₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,470 members, 8,517,669 topics. Date: Thursday, 12 November 2026 at 07:56 PM

Toggle theme

Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos (386 Views)

1 Reply (Go Down)

Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by FreeThinkerPlut(op): 5:55pm On Oct 06
Enough. There is a kind of political arrogance that mistakes a host’s decency for a licence to conquer. It is on display in Lagos. It is on display across the South-West. And it is being sold by a clique of Igbo political operators who have decided that Yoruba tolerance is a permanent condition—something to be exploited, stretched, and finally ignored.

Let me be clear. This is not an indictment of Igbo people. It is an indictment of Igbo political irredentism—the strategy that treats Lagos as a political vacuum, that treats Yoruba hospitality as weakness, and that treats indigeneity as an inconvenience to be legislated away.

1. Yoruba tolerance is not a blank cheque.

The Yoruba have built a society where Muslims, Christians, and traditionalists live side by side. Strangers come, trade, build, and raise families. That is our way. But our way is not a suicide pact. Hospitality is a gift, not a transfer of ownership. And the moment a guest starts acting like the landlord, the party is over.

2. Lagos is Yoruba land. Period.

The “No Man’s Land” myth is a lie. It was never a legal doctrine. It was a lazy description of a cosmopolitan city. Lagos is Awori-Yoruba land. It has deep Yoruba roots. The Igbo came as traders, workers, migrants. They built empires. Respect. But building a business in another man’s house does not give you the deed. Cosmopolitan is not ownerless. Diversity is not dispossession.

3. If you think you are a Lagos indigene, go and apply to university.

This is the simplest test. Nigeria’s law recognises indigenes and non-indigenes based on ancestral origin, not just residence. At Lagos State University and other South-West schools, the fee schedule proves it. Indigenes pay one rate. Non-indigenes pay another. Sometimes double. Sometimes triple. Go and apply. The fee will tell you the truth. This is not a Yoruba trick. It is the same principle as the United Kingdom. Home students pay less. International students pay more. You may hate the system. But you cannot pretend it does not exist.

4. The Indigeneship Bill is dead on arrival.

A bill once tried to make anyone who lived in a state for ten years an indigene. Generous? No. Naive. Nigeria is not one people. It is many ethnic groups. If every state opened indigeneship to long-term residents, every state would face a demographic and political war. The bill was withdrawn. It should stay dead. You cannot legislate away ancestry because it hurts your feelings.

5. The double standard is shameless.

Many of those shouting “I am a Lagosian” would not accept the same logic in the South-East. Non-indigenes in the South-East are often treated as outsiders. They are not given full political rights or indigene benefits. So the demand is one-sided: full inclusion in Yorubaland, but no reciprocal openness at home. That is not justice. That is conquest dressed up as rights. That is not a plea for fairness. That is a demand for surrender.

6. The 2023 election was a warning.

Peter Obi won Lagos. That is democracy. But for many Yoruba, it felt like an ethnic takeover. The backlash was ugly. Properties were demolished. Businesses were targeted. Streets were renamed. That did not happen because Yoruba people are naturally violent. It happened because patience ran out. Politicians who stoke ethnic takeover narratives are playing with fire. And fire does not care who started it.

7. Remember 1966—not as a threat, but as a warning.

In January 1966, a group of young army officers, mostly Igbo, staged Nigeria’s first coup. They killed Prime Minister Tafawa Balewa and Northern Premier Ahmadu Bello. The North saw it as an Igbo plot to dominate. Six months later, the North struck back. Then mobs killed tens of thousands of Igbos. It was a horror. It was a crime. It was also a warning. When ethnic political ambition collides with a host society that does not share Yoruba restraint, the result is not a debate. It is a massacre. Do not mistake this as a call for violence. It is the opposite. It is a warning to every ethnic entrepreneur: do not push any people until they break. The North does not have the Yoruba’s live-and-let-live temperament. The Yoruba will tolerate a lot. The North will not. That is not a boast. It is a fact. And it is a fact that should terrify anyone who thinks ethnic brinkmanship is a game.

