₦airaland Forum

Eniitankorede:
➜This your ITK sef! Are you telling me other white PHDs and professors have no skeleton in their cupboards?

There are other black Ph.Ds in that same school. If race was the issue as you would very much like for us to believe, why were they not singled out alongside this man? If they were scrutinized in much the same way as this man, why was he the only one among all the black professors at the school who had so many skeletons in his closet? It is literally on you to establish that the supposed witch hunt was racially motivated. 😒😒

DoWhatThouWilt:
Prof. Qadira (TB), PhD,PhD



Source

How come this man read my mind?
I was just responding exactly same thing to someone on Facebook about this issue. prof Jason would have enjoyed a quiet and fulfilled life As an academic of he had just stayed out of the limelight

DoWhatThouWilt:
She is a professor. She worked hard for it and she probably has knowledge she would like to share but she knows she is black (Of African origin) and she understands her environment very well. So she decided to avoid EVERY interview.

That is HUMILITY. Humility is not weakness. When you are HUMBLE, you will have common sense that will make you take wise decisions.

Before you japa to work or further your education in a white man's land, drop that your "i beta pass my neighbor" mentality if you want to live in peace overseas.

That mentality may have worked for you very well here in this lawless terrain but it will NEVER work for you in their land.

BE HUMBLE

SPOT ON

I wrote same thing about this issue on Facebook just hours ago. Are u sure u did not copy what I wrote?

obstead200:
How come this man read my mind?
I was just responding exactly same thing to someone on Facebook about this issue. prof Jason would have enjoyed a quiet and fulfilled life As an academic of he had just stayed out of the limelight

Na! His students were already on Reddit complaining from over a year ago! if he had kept to himself, it would still have eventually happened. 😒😒

Kobojunkie:
Na! His students were already on Reddit complaining from over a year ago! if he had kept to himself, it would still have eventually happened. 😒😒

I do not believe that a university like Cambridge can hand out tenure to a minority like Jason Arday without thorough scrutiny of his credentials. I stopped believing Reddit, twitter and quora a long time ago. Those spaces are full of highly bigoted, bitter and racist individuals

obstead200:
➜I do not believe that a university like Cambridge can hand out tenure to a minority like Jason Arday without thorough scrutiny of his credentials.
➜ I stopped believing Reddit, twitter and quora a long time ago.
➜ Those spaces are full of highly bigoted, bitter and racist individuals

. As it turns out, Cambridge may have just done exactly that, as that would partly explain why the school refused to investigate when complaints first started coming in against the Arday guy. 😒

2. I don't believe any of those sites either, but that doesn't mean the complaints posted on them were not based on reality. I watched one of Arday's lecture videos and left understanding the comments made on that thread, as well as a recent article supposedly written from an interview with a former student of his. 😒

3. If you think that way of them, then you should know the people on there are mostly those from the far-left liberal side of things. 😂😂😂

