₦airaland Forum

There is an uncomfortable question that deserves to be asked about Cosmas Maduka: why does the language of principle become so flexible when the person on the other side of the table is Stella Oduah his tribe person?

In the 2013 armoured-BMW controversy, Maduka, chairman of Coscharis Motors, appeared before the National Assembly and offered a defence of the transaction. According to reporting on the hearing, he maintained that due process had been followed and, crucially, said that the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority had told Coscharis that its initial price was not acceptable and demanded that the price be increased. He also explained that the BMWs had originally been purchased in connection with the Lagos 2012 National Sports Festival before subsequently being sold to the NCAA.

That testimony is important because it places a significant part of the responsibility for the controversial pricing with the NCAA rather than Coscharis. But it also raises an obvious question: if a government agency asks a private company to increase the price of an expensive vehicle, what exactly was Coscharis' responsibility as the supplier?

The controversy was not merely about whether an armoured BMW could legitimately cost a large amount of money. Reporting at the time raised questions about the vehicles' actual value, procurement process, financing and delivery. One report said the two vehicles were acquired for approximately ₦255 million, while experts cited by the report questioned whether their combined cost should have been anywhere near that figure.

Then came the issue of the customs waiver.

The House hearing heard evidence that a duty waiver originally granted to the Lagos State Government for vehicles connected with the 2012 National Sports Festival had been used in relation to the armoured BMWs. Customs officials told the committee that the waiver could have generated more than ₦10 million in revenue had it not been applied.

But Lagos State subsequently disputed the suggestion that it had requested armoured BMWs for the festival. The state's position, as reported at the time, was that it had requested a general waiver for vehicles for the festival and had not requested bulletproof BMWs.

So the public was left with a chain of questions: Who originally ordered the vehicles? Who requested the price increase? Why were vehicles associated with the Lagos sports festival subsequently transferred to the NCAA? Who authorised the transaction? Who benefited from the waiver? And, most importantly, who knew what, and when?

SaharaReporters went further, reporting claims from NCAA sources that officials who signed documents acknowledging delivery allegedly had not physically seen the cars. Those claims were disputed and should be treated as allegations rather than established facts, but they demonstrate the seriousness of the questions surrounding the transaction.

This is where the question of Maduka's relationship to the controversy becomes particularly interesting.

Maduka was not a government minister. He was the businessman supplying the vehicles. His company's involvement therefore placed him in a position where he could potentially clarify the commercial side of the transaction. Instead, his testimony, as reported, placed considerable emphasis on the instructions and demands coming from the NCAA.

That may be a perfectly legitimate account of what happened.

But if Maduka's own testimony was that the NCAA requested the price increase, then one is entitled to ask why the transaction proceeded at all. Was Coscharis merely following instructions, or was it an active participant in a transaction whose structure should have triggered greater scrutiny?

And this brings us to the uncomfortable issue of ethnicity.

There were contemporaneous attempts by some commentators to frame the Oduah controversy through ethnicity. One Nairaland discussion, for example, explicitly listed Oduah, Maduka and several other officials by ethnic identity as part of an argument about the scandal. That material is useful as evidence of the ethnic framing surrounding the controversy, but it is a forum discussion, not proof that the people involved acted because of ethnicity.

That distinction matters.

There is a difference between asking whether ethnic solidarity influenced public reactions and accusing an individual of tribalism. The latter requires evidence of conduct, not merely shared ethnicity.

And this is precisely why Maduka's later comments about a former Plateau governor are worth examining alongside the Oduah episode.

A 2026 report says Maduka alleged that a former Plateau governor asked Coscharis to double vehicle invoices, allegedly from ₦40 million to ₦80 million. According to the report, Maduka said he rejected the request and withdrew from the transaction. The former governor was not named by Maduka in the reported remarks, and the allegation has not been independently verified.

If Maduka's account is accurate, that is a very different posture from the one presented in the Oduah affair.

In the Plateau account, Maduka portrays himself as the businessman who refused an inflated government transaction.

In the Oduah account, however, his company completed a transaction after, according to his testimony, the NCAA requested that the original price be increased.

That contrast deserves examination.

Why was one alleged request something Maduka says he rejected, while the other became a transaction that Coscharis completed?

That question does not prove tribalism. It does not prove that Maduka protected Oduah. And it does not prove that the Plateau allegation is true. But it is a legitimate question about consistency.

