₦airaland Forum

QuinQ:
I am wealthy and upright, that's what counts. Whatever anybody else was/is, did or didn't do, is their business.
"Cult" here is NOT what it means in US. Here cult means street gang (exactly). And members don't get rich.

At least you've now learnt to find something meaningful to do with your life instead of spending your time being obsessed with the Y-chromosome Abraham passed to you!😅

Whenever you become king of your poor village you'll get chance to attend kings council and there you can impress the rich kings of Nigeria with your wealth and uprightness. But when they ask who was your father be upright and honest and tell them that he was no Prince but a mere pauper. And I know what you're expecting that this question will not come up but that would mean you don't understand male bloodline rivalry. But if you had been born royalty this would be in your blood. Good luck to you.

The race box is nothing more than male rivalry over bloodline. A bastard may rule over you or even a pauper or one produced by concubine when the race box is your system of identity.

Secretbloodline:
Whenever you become king of your poor village you'll get chance to attend kings council and there you can impress the rich kings of Nigeria with your wealth and uprightness. But when they ask who was your father be upright and honest and tell them that he was no Prince but a mere pauper. And I know what you're expecting that this question will not come up but that would mean you don't understand male bloodline rivalry. But if you had been born royalty this would be in your blood. Good luck to you.

This is why half knowledge is said to be a dangerous thing. All you know is that y-chromosome is passed down almost unchanged. What you don't know is that someone can pass y-chromosome to you yet bear no resemblance to you in appearance or character whatsoever.
A white man could have impregnated a local girl in Africa durring colonial period and has a direct male descendant. Yet that direct male descendant will be nothing like him both in character and in appearance.
You also don't know that a person with XY chromosome can be female! (see below).

People that matter, people that are going places, are concerned about your contributions today and how to solve today's and future issues. Only gossiping women and mediocre, inferior, jobless people with too much time on their hands are fixated on people’s ancestors!

QuinQ:
This is why half knowledge is said to be a dangerous thing. All you know is that y-chromosome is passed down almost unchanged. What you don't know is that someone can pass y-chromosome to you yet bear no resemblance to you in appearance or character whatsoever.
A white man could have impregnated a local girl in Africa durring colonial period and has a direct male descendant. Yet that direct male descendant will be nothing like him both in character and in appearance.
You also don't know that a person with XY chromosome can be female! (see below).

People that matter, people that are going places, are concerned about your contributions today and how to solve today's and future issues. Only gossiping women and mediocre, inferior, jobless people with too much time on their hands are fixated on people’s ancestors!

Lineage is the ultimate blueprint for quality control, and pretending it does not matter defies basic common sense. While everyday people focus only on the short-term present, elite structures survive by thinking in centuries. The simple truth is that not all horses are born equal; you cannot breed two cart horses and expect a Triple Crown champion. Individual effort and current contributions certainly matter, but lineage provides the raw material, the fundamental traits, and the inherited capabilities required for sustained excellence. To ignore ancestry is to pretend that genetic predispositions and generational advantages simply do not exist.

Furthermore, a family name operates as a generational track record. Knowing where someone comes from tells you how their family behaves when they hold power or face a crisis, reducing the risk of betrayal. Elite circles rarely trust newcomers based on a single good day or a fleeting success; they rely on a history that has been tested and proven over generations. This strict focus on lineage acts as a vital security system designed to protect a family's hard-earned wealth, power, and wisdom. Because these assets are incredibly difficult to build but effortless to lose, strict boundaries ensure that resources remain only with those explicitly bound to protect them, preventing outsiders from drifting in and scattering the fortune.

Ultimately, a person without a known lineage is a ship without an anchor, easily swept away by the changing tides of current trends. Embracing ancestry connects an individual to a timeless standard of excellence, forcing them to measure their present actions against a historical legacy. This continuity ensures the survival of the group, proving that looking backward is often the smartest way to secure the path forward.

A man without a known lineage is a ship without an anchor, easily swept away by the changing tides of current trends

Secretbloodline:
Lineage is the ultimate blueprint for quality control, and pretending it does not matter defies basic common sense. While everyday people focus only on the short-term present, elite structures survive by thinking in centuries. The simple truth is that not all horses are born equal; you cannot breed two cart horses and expect a Triple Crown champion. Individual effort and current contributions certainly matter, but lineage provides the raw material, the fundamental traits, and the inherited capabilities required for sustained excellence. To ignore ancestry is to pretend that genetic predispositions and generational advantages simply do not exist.

Furthermore, a family name operates as a generational track record. Knowing where someone comes from tells you how their family behaves when they hold power or face a crisis, reducing the risk of betrayal. Elite circles rarely trust newcomers based on a single good day or a fleeting success; they rely on a history that has been tested and proven over generations. This strict focus on lineage acts as a vital security system designed to protect a family's hard-earned wealth, power, and wisdom. Because these assets are incredibly difficult to build but effortless to lose, strict boundaries ensure that resources remain only with those explicitly bound to protect them, preventing outsiders from drifting in and scattering the fortune.

Ultimately, a person without a known lineage is a ship without an anchor, easily swept away by the changing tides of current trends. Embracing ancestry connects an individual to a timeless standard of excellence, forcing them to measure their present actions against a historical legacy. This continuity ensures the survival of the group, proving that looking backward is often the smartest way to secure the path forward.

Poor guy, confusing being aware of ancestry and being fixated on ancestry and Y-chromosome. What else have you posted here other than the French are wonderful and St Louis is your grandfather and Abraham gave you his Y-chromosome😅? Frankly it's mark of an inferior mind and a person of low personal self-esteem. (See below)

Besides, reality proves you wrong. Rarely does a great father produce a great son. The wealthy and influential families of yesterday are rarely the ones of today. History is full of paupers and even slaves who became royalty in various areas of life. Google King Jaja of Opobo. He was a slave. If Charles had died Andrew would have become king, a pedophile! Does it mean he would pass on pedophile Y-chromosome and all future kings would be pedophiles?
See below, Y-chromosome from your distant ancestors is almost virtually undetectable in what make up who you are!

QuinQ:
Poor guy, confusing being aware of ancestry and being fixated on ancestry and Y-chromosome. What else have you posted here other than the French are wonderful and St Louis is your grandfather and Abraham gave you his Y-chromosome😅? Frankly it's mark of an inferior mind and a person of low personal self-esteem. (See below)

Besides, reality proves you wrong. Rarely does a great father produce a great son. The wealthy and influential families of yesterday are rarely the ones of today. History is full of paupers and even slaves who became royalty in various areas of life. Google King Jaja of Opobo. He was a slave. If Charles had died Andrew would have become king, a pedophile! Does it mean he would pass on pedophile Y-chromosome and all future kings would be pedophiles?
See below, Y-chromosome from your distant ancestors is almost virtually undetectable in what make up who you are!

To measure a person’s worth entirely by the randomness of their ancestry is a trap, but to pretend that ancestry does not shape the battlefield of life is equally foolish. The argument that lineage is irrelevant because history is full of rare exceptions—like a slave rising to become a king—misses the entire point of how power actually operates. Pointing to a single anomaly to claim the system is fair is like pointing to a lottery winner to argue that poverty does not exist. It is a comforting illusion, but it is bad strategy. In the real world, ruling structures do not rely on random luck; they rely on repeating patterns. Exceptional stories are often tolerated by those in power precisely because they create the illusion of a meritocracy, distracting the majority from the rigid, inherited hierarchies that continue to run unchallenged in the background.

