₦airaland Forum

Iran has agreed to not build a nuclear weapon and to reopen the Strait of Hormuz if the US releases $25 billion in frozen assets as part of a President Trump-brokered peace deal, according to details released by Tehran on Sunday.

Washington and Tehran were expected to electronically sign a memorandum of understanding Sunday after a virtual meeting designed to set the table for negotiations over a longer-term deal on Iran’s nuclear program, Axios reported.

Trump said the deal was expected to go through despite Israeli strikes in Lebanon, with the president holding a blunt call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Tehran to smooth things out.
Iranian officials were cautiously optimistic that a deal to finally halt the conflict was on the horizon.

The war has raged for three and a half months, throwing world markets into chaos.

On Saturday, Trump and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said a deal would be signed Sunday and would immediately result in the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, the crucial chokepoint through which a fifth of the world’s oil supplies flow.

"We are closer to a peace deal than ever before,” Sharif said on social media. “With finalization likely expected in the next 24 hours, Pakistan is preparing for the electronic signing of the peace deal immediately after, followed by technical-level talks next week.”

An Iranian Foreign Ministry rep said the deal could happen in the next few days.

The pact, which would see $25 billion in Iranian assets unfrozen by the US, does not solve all of the issues between Tehran and Washington but offers a 60-day framework for technical discussions on the rest, according to officials from Pakistan.

US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz said Sunday that the deal would see Iran give up their nearly 1,000 pound supply of highly enriched uranium, as well as their status as backers of terrorist proxies in the region.

The US would also end its blockade of Iranian-linked ships coming out of the strait.

RealLordZeus:
Did Iran ever said they are making nukes

josielewa:
ATIMES I ASK MYSELF THE REASON FOR THIS WAR. THERE WAS NO NUKE BEFORE THE WAR, STRAIT OF HORMUZ HAS BEEN OPEN SINCE AGES.

THIS IS A SENSELESS WAR WITH NO AMBITION OR OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED, JUST DESTRUCTION. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE WAR IS TO STOP IRAN FROM HAVING NUKES, THEY CLAIM IRAN HAS ENRICHED URANIUM. LAST YEAR JULY, A B2 BOMBER BLEW THE SITE OF THE URANIUM ENRICHMENT WITH TRUMP CLAIMING THAT ALL IRAN NUCLEAR POSSIBILITIES HAS BEEN DESTROYED.

FAST FORWARD TO THIS YEAR, ITS BEEN ENDLESS BOMBING WITH THE DEATH FROM THE BOMBING OF 140+ CHILDREN IN A SCHOOL. WHAT HAS AMERICA ACHIEVED, JUST DESTROY THE IRANIAN ECONOMY, WASTED AMMUNITIONS AND MONEY ON A SENSELESS WAR WITH NO AMBITION. IT HAS NOT EVEN BEEN VERIFIED IF AMERICA TRULY DESTROYED IRANIAN ENRICHMENTS. AMERICA WASTED MONEY AND AMMUNITIONS WHILE IRAN LOST A LARGE CHUNK OF WEAPONS,MONEY AND ECONOMY. NO OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED AT ALL.

THIS WILL STAY COOL FOR A WHILE, UNTIL ISRAEL WILL RAISE ANOTHER ALARM THAT IRAN HAS 50 NUCLEAR WEAPONS. SAME TRICK USED IN IRAQ IN 2003. I ASK MYSELF IF THERE ARE OTHER SINISTER MOTIVES FOR THESE UNNECESSARY WARS WITH NO CLEAR OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED.

Eba50:
that one no mean say fuel becomes 1k cos for Nigeria, anything wey go up no dey come down again

Mattswaggz:
Iran would never give up give up their nuclear program blah blah blah....where are those guys that have been singing these songs here?....wuna think say na by mouth abi?. .

Mattswaggz:
Iran would never give up give up their nuclear program blah blah blah....where are those guys that have been singing these songs here?....wuna think say na by mouth abi?. .

Mattswaggz:
There was no nuke but there was almost nuke.....having the nuke could make a lot of difference so acting before them having the nuke is a sound strategy.

CuteTj:
Iran has said it multiple times that they have no plans of building a nuclear bomb. Since the start of the current war, they have realised keeping the Strait of Hormuz in their possession is greater than having a nuclear weapon.

Mattswaggz:
There was no nuke but there was almost nuke.....having the nuke could make a lot of difference so acting before them having the nuke is a sound strategy.

vr0xen:
Same thing North Korea said before they conducted a nuclear test. the west will continue bullying small nations without nukes