If Maduka's standard is that a government request to inflate a vehicle invoice should cause a businessman to walk away, then Nigerians are entitled to ask what standard was applied to the NCAA transaction.

And if the answer is that the two transactions were materially different, then Maduka should explain precisely what those differences were.

The public does not need ethnic speculation. It needs consistency.

If the Plateau allegation is false, Maduka can explain why. If the Oduah transaction was completely legitimate, he can explain why the pricing, procurement, waiver and delivery questions arose. And if the two situations were fundamentally different, he can explain the difference.

But Nigerians should not be asked to accept one standard for a Plateau politician and another standard for a powerful federal minister.

The real issue is not whether Maduka is Igbo, Oduah is Igbo, or the former Plateau governor is from another ethnic group. The real issue is whether the same ethical standard was applied to every government transaction.

That is the question Maduka's own accounts make difficult to avoid.

Rubbish, the man said what he said, let the plateau state governor come and defend himself

Politics is so sweet in Nigeria because you always have zombies ready to defend you

Op,
Why so much venom?
Tribalising everything, even the truth. So sad for Nigeria.

Bottom line:
They are ALL crooks!!!

So because he committed a crime in the past he must keep committing it at all times so you will no longer call him tribalism. Ewule Gambia

Na family affairs

helinues:
Na family affairs

Your IQ is definitely low. Ive noticed it for a while, just felt the need to tell you now. Pray for wisdom, knowledge and understanding. Genuine advise

QuinQ:
Bottom line:
They are ALL crooks!!!

They are not all crooks, comas Maduka is a complete saint. If he says this is what happened, then it is what happened…

I know like every other person, you didn’t read the nonsense the OP wrote, no need to bother reading it, he is just a defender of corruption..

Zionmdde:
Rubbish, the man said what he said, let the plateau state governor come and defend himself

Politics is so sweet in Nigeria because you always have zombies ready to defend you

The OP has made a very strong case of duality and double standards on the part of Coscharis motors involving Stella Odua's inflated invoice and that of the Plateau governor's case.

Why is Cosmas telling us that he refused to inflate on request the original selling price of a vehicle about to be purchased by the Plateau state govt but went ahead to inflate the cost on request from staff at the NCAA obviously working as proxies to Odua to increase the cost of vehicles he was about to supply to the agency ?

You guys only see corruption in others but when it involves your people you will start whataboutism and your usual persecution and victimhood complex.

Ddeliverer007:
They are not all crooks, comas Maduka is a complete saint. If he says this is what happened, then it is what happened…

I know like every other person, you didn’t read the nonsense the OP wrote, no need to bother reading it, he is just a defender of corruption..

The article is exposing the stinking hypocrisy of Maduka who testified to a Senate committee that he had inflated the cost of two BMW vehicles on request from officials at NCAA who were purchasing the vehicles on behalf of the Minister, Stella Odua.

Maduka forgot that there are people with long memories who recalled that scandal before coming out to give us another account (which nobody asked him) involving what he claims was a Plateau govt official requesting for the vehicles they wanted to purchase to be marked up.

Why is he claiming saint when no one asked him to when it involved Plateau state (which we are yet to even confirm with his vague assertions) but was ok in proceeding to increase the cost price of vehicles involving Stella Odua?

Let him be bold enough to mention the particular state governor of Plateau who made this request .

aljharem:
There is an uncomfortable question that deserves to be asked about Cosmas Maduka: why does the language of principle become so flexible when the person on the other side of the table is Stella Oduah his tribe person?

In the 2013 armoured-BMW controversy, Maduka, chairman of Coscharis Motors, appeared before the National Assembly and offered a defence of the transaction. According to reporting on the hearing, he maintained that due process had been followed and, crucially, said that the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority had told Coscharis that its initial price was not acceptable and demanded that the price be increased. He also explained that the BMWs had originally been purchased in connection with the Lagos 2012 National Sports Festival before subsequently being sold to the NCAA.

That testimony is important because it places a significant part of the responsibility for the controversial pricing with the NCAA rather than Coscharis. But it also raises an obvious question: if a government agency asks a private company to increase the price of an expensive vehicle, what exactly was Coscharis' responsibility as the supplier?

The controversy was not merely about whether an armoured BMW could legitimately cost a large amount of money. Reporting at the time raised questions about the vehicles' actual value, procurement process, financing and delivery. One report said the two vehicles were acquired for approximately ₦255 million, while experts cited by the report questioned whether their combined cost should have been anywhere near that figure.

