₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,330,267 members, 8,444,719 topics. Date: Monday, 13 July 2026 at 09:49 PM

Toggle theme

Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsSenate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors (9598 Views)

1 2 3 Reply (Go Down)

Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by coputa(op): 6:10am On Jun 10
Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, has disclosed plans to sponsor a constitutional amendment bill in the 11th National Assembly seeking to replace the current two-term tenure arrangement for the president and governors with a single six-year term.

The proposal, which is expected to form part of a broader package of political and constitutional reforms, is aimed at strengthening governance and reducing the distractions associated with re-election campaigns.

Bamidele made the disclosure during an extensive interview in Abuja, where he spoke on constitutional reforms, insecurity, legislative transparency, anti-terrorism measures and the performance of the 10th Senate.

The Senate Leader also challenged the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) to immediately publish the salaries, allowances and benefits of all public office holders in the country, including members of the National Assembly, ministers, commissioners and state legislators.

According to him, persistent public misconceptions about lawmakers’ earnings were largely the result of a lack of transparency by the commission constitutionally empowered to determine the remuneration of political office holders.

He maintained that legislators neither fixed their salaries nor determined their allowances and insisted that making the information public would help dispel widespread assumptions about the financial privileges of lawmakers.

“All allowances received by parliamentarians at both the federal and state levels should be published fully and publicly. Legislators do not determine their remuneration. The Revenue Mobilisation and Fiscal Commission is responsible for that.

“The commission should publish comprehensively what every category of public office holder earns. These includes members of the National Assembly, state assembly members, ministers and others. Once that is done, many of the misconceptions surrounding legislative remuneration will disappear,” Bamidele said.

He also clarified that vehicles provided to senators and members of the House of Representatives were official government assets meant for legislative and constituency responsibilities and not personal property of lawmakers.

On the nation’s security challenges, Bamidele defended the decision of the Senate to reject a motion seeking the establishment of a special committee to probe all financial releases made to the military in the prosecution of the war against insurgency and terrorism.

He argued that opening a public investigation into military expenditure while troops remained actively engaged in combat operations would amount to putting the armed forces on trial in the middle of a war.

According to him, the military has continued to make enormous sacrifices under exceptionally difficult circumstances, confronting terrorists who have shifted from conventional warfare to guerrilla tactics.

He explained that the Senate considered it more appropriate to allow the existing oversight committees on Defence, Army, Navy and Air Force to continue their constitutional responsibilities of monitoring military spending and procurement.

Bamidele stressed that lawmakers regularly inspect military equipment acquisitions both within and outside the country and are involved in monitoring procurement processes to ensure accountability.

He said much of the military operations and acquisitions could not be publicly discussed because of national security considerations.

Despite growing public concerns over renewed attacks in some parts of the country, the Senate Leader insisted that substantial progress was being recorded in the fight against terrorism.

He attributed the recent spate of attacks partly to the pressure being mounted on insurgent groups through intensified military operations and international counter-terrorism partnerships.

According to him, terrorist groups were increasingly resorting to retaliatory attacks in an effort to undermine public confidence in the armed forces and create the impression that security efforts were failing.

“We must not allow political interests or propaganda to weaken public support for our military. Significant progress is being made, even if much of it cannot be discussed openly,” he said.

On efforts to strengthen the legal framework against violent crimes, Bamidele reaffirmed his support for the death penalty for convicted kidnappers and disclosed that the anti-terrorism bill he sponsored was approaching final legislative approval.

He noted that recent court decisions imposing death sentences on convicted kidnappers reflected the growing national consensus that stronger sanctions were required to combat the menace.

The Senate Leader also rejected claims that the 10th Senate functioned as a rubber stamp of the executive arm of government.

He contended that the Assembly deliberately adopted a model of constructive engagement with the presidency and government agencies rather than public confrontation.

He explained that many disagreements with the executive were resolved through consultations before bills and nominations reached the floor of the Senate.

Bamidele noted that the approach helped to avert unnecessary institutional conflicts while ensuring that legislative concerns were adequately addressed.

Citing the administration’s tax reform programme as an example, he said lawmakers engaged extensively with government officials and relevant stakeholders before the bills were eventually passed.

He maintained that collaboration between the executive and legislative arms should not be mistaken for a lack of independence, arguing that statesmanship often required quiet negotiations rather than public disputes.

Reflecting on the performance of the 10th Senate, Bamidele identified the controversy surrounding the suspension of a female senator as one of the lowest moments of the Assembly.

He said the episode created a public perception of division within the Senate and overshadowed important legislative work being undertaken at the time.

Nevertheless, he argued that the Assembly’s achievements in economic reform, taxation, education, agriculture and institutional development would have far-reaching benefits for the country.

The lawmaker argued that the Senate has worked closely with the executive to pass laws aimed at stabilising the economy, expanding access to education, promoting investment and strengthening non-oil revenue generation.