8. What should happen now.

Yoruba leaders must protect every law-abiding resident. Igbo leaders must stop treating Lagos as a political vacuum. And all sides should remember 1966—not as a threat, but as a warning against ethnic brinkmanship.

The bottom line.

Lagos is Yoruba land. It is also a Nigerian city. Those two facts can coexist. But they will not coexist if either side treats the other as an enemy. Hospitality is not surrender. Tolerance is not weakness. And Lagos will not be conquered. Full stop.

FreeThinker from Pluto

Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by flokii: 6:05pm On Oct 06
The ownership of Lagos is clear as day.. Lagos belongs to Yoruba people.

The reason some miscreants wanted to rewrite history of Lagos was because a tiny part of Lagos State served as Federal Capital for Nigeria till a new capital city was built (Abuja). It's why we are telling our Yoruba people to wake up and stop handing benefits to outsiders in Lagos State.
Lagos has reverted to a full Yoruba State since over 2 decades, yet still our people keep allowing external influence in Lagos politics. It's not patriotism but self-sabotage. These outsiders occupy seat meant for Yorubas at Federal level, but still vote against anything that'll favour Lagos and Yorubaland in the National Aseembly So tell me how that is "liberalism" if not self destruction.

Lagos (Ilu Eko) is not for sale.. ring in in their ears, let it sink into their heads.
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by byinks(f): 6:41pm On Oct 06
Let's not overflog the matter.

The clowns know Lagos isn't on the table.

They can try their luck in Makurdi or Uyo. Maybe .
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by NaijaHelper1(m): 6:51pm On Oct 06
Mods. Please do the needful. Hateful tribal sentiments
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by aworatak: 6:55pm On Oct 06
Every election cycle some hate filled souls come up with their usual rhetoric.
If you dig deeper those unfortunate lots don’t even have any property to their names.
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by Justiceleague1: 6:57pm On Oct 06
sophisticated agbadoes ti ko ni ise se grin

Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by Christistruth03: 7:39pm On Oct 06
There is no Battle for Lagos.
Lagos is Yorubaland 100%.

Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by Validated: 2:20am On Oct 07
Op go and campaign, BUT WEAR A HELMET sha, Obi will flog Tinubu mercilessly in 2027. From Amuo to Mushin to Epe, Badagry, Tinubu is a goner.
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by softtorce: 3:25am On Oct 07
During election in Anambran Abia n Enugu you shut your mouth n let fools claiming your land is no man's land take it over.


aworatak:
Every election cycle some hate filled souls come up with their usual rhetoric.
If you dig deeper those unfortunate lots don’t even have any property to their names.
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by AMINDA: 6:38am On Oct 07
softtorce:
During election in Anambran Abia n Enugu you shut your mouth n let fools claiming your land is no man's land take it over.
We know all these are your only tactics to winning an election in Lagos state but Igbo votes alone are not the reason Tinubu lost Lagos. Tinubu also lost his state of origin, Osun and his party recently lost the state again leaving him to begging Adeleke for endorsement. How many Igbos are in Osun state? Tinubu is not as popular in Yorubaland as you lot like to pretend. He is also not the only Yorubaman in the race. He is not more Yoruba than Seyi Makinde or even Adebayo of the SDP.
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by owobokiri(m): 7:17am On Oct 07
FreeThinkerPlut:
Enough. There is a kind of political arrogance that mistakes a host’s decency for a licence to conquer. It is on display in Lagos. It is on display across the South-West. And it is being sold by a clique of Igbo political operators who have decided that Yoruba tolerance is a permanent condition—something to be exploited, stretched, and finally ignored.

Let me be clear. This is not an indictment of Igbo people. It is an indictment of Igbo political irredentism—the strategy that treats Lagos as a political vacuum, that treats Yoruba hospitality as weakness, and that treats indigeneity as an inconvenience to be legislated away.