Then came the issue of the customs waiver.

The House hearing heard evidence that a duty waiver originally granted to the Lagos State Government for vehicles connected with the 2012 National Sports Festival had been used in relation to the armoured BMWs. Customs officials told the committee that the waiver could have generated more than ₦10 million in revenue had it not been applied.

But Lagos State subsequently disputed the suggestion that it had requested armoured BMWs for the festival. The state's position, as reported at the time, was that it had requested a general waiver for vehicles for the festival and had not requested bulletproof BMWs.

So the public was left with a chain of questions: Who originally ordered the vehicles? Who requested the price increase? Why were vehicles associated with the Lagos sports festival subsequently transferred to the NCAA? Who authorised the transaction? Who benefited from the waiver? And, most importantly, who knew what, and when?

SaharaReporters went further, reporting claims from NCAA sources that officials who signed documents acknowledging delivery allegedly had not physically seen the cars. Those claims were disputed and should be treated as allegations rather than established facts, but they demonstrate the seriousness of the questions surrounding the transaction.

This is where the question of Maduka's relationship to the controversy becomes particularly interesting.

Maduka was not a government minister. He was the businessman supplying the vehicles. His company's involvement therefore placed him in a position where he could potentially clarify the commercial side of the transaction. Instead, his testimony, as reported, placed considerable emphasis on the instructions and demands coming from the NCAA.

That may be a perfectly legitimate account of what happened.

But if Maduka's own testimony was that the NCAA requested the price increase, then one is entitled to ask why the transaction proceeded at all. Was Coscharis merely following instructions, or was it an active participant in a transaction whose structure should have triggered greater scrutiny?

And this brings us to the uncomfortable issue of ethnicity.

There were contemporaneous attempts by some commentators to frame the Oduah controversy through ethnicity. One Nairaland discussion, for example, explicitly listed Oduah, Maduka and several other officials by ethnic identity as part of an argument about the scandal. That material is useful as evidence of the ethnic framing surrounding the controversy, but it is a forum discussion, not proof that the people involved acted because of ethnicity.

That distinction matters.

There is a difference between asking whether ethnic solidarity influenced public reactions and accusing an individual of tribalism. The latter requires evidence of conduct, not merely shared ethnicity.

And this is precisely why Maduka's later comments about a former Plateau governor are worth examining alongside the Oduah episode.

A 2026 report says Maduka alleged that a former Plateau governor asked Coscharis to double vehicle invoices, allegedly from ₦40 million to ₦80 million. According to the report, Maduka said he rejected the request and withdrew from the transaction. The former governor was not named by Maduka in the reported remarks, and the allegation has not been independently verified.

If Maduka's account is accurate, that is a very different posture from the one presented in the Oduah affair.

In the Plateau account, Maduka portrays himself as the businessman who refused an inflated government transaction.

In the Oduah account, however, his company completed a transaction after, according to his testimony, the NCAA requested that the original price be increased.

That contrast deserves examination.

Why was one alleged request something Maduka says he rejected, while the other became a transaction that Coscharis completed?

That question does not prove tribalism. It does not prove that Maduka protected Oduah. And it does not prove that the Plateau allegation is true. But it is a legitimate question about consistency.

If Maduka's standard is that a government request to inflate a vehicle invoice should cause a businessman to walk away, then Nigerians are entitled to ask what standard was applied to the NCAA transaction.

And if the answer is that the two transactions were materially different, then Maduka should explain precisely what those differences were.

The public does not need ethnic speculation. It needs consistency.

If the Plateau allegation is false, Maduka can explain why. If the Oduah transaction was completely legitimate, he can explain why the pricing, procurement, waiver and delivery questions arose. And if the two situations were fundamentally different, he can explain the difference.

But Nigerians should not be asked to accept one standard for a Plateau politician and another standard for a powerful federal minister.

The real issue is not whether Maduka is Igbo, Oduah is Igbo, or the former Plateau governor is from another ethnic group. The real issue is whether the same ethical standard was applied to every government transaction.

That is the question Maduka's own accounts make difficult to avoid.

No one in Abia State is condemning Alex Otti for buying a Toyota Hilux for over a billion naira for each Vehicle

Parachoko:
No one in Abia State is condemning Alex Otti for buying a Toyota Hilux for over a billion naira for each Vehicle

And a photocopier for millions of naira


That dwarf is tearing them a new one in Abia .