True power is not just carried in a strand of DNA; it is preserved through institutions. While a specific ancestral marker might become visually diluted over generations, the social sorting mechanisms and institutional capital tied to those bloodlines are carefully guarded. Elite organizations, clubs, and networks act as social asset managers. They quietly preserve the old biases and color hierarchies of the past to maintain their local dominance today. Dismissing the importance of lineage as mere low self-esteem is a clever piece of psychological warfare. By convincing people that their heritage and the historical systems surrounding it do not matter, dominant groups successfully neutralize any attempt by outsiders to build lasting, multi-generational legacies of their own.

This reveals the ultimate irony of the modern social hierarchy, where the mechanics of bureaucratic sorting can be completely inverted by a clever strategist. The modern world loves to reduce human complexity down to a series of institutional boxes. When a system relies entirely on surface-level definitions, it creates an opening for the ultimate deception. By simply checking the right race box on a form, a pauper born of a colonial bastard line can instantly flip the entire script. They don't just escape their low status; they weaponize the system's own rigid rules to leapfrog the established hierarchy. By mastering the paperwork of modern bureaucracy, the ultimate outsider transforms the very tools designed to categorize and suppress him into his own royal crown, turning a system of control into his personal stepping stone to the throne.

Secretbloodline:
To measure a person’s worth entirely by the randomness of their ancestry is a trap, but to pretend that ancestry does not shape the battlefield of life is equally foolish. The argument that lineage is irrelevant because history is full of rare exceptions—like a slave rising to become a king—misses the entire point of how power actually operates. Pointing to a single anomaly to claim the system is fair is like pointing to a lottery winner to argue that poverty does not exist. It is a comforting illusion, but it is bad strategy. In the real world, ruling structures do not rely on random luck; they rely on repeating patterns. Exceptional stories are often tolerated by those in power precisely because they create the illusion of a meritocracy, distracting the majority from the rigid, inherited hierarchies that continue to run unchallenged in the background.

True power is not just carried in a strand of DNA; it is preserved through institutions. While a specific ancestral marker might become visually diluted over generations, the social sorting mechanisms and institutional capital tied to those bloodlines are carefully guarded. Elite organizations, clubs, and networks act as social asset managers. They quietly preserve the old biases and color hierarchies of the past to maintain their local dominance today. Dismissing the importance of lineage as mere low self-esteem is a clever piece of psychological warfare. By convincing people that their heritage and the historical systems surrounding it do not matter, dominant groups successfully neutralize any attempt by outsiders to build lasting, multi-generational legacies of their own.

This reveals the ultimate irony of the modern social hierarchy, where the mechanics of bureaucratic sorting can be completely inverted by a clever strategist. The modern world loves to reduce human complexity down to a series of institutional boxes. When a system relies entirely on surface-level definitions, it creates an opening for the ultimate deception. By simply checking the right race box on a form, a pauper born of a colonial bastard line can instantly flip the entire script. They don't just escape their low status; they weaponize the system's own rigid rules to leapfrog the established hierarchy. By mastering the paperwork of modern bureaucracy, the ultimate outsider transforms the very tools designed to categorize and suppress him into his own royal crown, turning a system of control into his personal stepping stone to the throne.

Your mostly AI write-up does not change the fact that there is a huge "no man's land" between "dismissing lineage" and being obsessed with lineage and Y-chromosomes!

America, where you are, is not UK. They don't have Peerages, pedigrees, kings, and such. Many blacks (descendants of enslaved Africans) are American royalty today. Some white Americans worship Michael Jackson, others Michael Jordan.
On the flip side many American royalty of yesteryears are nowhere today or even paupers.
All American presidents had families. How many of them are near the seat of power today? There were two Roosevelt presidents. Do you know any influential Roosevelt??

Bottom line, you ought find something better to do with your time than hang your self-worth on something that applies to almost all French people (see below). Being French is NOT better than being Yoruba or Igbo (or Creole, if it were a race). They're just different "beings". Follow Socrates below and find ideas to discuss and leave minutae of ancient DNAs alone!

QuinQ:
Your mostly AI write-up does not change the fact that there is a huge "no man's land" between "dismissing lineage" and being obsessed with lineage and Y-chromosomes!

America, where you are, is not UK. They don't have Peerages, pedigrees, kings, and such. Many blacks (descendants of enslaved Africans) are American royalty today. Some white Americans worship Michael Jackson, others Michael Jordan.
On the flip side many American royalty of yesteryears are nowhere today or even paupers.
All American presidents had families. How many of them are near the seat of power today? There were two Roosevelt presidents. Do you know any influential Roosevelt??

Bottom line, you ought find something better to do with your time than hang your self-worth on something that applies to almost all French people (see below). Being French is NOT better than being Yoruba or Igbo (or Creole, if it were a race). They're just different "beings". Follow Socrates below and find ideas to discuss and leave minutae of ancient DNAs alone!

By bringing up Michael Jordan, you perfectly illustrate my point about the corporate trap of the Race Box. You are praising a system that took a man of disrupted lineage and used him as a marketing tool for Nike to extract massive capital from working-class youth buying overpriced sneakers. You worship corporate commercialism and consumer exploitation; I honor sovereign Frankish lineage—we are not the same."

Michael Jordan is a Black Buck that is a man breed to be a field workhorse. Michael Jordan paternal lineage is the master's son from raped enslaved girls. He is not royalty. Then again neither are you. His image as a black field hand turned basketball star was used to hijack billions out of poor communities for overpriced 15 dollars material labor sneakers.

[Possible Father: White Landowner / Overseer at Stag Park Plantation]
• Context: Preacher Jesse Jordan, his adult sons, his brothers,
and various white overseers lived on the subdivided estate
when Richard James was born in 1862. No DNA testing or historical
documentation exists to narrow it down to a specific individual.
│
▼
Richard James Jordan (Born into slavery, c. 1862 – Died before 1914)
• Documented in historical records as a "Mulatto" (mixed-race)
│
▼
Dawson "Dorcy" Jordan (June 23, 1892 – February 17, 1977)
│
▼
William Edward Jordan (March 1915 – Date unknown)
│
▼
James Raymond Jordan Sr. (July 31, 1936 – July 23, 1993)
│
▼
Michael Jeffrey Jordan (Born February 17, 1963)

good

Secretbloodline:
By bringing up Michael Jordan, you perfectly illustrate my point about the corporate trap of the Race Box. You are praising a system that took a man of disrupted lineage and used him as a marketing tool for Nike to extract massive capital from working-class youth buying overpriced sneakers. You worship corporate commercialism and consumer exploitation; I honor sovereign Frankish lineage—we are not the same."

Michael Jordan is a Black Buck that is a man breed to be a field workhorse. Michael Jordan paternal lineage is the master's son from raped enslaved girls. He is not royalty. Then again neither are you. His image as a black field hand turned basketball star was used to hijack billions out of poor communities for overpriced 15 dollars material labor sneakers.