1. Yoruba tolerance is not a blank cheque.

The Yoruba have built a society where Muslims, Christians, and traditionalists live side by side. Strangers come, trade, build, and raise families. That is our way. But our way is not a suicide pact. Hospitality is a gift, not a transfer of ownership. And the moment a guest starts acting like the landlord, the party is over.

2. Lagos is Yoruba land. Period.

The “No Man’s Land” myth is a lie. It was never a legal doctrine. It was a lazy description of a cosmopolitan city. Lagos is Awori-Yoruba land. It has deep Yoruba roots. The Igbo came as traders, workers, migrants. They built empires. Respect. But building a business in another man’s house does not give you the deed. Cosmopolitan is not ownerless. Diversity is not dispossession.

3. If you think you are a Lagos indigene, go and apply to university.

This is the simplest test. Nigeria’s law recognises indigenes and non-indigenes based on ancestral origin, not just residence. At Lagos State University and other South-West schools, the fee schedule proves it. Indigenes pay one rate. Non-indigenes pay another. Sometimes double. Sometimes triple. Go and apply. The fee will tell you the truth. This is not a Yoruba trick. It is the same principle as the United Kingdom. Home students pay less. International students pay more. You may hate the system. But you cannot pretend it does not exist.

4. The Indigeneship Bill is dead on arrival.

A bill once tried to make anyone who lived in a state for ten years an indigene. Generous? No. Naive. Nigeria is not one people. It is many ethnic groups. If every state opened indigeneship to long-term residents, every state would face a demographic and political war. The bill was withdrawn. It should stay dead. You cannot legislate away ancestry because it hurts your feelings.

5. The double standard is shameless.

Many of those shouting “I am a Lagosian” would not accept the same logic in the South-East. Non-indigenes in the South-East are often treated as outsiders. They are not given full political rights or indigene benefits. So the demand is one-sided: full inclusion in Yorubaland, but no reciprocal openness at home. That is not justice. That is conquest dressed up as rights. That is not a plea for fairness. That is a demand for surrender.

6. The 2023 election was a warning.

Peter Obi won Lagos. That is democracy. But for many Yoruba, it felt like an ethnic takeover. The backlash was ugly. Properties were demolished. Businesses were targeted. Streets were renamed. That did not happen because Yoruba people are naturally violent. It happened because patience ran out. Politicians who stoke ethnic takeover narratives are playing with fire. And fire does not care who started it.

7. Remember 1966—not as a threat, but as a warning.

In January 1966, a group of young army officers, mostly Igbo, staged Nigeria’s first coup. They killed Prime Minister Tafawa Balewa and Northern Premier Ahmadu Bello. The North saw it as an Igbo plot to dominate. Six months later, the North struck back. Then mobs killed tens of thousands of Igbos. It was a horror. It was a crime. It was also a warning. When ethnic political ambition collides with a host society that does not share Yoruba restraint, the result is not a debate. It is a massacre. Do not mistake this as a call for violence. It is the opposite. It is a warning to every ethnic entrepreneur: do not push any people until they break. The North does not have the Yoruba’s live-and-let-live temperament. The Yoruba will tolerate a lot. The North will not. That is not a boast. It is a fact. And it is a fact that should terrify anyone who thinks ethnic brinkmanship is a game.

8. What should happen now.

Yoruba leaders must protect every law-abiding resident. Igbo leaders must stop treating Lagos as a political vacuum. And all sides should remember 1966—not as a threat, but as a warning against ethnic brinkmanship.

The bottom line.

Lagos is Yoruba land. It is also a Nigerian city. Those two facts can coexist. But they will not coexist if either side treats the other as an enemy. Hospitality is not surrender. Tolerance is not weakness. And Lagos will not be conquered. Full stop.