Poor man go just carry big man matter for head, and who is talking about ethnicity preference here when it comes to cosmos,did you ask your self if he agreed to inflate same price with oduah,did we have any proof,if there is by now the case would have come up with evidence that cosmos inflated NCAA price dealing,una go just wake up with empty stomach the write rubbish up and down to feel relevant,why your mate are making good pay with such skill on Upwork ND fiveer

What if he sold normal price to oduah,or a middle man oduah used in the transaction who might have inflated the price to raise eyes in oduah case,this man clearly state that , government later use middle men so as to inflate same price but to him,he sold normal to such middle men with been involved with the corruption..a consultant company can procure and increase there price as a fee which inflate it and u can do nothing about it

Damn... Just humiliated Cosmos for being two faced

Ojukokoro..
My southwest people on top igbos .

Who are you and why will cosmos explain himself to you
Hahahahahaa
This people sef .. with their kind brain

You go write article tire .. cosmos sef no go send you.. talk more to read your crap

Yimu yimu folks

None of them Dey investigate their governors and government

See as southwest region be like place wey Dey just bomb out .. deserted with chronic abject poverty

Na to jump on other regions .. that’s 200 million ahead of them

Every Yoruba person Dey claim Lagos while denying their state of origin

Meet Yoruba corper for nassarawa or Kano.. where are you from ? Lagos 🤣
All na Lagos ? None is proud of other southwest states

Funny humans

Those people loves defending their criminal people.

Others are thief but their brothers are saint.

garykoeman:
Those people loves defending their criminal people.

Others are thief but their brothers are saint.

Reminds of Maj Donatus Okafor

aljharem:
There is an uncomfortable question that deserves to be asked about Cosmas Maduka: why does the language of principle become so flexible when the person on the other side of the table is Stella Oduah his tribe person?

In the 2013 armoured-BMW controversy, Maduka, chairman of Coscharis Motors, appeared before the National Assembly and offered a defence of the transaction. According to reporting on the hearing, he maintained that due process had been followed and, crucially, said that the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority had told Coscharis that its initial price was not acceptable and demanded that the price be increased. He also explained that the BMWs had originally been purchased in connection with the Lagos 2012 National Sports Festival before subsequently being sold to the NCAA.

That testimony is important because it places a significant part of the responsibility for the controversial pricing with the NCAA rather than Coscharis. But it also raises an obvious question: if a government agency asks a private company to increase the price of an expensive vehicle, what exactly was Coscharis' responsibility as the supplier?

The controversy was not merely about whether an armoured BMW could legitimately cost a large amount of money. Reporting at the time raised questions about the vehicles' actual value, procurement process, financing and delivery. One report said the two vehicles were acquired for approximately ₦255 million, while experts cited by the report questioned whether their combined cost should have been anywhere near that figure.

Then came the issue of the customs waiver.

The House hearing heard evidence that a duty waiver originally granted to the Lagos State Government for vehicles connected with the 2012 National Sports Festival had been used in relation to the armoured BMWs. Customs officials told the committee that the waiver could have generated more than ₦10 million in revenue had it not been applied.

But Lagos State subsequently disputed the suggestion that it had requested armoured BMWs for the festival. The state's position, as reported at the time, was that it had requested a general waiver for vehicles for the festival and had not requested bulletproof BMWs.

So the public was left with a chain of questions: Who originally ordered the vehicles? Who requested the price increase? Why were vehicles associated with the Lagos sports festival subsequently transferred to the NCAA? Who authorised the transaction? Who benefited from the waiver? And, most importantly, who knew what, and when?

SaharaReporters went further, reporting claims from NCAA sources that officials who signed documents acknowledging delivery allegedly had not physically seen the cars. Those claims were disputed and should be treated as allegations rather than established facts, but they demonstrate the seriousness of the questions surrounding the transaction.

This is where the question of Maduka's relationship to the controversy becomes particularly interesting.

Maduka was not a government minister. He was the businessman supplying the vehicles. His company's involvement therefore placed him in a position where he could potentially clarify the commercial side of the transaction. Instead, his testimony, as reported, placed considerable emphasis on the instructions and demands coming from the NCAA.

That may be a perfectly legitimate account of what happened.

But if Maduka's own testimony was that the NCAA requested the price increase, then one is entitled to ask why the transaction proceeded at all. Was Coscharis merely following instructions, or was it an active participant in a transaction whose structure should have triggered greater scrutiny?

