I might be wrong, I might be right, but I just don't support civilian attacks on any side...

Federalofficia:
They should face it, afterall they swear never to come back Nigeria even if all UAE is bombed to sand

DeepSight:
+
What sort of abominable upside down reasoning is this.

tctrills:
I already know you, everyone that disagrees with you is abomination and upside down.
Question for you, be honest, how would you feel if the US and Israel are able to gain control of the Hormuz strait, restore global shipping and save the global economy?
I can bet you will be pained. Here, the US and Israel victory is clearly tied to global victory but people like you would rather everything falls to pieces as long as the US and Iran don't win.

DeepSight:
+
Of course not.

I asked you a question about weapons of mass destruction and Iraq for a reason. You ignored the question.

tctrills:
Oh, I am completely against the US invading Iraq. It was unnecessary. But unlike you, I judge each event on its own merits.

Again, the US did not kill millions in Iraq as you guys claim. In fact, it's a lazy Gen z claim.

The most outlier studies estimate 1 million deaths and only about 35% were attributed to the coalition forces.

Most of the deaths were Arab Muslims killing fellow Arab Muslims. Militias and insurgents killing their fellow Muslims just like the Iranians are doing today.

DeepSight:
+
But the bold was the result of the US intervention, just the same way it led to civil war and unrest in other places like Libya and Syria for example (in the case of Syria to show you the extent of their evil hypocrisy, they ended up installing an Al Qaeda Chieftain and now dance and play with him).

As for the red above, the point is that there is a history and a pattern which should not be ignored.

Mind you in the case of Iraq and WMD, Bush and Blair went to the extent of getting a broad based international coalition, congress approval and even went to the United Nations. The war was still globally unpopular and there were protests across the globe against it, but they went ahead.

In this instance, no congress approval, no discussion with allies to form any coalition, nothing. One man or rather two men just woke up and started and plunged the world into this mess and you are blaming the side who were suddenly attacked even in the middle of negotiation which Oman had confirmed was going very well in Geneva.

Brendaniel:
I've refused to talk about this war for certain reasons, but there is something I have noticed which a lot of people have taken to be normal in this war which is:

It looks like most people(especially Iranian supporters) have taken it to be normal for Iran to attack civilians and civilian facilities of other countries while it is an atrocity for other countries to the same to it.


For instance, this is UAE, over 140 civilians were injured, no one says anything, the Iranian supporters will come here to cheer it as victory with justification, where these people in any military facility ? No!

Now reverse the same scenario for Iran and watch most people scream of injustice especially Iranian supporters.

I've refused to involve my discussion in this war but this is getting very obvious.

tctrills:
Let me explain what you are saying, you are taking away responsibility from others as you always do. You are blaming the US even when Muslims kill their fellow Muslims.

Again you have shown that you don't know what happened in Syria. It's the opposite of what you are claiming. Obama refused to bring in the US directly. That was why Asad and his russian friends were able to crush the resistance and that also led to the rise of ISIS.
Again, an Al Qaeda Chieftain taking power shows that the US did not interfere as you think. And it also shows great maturity that they can work with a formal enemy and invite him to the white house.

To your second point, Yes there is a historic pattern of great nations invading weaker nations but we can't get too lazy. We must look at each through its own Len.

Under the American law, Trump was completely in line. He broke no laws in declaring war on Iran without Congress and without his global partners. He needed the element of surprise and not bureaucracy.

Lastly, you seem to know very little about the
negotiation. If it was going as well as you claim, why was it extended twice without anything agreed upon? Please, let's use our brains here. Can you mention one thing from your Oman sources that was agreed on? Give me just one, I am listening.

Brendaniel:
I've refused to talk about this war for certain reasons, but there is something I have noticed which a lot of people have taken to be normal in this war which is:

It looks like most people(especially Iranian supporters) have taken it to be normal for Iran to attack civilians and civilian facilities of other countries while it is an atrocity for other countries to the same to it.


For instance, this is UAE, over 140 civilians were injured, no one says anything, the Iranian supporters will come here to cheer it as victory with justification, where these people in any military facility ? No!

Now reverse the same scenario for Iran and watch most people scream of injustice especially Iranian supporters.

I've refused to involve my discussion in this war but this is getting very obvious.

Image123:
You must be having nightmares about WhatsApp groups. Bye.