₦airaland Forum

OhBritannia:
Evil dead burn is a solid 9/10 for me.
This is the exact definition of horror.
When you are searching for a horror and a scary movie, it doesn't get better than this.
They went all in from gore to brutality and to pure evil.

Loved the back story to it and how it connects to the presence.
This is the kind of horror that they warn you "viewers discretion is advised"

Honestly tho, I think what ever you type to your Ai to refine is probably better than the rubbish it regurgitates for you to copy.

Speak your own English, nobody will kill you if your grammar isn't perfect. You can't be insecure on a faceless forum.

Just saying tho.

And the movie was stupid btw.

abduleez1:
I really don't have a negative verdict for James Gunn so far.
He's done well so far to me.

Only blip so far has been Supergirl. Something tells me Clayface might come pretty good.
Lanterns has been premium. Peacemaker S2 was judged good by critics and audience. Creature Commandos was pretty good too.

Only thing missing, is movies for the heavy hitters such as Wonder Woman, Batman, Flash, Martian Manhunter. And the slow pace of work on greenlit projects.
And we've obviously seen a re-strategising of the overall plan by James Gunn.

We're just waiting to get the full details of the slate rework. And this final completion of the merger will give full clarity in the coming months.

None has impressed me.
• I didn't watch Creature Commandos.

• I didn't even finish season 1 of Peacemaker.

• Lanterns is a good show, but Hal Jordan was done dirty. It spoilt the whole thing for me.

• I'm positively anticipating Clayface. I think it will be good

🎥 Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026) = 6.3/10 ✔️ ❤️

Stale. Nothing is ever beating Spiderman 1,2,3.

WriterNig:
🎥 Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026) = 6.3/10 ✔️ ❤️

Stale. Nothing is ever beating Spiderman 1,2,3.

Box office begs to differ lmao

WriterNig:
🎥 Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026) = 6.3/10 ✔️ ❤️

Stale. Nothing is ever beating Spiderman 1,2,3.

Tbh it doesn't have to.

It just had to be better than the other mcu Spider-Man man movies.

And if you stack up all the Tom Holland Spider-man movies, this is arguably the best one.

abduleez1:
Cold revenge.... I've always wondered the rationale behind letting Josh Goldstine go last year.

It could be seen how shambolic WB marketing has been this year that even A24 and Amazon are beating it without breaking too much sweat this year at the box office.

Why did WB fire him before?

I thought he was doing a great job.

The marketing he did for Superman in late 2024 was superb.

That teaser trailer moved mountains.

She thought the marriage would help her get a visa. But immigration officials uncovered something that changed everything...
Watch the full story here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ax1q8VfCeS0?si=psHqOs8OYV4BhbDY

BlackManta:
Why did WB fire him before?

I thought he was doing a great job.

The marketing he did for Superman in late 2024 was superb.

That teaser trailer moved mountains.

Guy I was shocked. I think I mentioned it here back then too. Dude has a very solid resume for WB.

I heard Zaslav wanted to trim money and let go off some expensive execs and he was the most expensive in the marketing department. Josh Goldstine was sacked for Jeff Goldstein who was under him to take over.
The duo co-CEOs Mike Deluca and Pamela Abdy made the decision to put him in the chopping block and Zaslav agreed.
You remember these two were in the hot seat to be let go by Zaslav because of poor 2024 performance and a seemingly weak slate compared to the competition.

They probably offered him as the scape goat of the 2024 flops with the promise that there will be a turnaround. And yep, WB coincidentally had one of the greatest years they've ever had at box office last year.
Still, some of those films owe their success to this guy's marketing strategy.

Thankfully, DUNE 3 will get a premium marketing push now, probably it's a little late tho as marketing are planned months to a year away. But at least The Batman 2, Lord of The Rings and Man of Tomorrow will get top tier marketing.

You can see the fall off and how WB movies have suffered this year. Cos I see movies that are weak compared to WB's doing better, whether quality or not. It's a shocker no WB film had done $100mn domestic this year, especially in a historic box office year. Everyone was benefitting and enjoying at the box office even small studios but WB and Paramount were nowhere to be seen.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day 5/10
I’m a die hard fan of spider man, this is the first time in the history of all spiders getting a rating below 8/10 for me.

Spider man has a lot of potential villains in the universe but they chose to pick a kid’s to announce for her role in the Marvel upcoming show

2hrs runtime but it’s feel like it was rush and they didn’t give room for other characters enough.

Base on what I watched:

Rewatch value: 0/10
Storyline: nothing special
Spider Character development: 10/10 (the next movie will definitely be great if they keep this new spider ability)


Now I know what I’ll spend my money on December #Dune 3

Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026)

Not so brand new day.

There’s been a school of thought lately that you have to forgo a logical, well-written plot to enjoy movies these days. But I dare say, if I have to forgo the plot, is it really a movie anymore?

The plot here is so narratively weak, and I think that’s where my entire problem with the film stems from. It’s no secret that a superhero movie is only as good as its villain. The charisma and twisted ideologies of a great villain are what people remember years later. Think Avengers: Infinity War and Endgame, and you instantly think Thanos. Think The Dark Knight, and you think the Joker.

Making a young Jean Grey the villain here simply didn’t work for me. I couldn’t take her seriously, and it feels like it negates much of what the franchise has been building toward.