And this brings us to the uncomfortable issue of ethnicity.

There were contemporaneous attempts by some commentators to frame the Oduah controversy through ethnicity. One Nairaland discussion, for example, explicitly listed Oduah, Maduka and several other officials by ethnic identity as part of an argument about the scandal. That material is useful as evidence of the ethnic framing surrounding the controversy, but it is a forum discussion, not proof that the people involved acted because of ethnicity.

That distinction matters.

There is a difference between asking whether ethnic solidarity influenced public reactions and accusing an individual of tribalism. The latter requires evidence of conduct, not merely shared ethnicity.

And this is precisely why Maduka's later comments about a former Plateau governor are worth examining alongside the Oduah episode.

A 2026 report says Maduka alleged that a former Plateau governor asked Coscharis to double vehicle invoices, allegedly from ₦40 million to ₦80 million. According to the report, Maduka said he rejected the request and withdrew from the transaction. The former governor was not named by Maduka in the reported remarks, and the allegation has not been independently verified.

If Maduka's account is accurate, that is a very different posture from the one presented in the Oduah affair.

In the Plateau account, Maduka portrays himself as the businessman who refused an inflated government transaction.

In the Oduah account, however, his company completed a transaction after, according to his testimony, the NCAA requested that the original price be increased.

That contrast deserves examination.

Why was one alleged request something Maduka says he rejected, while the other became a transaction that Coscharis completed?

That question does not prove tribalism. It does not prove that Maduka protected Oduah. And it does not prove that the Plateau allegation is true. But it is a legitimate question about consistency.

If Maduka's standard is that a government request to inflate a vehicle invoice should cause a businessman to walk away, then Nigerians are entitled to ask what standard was applied to the NCAA transaction.

And if the answer is that the two transactions were materially different, then Maduka should explain precisely what those differences were.

The public does not need ethnic speculation. It needs consistency.

If the Plateau allegation is false, Maduka can explain why. If the Oduah transaction was completely legitimate, he can explain why the pricing, procurement, waiver and delivery questions arose. And if the two situations were fundamentally different, he can explain the difference.

But Nigerians should not be asked to accept one standard for a Plateau politician and another standard for a powerful federal minister.

The real issue is not whether Maduka is Igbo, Oduah is Igbo, or the former Plateau governor is from another ethnic group. The real issue is whether the same ethical standard was applied to every government transaction.

That is the question Maduka's own accounts make difficult to avoid.

He's now a born again

MartinCorridon:
Damn... Just humiliated Cosmos for being two faced

Only you

FSBoperator:
Reminds of Maj Donatus Okafor

Posting with all your akants just to push this tribalistic thread against those you see in your dreams

emperor4love:
What if he sold normal price to oduah,or a middle man oduah used in the transaction who might have inflated the price to raise eyes in oduah case,this man clearly state that , government later use middle men so as to inflate same price but to him,he sold normal to such middle men with been involved with the corruption..a consultant company can procure and increase there price as a fee which inflate it and u can do nothing about it

What blew up the Odua scandal was the cost of the two BMW cars.

The cars were grossly overinflated and paid for by NCAA directly to Coscharis motors.


The National Assembly set up a committee to investigate the costing of the vehicle and had already contacted the original suppliers abroad to furnish how much they supplied the cars to Coscharis motors.

Coscharis motors had also used a govt approved waiver for another procurement on behalf of Lagos state who had applied for such to bring in the two BMW cars.

This is important because with that misused waiver, Coscharis did not have to declare the original cost of the vehicle to customs .


This is why the NASS committee had to contact the original supplier on the cost paid for the vehicles from where it was established that the vehicles were grossly overinflated during billing.

When confronted on why Coscharis was billing the NCAA at a ridiculously over inflated price, that was when Maduka opened up and said it was requested by NCAA officials involved in the procurement process.

So why is Maduka now forming a saint with the case of Plateau state ?

Was it after the scandal broke concerning Stella Odua and the bullet proof BMW cars that he realized he can get into hot soup with the law ?

And why did he not reference this Stella Odua case which he was central to?

Why leave it out when we knew of Stella Odua's case and not this Plateau state incidence.?

SeeWahala:
Only you



Posting with all your akants just to push this tribalistic thread against those you see in your dreams

Keep seeing me everywhere .

Anyone that holds the same view as me is my alternate handle to you guys

FSBoperator:
Keep seeing me everywhere .