He, however, expressed confidence that the reforms already enacted by the National Assembly would, over time, contribute significantly to national development and improve the welfare of Nigerians.
https://www.thisdaylive.com/2026/06/10/senate-leader-to-propose-six-year-single-term-bill-for-the-president-and-governors/

Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by garykoeman: 6:13am On Jun 10
Senate and house of rep should also be included in the single term.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by Bentacur007: 6:48am On Jun 10
garykoeman:
Senate and house of rep should also be included in the single term.
Na lie..We no gree
Only Governors and president
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by saintopus(m): 7:03am On Jun 10
GEJ proposed this but they rejected it.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by insidelife22(m): 7:04am On Jun 10
Bentacur007:
Na lie..We no gree
Only Governors and president
I agree with you.
On a serious note, I don't think the bill will see the light of day.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by orisa37: 7:19am On Jun 10
6 YEAR PRESIDENCY AND GOVERNCRACY IS FOR CROOKS AND UNTAMED IMBECILES.
THE PRESENT SYSTEM OF 4 YEARS FOR CAUTION AND 4 YEARS FOR ACTIONS IS THE BEST.
WE CAN'T ALL BE PRESIDENTS, COOKS, CROOKS AND TRAINERS FOR slowpoke LOOTERS.
WE VALUE EDUCATED AND SKILLED GOVERNORS AND PRESIDENTS OF FOCUS, ACTIONS AND AMBITIONS LIKE NETANYAHU TRUMP AND OBASANJO.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by Dogalmighty17: 7:20am On Jun 10
They are looking for how to extend Tinubu's tenure. They know he is not a marketable product for reelection and plan to make him the first beneficiary of this.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by dgr8truth(m): 8:45am On Jun 10
One of the most disappointing realities of our politics is how often ideas are judged, not by their merit, but by who proposes them. I often wonder what has really changed over the years. During the administration of President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, the proposal for a single six-year term for elected executives generated intense opposition. Many politicians like mr Bamidele, who are today advocating similar reforms were among those who vigorously criticized and politicized the idea at the time.

This raises an uncomfortable question: Were the objections based on genuine concerns about the proposal itself, or were they driven by political calculations and partisan interests? When politicians reject an idea in one administration only to embrace it in another, it creates the impression that principles are secondary to political expediency. It suggests that some actors in our political system are more committed to power than to the pursuit of policies that advance the common good.

If public officials truly believe that a particular policy is beneficial for national development, intellectual honesty requires them to acknowledge when previous opposition was misplaced. Political maturity demands the ability to rise above partisan loyalties and admit that an idea has merit regardless of its source. Such humility would go a long way toward rebuilding public trust in government institutions.

What is particularly troubling is that these contradictions reinforce the belief that many politicians already know what is necessary for the country's progress. They understand the reforms needed to strengthen institutions, improve governance, and promote national development. Yet those reforms are often sacrificed on the altar of personal ambition, party loyalty, or the pursuit of political advantage.

This leaves many citizens asking how we arrived at a point where the administration of public power frequently appears disconnected from the public good. It is disheartening to witness the extent to which narrow interests can overshadow national priorities.

Perhaps part of the solution lies in changing our own approach as citizens. We must begin to think and act as stakeholders in a common national project rather than as members of competing political camps. The collective interest of the nation should outweigh partisan, ethnic, religious, or personal agendas. Policies should be evaluated on their merits, not on the political identity of those who propose them.

We must also cultivate the habit of supporting good governance wherever it is found. This does not mean abandoning criticism or accountability. On the contrary, governments should always be held accountable. However, there is a difference between constructive criticism aimed at improvement and opposition driven solely by political hostility.

As citizens, we should desire the success of every government, including those we did not vote for or those with whom we disagree politically. The reason is simple: when a government succeeds in delivering security, economic growth, infrastructure, and effective public services, the benefits extend to all citizens. Likewise, when a government fails, the consequences are borne by the entire nation.

This principle is reflected in Scripture as well. The prophet Jeremiah instructed the Israelites in exile to seek the welfare of the city where they lived, because their welfare was tied to its welfare (Jeremiah 29:7). Similarly, Christians are instructed to pray for rulers and those in authority so that society may enjoy peace and stability (1 Timothy 2:1-2).

A mature democracy requires citizens who can separate the fortunes of a political party from the fortunes of the nation itself. Governments will come and go, but the country remains. If we genuinely love our nation, we should pray for wise leadership, demand accountability, support good policies regardless of their source, and place the common good above partisan interests.

