World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It - Politics - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It (404 Views)
| World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by 1vandragon(op): 5:39am On Oct 03 |
World fights costly petrol, Tinubu defends it Something extraordinary is happening across the world. Governments are losing sleep over the intolerably rising prices of petrol and diesel. They are cutting taxes, subsidizing fuel, capping prices, releasing strategic reserves, relaxing regulations and strong-arming oil companies. Where relief has not yet come, governments are promising it. Tinubu’s Nigeria is the exception. It is marching callously and ignominiously in the opposite direction. It derives perverse joy and pride in its soulless, cold-hearted strangulation of the people. A few examples of countries that are doing the exact opposite of Tinubu’s insensate destruction will suffice. On Friday, October 2, the G7 agreed to release 100 million barrels of diesel and crude oil from emergency reserves to bring prices down. The decision followed pressure from the Trump administration, which had threatened restrictions on American diesel exports if European governments did not release their reserves. Oil prices fell almost immediately after the announcement. Germany has cut taxes on petrol and diesel by 17 euro cents per liter through December and is discussing a fuel-price cap. Australia halved its petrol and diesel excise, shaving 26.3 Australian cents off every liter. Canada suspended its federal excise tax on gasoline and diesel. Ireland cut petrol taxes by 27 cents per liter and diesel taxes by 32 cents. Spain proposed relief of up to 30 euro cents per liter. South Korea imposed a fuel-price ceiling. Brazil has subsidized gasoline and cut taxes. Italy leaned on major oil companies to cap petrol and diesel prices. Kenya cut VAT on petroleum products. President William Ruto personally announced a reduction in diesel price after public protests over rapidly rising energy costs. His government had already spent substantial public funds cushioning fuel prices. Ghana’s President John Mahama said his government was considering cutting fuel margins and reviewing a new petroleum levy to relieve the pain at the pump after petrol rose about 15% and diesel about 19% in one pricing window. He also raised the possibility of a supply agreement with the Dangote refinery. My research for this column has documented at least 50cross-continent national cases of state interventions designed to reduce the cost of petrol or diesel, and that’s not even an exhaustive global count. In the United States, the Associated Press found this week that about one-third of U.S. states have implemented some form of fuel-tax relief alone. That does not count every regulatory waiver, supply measure or proposed tax holiday. The Real Enemy of Sugar Has Been Found! Try This Tonight Africa Med by TaboolaSponsored Links The mechanisms differ, but objective is unmistakably the same: to shield citizens and businesses from bearing the full brunt of an international fuel-price shock. I am writing this column from Texas where I was invited to give a keynote address on Nigerian Independence at the University of Texas at Rio Grande Valley. I, of course, live in Georgia. The comparison of Texas and Georgia with Nigeria is both revealing and enraging. On September 28, Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued a statewide disaster proclamation because of record diesel prices. He authorized expanded use of cheaper tax-exempt dyed diesel on Texas roads, relaxed weight restrictions and sought federal waivers intended to expand supply and reduce costs. Abbott said record prices threatened agriculture and freight and raised costs for every Texas family. That same day, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp declared a state of emergency and suspended the state’s motor-fuel excise tax for 30 days. Georgia ordinarily taxes gasoline at 33.3 cents per gallon and diesel at 37.3 cents. Kemp suspended the taxes because, as his office put it, Georgians needed relief from global market volatility. Now look at the prices. AAA put regular petrol at $3.94 per gallon in Texas and $3.96 in Georgia on October 1. A U.S. gallon is 3.785 liters. That works out to about $1.042 per liter in Texas and $1.046 in Georgia. At roughly ₦1,329 to the dollar, that is about ₦1,385 per liter in Texas and ₦1,391 in Georgia. Petrol in Nigeria has recently hovered around ₦1,400 to ₦1,430 per liter, although NNPCL stations cut prices this week to about ₦1,360 in Lagos and ₦1,370 in Abuja. That means petrol costs roughly the same in Nigeria as it does in Texas and Georgia. Yet Texas regards its diesel prices as disastrous enough for a statewide disaster proclamation. Georgia regards its fuel prices as sufficiently intolerable to declare a state of emergency and surrender tax revenue. Nigeria regards almost the same nominal fuel price as “economic reform” that will yield an illusory