Anyone that holds the same view as me is my alternate handle to you guys

Mschew as if I was expecting you to agree

Keep on propagating you propaganda jarè afterall it's only on nairaland you have a platform 😉

SeeWahala:
Mschew as if I was expecting you to agree

Keep on propagating you propaganda jarè afterall it's only on nairaland you have a platform 😉

..so anyone who shares similar view with me here is actually me?


Nah wah oh.

FSBoperator:
What blew up the Odua scandal was the cost of the two BMW cars.

The cars were grossly overinflated and paid for by NCAA directly to Coscharis motors.


The National Assembly set up a committee to investigate the costing of the vehicle and had already contacted the original suppliers abroad to furnish how much they supplied the cars to Coscharis motors.

Coscharis motors had also used a govt approved waiver for another procurement on behalf of Lagos state who had applied for such to bring in the two BMW cars.

This is important because with that misused waiver, Coscharis did not have to declare the original cost of the vehicle to customs .


This is why the NASS committee had to contact the original supplier on the cost paid for the vehicles from where it was established that the vehicles were grossly overinflated during billing.

When confronted on why Coscharis was billing the NCAA at a ridiculously over inflated price, that was when Maduka opened up and said it was requested by NCAA officials involved in the procurement process.

So why is Maduka now forming a saint with the case of Plateau state ?

Was it after the scandal broke concerning Stella Odua and the bullet proof BMW cars that he realized he can get into hot soup with the law ?

And why did he not reference this Stella Odua case which he was central to?

Why leave it out when we knew of Stella Odua's case and not this Plateau state incidence.?

yes am not in support definitely if cosmos has some skeleton on cupboard,neither I am a defender of evil,if so he should melt such energy on oduah as well but then,contrary if cosmos bought direct from German,don't he have the power to set his price,with his expense shipping it here ND is that bad if he do so?

FSBoperator:
What blew up the Odua scandal was the cost of the two BMW cars.

The cars were grossly overinflated and paid for by NCAA directly to Coscharis motors.


The National Assembly set up a committee to investigate the costing of the vehicle and had already contacted the original suppliers abroad to furnish how much they supplied the cars to Coscharis motors.

Coscharis motors had also used a govt approved waiver for another procurement on behalf of Lagos state who had applied for such to bring in the two BMW cars.

This is important because with that misused waiver, Coscharis did not have to declare the original cost of the vehicle to customs .


This is why the NASS committee had to contact the original supplier on the cost paid for the vehicles from where it was established that the vehicles were grossly overinflated during billing.

When confronted on why Coscharis was billing the NCAA at a ridiculously over inflated price, that was when Maduka opened up and said it was requested by NCAA officials involved in the procurement process.

So why is Maduka now forming a saint with the case of Plateau state ?

Was it after the scandal broke concerning Stella Odua and the bullet proof BMW cars that he realized he can get into hot soup with the law ?

And why did he not reference this Stella Odua case which he was central to?

Why leave it out when we knew of Stella Odua's case and not this Plateau state incidence.?

if he did so definitely he is not a saint, but then what if it is when he was in a secular world,but then he should have not cover his past as well when using such narrative on past governor,he never did well definitely,was better he shut up ND NV bring the case to sound born again to public

emperor4love:
if he did so definitely he is not a saint, but then what if it is when he was in a secular world,but then he should have not cover his past as well when using such narrative on past governor,he never did well definitely,was better he shut up ND NV bring the case to sound born again to public

That's what I can't understand here.

You have been implicated in a major scandal involving the illegal purchase of two vehicles through an agency that never captured those cars in their budget but were compelled by the minister to purchase it for her official use despite her having several luxury SUVs attached to her office .

And to make matters worse the vehicle was imported into Nigeria using an import waiver not for said vehicles and then you billed the agency in question what they said they are going to pay for it which is more than 300% the cost of the vehicles which you knew clearly was a round tripping money laundering operation.

But today you ignore this major scandal and begin to tell us another story.

emperor4love:
yes am not in support definitely if cosmos has some skeleton on cupboard,neither I am a defender of evil,if so he should melt such energy on oduah as well but then,contrary if cosmos bought direct from German,don't he have the power to set his price,with his expense shipping it here ND is that bad if he do so?

The vehicles were cleared at the ports with an FG waiver meant for Lagos state.

So that cost is out of the equation.

And then you bill the govt over 3 times what it will be worth if the vehicle landed in Nigeria with import duties duly paid.