₦airaland Forum

GanagiBitrus:
Where did I say that?
Anyway, extra time involves teams still in the competition.
In this case, the 2 teams are already out of the competition. If at all there should be a 3rd place match, it should strictly be to determine who wins Bronze, not to give players undue advantage of accumulating goals.

EUFA was wise to scrap 3rd place match from EURO Competition.

All because ur fraud has lost the golden boot ... very bitter fans

cr7lomo:
All because ur fraud has lost the golden boot ... very bitter fans

Leave sentiments & counter my points with valid arguments.

&you are wrong; I'm speaking from a neutral perspective.

yomi531:
True 💯 . It's also interesting to note that Just Fontaine who , holds the record for most goals in a single Wcup tournament (13) actually, scored the bulk of his goals in a 3rd place match😆

Quite Interesting.
Coaches usually adopt a less cautious approach in 3rd place matches, so higher chances for more goals.

Dapo I won't be crying over made men, makes no sense it's all a hobby for me dont take it personal.

dapsoneh:
cry more, cry more, zero for Ronaldon cry more cry more

Reference:
I don't regard these statistics anymore.
As FIFA continues to expand the tournament with more matches and more weaker teams participating, records are bound to be broken every tournament.

The quality or importance of a record relates to how difficult it is to make or break. So these things are becoming valueless in my opinion.

If Infantino has his way next tournament may feature 64 teams. 64 reasons why new records will be set. Pointless.

Mbappe scored 2 against Senegal, 2 against England, 1 against Paraguay that knocked out Germany, scored against Sweden....

pdppower:
Messi may cancel the record at the final if he scores two goals.

22games22goal is different from 33games and 21goals

pdppower:
Messi may cancel the record at the final if he scores two goals.

Shout power😂

GanagiBitrus:
Quite Interesting.
Coaches usually adopt a less cautious approach in 3rd place matches, so higher chances for more goals.

Yeah 👍

Don27tiky:
but should mpape’s goals yesterday count? You cannot be knocked out of the World Cup and still be scoring useful goals. Imagine placing Bellingham ahead of Halaand if he scored more yesterday

mtcheeew u wanna rob abi.. He's the highest goal scorer, period. Always coming up with one silly scheme to put a useless agenda

RealEzee:
mtcheeew u wanna rob abi.. He's the highest goal scorer, period. Always coming up with one silly scheme to put a useless agenda

it’s not what you are thinking bro. Reason it logically. You eliminated someone you are competing with but tje person is still competing with you. Euro and Copa America don’t play 3rd place for a reason.
You could clearly see that both teams were casual about the match. Do you actually think Saka will score 3 goals against France in a World Cup group stage or knockout games?
England couldn’t beat Panama like this

Don27tiky:
it’s not what you are thinking bro. Reason it logically. You eliminated someone you are competing with but tje person is still competing with you. Euro and Copa America don’t play 3rd place for a reason.
You could clearly see that both teams were casual about the match. Do you actually think Saka will score 3 goals against France in a World Cup group stage or knockout games?
England couldn’t beat Panama like this

each tournament with its own, it has been for a long time so why change it now, to appeal to some other? Besides their game was entertaining, pls don't downplay the performance put out by England and France in the third place match as 'casual', do you think France didn't want it? Why press to equalize if they didn't?
So the hardwork of the person you so called eliminated should be put where? Plsss Plsss it's logical that it's called the higest goal scorer of the tournament for a reason, who scored the most goals during the tournament, it matters not if the most goals where scored during the group stage.

RealEzee:
each tournament with its own, it has been for a long time so why change it now, to appeal to some other? Besides their game was entertaining, pls don't downplay the performance put out by England and France in the third place match as 'casual', do you think France didn't want it? Why press to equalize if they didn't?
So the hardwork of the person you so called eliminated should be put where? Plsss Plsss it's logical that it's called the higest goal scorer of the tournament for a reason, who scored the most goals during the tournament, it matters not if the most goals where scored during the group stage.

you deliberately don’t want to be logical about it.
It is not about Messi or Mpape. It’s about fairness. What if Bellingham started and scored 5 goals with the way the match was. Will it be fair to place him ahead of Halaand and even Messi after been eliminated from the top prize?
Well FIFA is looking into it. One day FiFA will do it and you will see what we see now

cr7lomo:
But tgey found the net against the best teams Portugal Belgium and France

Portugal wasn't one of the best teams.

And yeah, Spain did great. That's why they won. Argentina did great too. That's why there were in the final.

Don27tiky:
you deliberately don’t want to be logical about it.
It is not about Messi or Mpape. It’s about fairness. What if Bellingham started and scored 5 goals with the way the match was. Will it be fair to place him ahead of Halaand and even Messi after been eliminated from the top prize?
Well FIFA is looking into it. One day FiFA will do it and you will see what we see now

oh pls spare the sane the mental gymnastics you are bringing, he with the most goals in the tournament should be given to him who score the most goals, period. All this useless agenda amount to nothing, if one scores 20 goals in one match and don't score till the end of the tournament or get eliminated at group stage it matters not, d koko is he scored the most goals.
And so what if Bellingham scored more goals ahead of Messi even after been eliminated what disqualifies him from the award, was it his fault that Messi or Co didn't score again? Abeg abeg no dey bring lame excuses here ja re,Fifa ko you are moved by sentiment buddy

Winnin009:
Portugal wasn't one of the best teams.

And yeah, Spain did great. That's why they won. Argentina did great too. That's why there were in the final.

Argentina only got to the final because of wuruwuru from fifa

RealEzee:
oh pls spare the sane the mental gymnastics you are bringing, he with the most goals in the tournament should be given to him who score the most goals, period. All this useless agenda amount to nothing, if one scores 20 goals in one match and don't score till the end of the tournament or get eliminated at group stage it matters not, d koko is he scored the most goals.
And so what if Bellingham scored more goals ahead of Messi even after been eliminated what disqualifies him from the award, was it his fault that Messi or Co didn't score again? Abeg abeg no dey bring lame excuses here ja re,Fifa ko you are moved by sentiment buddy

I don’t respond to people who are shallow thinkers. Maybe it’s only you that didn’t know France and England didn’t take the match seriously hence the rested key layers. Maybe it’s only you and people like you who didn’t know that the tempo of the game was very low. If you think Saka is capable of scoring hat trick in a competitive game that easily against France, then I cannot help you

cr7lomo:
Argentina only got to the final because of wuruwuru from fifa

Okay bro.

Don27tiky:
I don’t respond to people who are shallow thinkers. Maybe it’s only you that didn’t know France and England didn’t take the match seriously hence the rested key layers. Maybe it’s only you and people like you who didn’t know that the tempo of the game was very low. If you think Saka is capable of scoring hat trick in a competitive game that easily against France, then I cannot help you

damn you prove to be dull, which key players didn't feature in that match?