Still discussing PEOPLE! Need I say more?
As for Jordan, see who buys vast majority of his overpriced merchandise below. And who do you think pays millions for his used shoes? Blacks?
In case you haven't noticed, celebrities (white and black) slap their names on all sorts of things to make money, not just Jordan.

In case you didn't notice, I also mentioned Michael Jackson. Add to him countless other black inventors of various genres of music and countless other inventions.

Musician below actually has a Congolese father that was killed when he was 9. But he considers himself 60% Belgium because he was raised in Belgium. Yet someone who has never set foot in France considers himself 100% French!😅
White French will just be laughing behind.
Hear him below, singing to his father. Very good musician.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7Z2tgJo8Hg?si=ocymSjQ2OZtObim2


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpweTFYkNhc?si=Wxbus_OdKnLUOP7T

Secretbloodline:
[Possible Father: White Landowner / Overseer at Stag Park Plantation]
• Context: Preacher Jesse Jordan, his adult sons, his brothers,
and various white overseers lived on the subdivided estate
when Richard James was born in 1862. No DNA testing or historical
documentation exists to narrow it down to a specific individual.
│
▼
Richard James Jordan (Born into slavery, c. 1862 – Died before 1914)
• Documented in historical records as a "Mulatto" (mixed-race)
│
▼
Dawson "Dorcy" Jordan (June 23, 1892 – February 17, 1977)
│
▼
William Edward Jordan (March 1915 – Date unknown)
│
▼
James Raymond Jordan Sr. (July 31, 1936 – July 23, 1993)
│
▼
Michael Jeffrey Jordan (Born February 17, 1963)

Speaking of which, we all know how vast majority of Louisiana Creoles came about. We know no French soldiers went about marrying local black girls. Not your fault, and it's no reflection on you. Just a historical fact

QuinQ:
Speaking of which, we all know how vast majority of Louisiana Creoles came about. We know no French soldiers went about marrying local black girls. Not your fault, and it's no reflection on you. Just a historical fact

My forefathers were the same complexion and bloodline as myself. I'm tan skinned on outside and tan genetics on the inside. I'm no coconut. Creoles don't claim to be Hebrews, Egyptians, Moors and Native American, but proudly identify as French. Now were all French white?! Absolutely not. France was a Southern European kingdom and the population my forefathers ruled were diverse and 100 percent Catholic. The name Catholic means Universal because people of different ethnicities were adherents to the faith and it was intended for all.


White Supremacists took over Europe in the 18th century after the fall of the French and the fall of Spain which was another kingdom of tan skinned men. The British Empire is the most powerful and wealthiest empire in the history of the world. Not Rome, France, Spain, Greece, Moors, Arabs, Turks, Egypt were more powerful than the British. The Anglo Saxons who rule Britain are pale skin people. You and the dummies amongst you who took the oath of Freemasonry must support the narrative of the British which is they were everything great in history. Its taught in universities, scholastic books, publications, museums and artwork that the Frankish kings were white. It's a lie. And you tell that lie for two reasons, your bloody oath to the British and your ancestral bitterness and envy because your father is a peasant.

Respect your King. You talk down upon your King and his son that there should have ended our conversation. If you offend an African king there is no pardon with me. I uphold the same law. Kings built kingdoms, fought upon battlefields against rival male bloodlines aimed to enslave and conquer their people. Kings brought laws, customs, language, religion and trade to their subjects. My forefathers built Europe....Go look at your father's plot of land and look at everything your forefather ever built after many generations. Very small and very little.

Secretbloodline:
My forefathers were the same complexion and bloodline as myself. I'm tan skinned on outside and tan genetics on the inside. I'm no coconut. Creoles don't claim to be Hebrews, Egyptians, Moors and Native American, but proudly identify as French. Now were all French white?! Absolutely not. France was a Southern European kingdom and the population my forefathers ruled were diverse and 100 percent Catholic. The name Catholic means Universal because people of different ethnicities were adherents to the faith and it was intended for all.


White Supremacists took over Europe in the 18th century after the fall of the French and the fall of Spain which was another kingdom of tan skinned men. The British Empire is the most powerful and wealthiest empire in the history of the world. Not Rome, France, Spain, Greece, Moors, Arabs, Turks, Egypt were more powerful than the British. The Anglo Saxons who rule Britain are pale skin people. You and the dummies amongst you who took the oath of Freemasonry must support the narrative of the British which is they were everything great in history. Its taught in universities, scholastic books, publications, museums and artwork that the Frankish kings were white. It's a lie. And you tell that lie for two reasons, your bloody oath to the British and your ancestral bitterness and envy because your father is a peasant.

Respect your King. You talk down upon your King and his son that there should have ended our conversation. If you offend an African king there is no pardon with me. I uphold the same law. Kings built kingdoms, fought upon battlefields against rival male bloodlines aimed to enslave and conquer their people. Kings brought laws, customs, language, religion and trade to their subjects. My forefathers built Europe....Go look at your father's plot of land and look at everything your forefather ever built after many generations. Very small and very little.

Height of delusion. Read the underlined below then carefully research the rest. King indeed!😂

You never answered what race your father, St. Louis, was😂🤣

QuinQ:
Height of delusion. Read the underlined below then carefully research the rest. King indeed!😂

You never answered what race your father, St. Louis, was😂🤣

QuinQ:
Height of delusion. Read the underlined below then carefully research the rest. King indeed!😂