Ibime:
Lies told by Prof Arday

PE teacher to Cambridge Professor based on a mountain of lies


>claim diagnosed autistic at 3
>claim non-verbal until 11
>claim partial deafness in one ear & being taught to sign by yourself
>claim couldn't read until 18, still leave school w/ two GCSEs
>claim you joined the pro snooker tour at 10, a year before you could speak
>claim you won so much at snooker your mom thought you were dealing drugs
>have the sport's database show just one amateur event, many years later, w/ zero prize money
>claim football academy & a pro career
>have Crystal Palace say no record
>have the real record show tier eight
>claim to have been on Seven Up, a series that first tracked 7 year olds as they grew up
>have it first air 28 years before you were actually seven years-old
>have BBC say you weren't on it, since you're not a time traveller
>claim youths at a bus stop beat you into a weeks-long coma
>claim you heard medics tell your parents to switch off life support
>claim you begged the judge to spare them
>claim they turned up years later as your students, hug them, become godfather to one's child
>claim 30 marathons in 35 days in 2010, the last nine on a broken leg swollen to twice its size
>add an epileptic fit in later tellings
>tell local paper you raised more than £100,000 since you were 17
>claim running 600 miles in six days as your final challenge, when the men's record is 650
>claim it came at the same time as a stroke
>have no race time on record anywhere, because why bother
>have nobody in the ultra running world ever hear of you
>hand in a PhD on reflective practice w/ 100+ passages matching another student's 2009 thesis
>have 188 sentences come back identical or near identical, including her copy-editing errors
>match a second PhD & two published papers on top
>claim you did it in 2.5 years, working full time, w/ a brain tumor
>claim the tumor was cut out 2 weeks before the viva
>claim a stroke after the surgery
>claim you turned up & remembered nothing at all
>claim one supervision meeting in the whole doctorate
>get the PhD anyway
>publish a paper claiming focus groups w/ 32 black & minority students
>have the quotes match an epidemiologist's quotes
>have structure follow his too
>lift quotes into other papers & pass them off as interviews you conducted
>get a correction, not a retraction b/c well. . . .
>delete 18 of the 31 quotes
>get full chair at Glasgow
>tell TEDx crowd you've raised over £5m by age 36
>claim you were once watched a teacher tell a boy who wanted to be a concert pianist to aim lower
>retell sort in 2021 w/ the boy as a would-be astrophysicist
>retell it again in 2023 as your own & experience & open a Ch 4 film w/ it
>be youngest black prof in 900 years, and at Cambridge
>get BBC radio series on loneliness
>claim 70% of Brits live below the breadline
>be voted number 1 in the Disability Power 100
>collect honorary degrees from Solent, Anglia Ruskin, St Mary's, Westminster & London South Bank
>say you raised millions for 70+ charities
>claim a Palgrave book called Being Young, Black, and Male
>have Palgrave say it was never published
>claim water points built for WaterAid across SA & Africa
>have WaterAid webpage titled "Why we don't send volunteers abroad"
>list yourself as a visiting prof at Glasgow
>have Glasgow say “nope”
>list yourself as a visiting pro at Ohio State's Office of DEI
>have no record and have that office turn out to have shut in 2025
>have Birkbeck say no record of your master's
>have Nelson Mandela U say the adjunct post ended
>get a second paper corrected 2024
>tell a funeral directors' convention in New Orleans the ultras raised £5m alone, but no record again
>be named on more than $10m in UKRI & NIHR grants
>write to a minister claiming knife threats, assault, spitting, rape, & death threats, plus bananas, bullets, corrosive substances, & mutilated animals
>photograph none of it for some odd reason!
>claim a masked man w/ a knife cornered you in the faculty twice
>show up on no CCTV either time
>tell nobody AT THE TIME

Thank you for this list. So the dude was not innocent. He lied and exxagerrated most aspects of his life. So why are online lots whining?

I guess this is one of the ills of living in a region/country that judges and rewards people based on their skin colour. Everything is assessed through the lens of race. Black professors at universities in East Asia are highly respected because there is nothing like lovey-dovey here. If you get it, it means you merited it.

Good luck to Ndi lovey-dovey.

The way they ran ads to destroy dis guy is something I've not seen before.... They said he plagiarised his PhD thesis, the sch that awarded him, said no he didn't... After they couldn't get him through that, they went after his personal stories, that it's fake, they went through his students who doesn't like him... His school couldn't find anything to sack him for, yet the press kept writing and releasing articles... Till the dude couldn't take it anymore.... Omooo

Gerrard59:
Thank you for this list. So the dude was not innocent. He lied and exxagerrated most aspects of his life. So why are online lots whining?

I guess this is one of the ills of living in a region/country that judges and rewards people based on their skin colour. Everything is assessed through the lens of race. Black professors at universities in East Asia are highly respected because there is nothing like lovey-dovey here. If you get it, it means you merited it.