FreeThinker from Pluto
Another election circle, another tribally charged propaganda to sware the poor voters and get them to support their oppressors. As usual, base thinkers will conveniently reach for their favourite fall guys; the igbos. You woke up and found it worthy to blame all your failures in life on a tribe that does not control any part of the government. You are the president, you are the army Chief, the CBN chief, The Police Chief, The Customs Chief, The Immigration Chief, The Minister of Finance, The Chief at The Board of Internal Revenue. You control the Banking Industry, the Insurance Industry, the Betting Industry, the Petroleum Industry, the Solid Minerals Industry..., even in that Lagos in particular and the South West in general, you control all governments, all regulations! Yet, it is these "ubiquitous igbos" that control zilch that are the cause of your problems..?
Make that make sense..

The topic should be about a rudderless and vindictive Sanwo Olu and his glaring failures as a governor. The topic should dwell on Tinubus and APCs monumental failures in government.
The topic should revolve around pressing issues like the epileptic power supply, the worsening management of refuse disposal in Lagos, the astronomical rise in the numbers of poor people as a result of bad government policies, the insufficient disposable income available to Lagosians/Nigerians as APCs austerity measures tighten the noose around our necks. The topic of discussions should focus on the bad roads, the dilapidated schools, the shabby health delivery system, the agbero menace and the industrial scale corruption going on in all farcets of government..

But you don't want that.. lol, you can't deal.
As a ruling party, you uave nothing in your scorecards positive enough to be used to brag.
Essentially, you failed woefully! So you delved into "Plan B"; blame the igbos. You now deliberately want to obfuscate facts. That's the only way you can win; hoodwink the people, blame other ethnicities and utilise rabid tribalism as your "cudgel of war"....
You would rather we frame the igbos as the problem, when the problem is the blundering party in power.
It is called "Base Politics", and it won't fly this time...
Let me remind those of you angling for some ethnic confrontations in Lagos of this truth; no one can perfectly predict how wars end..
Keep that in mind as you plot...
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by owobokiri(m): 7:30am On Oct 07
Christistruth03:
There is no Battle for Lagos.
Lagos is Yorubaland 100%.
Lagos belongs to the Eguns and the Aworis.
Get used to that. The notion that there is a uniformed lone ethnic group in the Southwest is purile. Dead on Arrival! It is a fallacy that has been framed as" the truth" by the highly compromised media houses quartered around the Lagos Ibadan express way.. Just as we have in other regions of the country, the South West is full of highly marginalised minorities struggling not to be swallowed by one avaricious majority ethnic group!
They need help and help they will get..

You can't say that PortHarcourt belongs to the Ikwerres and not the Igbos and expect us all to dash you Lagos and her minorities for free, when we can conveniently adduce your theory too ro save the indigenous tribes.
The ikwerres are far more related to the igbos than the Eguns are related to the Yorubas. Do your research.
So Lagos belongs to the minorities of the Eguns, the Aworis and others.
Go back to your Ogbomosho, Okitipupa and Oshogbo and let these minorities breath...
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by FreeThinkerPlut(op): 9:56am On Oct 07
owobokiri:
Another election circle, another tribally charged propaganda to sware the poor voters and get them to support their oppressors. As usual, base thinkers will conveniently reach for their favourite fall guys; the igbos. You woke up and found it worthy to blame all your failures in life on a tribe that does not control any part of the government. You are the president, you are the army Chief, the CBN chief, The Police Chief, The Customs Chief, The Immigration Chief, The Minister of Finance, The Chief at The Board of Internal Revenue. You control the Banking Industry, the Insurance Industry, the Betting Industry, the Petroleum Industry, the Solid Minerals Industry..., even in that Lagos in particular and the South West in general, you control all governments, all regulations! Yet, it is these "ubiquitous igbos" that control zilch that are the cause of your problems..?
Make that make sense..

The topic should be about a rudderless and vindictive Sanwo Olu and his glaring failures as a governor. The topic should dwell on Tinubus and APCs monumental failures in government.
The topic should revolve around pressing issues like the epileptic power supply, the worsening management of refuse disposal in Lagos, the astronomical rise in the numbers of poor people as a result of bad government policies, the insufficient disposable income available to Lagosians/Nigerians as APCs austerity measures tighten the noose around our necks. The topic of discussions should focus on the bad roads, the dilapidated schools, the shabby health delivery system, the agbero menace and the industrial scale corruption going on in all farcets of government..