You never answered what race your father, St. Louis, was😂🤣

The concept of "race" as a biological or phenotypical division of humanity is a modern invention. It was developed during the 17th to 19th centuries by European powers, particularly within the British Empire, to justify the economic exploitation of colonialism and the transatlantic slave trade.Historically, distinctions between groups of people were based on religion, nationality, or culture rather than skin color. However, as the British Empire and other European powers expanded globally, this framework fundamentally changed.The rise of racial hierarchy was driven by several key factors:1. Justifying ExploitationDuring the Enlightenment, European philosophers and colonial leaders proclaimed ideals of "liberty" and "natural human rights". Enslaving and dispossessing human beings directly contradicted these values. To resolve this moral conflict, colonial systems developed the myth of race, arguing that non-European peoples were biologically inferior, sub-human, or inherently "savage" and thus naturally suited for forced labor.2. Codification in LawThe British Empire actively structured its legal and societal systems around race, which can be seen across the Atlantic colonies:The Transatlantic Trade: From the 17th century onward, the British Empire transported millions of enslaved Africans to the Americas to fuel a highly profitable plantation economy.The Barbados Slave Code: Enacted in 1661, this influential British colonial legislation established distinct and unequal legal statuses based purely on skin color and ancestry. It stripped enslaved Black individuals of legal rights, codifying the ideology that blackness was synonymous with servitude.Creation of Whiteness: To prevent poor European laborers from uniting with enslaved Africans, colonial laws elevated all Europeans to a single legal tier of "whiteness," granting them basic privileges regardless of class.3. "Scientific" RacismIn the 18th and 19th centuries, the ideology of race was legitimized through pseudo-science. Naturalists and anthropologists like Carl Linnaeus and Johann Friedrich Blumenbach created racial taxonomies. These frameworks categorized humans into hierarchical types, placing Europeans at the top to provide an academic justification for imperial rule and the civilizing missions across Africa, Asia, and the Americas.The understanding that race is a historical, man-made construct rather than a biological reality is a vital framework for studying both colonial history and contemporary social inequalities.If you are interested in this history, I can provide more details on:How the transatlantic slave trade shaped the modern global economy.The role of pseudoscientific theories in 19th-century colonial governance.The history of slave codes in British North America and the Caribbean.Let me know how you'd like to proceed!How European Colonialism Led to the Invention of Race-And Why That Still ...Most of us assume that racism led to the conquest of American Natives and to the enslavement of Africans. Cox, Fredrickson, and many others argue just the oppos...Hope College Blog NetworkThe British Empire and Race: A Debate with Robert Tombs - Sussex BlogsFeb 1, 2022 — Yet the British Empire's maintenance of White people's rule over people of colour on six continents was unique. Only the other modern European and American empi...University of Sussex15:23The entangled histories of Britain and the CaribbeanYouTube·LSESlavery in the Colonies: The British Position on ...Mar 19, 2020 — Slavery in the Colonies: The British Position on Slavery in the Era of Revolution * First slave auction in New Amsterdam by Howard Pyle, 1895. We know that the ...American Battlefield TrustSlavery in the British colonies (article) | Khan AcademyEvery English colony practiced slavery, building an empire-wide system of white racial dominance and African oppression. Overview. The seventeenth and eighteent...Khan AcademyThe British construction of whiteness: unionism, imperialism, and the United ...Jun 19, 2017 — To put this as simply as I can, the idea of race — the ideology of racialising people, in particular black and white — did not only come about through the imbal...Medium·Malory NyeAP® US History: Topic 2.6 Slavery in the British Colonies - Albert.ioColonial Slavery and the Ideology of Race ... But the development of slavery tied to Africa and Africans created something new: an ideology that racial categori...Albert.io2:56The invention of race explained in under 3 minutes | Smarter in SecondsYouTube·Blair ImaniRace - History, Ideology, Science | BritannicaApr 25, 2026 — Race as a categorizing term referring to human beings was first used in the English language in the late 16th century. Until the 18th century it had a generaliz...BritannicaDefining Race & Lifelong Servitude in the Colonial Americas (2024)The 1705 Virginia Act Concerning Servants and Slaves collates the practices of British colonies throughout the Caribbean and Atlantic seaboard. In these acts, t...University of Nebraska–LincolnColonial model of racism | History | Research Starters - EBSCOThe British maintained a rigid separation between themselves and Indigenous populations, fostering a sense of racial superiority, particularly evident in Britis...EBSCOReplacing Race: Interactive Constructionism about Racialized GroupsIt was the joining of what Doron calls the classificatory and the genealogical style of reasoning in the eighteenth century (by, for example, Buffon and Kant) i...University of MichiganAbandon “Race.” Focus on Racism - PMCSep 7, 2021 — “Race,” as construed since then and now, refers to the classification of humans based on phenotype—observable physical differences—which are assumed to reflect ...National Institutes of Health (.gov)Thomas Jefferson: Liberty & SlaveryEnlightenment philosophy stressed that liberty and equality were natural human rights. Colonial Americans argued that King George III and Parliament had denied ...Monticello | Thomas Jefferson's HomeHuman Rights and Freedom from State Tyranny: HistoryJan 21, 2025 — The philosophical underpinnings of modern standards of human rights, however, are found in the Enlightenment, the historical period in Europe when concepts such...Democracy WebHow racist was the British Empire? - History ReclaimedAug 12, 2021 — The movement to “decolonise” that is sweeping feverishly through our schools, universities and cultural institutions is propelled by three axioms. The first is ...History ReclaimedAmerican Race Relations and the Legacy of British Colonialism S21WEEK 2 - March 25: Colonialism and Social Division British colonial rule brought white settlers and enslaved Africans to America. The divided society functioned...QualtricsBlack Perspectives on the American EmpireDec 17, 2024 — The modern concept of race, that demarcates and classifies racial groups as inherently and innately different, was developed in the Western world from the late ...Springer Nature LinkWhiteness is an invented concept that has been used as a tool of oppressionJul 14, 2022 — In colonial Barbados, 17th-century labour codes described indentured Europeans as “white” and gave them more rights than enslaved Africans on that basis. This e...The ConversationIdeas of Race and Racism in History | OriginsOct 15, 2021 — Colonial leaders began to homogenize all Europeans, regardless of ethnicity, or status or social class, into a single novel category. White people of African de...Origins: Current Events in Historical PerspectiveEdTech BooksThis broad land ownership meant that nearly everyone was a “lord”; everyone was equal (with the exception of marginalized groups who received rights much later,Home - BYUFrom colonial ‘mongoloid’ to neoliberal ‘northeastern’: theorising ‘race’, racialization and racism in contemporary IndiaJan 7, 2021 — Footnote 22 This scientific conceptualisation of 'race' became consolidated in the 18 th and 19 th centuries during the era of European imperialism and colonial...Taylor & Francis OnlineUnderstanding Racism in Europe: Historical Roots, Contemporary Challenges, and Paths to EqualityFurthermore, the 18th and 19th centuries saw the emergence of scientific racism, a pernicious pseudo-science that sought to categorize and rank different racial...International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)Race as a concept | Social Sciences and Humanities - EBSCOAncient societies, like the Greeks, did not possess a term equivalent to race, but notions of ethnic and cultural differences certainly existed.


Race Box enforcer.

White Race Box

Asian Race Box

Black Race Box

Indigenous Race Box


The Race Box or category are ranks of heirarchy. There is no biological race that King Louis belonged too. King Louis was tan skinned with dark hair and some Kings had blonde hair and tan skinned so as my great great great great grandfather King Louis Augusta de France. What separated the Louis from the King of England is bloodline. King Louis is J2 haplagroup and the King of England is R1B. The Frankish kings were from Troy and migrated to Gaul then Germany then back to Gaul then founded Francia. The Kingdom is named after my family because we founded Francia our surname de France. The first king of France was Clovis de France. My father is Gerald de France and he had dark skin. Yet my father wasn't a perception lover he told me our ancestor King Louis was light skinned or tan skinned and that George Washington was light skinned or tan skinned. George Washington fought against the British because technically he was not British and sought to create an Independent nation free of British monarchy and that he did. Whilst you are using AI you can search my great great great great uncle John Henri de France and his son John de France who fought with George Washington. We know what George Washington looked like because we were there in battle fighting the British.


Have y'all fought the British in Nigeria? Did you rid yourself yet of its colonial system, its court, its laws and Freemasonry system? Did you educate yourself on true history or what your masters the British taught you? You need to stay in your lane. Nigeria still a British colony if you think race exists.