Good luck to Ndi lovey-dovey.

he didn't lie to get his job... Did he plagiarise, yes, the right thing to do is to write to the school that awarded him his PhD... They did so and the sch cleared him.... About his personal lies.. That has nothing to do with his academic qualifications... He said he ran 30 marathons in 36 days... They said they couldn't find evidence, but no one has come out with evidence that he didn't.... The media helped in destroying this guy...

oakenfold:
You, my friend, are blind.
Nathan Cofnas, the initiator of the witch hunt is in fact a Jew and a supremacist. Someone who really does seem to detest the existence of black people in academia. He has a twitter page, you can visit it instead of crying here.. Know your enemy!

Nathan Cofnas is an American with a Jewish heritage. He is a hater of black indeed and a supremacist. No argument.

Why I called that guy sick is because he likes to subvert the truth. He claims Cofnas was dismissed from Cambridge too because of plagiarism as well which is not true. Cofnas was dismissed because of his supremacy view which the school viewed as being racist.

The young man, Nathan Cofnas was guilty as charged. There might be a witch hunting against black scholars in USA but Cofnas was guilty.

AndroBlaze:
So every black person that achieves something in the Western world should be afraid of the media abi.....

I wonder, if someone like Obama had taken this advice, would he have ever had the chance to become a Senator, let alone the first minority President in a modern America!

This thing is not as complicated as people are making it out to be. My advice to fellow immigrants is no matter what you achieve, stay true to yourself and the community that you know birthed/molded you....if you keep this rule, it will guide you and save you from most of the invisible traps that are being set.

The media comment is that Jason benefited from DEI.

It's always good to succeed in silence.

i saw this

this is another take on the matter

https://emeraldbook.org/news/aug-1526-3/

The story of Jason Arday was never simply about one man. It was a tragedy written in two acts, a devastating play performed by two powerful actors: the University of Cambridge and the British media. The narrative is painfully simple and devastatingly clear—th[b]e university set him up to fail, and the press finished the job.[/b] The death of the 41-year-old sociologist, who was found dead at his home in Battersea, South London, on August 14, 2026, is not just a personal tragedy but a profound institutional failure that has sent shockwaves through British academia. The Metropolitan Police stated that his death is being treated as unexpected, but it is not believed to be suspicious.

In 2023, Cambridge University appointed Arday to a prestigious, senior professorship, making him the youngest Black professor in its history. It was a moment of celebration, a headline-grabbing milestone for a university often criticized for its lack of diversity. However, behind the scenes, the university appears to have bypassed the most basic administrative due diligence. Senior faculty members later admitted they had never read his work. The university failed to run standard software checks on his publications or independently verify details on his CV—including certain visiting professorships and specific fundraising numbers—before placing him into one of the most scrutinized positions in the world. They were so eager for the "historic" headline that they neglected the necessary vetting, leaving their new star hire completely exposed to the inevitable scrutiny.


The university wanted the prestige and positive publicity, but they failed to protect him with standard due diligence during the hiring process.



When the inevitable accusations surfaced—ignited by Dr. Nathan Cofnas, a former Cambridge philosophy researcher with a well-documented history of promoting eugenics and race-realism theories (claiming Black people have lower average IQs)—the university panicked. Cofnas, who had recently been dismissed from his own Cambridge role following intense protests over his race-realism blogs, used his personal newsletter to publish the initial evidence of plagiarism in Arday's 2015 doctoral thesis. Instead of taking accountability for its own administrative negligence—having failed to conduct basic due diligence during the hiring process—Cambridge bowed to internal and external pressure and launched an investigation into Arday himself. This was a classic corporate maneuver: investigate the employee to deflect blame from the systemic failures of the employer. Dozens of Cambridge academics signed a letter demanding an independent inquiry into his background, with some expressing anger over how his senior appointment was handled. Over 100 senior faculty members revolted against their own leadership, arguing that the university was trying to investigate Arday to cover up its own negligence. On August 5, 2026, Arday resigned as a professor and fellow of Jesus College, noting that the "personal cost" of the relentless public commentary had become too great to bear. Even after his resignation, Cambridge confirmed that its investigation would continue regardless, intending to use the findings to audit and revamp its broader hiring processes—an admission that its own systems were broken from the start.