But you don't want that.. lol, you can't deal.
As a ruling party, you uave nothing in your scorecards positive enough to be used to brag.
Essentially, you failed woefully! So you delved into "Plan B"; blame the igbos. You now deliberately want to obfuscate facts. That's the only way you can win; hoodwink the people, blame other ethnicities and utilise rabid tribalism as your "cudgel of war"....
You would rather we frame the igbos as the problem, when the problem is the blundering party in power.
It is called "Base Politics", and it won't fly this time...
Let me remind those of you angling for some ethnic confrontations in Lagos of this truth; no one can perfectly predict how wars end..
Keep that in mind as you plot...
How does the article relate to APC? You brought APC into it. You are the one who said anyone talking about Lagos belonging to Yoruba is doing APC's work. So let me ask you directly: does saying "Lagos is Yoruba land" automatically mean someone supports APC?

Because if that is your argument, then you are saying Yoruba identity is a political party. You are saying every Yoruba person who defends their homeland is a Tinubu supporter. That is absurd.

Let me break it down for you.

First: APC does not own Yoruba land. Yoruba land existed before APC. It will exist after APC. Tinubu did not create Lagos. Sanwo-Olu did not create Lagos. Yoruba history is not a party asset.

Second: Many Yoruba people who say "Lagos is Yoruba land" voted against APC. Many voted for Obi. Many protested against Sanwo-Olu. Many are suffering under Tinubu's policies. Are they all APC supporters now? By your logic, yes. That is nonsense.

Third: You are using APC's failures to silence a debate about belonging. You are saying: because APC is bad, nobody should talk about indigeneity. That is not logic. That is evasion. APC being bad does not make Lagos a no man's land. APC being bad does not erase Yoruba history.

Fourth: The people truly doing APC's work are those who turn every governance fight into an ethnic shouting match. You are giving APC exactly what it wants: distraction. While you fight Igbos and Yorubas online, Sanwo-Olu is still in office. Tinubu is still in Aso Rock. Refuse is still on the streets. Power is still dark. Roads are still death traps. You are doing their job for them.

Fifth: You can fight APC and still say Lagos is Yoruba land. You can hate Tinubu and still believe indigeneity is real. You can be angry about hunger and still notice that 2023 was a political earthquake in Lagos. Two things can be true at once.

So stop hiding. Answer the question: does saying "Lagos belongs to Yoruba" mean supporting APC? Yes or no?

If yes, then you are calling every Yoruba person an APC supporter. That is tribalism.

If no, then your entire attack on the article collapses.

Pick one.

FreeThinker from Pluto
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by FreeThinkerPlut(op): 10:25am On Oct 07
owobokiri:
Lagos belongs to the Eguns and the Aworis.
Get used to that. The notion that there is a uniformed lone ethnic group in the Southwest is purile. Dead on Arrival! It is a fallacy that has been framed as" the truth" by the highly compromised media houses quartered around the Lagos Ibadan express way.. Just as we have in other regions of the country, the South West is full of highly marginalised minorities struggling not to be swallowed by one avaricious majority ethnic group!
They need help and help they will get..

You can't say that PortHarcourt belongs to the Ikwerres and not the Igbos and expect us all to dash you Lagos and her minorities for free, when we can conveniently adduce your theory too ro save the indigenous tribes.
The ikwerres are far more related to the igbos than the Eguns are related to the Yorubas. Do your research.
So Lagos belongs to the minorities of the Eguns, the Aworis and others.
Go back to your Ogbomosho, Okitipupa and Oshogbo and let these minorities breath...
You say "Lagos belongs to the Eguns and the Aworis" and "get used to that." You frame this as a devastating point that somehow demolishes the idea of Lagos as Yoruba land. But you are playing a dishonest game, and it is time to call it out.

First, let's deal with the Awori.