Secretbloodline:
The concept of "race" as a biological or phenotypical division of humanity is a modern invention. It was developed during the 17th to 19th centuries by European powers, particularly within the British Empire, to justify the economic exploitation of colonialism and the transatlantic slave trade.Historically, distinctions between groups of people were based on religion, nationality, or culture rather than skin color. However, as the British Empire and other European powers expanded globally, this framework fundamentally changed.The rise of racial hierarchy was driven by several key factors:1. Justifying ExploitationDuring the Enlightenment, European philosophers and colonial leaders proclaimed ideals of "liberty" and "natural human rights". Enslaving and dispossessing human beings directly contradicted these values. To resolve this moral conflict, colonial systems developed the myth of race, arguing that non-European peoples were biologically inferior, sub-human, or inherently "savage" and thus naturally suited for forced labor.2. Codification in LawThe British Empire actively structured its legal and societal systems around race, which can be seen across the Atlantic colonies:The Transatlantic Trade: From the 17th century onward, the British Empire transported millions of enslaved Africans to the Americas to fuel a highly profitable plantation economy.The Barbados Slave Code: Enacted in 1661, this influential British colonial legislation established distinct and unequal legal statuses based purely on skin color and ancestry. It stripped enslaved Black individuals of legal rights, codifying the ideology that blackness was synonymous with servitude.Creation of Whiteness: To prevent poor European laborers from uniting with enslaved Africans, colonial laws elevated all Europeans to a single legal tier of "whiteness," granting them basic privileges regardless of class.3. "Scientific" RacismIn the 18th and 19th centuries, the ideology of race was legitimized through pseudo-science. Naturalists and anthropologists like Carl Linnaeus and Johann Friedrich Blumenbach created racial taxonomies. These frameworks categorized humans into hierarchical types, placing Europeans at the top to provide an academic justification for imperial rule and the civilizing missions across Africa, Asia, and the Americas.The understanding that race is a historical, man-made construct rather than a biological reality is a vital framework for studying both colonial history and contemporary social inequalities.If you are interested in this history, I can provide more details on:How the transatlantic slave trade shaped the modern global economy.The role of pseudoscientific theories in 19th-century colonial governance.The history of slave codes in British North America and the Caribbean.Let me know how you'd like to proceed!How European Colonialism Led to the Invention of Race-And Why That Still ...Most of us assume that racism led to the conquest of American Natives and to the enslavement of Africans. Cox, Fredrickson, and many others argue just the oppos...Hope College Blog NetworkThe British Empire and Race: A Debate with Robert Tombs - Sussex BlogsFeb 1, 2022 — Yet the British Empire's maintenance of White people's rule over people of colour on six continents was unique. Only the other modern European and American empi...University of Sussex15:23The entangled histories of Britain and the CaribbeanYouTube·LSESlavery in the Colonies: The British Position on ...Mar 19, 2020 — Slavery in the Colonies: The British Position on Slavery in the Era of Revolution * First slave auction in New Amsterdam by Howard Pyle, 1895. We know that the ...American Battlefield TrustSlavery in the British colonies (article) | Khan AcademyEvery English colony practiced slavery, building an empire-wide system of white racial dominance and African oppression. Overview. The seventeenth and eighteent...Khan AcademyThe British construction of whiteness: unionism, imperialism, and the United ...Jun 19, 2017 — To put this as simply as I can, the idea of race — the ideology of racialising people, in particular black and white — did not only come about through the imbal...Medium·Malory NyeAP® US History: Topic 2.6 Slavery in the British Colonies - Albert.ioColonial Slavery and the Ideology of Race ... But the development of slavery tied to Africa and Africans created something new: an ideology that racial categori...Albert.io2:56The invention of race explained in under 3 minutes | Smarter in SecondsYouTube·Blair ImaniRace - History, Ideology, Science | BritannicaApr 25, 2026 — Race as a categorizing term referring to human beings was first used in the English language in the late 16th century. Until the 18th century it had a generaliz...BritannicaDefining Race & Lifelong Servitude in the Colonial Americas (2024)The 1705 Virginia Act Concerning Servants and Slaves collates the practices of British colonies throughout the Caribbean and Atlantic seaboard. In these acts, t...University of Nebraska–LincolnColonial model of racism | History | Research Starters - EBSCOThe British maintained a rigid separation between themselves and Indigenous populations, fostering a sense of racial superiority, particularly evident in Britis...EBSCOReplacing Race: Interactive Constructionism about Racialized GroupsIt was the joining of what Doron calls the classificatory and the genealogical style of reasoning in the eighteenth century (by, for example, Buffon and Kant) i...University of MichiganAbandon “Race.” Focus on Racism - PMCSep 7, 2021 — “Race,” as construed since then and now, refers to the classification of humans based on phenotype—observable physical differences—which are assumed to reflect ...National Institutes of Health (.gov)Thomas Jefferson: Liberty & SlaveryEnlightenment philosophy stressed that liberty and equality were natural human rights. Colonial Americans argued that King George III and Parliament had denied ...Monticello | Thomas Jefferson's HomeHuman Rights and Freedom from State Tyranny: HistoryJan 21, 2025 — The philosophical underpinnings of modern standards of human rights, however, are found in the Enlightenment, the historical period in Europe when concepts such...Democracy WebHow racist was the British Empire? - History ReclaimedAug 12, 2021 — The movement to “decolonise” that is sweeping feverishly through our schools, universities and cultural institutions is propelled by three axioms. The first is ...History ReclaimedAmerican Race Relations and the Legacy of British Colonialism S21WEEK 2 - March 25: Colonialism and Social Division British colonial rule brought white settlers and enslaved Africans to America. The divided society functioned...QualtricsBlack Perspectives on the American EmpireDec 17, 2024 — The modern concept of race, that demarcates and classifies racial groups as inherently and innately different, was developed in the Western world from the late ...Springer Nature LinkWhiteness is an invented concept that has been used as a tool of oppressionJul 14, 2022 — In colonial Barbados, 17th-century labour codes described indentured Europeans as “white” and gave them more rights than enslaved Africans on that basis. This e...The ConversationIdeas of Race and Racism in History | OriginsOct 15, 2021 — Colonial leaders began to homogenize all Europeans, regardless of ethnicity, or status or social class, into a single novel category. White people of African de...Origins: Current Events in Historical PerspectiveEdTech BooksThis broad land ownership meant that nearly everyone was a “lord”; everyone was equal (with the exception of marginalized groups who received rights much later,Home - BYUFrom colonial ‘mongoloid’ to neoliberal ‘northeastern’: theorising ‘race’, racialization and racism in contemporary IndiaJan 7, 2021 — Footnote 22 This scientific conceptualisation of 'race' became consolidated in the 18 th and 19 th centuries during the era of European imperialism and colonial...Taylor & Francis OnlineUnderstanding Racism in Europe: Historical Roots, Contemporary Challenges, and Paths to EqualityFurthermore, the 18th and 19th centuries saw the emergence of scientific racism, a pernicious pseudo-science that sought to categorize and rank different racial...International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)Race as a concept | Social Sciences and Humanities - EBSCOAncient societies, like the Greeks, did not possess a term equivalent to race, but notions of ethnic and cultural differences certainly existed.


Race Box enforcer.

White Race Box

Asian Race Box

Black Race Box

Indigenous Race Box


The Race Box or category are ranks of heirarchy. There is no biological race that King Louis belonged too. King Louis was tan skinned with dark hair and some Kings had blonde hair and tan skinned so as my great great great great grandfather King Louis Augusta de France. What separated the Louis from the King of England is bloodline. King Louis is J2 haplagroup and the King of England is R1B. The Frankish kings were from Troy and migrated to Gaul then Germany then back to Gaul then founded Francia. The Kingdom is named after my family because we founded Francia our surname de France. The first king of France was Clovis de France. My father is Gerald de France and he had dark skin. Yet my father wasn't a perception lover he told me our ancestor King Louis was light skinned or tan skinned and that George Washington was light skinned or tan skinned. George Washington fought against the British because technically he was not British and sought to create an Independent nation free of British monarchy and that he did. Whilst you are using AI you can search my great great great great uncle John Henri de France and his son John de France who fought with George Washington. We know what George Washington looked like because we were there in battle fighting the British.