ElDorado in an undefined future. The obscenity of the contrast becomes starker when income enters the picture. The statutory minimum wage in Texas is $7.25 an hour. The same federal rate applies to most workers in Georgia. At 40 hours a week, that is about $1,257 a month. At current petrol prices, a minimum-wage worker earns enough in a month to buy roughly 1,200 liters of petrol. Nigeria’s national minimum wage is ₦70,000 a month. At ₦1,400 per liter, it buys exactly 50 liters. A minimum-wage worker in Texas or Georgia can therefore buy roughly 24 times as much petrol as a Nigerian minimum-wage worker, even though the pump prices are almost identical. And Nigerians endure vastly inferior public transportation, unreliable electricity that forces households and businesses to buy fuel for generators and a road-dependent economy in which virtually every increase in petrol price cascades into food, transportation, rent and other costs. Yet we have been conditioned to regard a demand for affordable petrol as some primitive Nigerian appetite for undeserved indulgence. I have consistently called this attitude an example of self-annihilating stupidity. The intellectual conditioning began in earnest under Muhammadu Buhari. Government increasingly spoke of affordable petrol as an economic pathology. By 2020, his administration was arguing that market-determined petrol prices were unavoidable, that cheaper Nigerian petrol encouraged smuggling and that subsidy was unsustainable. The language gradually migrated from government officials into elite public discourse. Tinubu has elevated this attitude into a governing creed. He announced on May 29, 2023, that “subsidy is gone.” Two years later, he said his economic reforms were “working” and described subsidy removal as necessary to rescue Nigeria from fiscal collapse. His government continues to present the pain generated by the World Bank-dictated “reforms” as a difficult passage toward eventual prosperity that we all know will never come. Meanwhile, the very premise on which Nigerians have been asked to suffer is coming under increasingly serious scrutiny. On our September Diaspora Dialogues podcast, oil producer and oil-and-gas businessman Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim broke down the pricing chain and arrived at an unsubsidised pump price of roughly ₦605 per liter. His central argument is devastatingly simple. Nigeria should dedicate crude for domestic refining and price that crude for the Nigerian economy rather than pretend that every barrel consumed in Nigeria has first been exported to Rotterdam and bought back at international opportunity cost. He included production, refining, distribution and reasonable profit margins in his calculation. The conversation consequently moved from the tired incantation of “subsidy or no subsidy” toward the more useful question of what petrol should actually cost in an oil-producing country. Professor Izielen Agbon, a U.S.-based petroleum engineer, approached the problem separately at a seminar organized by Femi Falana and reached a remarkably similar range. Using production-cost pricing and accounting for crude production, refining, transportation, margins and Nigeria’s tax regime, he calculated a pump price of roughly ₦435 to ₦687 per liter. Agbon argues that Nigeria’s central pricing problem is import-parity pricing, which treats domestically produced crude as though its economic value to Nigerians must always equal what it could fetch abroad. He argues that this abandons Nigeria’s comparative advantage as an oil producer and transmits international prices directly into an impoverished domestic economy. In light of Olawepo-Hashim’s ₦605 calculation or Agbon’s ₦435-₦687 range, government and defenders of the present system now owe Nigerians something better than slogans. Show us the numbers. Demonstrate why petrol produced from Nigerian crude for Nigerians must cost ₦1,400 per liter. The old argument that affordability necessarily means an unsustainable subsidy is no longer sufficient. There is an additional irony. NNPCL’s own 2024 audited accounts contain trillions of naira in “under-recovery” and energy-security obligations even after the government announced that subsidy had vanished. Agbon cites ₦8.67 trillion in under-recovery. The accounting terminology has changed, bu the underlying questions have not. And where is organised labour in all this? To be fair, the NLC and TUC have condemned the latest increases. On September 30, the NLC demanded an immediate petrol-price reduction and described Nigeria as facing a “full-scale survival crisis.” But statements are not commensurate with the scale of the emergency. If a ₦70,000 minimum wage buys barely 50 liters of petrol and every fuel increase ricochets through food, transportation and household survival, at what point does organised labour organise? Governments from Washington to Berlin, Ottawa to Canberra and Seoul to Brasília understand that citizens cannot simply be abandoned to whatever price the global oil market produces. Nigeria should not require a special theory of economics to arrive at the same humane conclusion. https://tribuneonlineng.com/world-fights-costly-petrol-tinubu-defends-it/amp/ |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by nairalanda1(m): 6:23am On Oct 03 |