The Awori are not a separate ethnic group fighting against "Yoruba." They are a major Yoruba subgroup. The Awori are descendants of Ile-Ife, the cradle of the Yoruba race, sent by Oduduwa's progeny to found Aworiland. They speak a distinct Yoruba dialect. They practice Yoruba customs. They are Yoruba. So when you say "Lagos belongs to the Aworis," you are saying Lagos belongs to the Yoruba. You have just made my point for me. The Awori are not a counter-argument to Yoruba ownership; they are the evidence for it.

Second, the Egun.

The Egun (Ogu) are a distinct ethnolinguistic group found in Badagry. No one denies their indigenous status. But you know what the Egun are not? They are not Yoruba, and they are not the majority. The Egun account for a small fraction of Lagos State's indigenous population. The Awori constitute the bulk. So your attempt to weaponize the Egun against the Yoruba is a classic minority-hijacking tactic. You are using a legitimate minority group as a cudgel to attack the majority. That is not justice; that is manipulation.

Third, your "go back to Ogbomosho" insult is a self-own.

You said: "Go back to your Ogbomosho, Okitipupa and Oshogbo and let these minorities breathe."

Let me get this straight. You, an Igbo man whose region is hundreds of kilometers away from Lagos, are telling a Yoruba man to leave Lagos—a Yoruba city in Yoruba land—and go back to Ogbomosho, Okitipupa, or Oshogbo, which are also in Yoruba land?

So a Yoruba man should leave Yoruba land for Yoruba land? And an Igbo man should stay in Yoruba land? Do you hear yourself?

Ogbomosho is in Oyo State. Okitipupa is in Ondo State. Oshogbo is in Osun State. All Yoruba. All South-West. All in the same region as Lagos. You are telling a Yoruba man to go back to his own region while you, a non-Yoruba from the South-East, claim ownership of Lagos. That is delusion.

Fourth, be careful what you wish for.

If a Yoruba man should leave Lagos because "minorities need to breathe," then what happens when Igbo people in the South-West and the North are told to leave? What happens when host residents in the South-South decide that non-indigenes have overstayed their welcome? What happens when the same logic you are using against Lagos is used against your kinsmen in other regions?

You cannot demand expulsion in one direction and expect it never to come back to you. The logic of "go back to your own land" is a two-way street. If you open that door for Lagos, you open it for every state in Nigeria. And your people have more to lose from that game than anyone else.

Fifth, let's talk about geography and logic.

This is the question you have not answered and cannot answer. Why are the Igbos so concerned about Lagos? Lagos is in the South-West. It is Yoruba land. The Igbos are not even a neighboring region to the South-West.

Look at the map. The South-East shares boundaries with the South-South. The South-South shares boundaries with the South-West. The Igbos have the entire South-East and South-South as their immediate neighbors. If they want to expand politically, economically, or demographically, they have the South-South right next door.

So why Lagos? Why cross the Niger, bypass the South-South, and plant your flag in Yoruba land? Why is your political energy not focused on the South-East and South-South? Why are you not fighting for indigene rights in Port Harcourt, Warri, or Calabar? Why is Lagos the prize?

The answer is simple: Lagos is the prize because Lagos is the money. Lagos is the power. Lagos is the future. You want the fruits of Yoruba land without the roots.

But you cannot have it both ways. You cannot claim to be a victim in your own region while simultaneously claiming ownership of another man's region. You cannot demand indigene rights in Lagos while denying them in your own backyard.

The bottom line.

Lagos is Yoruba land. The Awori are Yoruba. The Egun are a minority within Lagos. The Ijebus are Yoruba. The descendants of freed slaves are Lagosians. This is a complex, layered history.

But if Lagos is truly a "no man's land," why is every Igbo politician from the South-East trying to plant their flag here, while ignoring the South-South that is right on their doorstep?

You cannot answer that. Because the answer exposes the lie.

And if you think you can tell a Yoruba man to leave Lagos and go back to Ogbomosho, then do not be angry when your own kinsmen are told to leave other regions.