Have y'all fought the British in Nigeria? Did you rid yourself yet of its colonial system, its court, its laws and Freemasonry system? Did you educate yourself on true history or what your masters the British taught you? You need to stay in your lane. Nigeria still a British colony if you think race exists.

I have explained to you why this bloodline, haplo groups and etc don't mean much. It is because we are spirits and DNA is just clothes. If a woman does not agree with you or love you or is not legally married to you then her son by you will carry your haplo group but will be descended from the mother side. The son will be a spiritual bastard A spirit from the mother side will incarnate in the child who is your son and it's personality will be decided by it's past incarnations and past lives. If you kill someone, that person will reincarnate within three days into your Earth family etc etc. According to my research with the IFA oracle, most Americans, Brazilians, Mexicans and etc have spirits that originated from the native Indians of America and not Europe and Africa as their DNA suggests but there are still African and European spirits among them. Then if you are a free person in your past life and you are aware of how the society is organized, then you would not reincarnate as a slave willingly even if you had legitimate children by a slave woman

Would George Washington in the olden days come back through one of his slave descendants? No.

Also you can have rights of incarnation as a spirit just as a result of raising someone. When you raise someone you can qualify as a member of their Earth family or they as a member of yours

Then if you are displaced from your original culture and disconnected from them in the case of a slave then your Earth family from that place can only incarnate in your children and not in the next generation after them. Your own spirit upon death will either go back to it's culture or incarnate in the new line created in the new culture

Secretbloodline:
The concept of "race" as a biological or phenotypical division of humanity is a modern invention. It was developed during the 17th to 19th centuries by European powers, particularly within the British Empire, to justify the economic exploitation of colonialism and the transatlantic slave trade.Historically, distinctions between groups of people were based on religion, nationality, or culture rather than skin color. However, as the British Empire and other European powers expanded globally, this framework fundamentally changed.The rise of racial hierarchy was driven by several key factors:1. Justifying ExploitationDuring the Enlightenment, European philosophers and colonial leaders proclaimed ideals of "liberty" and "natural human rights". Enslaving and dispossessing human beings directly contradicted these values. To resolve this moral conflict, colonial systems developed the myth of race, arguing that non-European peoples were biologically inferior, sub-human, or inherently "savage" and thus naturally suited for forced labor.2. Codification in LawThe British Empire actively structured its legal and societal systems around race, which can be seen across the Atlantic colonies:The Transatlantic Trade: From the 17th century onward, the British Empire transported millions of enslaved Africans to the Americas to fuel a highly profitable plantation economy.The Barbados Slave Code: Enacted in 1661, this influential British colonial legislation established distinct and unequal legal statuses based purely on skin color and ancestry. It stripped enslaved Black individuals of legal rights, codifying the ideology that blackness was synonymous with servitude.Creation of Whiteness: To prevent poor European laborers from uniting with enslaved Africans, colonial laws elevated all Europeans to a single legal tier of "whiteness," granting them basic privileges regardless of class.3. "Scientific" RacismIn the 18th and 19th centuries, the ideology of race was legitimized through pseudo-science. Naturalists and anthropologists like Carl Linnaeus and Johann Friedrich Blumenbach created racial taxonomies. These frameworks categorized humans into hierarchical types, placing Europeans at the top to provide an academic justification for imperial rule and the civilizing missions across Africa, Asia, and the Americas.The understanding that race is a historical, man-made construct rather than a biological reality is a vital framework for studying both colonial history and contemporary social inequalities.If you are interested in this history, I can provide more details on:How the transatlantic slave trade shaped the modern global economy.The role of pseudoscientific theories in 19th-century colonial governance.The history of slave codes in British North America and the Caribbean.Let me know how you'd like to proceed!How European Colonialism Led to the Invention of Race-And Why That Still ...Most of us assume that racism led to the conquest of American Natives and to the enslavement of Africans. Cox, Fredrickson, and many others argue just the oppos...Hope College Blog NetworkThe British Empire and Race: A Debate with Robert Tombs - Sussex BlogsFeb 1, 2022 — Yet the British Empire's maintenance of White people's rule over people of colour on six continents was unique. Only the other modern European and American empi...University of Sussex15:23The entangled histories of Britain and the CaribbeanYouTube·LSESlavery in the Colonies: The British Position on ...Mar 19, 2020 — Slavery in the Colonies: The British Position on Slavery in the Era of Revolution * First slave auction in New Amsterdam by Howard Pyle, 1895. We know that the ...American Battlefield TrustSlavery in the British colonies (article) | Khan AcademyEvery English colony practiced slavery, building an empire-wide system of white racial dominance and African oppression. Overview. The seventeenth and eighteent...Khan AcademyThe British construction of whiteness: unionism, imperialism, and the United ...Jun 19, 2017 — To put this as simply as I can, the idea of race — the ideology of racialising people, in particular black and white — did not only come about through the imbal...Medium·Malory NyeAP® US History: Topic 2.6 Slavery in the British Colonies - Albert.ioColonial Slavery and the Ideology of Race ... But the development of slavery tied to Africa and Africans created something new: an ideology that racial categori...Albert.io2:56The invention of race explained in under 3 minutes | Smarter in SecondsYouTube·Blair ImaniRace - History, Ideology, Science | BritannicaApr 25, 2026 — Race as a categorizing term referring to human beings was first used in the English language in the late 16th century. Until the 18th century it had a generaliz...BritannicaDefining Race & Lifelong Servitude in the Colonial Americas (2024)The 1705 Virginia Act Concerning Servants and Slaves collates the practices of British colonies throughout the Caribbean and Atlantic seaboard. In these acts, t...University of Nebraska–LincolnColonial model of racism | History | Research Starters - EBSCOThe British maintained a rigid separation between themselves and Indigenous populations, fostering a sense of racial superiority, particularly evident in Britis...EBSCOReplacing Race: Interactive Constructionism about Racialized GroupsIt was the joining of what Doron calls the classificatory and the genealogical style of reasoning in the eighteenth century (by, for example, Buffon and Kant) i...University of MichiganAbandon “Race.” Focus on Racism - PMCSep 7, 2021 — “Race,” as construed since then and now, refers to the classification of humans based on phenotype—observable physical differences—which are assumed to reflect ...National Institutes of Health (.gov)Thomas Jefferson: Liberty & SlaveryEnlightenment philosophy stressed that liberty and equality were natural human rights. Colonial Americans argued that King George III and Parliament had denied ...Monticello | Thomas Jefferson's HomeHuman Rights and Freedom from State Tyranny: HistoryJan 21, 2025 — The philosophical underpinnings of modern standards of human rights, however, are found in the Enlightenment, the historical period in Europe when concepts such...Democracy WebHow racist was the British Empire? - History ReclaimedAug 12, 2021 — The movement to “decolonise” that is sweeping feverishly through our schools, universities and cultural institutions is propelled by three axioms. The first is ...History ReclaimedAmerican Race Relations and the Legacy of British Colonialism S21WEEK 2 - March 25: Colonialism and Social Division British colonial rule brought white settlers and enslaved Africans to America. The divided society functioned...QualtricsBlack Perspectives on the American EmpireDec 17, 2024 — The modern concept of race, that demarcates and classifies racial groups as inherently and innately different, was developed in the Western world from the late ...Springer Nature LinkWhiteness is an invented concept that has been used as a tool of oppressionJul 14, 2022 — In colonial Barbados, 17th-century labour codes described indentured Europeans as “white” and gave them more rights than enslaved Africans on that basis. This e...The ConversationIdeas of Race and Racism in History | OriginsOct 15, 2021 — Colonial leaders began to homogenize all Europeans, regardless of ethnicity, or status or social class, into a single novel category. White people of African de...Origins: Current Events in Historical PerspectiveEdTech BooksThis broad land ownership meant that nearly everyone was a “lord”; everyone was equal (with the exception of marginalized groups who received rights much later,Home - BYUFrom colonial ‘mongoloid’ to neoliberal ‘northeastern’: theorising ‘race’, racialization and racism in contemporary IndiaJan 7, 2021 — Footnote 22 This scientific conceptualisation of 'race' became consolidated in the 18 th and 19 th centuries during the era of European imperialism and colonial...Taylor & Francis OnlineUnderstanding Racism in Europe: Historical Roots, Contemporary Challenges, and Paths to EqualityFurthermore, the 18th and 19th centuries saw the emergence of scientific racism, a pernicious pseudo-science that sought to categorize and rank different racial...International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)Race as a concept | Social Sciences and Humanities - EBSCOAncient societies, like the Greeks, did not possess a term equivalent to race, but notions of ethnic and cultural differences certainly existed.