Tinubu na bad leader, I no dey vote for am, but thanks to decades of bad economic choices, including subsides, we cannot afford a subsidy at the moment. Having a subsidy is going to worsen our debt, and lead us to have a massive inflation in the future that would really deal with us badly. We are already heavily in debt, and we are borrowing to keep our heads above water. Had Nigeria removed subsidy decades ago, we may have had the savings and the resources to do a limited subsidy now, but right now, thanks to our debt of over 130 BILLION dollars, if not higher, we cannot afford anything called subsidy Even the electricity susbsidy, government is struggling to pay it, talkless fuel subsidy. You can abuse me, OP Has abused me, you can lie and call me tinubu supporter, but I had my eyes opened in 2012, and I saw. I cannot unsee what I saw. And yes, eff APC, but welcome to cold hard reality. Yes, tinubu na hypocrite, and na person wey take power to chop money, but at the end of the day, whoever is in charge, a subsidy is going to cause our debt to balloon. Even the money government is paying NNPC, that one go hit us well well in the form of debt. |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by Dalohad: 6:32am On Oct 03 |
Are you surprised? Even his APC lackeys defended the fact that Nigerians should continue grinding rotten maggot-infested tomatoes 🍅. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUc4tdcXWAo?si=ra1M_lt8H2eMjd7K They said there is nothing wrong in eating baje baje maggot-infested tomatoes and that maggots and moulds are proteinous. |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by nairalanda1(m): 6:33am On Oct 03 |
The article says that Germany and Ireland and the USA have done this and that... Yet, the author would not suggest that Nigerians pay the taxes that Germany, Ireland and the USA paid to fund their treasury to be able to afford temporary subsides. And Nigeria is not running an industrial economy Ghana in the report, is risking reducing it's government income, meaning it would have to borrow more. Plus, they are reducing their prices by buying from Dangote, instead of importing form oversease like they did. I hate how people dey suffer under the high prices, and wahlaii ta lai, I know I supported subsidy removal in 2012, and I blame APC for putting us in a posiiton where we cannot afford subsidy, but the milk has been spilt. Another subsidy in any form is an invitation to borrowing and more borrowing |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by Parachoko: 6:46am On Oct 03 |
Crude price is set in dollar all over the world, even if you pay in Naira, you won't still pay below the Market price unless Government decides to subsidize The main reason price is this high is because of the US unnecessary war in Iran Petrol price was below 750/Litre before the Unnecessary war What the FG can do at this point is to suspend taxes on fuel |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by helinues: 7:05am On Oct 03 |
So the CNG buses that was introduced just on Oct 1st is not part of fighting the fuel cost. Imagine a whole book epistle missing that important details |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by helinues: 7:06am On Oct 03 |
Meanwhile, fuel can be sold at N500 in Nigeria but it will take some time https://www.nairaland.com/8753956/how-fuel-sold-n500-nigeria |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by ogolemati: 7:42am On Oct 03 |
Parachoko: you are right again the second time today.i saw helinues giving you hope
|
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by Fujiyama: 7:53am On Oct 03 |
Dalohad:^^^ ![]() |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by Racoon(m): 7:59am On Oct 03 |
Tinubu removed fuel subsidy, electricity, educational taxes yet kept on borrowing to fund his ostentatious lifestyle and that of his wicked cronies in govt. The man is a terrible elitist that takes special pleasure in suffering the downtrodden just to pleased his egocentric desires. |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by mycar: 8:07am On Oct 03*. Modified: 10:09am On Oct 03 |
Tinubu isn't nearly as wicked as his own supporters, the supporters are the worst because they are the ones pushing the old man |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by PulaPower: 8:09am On Oct 03 |
Very very correct.. They were told about the dangers that can happen should USA attacks Iran but some misguided people, hide under Christianity and starting gingering Trump to attack.. The same people that gingered trump yesterday are the same people wailing today.. But Trump don already tell them sha… No Price is too huge to pay for oil as long as Iran won’t have nuclear weapon..