That is the game you are playing. Be careful. It does not end well for those who forget history.

FreeThinker from Pluto
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by FreeThinkerPlut(op): 10:45am On Oct 07
flokii:
The ownership of Lagos is clear as day.. Lagos belongs to Yoruba people.

The reason some miscreants wanted to rewrite history of Lagos was because a tiny part of Lagos State served as Federal Capital for Nigeria till a new capital city was built (Abuja). It's why we are telling our Yoruba people to wake up and stop handing benefits to outsiders in Lagos State.
Lagos has reverted to a full Yoruba State since over 2 decades, yet still our people keep allowing external influence in Lagos politics. It's not patriotism but self-sabotage. These outsiders occupy seat meant for Yorubas at Federal level, but still vote against anything that'll favour Lagos and Yorubaland in the National Aseembly So tell me how that is "liberalism" if not self destruction.

Lagos (Ilu Eko) is not for sale.. ring in in their ears, let it sink into their heads.
You are absolutely right. And it is time we stop apologizing for stating the obvious.

Lagos belongs to the Yoruba people. Full stop. No debate. No negotiation. No "no man's land" fiction.

If being a former capital city means a place belongs to everyone, then what about Calabar? Calabar served as a colonial capital in the East. Kaduna served as the capital of the Northern Region. Enugu served as a regional capital. By that logic, should Calabar belong to all Nigerians? Should Kaduna belong to all Nigerians? Nobody makes that claim. Nobody calls Kaduna a no man's land. So the "federal capital" argument is not a principle. It is a pretext.

Now the question that destroys the whole thing.

Abuja is the capital of Nigeria right now. Not sixty years ago. Right now. So why are these same people not claiming Abuja? Why are they not demanding indigene rights in the FCT? Why is Lagos the prize and not Abuja?

The answer is simple. Abuja is not the money. Lagos is. It was never about federal capital status. It was never about history. It was always about the wealth of Lagos.

And let us talk about history.

Lagos was a Yoruba city long before Nigeria existed. Long before the British drew any borders. Long before anyone called it a Federal Capital. Lagos was a kingdom. It had its own Oba. It had its own system of government. It was a thriving commercial centre trading with Europeans, with other African kingdoms, with the world. Lagos was prosperous when Nigeria was not yet an idea. Lagos was Yoruba when there was no Nigeria to be the capital of.

So how can a city that existed, flourished, and governed itself as Yoruba land suddenly become no man's land because Nigeria later chose it as an administrative seat? That is like saying your grandfather's house belongs to the tenant because the tenant once used the parlour for a meeting.

You cannot give someone a seat at your table, watch them vote to starve your family, and then call it hospitality. That is not hospitality. That is foolishness.

Lagos was Yoruba before Nigeria existed. Lagos was prosperous before Nigeria existed. Lagos will remain Yoruba long after this argument is forgotten.

And if they do not like it, they know where the road leads back to.

FreeThinker from Pluto
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by byinks(f): 10:51am On Oct 07
Awori , egun and others share the same ghost DNA with the Yoruba. Adamic Ghost DNA is the most ancient DNA type found in only a few West African tribes.

The distinction between egun awori and Yoruba is a pointless exercise.
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by ariesbull: 11:38am On Oct 07
Chai ... Very apt
owobokiri:
Another election circle, another tribally charged propaganda to sware the poor voters and get them to support their oppressors. As usual, base thinkers will conveniently reach for their favourite fall guys; the igbos. You woke up and found it worthy to blame all your failures in life on a tribe that does not control any part of the government. You are the president, you are the army Chief, the CBN chief, The Police Chief, The Customs Chief, The Immigration Chief, The Minister of Finance, The Chief at The Board of Internal Revenue. You control the Banking Industry, the Insurance Industry, the Betting Industry, the Petroleum Industry, the Solid Minerals Industry..., even in that Lagos in particular and the South West in general, you control all governments, all regulations! Yet, it is these "ubiquitous igbos" that control zilch that are the cause of your problems..?
Make that make sense..