Race Box enforcer.

White Race Box

Asian Race Box

Black Race Box

Indigenous Race Box


The Race Box or category are ranks of heirarchy. There is no biological race that King Louis belonged too. King Louis was tan skinned with dark hair and some Kings had blonde hair and tan skinned so as my great great great great grandfather King Louis Augusta de France. What separated the Louis from the King of England is bloodline. King Louis is J2 haplagroup and the King of England is R1B. The Frankish kings were from Troy and migrated to Gaul then Germany then back to Gaul then founded Francia. The Kingdom is named after my family because we founded Francia our surname de France. The first king of France was Clovis de France. My father is Gerald de France and he had dark skin. Yet my father wasn't a perception lover he told me our ancestor King Louis was light skinned or tan skinned and that George Washington was light skinned or tan skinned. George Washington fought against the British because technically he was not British and sought to create an Independent nation free of British monarchy and that he did. Whilst you are using AI you can search my great great great great uncle John Henri de France and his son John de France who fought with George Washington. We know what George Washington looked like because we were there in battle fighting the British.


Have y'all fought the British in Nigeria? Did you rid yourself yet of its colonial system, its court, its laws and Freemasonry system? Did you educate yourself on true history or what your masters the British taught you? You need to stay in your lane. Nigeria still a British colony if you think race exists.

All this copius AI dump trying to mask something even the blind can see: almost all Colored Creoles are a result of UNMARRIED SEX between white men and black women. NO "TAN" PEOPLE CAME FROM FRANCE TO PRODUCE CREOLES!!! It's nothing to be ashamed of because you neither did it nor was it in any way your fault. It is just a historical fact. The Shame is in trying to deny it with "tan" people!😅
See how I produced all these below? Produce research that says Colored Louisiana Creoles were created by "tan" people that came from France!😂

QuinQ:
All this copius AI dump trying to mask something even the blind can see: almost all Colored Creoles are a result of UNMARRIED SEX between white men and black women. NO "TAN" PEOPLE CAME FROM FRANCE TO PRODUCE CREOLES!!! It's nothing to be ashamed of because you neither did it nor was it in any way your fault. It is just a historical fact. The Shame is in trying to deny it with "tan" people!😅
See how I produced all these below? Produce research that says Colored Louisiana Creoles were created by "tan" people that came from France!😂

Modern concepts of race were systematically constructed alongside the rise of the British Empire, transatlantic slavery, and colonialism to economically and morally justify the exploitation of non-European peoples


The difference between me using AI and you is that my mind is already vast and contains huge knowledge. Not bragging but I used read books the size of boxes. The books were big enough to be classified as a weapon. AI is an archive with multiple fast processors. That's all. It's a search engine for knowledge. But the danger is it has Echoing Chambers where AI will feed the person's opinions back to them as truth.


There is no such thing as race. King Louis was tan skinned not white. He was not cousins with King Charles or King George. King Louis was from the bloodline of ancient kings that go back to Sumeria or Shemaria after Shem the heir to Noah. All Africans came from Noah's family too.


You're a Dark Skinned Supremacist and I have encountered your type before who believes anyone light skinned is white. Hell in Nigeria I would be called White by little boys who mean no harm but are identifying my skin tone by their father's paradigm. Ethiopians who are my maternal cousins are considered non Black by the dark skinned Supremacists of Nigeria. And I know you look in the mirror and love your image as you should love yourself. But you are your father's bloodline, your DNA is your AI, your archive of knowledge. That is what you should honor and improve upon your peasant bloodline so that one day you'd become a King.

Becoming a king requires courage not money. Those kings you see today aren't their forefathers who were brave men who took the bulls by the horns and brought down rival men on the battlefield. Those men who would bow to no other man. That's how they become king. Every Prince of the royal blood has that archive in him. Oath swearing, false accolades, social awards, media blitz, social influence, luxury cars and homes and all that jazz isn't what made the family royalty.


This is where you are in grade. You didn't pass the class of kingship. Keep bowing to the British and you'll never be free.

Secretbloodline:
Modern concepts of race were systematically constructed alongside the rise of the British Empire, transatlantic slavery, and colonialism to economically and morally justify the exploitation of non-European peoples


The difference between me using AI and you is that my mind is already vast and contains huge knowledge. Not bragging but I used read books the size of boxes. The books were big enough to be classified as a weapon. AI is an archive with multiple fast processors. That's all. It's a search engine for knowledge. But the danger is it has Echoing Chambers where AI will feed the person's opinions back to them as truth.


There is no such thing as race. King Louis was tan skinned not white. He was not cousins with King Charles or King George. King Louis was from the bloodline of ancient kings that go back to Sumeria or Shemaria after Shem the heir to Noah. All Africans came from Noah's family too.


You're a Dark Skinned Supremacist and I have encountered your type before who believes anyone light skinned is white. Hell in Nigeria I would be called White by little boys who mean no harm but are identifying my skin tone by their father's paradigm. Ethiopians who are my maternal cousins are considered non Black by the dark skinned Supremacists of Nigeria. And I know you look in the mirror and love your image as you should love yourself. But you are your father's bloodline, your DNA is your AI, your archive of knowledge. That is what you should honor and improve upon your peasant bloodline so that one day you'd become a King.