Only when we begin to think as citizens first and political partisans second can we hope to build a nation that serves the interests of all rather than the ambitions of a few.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by Parachoko: 9:43am On Jun 10
coputa:
https://www.thisdaylive.com/2026/06/10/senate-leader-to-propose-six-year-single-term-bill-for-the-president-and-governors/
A lot of people criticised Jonathan when he talked about this 6 years single tenure back then
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by AntiChristian: 9:45am On Jun 10
This is good for the polity! Let it happen from 2031!

Peter Obi should go against it as 4 years is enough to turn Nigeria to Dubai-Anambala!
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by benitwater(m): 9:45am On Jun 10
This is better, do one term and retire.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by kaywhy09(m): 9:46am On Jun 10
Then, another will propose Two terms of the 6 years
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by DeltaBachelor(m): 9:47am On Jun 10
lol. It has started already
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by RealityKings1: 9:47am On Jun 10
3 years single term is the best
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by BestLife247: 9:47am On Jun 10
benitwater:
This is better, do one term and retire.
If Obi/Kwankwaso win, the law should be changed. The hope of contesting for another 4 Years makes sesible President to perform well because the threat of being voted out if not would always be there.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by b0rn2fuck(m): 9:48am On Jun 10
What kind of things is this, if not for ban, I for lay curses on this people
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by latiephwald: 9:48am On Jun 10
grin grin cheesy Baba won spend 6more year's 😀😀😀😀
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by SmartMaster001: 9:49am On Jun 10
They have seen the handwriting on the wall.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by ThunderFireAgba: 9:50am On Jun 10
A good proposition. I wonder of its only the 3 major tribes that has political in this country?
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by AllBlack: 9:51am On Jun 10
When will SENATORS propose death sentence for kidnappers and their sponsors?

When will senators propose death sentence for rapists and armed robbers?
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by Klington: 9:53am On Jun 10
Tinubu the failure should be excluded because right thinking Nigerians know he's behind the so called Bill to enable him rule for 10yrs.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by Iran2025: 9:53am On Jun 10
They should also add after the tenure. They will audited and probe... if found guilty 20years imprisonment with no option.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by shadrach77: 9:53am On Jun 10
These phools. Shebi you modelled the constitution after US constitution so is the US term a single 6 year term? Thieves

This was how Paul Biya started. Later they will say 6 years is not enough then they will amend it again to two 6 year terms
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by Hedonisco: 9:54am On Jun 10
I said it many months ago. I said it that these despicable 'Lagos boys' have been bragging that they will be in power for 10 years.

Now they have set the machinery in motion.

Their downfall will be loud.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by Mrchippychappy(m): 9:54am On Jun 10
Oya make una approve am so that I can add 6 years to the 4 years I have just done. Senator Bamidele, sense no go kee you.

Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by oyoofong(m): 9:54am On Jun 10
They are beginning to get it right.

No governor or president can achieve much in the first four years. A significant part of that period is often spent dealing with election petitions, court cases, settling into office, and strategizing for the next election cycle.

Former President Goodluck Jonathan made this suggestion years ago, and I believe it deserves serious consideration. It would be a welcome development if the bill proposing a single six-year tenure for presidents and governors eventually scales through the National Assembly.

Such an arrangement could allow leaders to focus more on governance and long-term development rather than being distracted by early re-election campaigns.I come in peace!
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by jude33084(m): 9:55am On Jun 10
nit is a good move grin

does it mean Tinubu will now serve for 10 years?
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by iwaeda: 9:55am On Jun 10
This is a pre third term agenda. This Senate will pass anything . grin grin grin grin
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by Dalohad: 9:55am On Jun 10
When GEJ made the sane proposition in 2014, your Buhari, Tinubu and APC asked Nigerians to catch him and cut off his head.

What changed?

APC, we will continue to tell you the truth. You are a danger to Nigeria and Nigerians.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by Starboytwo(m): 9:56am On Jun 10
It will help cut down on election expenses every 4 year.
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by anonimi: 9:58am On Jun 10
saintopus:
GEJ proposed this but they rejected it.
Jonathan was not a master strategist.

The master strategist has found a way to test the waters for his 3rd term agenda after winning next year. He is set to succeed where Obasanjo failed in 2007, because Atiku led other democracy heroes to align with the people and our 1999 constitution, thereby killing the bill in the NASS.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPytmuhYDAU
Re: Senate To Propose a 6 Year Single Term Bill For President/governors by Amalekki: 10:00am On Jun 10
True, and It was proposed by others even before GEJ. In a democracy, things don't stop at suggestion level. The constitutional guideline for such amendments is clear.

saintopus:
GEJ proposed this but they rejected it.
1 2 3 Reply

Bill Seeking Six-Year Single Term For President, Governors Scales First ReadingReps To Bar Courts From Sacking President, GovernorsSenate Okays HND As Minimum Qualification For President, Governors234

Nigeria, The Next Battlefield In The War On Terror?Sahara Reporters' Website Under AttackINEC Bill: Senate Moves To Amend INEC Act