The Media: The Finishing Blow
The media took the baton from the university and ran with it, transforming a localized academic dispute into a national culture-war referendum. In the weeks leading up to his resignation and death, the press unleashed a "media pile-on" of staggering proportions. Investigative tracking indicates that nearly 250 articles were written about Jason Arday across dozens of major local and international news organizations before his death, with 188 of them appearing in the final nine days of his life.
“

When other white, tenured professors face serious misconduct, the standard response is slow-moving bureaucracy. For Arday, a visible symbol of DEI, his infractions were weaponized.

— The core of the disparity argument

This was not standard reporting. The coverage was led by dominant UK and international publications, including The Telegraph, The New York Times, The Times (UK), and independent academic watchdogs like Retraction Watch. Outlets like The Telegraph published at least a dozen separate front-page investigative features, explicitly branding Arday with headlines like "Cambridge's diversity poster boy." The press did not just focus on his thesis; they launched full-scale investigations into his life—auditing his charity running times, questioning his childhood medical records (including his autism diagnosis), investigating his claims of overcoming severe childhood developmental delays (being non-verbal until age 11 and illiterate until his late teens), and even contacting old acquaintances. Each detail became a new story, creating an endless, relentless cycle of torment.
A Double Standard Exposed

The disparity in coverage is the most damning piece of evidence. Other professors at Cambridge and across the UK have faced far worse accusations—some of which were upheld by internal investigations. Yet they did not have 250 articles written about them in a matter of weeks. Consider Professor Simon Goldhill, a high-profile Professor of Greek Literature, against whom an internal investigation upheld complaints of severe professional and sexual misconduct in early 2026. Despite the university upholding the misconduct findings, the case did not trigger the same immediate, front-page national media frenzy or massive public pile-on that Arday experienced.

The difference is clear: Arday was a high-profile, proud symbol of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). His downfall was a lucrative narrative for news organizations catering to an anti-DEI audience. He was not treated as an individual with potential academic errors; he was treated as a proxy in a culture war, his life dissected and humiliated for clicks. Defenders of Jason Arday, including the Runnymede Trust and the Good Law Project, argue that a distinct double standard exists. When white, tenured professors face allegations of sexual misconduct, financial fraud, or fringe racial theories, the standard response is often slow-moving internal bureaucracy and a shield of "academic freedom." In contrast, critics argue that because Arday was a highly visible symbol of DEI, his infractions were weaponized into an existential culture war, resulting in an unprecedented "total takedown."
The University's Shifting Stance

The University of Cambridge shifted its stance significantly over the course of the controversy. Initially, when the plagiarism allegations first emerged, Cambridge administration stood firmly by Arday, pointing out that Liverpool John Moores University (the institution that awarded his PhD) had already reviewed his thesis and cleared him of wrongdoing. At that stage, Cambridge officials privately described the situation as a "vile campaign to undermine his credibility." However, as the press and critics expanded their scrutiny to encompass his personal achievements, fundraising claims, and biographical background, the university reversed its initial defense. They announced an independent investigation into his qualifications, honorary appointments, and the circumstances surrounding his hiring by the Faculty of Education.

Following the news of his passing on August 14, 2026, University of Cambridge Vice-Chancellor Deborah Prentice issued an official statement saying the institution was "desperately saddened to hear this tragic news" and extended heartfelt sympathies to his family. Prentice also strongly defended the university's staff of color amid the wider political fallout, emphasizing that they are highly valued for their scholarship. She explicitly stated that Arday's case was an "aberration" and should not be used by critics to cast aspersions on the legitimacy of other minority academics at Cambridge.

cambridge no try as if they had done proper due diligence mr arday would not have been elevated to his position in the first place. likely there was serious internal mgt pressure .Normally in instances like this you have to get a person with an impeccable record because down the line he will be challenged. If Barack obama had any dirt on him, you can be sure the right wing press would have jumped on it.

GloriousGbola:
i saw this

this is another take on the matter

https://emeraldbook.org/news/aug-1526-3/



cambridge no try as if they had done proper due diligence mr arday would not have been elevated to his position in the first place. likely there was serious internal mgt pressure .Normally in instances like this you have to get a person with an impeccable record because down the line he will be challenged. If Barack obama had any dirt on him, you can be sure the right wing press would have jumped on it.