Becoming a king requires courage not money. Those kings you see today aren't their forefathers who were brave men who took the bulls by the horns and brought down rival men on the battlefield. Those men who would bow to no other man. That's how they become king. Every Prince of the royal blood has that archive in him. Oath swearing, false accolades, social awards, media blitz, social influence, luxury cars and homes and all that jazz isn't what made the family royalty.


This is where you are in grade. You didn't pass the class of kingship. Keep bowing to the British and you'll never be free.

This life is so ironical. An offspring fervently defending and being very proud of the father who raped his mother to produce him!
Read below then produce research that proves them wrong

Another man's system will never free you to be independent and sovereign, it was only meant to be benefit his bloodline elites.

lawani:
I have explained to you why this bloodline, haplo groups and etc don't mean much. It is because we are spirits and DNA is just clothes. If a woman does not agree with you or love you or is not legally married to you then her son by you will carry your haplo group but will be descended from the mother side. The son will be a spiritual bastard A spirit from the mother side will incarnate in the child who is your son and it's personality will be decided by it's past incarnations and past lives. If you kill someone, that person will reincarnate within three days into your Earth family etc etc. According to my research with the IFA oracle, most Americans, Brazilians, Mexicans and etc have spirits that originated from the native Indians of America and not Europe and Africa as their DNA suggests but there are still African and European spirits among them. Then if you are a free person in your past life and you are aware of how the society is organized, then you would not reincarnate as a slave willingly even if you had legitimate children by a slave woman

Would George Washington in the olden days come back through one of his slave descendants? No.

Also you can have rights of incarnation as a spirit just as a result of raising someone. When you raise someone you can qualify as a member of their Earth family or they as a member of yours

Then if you are displaced from your original culture and disconnected from them in the case of a slave then your Earth family from that place can only incarnate in your children and not in the next generation after them. Your own spirit upon death will either go back to it's culture or incarnate in the new line created in the new culture

Secretbloodline if you understand this please patiently explain it to us. Is he saying Creoles are spiritual bastards or what?

QuinQ:
Secretbloodline if you understand this please patiently explain it to us. Is he saying Creoles are spiritual bastards or what?

You're useful because you keep this thread rising!

Here's a picture of King Louis XIII my great great great great great great great great great grandfather. King Louis XIII he was the older brother of Gaston who inherited the title the Duke of Orleans whom New Orleans is named after. Great uncle Gaston was the grandfather of my uncle John Henri de France who immigrated to the English colony and fought under General Washington. All them were light tan skinned. Creoles are not Africans. We had nothing to do with Africans until we purchased them as slaves and used them to build New Orleans and the French Quarter. There was not enough people in Europe interested in being paid low wages as a laborer far away from Paris where life had modern convienances. This is why the Franks used slaves. But we set a record number of them free and had women as concubines but some became Christian and the Church deemed free, free to marry. We married Choctaw women too and had children with them. So Creole which means create became a mix of different sons from Franks in France. This is what we went by patriarchy, my forefathers and my family structure de France is patriotical my father was the heir and considered the king and heir to King Louis Augusta de France our great great great great great great grandfather. My father was dark skinned but he put the bloodline first after God. It was my father who told me that King Louis was light skinned and George Washington was light skinned. I meant light tan.


You say Creoles are spiritually cursed, no we are the tribe of Benjamin and Judah. A core group of Creole men are J2 haplagroup and we are the original Franks who came from the Middle East. Tan skin we have always been tan skinned. The pictures prove it! Both French and Creole we look the same!


Here look.

King Louis XIV the son of King Louis XIII

King Louis XIII

The Countess of Lorraine.

A Creole man.

A Creole woman.


We always were light skinned. And like the Choctaw lost their land stolen by the English we Creole loss France and our identity as Franks. Then you insult us with the Black Box. It was the White Supremacists who created the White Box and Black Box. The move of chess where the white always moves first started in England.

King XIII father of King Louis XIV.

Another Creole gentleman.

We are the ones who suffered the One Drop Rule but if you were to apply that to the Anglos then all of America is Black because all the Anglos did was force sex their slaves both men and women masters.


J2 haplagroup.

Secretbloodline:
You're useful because you keep this thread rising!

Here's a picture of King Louis XIII my great great great great great great great great great grandfather. King Louis XIII he was the older brother of Gaston who inherited the title the Duke of Orleans whom New Orleans is named after. Great uncle Gaston was the grandfather of my uncle John Henri de France who immigrated to the English colony and fought under General Washington. All them were light tan skinned. Creoles are not Africans. We had nothing to do with Africans until we purchased them as slaves and used them to build New Orleans and the French Quarter. There was not enough people in Europe interested in being paid low wages as a laborer far away from Paris where life had modern convienances. This is why the Franks used slaves. But we set a record number of them free and had women as concubines but some became Christian and the Church deemed free, free to marry. We married Choctaw women too and had children with them. So Creole which means create became a mix of different sons from Franks in France. This is what we went by patriarchy, my forefathers and my family structure de France is patriotical my father was the heir and considered the king and heir to King Louis Augusta de France our great great great great great great grandfather. My father was dark skinned but he put the bloodline first after God. It was my father who told me that King Louis was light skinned and George Washington was light skinned. I meant light tan.


You say Creoles are spiritually cursed, no we are the tribe of Benjamin and Judah. A core group of Creole men are J2 haplagroup and we are the original Franks who came from the Middle East. Tan skin we have always been tan skinned. The pictures prove it! Both French and Creole we look the same!


Here look.

King Louis XIV the son of King Louis XIII

King Louis XIII

The Countess of Lorraine.

A Creole man.

A Creole woman.


We always were light skinned. And like the Choctaw lost their land stolen by the English we Creole loss France and our identity as Franks. Then you insult us with the Black Box. It was the White Supremacists who created the White Box and Black Box. The move of chess where the white always moves first started in England.

Height of delusion, you were asked a simple question: what the guy wrote is confusing, please explain it if you can.
No one is asking you how coloured Louisiana Creoles came about or whether St Louis was white. We know (KNOW as in 100% certain) the answer to those. We are no longer discussing those. We are now transitioning to discussing ideas.
In my endeavor to discuss ideas, I wanted to get your explanation of the guy's "spiritual bastards" thesis

But the Catholic Church now bows to the Anglos because the British Empire took over the world. The British colonized Nigeria the Giant of Africa. I always considered Nigeria the Giant of Africa. A place I knew what make a difference in these times. Y'all are useful even if we don't agree on religion but know this Catholcism belongs to the Franks and we are the heirs. That's why they made a Creole Pope but he's only Creole maternal wise. That's called castration of power by putting female relations in order to suppress the male but still use them. The way Pope Leo is talked down to angers me. It is directed at us and I see it as witchcraft. My relationship with Nigerians taught me some valuable tools of priesthood. I was allowed by God to see witchcraft work and understood that it is real and why prayer is so powerful. For that I thank you. Freedom of Religion.

Psalm 23.

The Catholic Church wants everyone to think this Creole. And this Negro because you know many have the white man's bloodline and are dark skinned. These are the ones who support the Black Box and present Creole as African. That's why you misunderstood what a Creole is because of the Negro impersonation of Creole.

But this is Creole again tan skinned.

Secretbloodline:
But this is Creole again tan skinned.

And this is St Louis below. Please explain to us how he is "tan"