₦airaland Forum

alobright17:
this guy sef

When you go to top hotels and see them doing stop and search does it mean they’re shutting down the hotel ?

Who on earth told you that stop and search means shutting down a place ?

The discussion is about the lapses not whether he succeeded or not .

How can you judge a case without seeing if they did that or not? What i saw via the video is that he came in to where they are and they stopped him from harming the president, very simple.

rapcy:
How can you judge a case without seeing if they did that or not? What i saw via the video is that he came in to where they are and they stopped him from harming the president, very simple.

I’m seeing the video that they never had any stop and search , the guy walked through the entrance without anyone searching him .

I asked you again if they searched him how come they didn’t see the gun ?

alobright17:
I’m seeing the video that they never had any stop and search , the guy walked through the entrance without anyone searching him .

I asked you again if they searched him how come they didn’t see the gun ?

That guy lodged in that hotel, plus what i saw from the videos posted here, the security contained him

rapcy:
That guy lodged in that hotel, plus what i saw from the videos posted here, the security contained him

Stop putting lies to this , show me evidence that the guy lodged in the hotel

alobright17:
Stop putting lies to this , show me evidence that the guy lodged in the hotel

rapcy:
That guy lodged in that hotel, plus what i saw from the videos posted here, the security contained him

How can someone this uninformed be arguing on SM??
It's been all over the news from the moment the guy was identified that he was a registered guest lodged in the hotel

QuinQQ:
How can someone this uninformed be arguing on SM??
It's been all over the news from the moment the guy was identified that he was a registered guest lodged in the hotel

My oga i tire, yes, no system is perfect, we know, but saying the security didn't do their job is another thing entirely. I know he just wants to argue.

rapcy:
My oga i tire, yes, no system is perfect, we know, but saying the security didn't do their job is another thing entirely. I know he just wants to argue.

Na wa my brother. These conspiracy nuts are something else. Here's a gay man who has been ranting on SM since forever against the "rapist, pedophile, traitor" in the White House, a man facing life imprisonment, they're still saying it was Trump that sent him!

QuinQQ:
Na wa my brother. These conspiracy nuts are something else. Here's a gay man who has been ranting on SM since forever against the "rapist, pedophile, traitor" in the White House, a man facing life imprisonment, they're still saying it was Trump that sent him!

People no dey calm down assimilate info, the moment you bring an off topic and it seem convincing, they will jump on it

QuinQQ:
How can someone this uninformed be arguing on SM??
It's been all over the news from the moment the guy was identified that he was a registered guest lodged in the hotel

Post the news here and stop this lies . Evidence of him lodged there .

alobright17:
Post the news here and stop this lies . Evidence of him lodged there .

BBC, Bloomberg, and all the reputable news organizations in the world are lying. Wehdon

QuinQQ:
BBC, Bloomberg, and all the reputable news organizations in the world are lying. Wehdon

Post where they said it here . Stop the gaslighting and lies .

QuinQQ:
BBC, Bloomberg, and all the reputable news organizations in the world are lying. Wehdon

Go where you read them saying it that the dude lodged at the hotel , I like the fact that you mentioned plenty of them so getting the information won’t be hard.

alobright17:
Post where they said it here . Stop the gaslighting and lies .

See below, genius

QuinQQ:
BBC, Bloomberg, and all the reputable news organizations in the world are lying. Wehdon

Now after reading this tell me the point of your argument, because I kept mentioning about lapses which is now obvious that there’s gaps which is not supposed to be.

If the event entrance was not secured is that not an error ?

QuinQQ:
See below, genius

When investigators said that someone leveraged on so and so gaps what do you understand by that statement?

If an investigator said there’s gaps something I’ve been saying since what then are you arguing about?

alobright17:
When investigators said that someone leveraged on so and so gaps what do you understand by that statement?

If an investigator said there’s gaps something I’ve been saying since what then are you arguing about?

😆😅
Funny guy. Posted something that disproves him. Says it right on your screenshot he was lodged in the hotel.
Do you still believe he was not lodged in the hotel??

QuinQQ:
😆😅
Funny guy. Posted something that disproves him. Says it right on your screenshot he was lodged in the hotel.
Do you still believe he was not lodged in the hotel??

my argument has been lapses which investigators said also .

Yes he lodged there .

Did you also read where they said there’s gaps which is not securing the area or not ? That has been the argument.

alobright17:
my argument has been lapses which investigators said also .

Yes he lodged there .

Did you also read where they said there’s gaps which is not securing the area or not ? That has been the argument.

😂😅
Really funny guy u r! You have been hollering throughout the thread that he was never lodged at the hotel and insulting anyone who politely and patiently tried to tell you he indeed was!🤣

BREAKING...