Yes agreed, but the way the writer tries to blame Cambridge more than Arday is all shades of wrong.

DeepSight:
Yes agreed, but the way the writer tries to blame Cambridge more than Arday is all shades of wrong.

Your run of the mill corporate employer in naija will vet your credentials. A Google search can confirm a lot of what is in your cv. If there was no internal pressure, this would have ended at the interview stage. It is not as if Jason was weaving intricate impenetrable falsehoods.

Someone made HR waive all the protocols in place because they were engaging in performative DEI and they wanted someone who would tick all possible boxes.

"To be a Black person in elite institutions, and particularly in elite academia, is to have the standards simultaneously set too low and too high: too low because only a Black person with Arday’s dubious qualifications and seemingly invented biography could have been elevated to the top of the mountain in academia and publishing; and too high because only a Black person could have been pushed off that mountain with such nakedly racist enthusiasm, his tumbling fall so ruthlessly documented, analyzed, and cheered. When a famous white man errs, people tend to rightly understand his mistakes or transgressions as an individual’s missteps. When a famous Black man does, the errors are typically turned into spectacle, characterized as proof of the inferiority, suspected all along, of his race.

Around the same time yesterday afternoon that I learned of Arday’s fate, I came across another piece of news: an announcement that Ross Barkan, a white novelist and journalist, had just been dropped by New York magazine after the publication—having investigated allegations regarding dozens of instances of plagiarism in Barkan’s writing—concluded that his work “did not live up to our editorial standards.” Swiftly afterward, Barkan announced that he would now focus on writing a new column at The Nation, another venerable outlet, where he will get a very public second chance.

It is impossible to know what is in someone’s head or heart in their final moments. I have to imagine, though, that Arday understood well enough the world he had entered and how its rules tend to work: When you are Black, some people will open the door for you far wider than they should. And when that door abruptly comes swinging shut, you will be offered no second chances."

Tyler Austin Harper in the Atlantic

READ: The Truths That Failed Jason Arday

https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/2026/08/jason-arday-cambridge-professor-death/688304/?gift=v-0hjcKeTUtA3JJp7LeBdLutCSe0xZNnAy0pVoRtVjg&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share

GloriousGbola:
Your run of the mill corporate employer in naija will vet your credentials. A Google search can confirm a lot of what is in your cv. If there was no internal pressure, this would have ended at the interview stage. It is not as if Jason was weaving intricate impenetrable falsehoods.

Someone made HR waive all the protocols in place because they were engaging in performative DEI and they wanted someone who would tick all possible boxes.

I said I agree. I am simply saying the employer who failed to check is not more guilty than the employee who forges and fakes. But the writer made it seem so, and even made it seem that it was a deliberate thing.

Kobojunkie:
Black man and victim mentality na 5&6. 😒

A simple Google search would reveal that even O'Reilly was subjected to media scrutiny back in 2024. But reading the story of the two men, you already begin seeing the difference almost as soon as you do. O'Reilly did not resign and endured the investigation, from which Cambridge eventually cleared him for reasons best known at this point to the counsel. Arday resigned from his post as soon as the heat came on. 😒

You also need to examine some of the claims he made in his memoir. Yes, he wrote a book about himself, further opening himself up to public scrutiny. People from his past, including some who attended primary school with him, chimed in, confirming the falsehoods of many claims made. If you open up to be scrutinized, shouldn't you at least expect people to do just that... scrutinize you? 😒

Also, have you at least watched one of Arday's lectures? I have taken some time to review his teaching in order to understand some of the complaints made by former students. After watching that, I think the student may have been on to something, if not on point.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBhYvEq3qyU?si=MCl5befEcFn32Owg
https://www.reddit.com/r/UniUK/comments/1veinaa/can_anyone_comment_on_jason_ardays_teaching/
https://unherd.com/newsroom/jason-arday-taught-me-heres-what-i-learnt/?edition=us

This was quite interesting.