|
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by PulaPower: 8:11am On Oct 03 |
mycar:Nah Tinubu raised Oil price? How much was Oil price before the unnecessary war started? Trump don use una head to business.. Check these pages out on TikTok and watch how Americans are lamenting hard..
|
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by Dogalmighty17: 8:12am On Oct 03 |
The author wrote brilliantly but the premise of his writing lies on a fallacy. Yes, Nigeria is an oil producing country and prices here should be cheaper but the question is, how much of this oil do we make available to local refiners? Very little. Oil is a fungible commodity. The price of a barrel of crude is the same worldwide. Outside the massive quantitative easing monetary policy of the Buhari administration, a great number of loans he collected were secured against Nigeria's future crude oil production. That future is now. This arrangement makes it nearly impossible for the NNPC to meet supply obligations to local refineries forcing them to depend on imported crude to keep their refineries running. This exposed the country to whatever shocks exist in the international oil market. |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by grandstar(m): 9:07am On Oct 03 |
At the end of the day, he rubbished himself by saying in Georgia costs roughly the same as in Nigeria. This exposes the fact that prices in Nigeria are relatively fair, despite the excessive fear mongering and criticism. |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by grandstar(m): 9:10am On Oct 03 |
helinues:I also learnt that pigs can fly |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by mycar: 9:54am On Oct 03 |
PulaPower:The crude oil price benchmark for Nigeria’s 2026 federal budget was set at $64.85 per barrel. Currently, the government is enjoying a windfall due to the high cost of crude; however, corrupt politicians hold onto the positives while passing the negatives down to the masses. During the administration of President Goodluck Jonathan (2010–2015), the highest recorded annual average crude oil price reached approximately $109 to $111.63 per barrel in 2012. Peak daily spot trading values during that broader high-price window even reached around $128 per barrel. Is this not one of the accusations against Goodluck Jonathan— that the oil price was high during his administration but could not improve the economy? |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by nairalanda1(m): 2:35pm On Oct 03 |
mycar:Economy improved under GEJ, but the problem with that was that it was economy based on high oil prices...and low debt. Same can be said of the slight 'improvements' under tinubu economy Real economic improvement happens when there is a boost in productivity of industrial goods and services for export |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by mycar: 3:06pm On Oct 03 |
nairalanda1:But APC did not acknowledge the growth under Jonathan and on the contrary, the economy declined under Tinubu. It’s like dropping from point 8 to point 2, then crawling back to point 3. That isn't real growth—you are still just trying to climb out of the hole. Nigeria Nominal GDP Trend (2012–2026) • 2012: $658 billion • 2013: $735 billion • 2014: $811 billion (Peak) • 2015: $696 billion • 2016: $570 billion • 2017: $529 billion • 2018: $594 billion • 2019: $668 billion • 2020: $599 billion • 2021: $609 billion • 2022: $646 billion • 2023: $364 billion • 2024: $252 billion • 2025: $285 billion (Projected) • 2026: ~$303 billion (Estimated end-of-year) |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by byinks(f): 8:13pm On Oct 03 |
No need to comment here... They're already talking to themselves... |
| Re: World Fights Costly Petrol, Tinubu Defends It by Twist4u: 1:02am On Oct 04 |
The obscenity of the contrast becomes starker when income enters the picture. The statutory minimum wage in Texas is $7.25 an hour. The same federal rate applies to most workers in Georgia. At 40 hours a week, that is about $1,257 a month. At current petrol prices, a minimum-wage worker earns enough in a month to buy roughly 1,200 liters of petrol. Nigeria’s national minimum wage is ₦70,000 a month. At ₦1,400 per liter, it buys exactly 50 liters. A minimum-wage worker in Texas or Georgia can therefore buy roughly 24 times as much petrol as a Nigerian minimum-wage worker, even though the pump prices are almost identical. op Terrible Tinubu. |
Tinubu Defends Borrowing, Says Infrastructure Will Drive $1 Trillion Economy • World Fights Costly Petrol. Tinubu Defends It- Farooq Kperogi • Remi Tinubu Defends Federal Government's Empowerment Schemes At The Grassroots • 2 • 3 • 4
INEC To Publish 2015 Voters’ Register Tuesday • When Will Nigeria Change.?? • 40 Days To Presidential Election. If You're Votingremember These