Author
New York Post

Read more: https://trib.al/sgXsACp

QuinQQ:
😂😅
Really funny guy u r! You have been hollering throughout the thread that he was never lodged at the hotel and insulting anyone who politely and patiently tried to tell you he indeed was!🤣

You must be the biggest lair on earth, when did the issue of him lodging there even came up apart from today when you said he lodged there and I said bring the evidence?

Why are you running away from the investigation that said the guy leveraged on the gaps to gain access because the entrance was not secured?

Why ignoring that findings?

alobright17:
You must be the biggest lair on earth, when did the issue of him lodging there even came up apart from today when you said he lodged there and I said bring the evidence?

Why are you running away from the investigation that said the guy leveraged on the gaps to gain access because the entrance was not secured?

Why ignoring that findings?

I think u r confusing me with someone else.
Below is my very first comment to you on this thread

QuinQQ:
😂😅
Really funny guy u r! You have been hollering throughout the thread that he was never lodged at the hotel and insulting anyone who politely and patiently tried to tell you he indeed was!🤣

The guy lodged in a hotel has absolutely nothing to do with the security guards from negligence,
I wonder why you kept running from the report that said the leveraged on the gaps .

Why don’t you want to have a conversation on that ?

Is funny when you only hammering on the guy lodging in the hotel as if that is an excuse?

My comment was that there’s lapses in the security set up of the area . Are you saying no to this ?

QuinQQ:
I think u r confusing me with someone else.
Below is my very first comment to you on this thread

if the event area was fully secured , the argument of the guy lodging there wouldn’t matter .

Haven’t you seen this report? Why are you not talking about it ? Is even worse when they know people lodged there yet they still didn’t properly secured the area .

In your next response let’s bet you won’t care to comment on the report that said the area was not well secured.

alobright17:
if the event area was fully secured , the argument of the guy lodging there wouldn’t matter .

Haven’t you seen this report? Why are you not talking about it ? Is even worse when they know people lodged there yet they still didn’t properly secured the area .

In your next response let’s bet you won’t care to comment on the report that said the area was not well secured.

First things first. First admit you were wrong about hotel lodging AND apologize. Then we go on from there

QuinQQ:
First things first. First admit you were wrong about hotel lodging AND apologize. Then we go on from there

if my first comment was that there is lapses in the security setup and the report affirmed it . What then am I apologizing for ?

So I should apologize for saying there’s gaps which enabled the suspect got access not only to the hotel but at the event or arena .

If the guy lodged there and there’s no gaps for him to leverage on as the report said then his lodging there would’ve been an effort in futile.

QuinQQ:
First things first. First admit you were wrong about hotel lodging AND apologize. Then we go on from there

this was how the whole thing started at least the dates are there ,

In the comment I was clearly talking about prevention while the guy was talking about cure .

That’s what you get when you jumped into an ongoing argument that you don’t know the starting point.

Show me where the conversation has anything to do with whether the guy lodged in the hotel or not .


What I said about lapses has also been affirmed by the investigators . So who should apologize to who ?

alobright17:
this was how the whole thing started at least the dates are there ,

In the comment I was clearly talking about prevention while the guy was talking about cure .

That’s what you get when you jumped into an ongoing argument that you don’t know the starting point.

Show me where the conversation has anything to do with whether the guy lodged in the hotel or not .


What I said about lapses has also been affirmed by the investigators . So who should apologize to who ?

This funny and stubborn guy. Just APOLOGIZE for calling people liars who were trying to educate you!
Even the screenshot you just posted, you clearly didn't know that since checking in the guy never left the hotel again

QuinQQ:
This funny and stubborn guy. Just APOLOGIZE for calling people liars who were trying to educate you!
Even the screenshot you just posted, you clearly didn't know that since checking in the guy never left the hotel again

I like how you’re cowardly running away from my first comment about the gaps

Imagine jumping into a convo and be asking for apology.

alobright17:
I like how you’re cowardly running away from my first comment about the gaps

Imagine jumping into a convo and be asking for apology.

Gaps, gaps, gaps, did anybody ever call you a liar for that?? What is undebatable is that the guy was lodged in the hotel - yet that's what you were calling people liars for! That's why you MUST apologize!

QuinQQ:
Gaps, gaps, gaps, did anybody ever call you a liar for that?? What is undebatable is that the guy was lodged in the hotel - yet that's what you were calling people liars for! That's why you MUST apologize!

My first and 3rd response show me where I called anyone a lair .

QuinQQ:
Gaps, gaps, gaps, did anybody ever call you a liar for that?? What is undebatable is that the guy was lodged in the hotel - yet that's what you were calling people liars for! That's why you MUST apologize!

If there’s any apology to be rendered it should be from you that jumped into a conversation halfway without knowing the beginning.