DeepSight:
I said I agree. I am simply saying the employer who failed to check is not more guilty than the employee who forges and fakes. But the writer made it seem so, and even made it seem that it was a deliberate thing.

I personally think that Cambridge Ogas at the top wanted to convey a liberal image and so pushed this through


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViZEDSfX9EI?si=C92EBSvLEH_9vG2M

This scene from dirty Harry may clarify my thoughts

Performative liberalism

Meanwhile during Jim crow Civil rights activists had to ensure anyone put forward was 101%

Rosa Parks was not the first person to refuse to give up her seat. But the first person who did so was an unwed mother and that is what the media would have focused on to change the narrative.

I am sure there were enough sterling candidates that Cambridge could have taken for this role but they chose to self sabotage by rushing the process and taking the least qualified but best packaged box ticker.

Kobojunkie:
Na! His students were already on Reddit complaining from over a year ago! if he had kept to himself, it would still have eventually happened. 😒😒

If he also had not told stories like being non verbal until eleven and running thirty marathons in 35 days, partly with a broken femur, the story won't have made the media, just the 'retraction watch' website.

GloriousGbola:
I personally think that Cambridge Ogas at the top wanted to convey a liberal image and so pushed this through


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViZEDSfX9EI?si=C92EBSvLEH_9vG2M

This scene from dirty Harry may clarify my thoughts

Performative liberalism

Meanwhile during Jim crow Civil rights activists had to ensure anyone put forward was 101%

Rosa Parks was not the first person to refuse to give up her seat. But the first person who did so was an unwed mother and that is what the media would have focused on to change the narrative.

I am sure there were enough sterling candidates that Cambridge could have taken for this role but they chose to self sabotage by rushing the process and taking the least qualified but best packaged box ticker.

I agree with all this. Does any of it take away from the fraud by Arday? Or does it convert Cambridge to the prime mover in the fraud?

DeepSight:
I agree with all this. Does any of it take away from the fraud by Arday? Or does it convert Cambridge to the prime mover in the fraud?

One time in my career I had a grossly incompetent and lazy hod who was related to executive mgt. Basically they forced her on us and forced her elevation to HOD even though she clearly had no technical competence.

On her own steam she would have remained in her manager position. Instead she was put in a role where her negligence led to real damage because she was not on top of anything.

My point is Arday would not have gotten as far as he did if Cambridge mgt were not pushing for and focusing on meeting an unrealistic DEI target.

GloriousGbola:
One time in my career I had a grossly incompetent and lazy hod who was related to executive mgt. Basically they forced her on us and forced her elevation to HOD even though she clearly had no technical competence.

On her own steam she would have remained in her manager position. Instead she was put in a role where her negligence led to real damage because she was not on top of anything.

My point is Arday would not have gotten as far as he did if Cambridge mgt were not pushing for and focusing on meeting an unrealistic DEI target.

I am tired of saying I agree. I agree and understand. But at this point you are almost absolving Arday of fraud and suggesting that Cambridge was the only sinner here.

DeepSight:
I am tired of saying I agree. I agree and understand. But at this point you are almost absolving Arday of fraud and suggesting that Cambridge was the only sinner here.

Arday is obviously a fraud and we meet people like that all the time

With the resources available to Cambridge, they should and would have sussed him out sharply.

In the 2020s lies can be fact checked in real time. I am running a business. If I wind up employing a fraud who has no technical knowledge but a great doctored resume I will blame myself.

GloriousGbola:
Arday is obviously a fraud and we meet people like that all the time

With the resources available to Cambridge, they should and would have sussed him out sharply.

In the 2020s lies can be fact checked in real time. I am running a business. If I wind up employing a fraud who has no technical knowledge but a great doctored resume I will blame myself.

Agreeed.

Lordbinsmar:
Can you google search academic frauds and misconduct at Cambridge University?

Just as expected. Beer parlor stories.

Wickedtruths:
Just as expected. Beer parlor stories.

That you do listen to every day of your life.