The topic should be about a rudderless and vindictive Sanwo Olu and his glaring failures as a governor. The topic should dwell on Tinubus and APCs monumental failures in government.
The topic should revolve around pressing issues like the epileptic power supply, the worsening management of refuse disposal in Lagos, the astronomical rise in the numbers of poor people as a result of bad government policies, the insufficient disposable income available to Lagosians/Nigerians as APCs austerity measures tighten the noose around our necks. The topic of discussions should focus on the bad roads, the dilapidated schools, the shabby health delivery system, the agbero menace and the industrial scale corruption going on in all farcets of government..

But you don't want that.. lol, you can't deal.
As a ruling party, you uave nothing in your scorecards positive enough to be used to brag.
Essentially, you failed woefully! So you delved into "Plan B"; blame the igbos. You now deliberately want to obfuscate facts. That's the only way you can win; hoodwink the people, blame other ethnicities and utilise rabid tribalism as your "cudgel of war"....
You would rather we frame the igbos as the problem, when the problem is the blundering party in power.
It is called "Base Politics", and it won't fly this time...
Let me remind those of you angling for some ethnic confrontations in Lagos of this truth; no one can perfectly predict how wars end..
Keep that in mind as you plot...
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by Christistruth03:
owobokiri:
Lagos belongs to the Eguns and the Aworis.
Get used to that. The notion that there is a uniformed lone ethnic group in the Southwest is purile. Dead on Arrival! It is a fallacy that has been framed as" the truth" by the highly compromised media houses quartered around the Lagos Ibadan express way.. Just as we have in other regions of the country, the South West is full of highly marginalised minorities struggling not to be swallowed by one avaricious majority ethnic group!
They need help and help they will get..

You can't say that PortHarcourt belongs to the Ikwerres and not the Igbos and expect us all to dash you Lagos and her minorities for free, when we can conveniently adduce your theory too ro save the indigenous tribes.
The ikwerres are far more related to the igbos than the Eguns are related to the Yorubas. Do your research.
So Lagos belongs to the minorities of the Eguns, the Aworis and others.
Go back to your Ogbomosho, Okitipupa and Oshogbo and let these minorities breath...
Lagos is Yorubaland.
Don't kpai yourself over what isn't yours.
Awori are Yoruba, Ijebu are Yoruba, Egun migrated from Ile Ife and are Oduduwa descendants , so which one be una own?
Na long throat for others Ancestral lands want kpai una


Una no dey take eye see other people's land.
Una go start to do History reconstruction for them because una want to steal what was never yours

Because people shift small for una
to allow una open shop and sell market for Lagos you think you own the place?
Even in the 9th Century Moba and Ijebu Yorubas were already settled and living on the Lekki peninsula in Lagos
Lekki is Ijebuland!!

Yorubas dey just take corner eye dey look una.
When it comes to Kingdom and Nation building, you are now dealing with the big boys,
our Ancestors have been at it for over 1000 years

Chinese go inherit all your Markets in Yorubaland and Lagos , we will even make sure they are given Nigerian Citizenship on top.

Una never see anything
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by wshaderack: 12:30pm On Oct 21
This post cuts straight to the core of what is happening. The clarity of thought here makes it very easy to digest, and it definitely adds solid value to anyone taking the time to read through.
Re: Tolerance Is Not Surrender: The Battle For Lagos by helinues: 12:51pm On Oct 21
Easyyy
1 Reply

“I Will Not Surrender!” Dr. Mo Rejects AMAC Results • BREAKING: I'll Not Surrender Rivers N700bn IGR To Wike — Gov Fubara Blows Hot • I Will Never Surrender The Soul Of Rivers On Bended Knees - Fubara • 2 • 3 • 4

Why Attack Tinubu For The Hardship Caused By Trump? Are You M...? • Peter Obi Is A Thief Who Siphoned Anambra Money For His Family Business- Umahi • Moment Peter Obi Set Bayelsa Creeks On Fire!