FSBoperator:
You do know a Jew outed him out after he (the Jew) was sacked by Cambridge over a paper he wrote that if universities applied meritocracy alone as a criteria for hiring and retaining lecturers and scholars, there will be 0% black professors

He argued further in his paper that blacks are hereditary handicapped to excel in academic research and he based his findings as "race realism".

You do also know that Jews sponsored Darwin and pushed his Darwinism evolutionary theory for the sake of advancing their own slave trade business that blacks are not fully humans but a missing link between apes and homo sapiens.

It annoys me that here in Nigeria some misguided citizens will be bragging about being descendants of Jews

SamuraiXXX:
➜It annoys me that here in Nigeria some misguided citizens will be bragging about being descendants of Jews

There is nothing wrong with being a descendant of Jews. Why must they be ashamed of their ancestry(assuming their claim is true) because some Jew-hate virus has infected your mind? 😒😒

nairalanda1:
If he also had not told stories like being non verbal until eleven and running thirty marathons in 35 days, partly with a broken femur, the story won't have made the media, just the 'retraction watch' website.

The lies were just too glaring for them not to have attracted public scrutiny

Kobojunkie:
There is nothing wrong with being a descendant of Jews. Why must they be ashamed of their ancestry(assuming their claim is true) because some Jew-hate virus has infected your mind? 😒😒

Na wetin concern blackman with Jews hereditary wise?

Only a self-hating and low self esteem person would be trying to famz a race which descriminates and belittles your own race!

SamuraiXXX:
➜Na wetin concern blackman with Jews hereditary wise? Only a self-hating and low self esteem person would be trying to famz a race which descriminates and belittles your own race!

Why education don skip this one and finish!😒😒

So, if a black man happens to have Jewish blood in him, he should not concern himself with his very ancestry because, according to you, na self-hate to honor one's own ancestry? Some of you are just walking zombies! 😒

chigator2:
All I have to say is this: wherever you find yourself in the Western world as a Black person, try to represent yourself properly. Everyone has stereotypes they are willing to perpetuate about Black people, so do your very best to disappoint them bitterly with your very best.

I come very early to meetings here, and some devious people will say, “Wow, you’re always on time, it surprising”. Then I ask, “What is surprising about arriving early for a scheduled meeting?” Suddenly, they become deaf and dumb, as if they have no idea what they were implying.

I went to a majority-Asian church here, and during the two Sundays I attended, I noticed that whenever a Black person sat in a row, no Asian person would sit there. By the second Sunday, it was impossible not to notice.

A family of three(Chinese)walked in. They couldn’t see me from the entrance, so they approached the free seats in my row. The father saw me sitting there and immediately moved to the row in front, even though it was badly positioned and at an angle to the pulpit. He sat down and eventually had to tilt his seat just to get a better view. He glanced at me and gave me one of those fake smiles, and I pretended not to notice.

I told myself right there, I cannot worship God with people who behave this way.

Also, if you see a crime report involving a Black suspect, you’ll see people who would swear they aren’t racist commenting, “Usual suspects,” while White suspects don’t receive the same treatment. So don’t let these people use you to score cheap points.

We are here fighting one another, trying to prove who is superior, while the rest of the world looks at us and sees nothing but worthlessness. Wake up.

You get it perfectly. Africans especially Nigerians are the most friendly and welcoming people in the entire world.

Wherever I go I keep my head up and carry myself with tremendous dignity and I am not looking for love or validation from strangers.

I understand that racism has zero to do with the color of the black skin...but with how naive, timid, foolish, porous, un-shrewd, self seeking, seemingly self loathing , openely corrupt behaviour that our leaders have exhibited over the years.

All other races are not as loving as Africans but lookout solely for the perpetuation of their race.

Na we go open our the stores of our treasures to come carry, we no get any means to defend our lands, we no go use our resources to develop our land but instead carry am go dump for other continents, na we go sell our own fellow Africans give other races as slaves still borrow money from them for enjoyment purposes and steal and take it back to them again.

Utterly disrespect worthy behaviour.