The film stretches to almost two and a half hours, but it could easily have been 45 minutes. There are surprisingly few scenes that actually matter, with the rest padded out by unnecessary characters and recycled MCU ideas in a desperate attempt to tie everything into Avengers: Doomsday (2026) because apparently that movie needs every bit of buildup it can get.

Seriously, why were Yelena, the Punisher, or even the Hulk in this? I’m going out on a limb and saying Avengers: Doomsday might end up feeling the same way, because it’s being built on a pretty shaky foundation. Thin plot, bloated runtime and nostalgia bait. I’ll still watch it as part of my dirty December plans, but man, my expectations are on the floor.

Technically, though, I can see why this movie made so much money. The production value is ridiculously high, as expected from this franchise. The cinematography is great, the colours pop, and the Spidey suit is insanely good. The VFX, web-slinging and those sweeping shots of Spider-Man swinging through a spiralling New York are gorgeous. I can totally see how this will read beautifully on a cinema screen and, honestly, it’s a pretty good distraction from how weak the plot is.

Personally, I think this franchise has been worn thin. Tom Holland has taken it as far as he can. It needs some kind of refresh, but with the amount of money it brings in, I doubt Sony will ever let it go.

Almost a nothing film with very little replay value. Just glad to be done with it.

5/10

🎥 Insidious: Out Of The Further (2026) = 5.7/10 ✔️ ❤️

Horror movies are getting less & less horror these days.

oyaskii:
Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026)

Not so brand new day.

There’s been a school of thought lately that you have to forgo a logical, well-written plot to enjoy movies these days. But I dare say, if I have to forgo the plot, is it really a movie anymore?

The plot here is so narratively weak, and I think that’s where my entire problem with the film stems from. It’s no secret that a superhero movie is only as good as its villain. The charisma and twisted ideologies of a great villain are what people remember years later. Think Avengers: Infinity War and Endgame, and you instantly think Thanos. Think The Dark Knight, and you think the Joker.

Making a young Jean Grey the villain here simply didn’t work for me. I couldn’t take her seriously, and it feels like it negates much of what the franchise has been building toward.

The film stretches to almost two and a half hours, but it could easily have been 45 minutes. There are surprisingly few scenes that actually matter, with the rest padded out by unnecessary characters and recycled MCU ideas in a desperate attempt to tie everything into Avengers: Doomsday (2026) because apparently that movie needs every bit of buildup it can get.

Seriously, why were Yelena, the Punisher, or even the Hulk in this? I’m going out on a limb and saying Avengers: Doomsday might end up feeling the same way, because it’s being built on a pretty shaky foundation. Thin plot, bloated runtime and nostalgia bait. I’ll still watch it as part of my dirty December plans, but man, my expectations are on the floor.

Technically, though, I can see why this movie made so much money. The production value is ridiculously high, as expected from this franchise. The cinematography is great, the colours pop, and the Spidey suit is insanely good. The VFX, web-slinging and those sweeping shots of Spider-Man swinging through a spiralling New York are gorgeous. I can totally see how this will read beautifully on a cinema screen and, honestly, it’s a pretty good distraction from how weak the plot is.

Personally, I think this franchise has been worn thin. Tom Holland has taken it as far as he can. It needs some kind of refresh, but with the amount of money it brings in, I doubt Sony will ever let it go.

Almost a nothing film with very little replay value. Just glad to be done with it.

5/10

This would have been my review, if only I had elite writing skill. The only difference is that my rating would have been slightly higher at 6/10

iamoyindamola:
You are generous
I will give it 5/10

People wey use money watch am no rate am like this, u use data dey rate wetin I no understand

.

Spiderman Brand New Day was not appreciated enough!!!

phr0nesis:
This would have been my review, if only I had elite writing skill. The only difference is that my rating would have been slightly higher at 6/10

6/10 flatters it alot my mannn but i will allow it. Genuinely don't see a scenario where i can sit through it again, hence my rating.

oyaskii:
6/10 flatters it alot my mannn but i will allow it. Genuinely don't see a scenario where i can sit through it again, hence my rating.

A really good plot is a major reason why I'll rewatch any movie, of which "Brand New Day" never had. My rating is simply for the other things they got right. A second viewing is out of the question for me as well

🎥 The Uprising (2026) = 7.3/10 ✔️ ❤️

Great movie but terrible ending.

🎥 Motor City (2025) = 4/10 👎🏻

If you're a Mute, you'd surely love this movie.

Spiderman Brand New Day.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0aUkjfU-M8


sasha baran coren - he has stolen your word - he has taken your pun ani and put it in his mouth

Spider man Brand New day.

Please ooo is the movie in nkiri and other platforms different from the cinema version?

Because this movie is more of a sleeping pill than a movie that made billions.

There’s nothing intriguing about this movie

iamoyindamola:
You are generous
I will give it 5/10

Lol it's not that bad though but I still rate far from home more than brand new day.

Far from homes was just everything and Marvel bringing back Tobey maguire and Andrew Garfied back was the best thing ever.

9/10

Peak

Mirasteel:
Lol it's not that bad though but I still rate far from home more than brand new day.

Far from homes was just everything and Marvel bringing back Tobey maguire and Andrew Garfied back was the best thing ever.

I think you mean No Way Home

Brand new day was great.

Evwry mallam to him kettle. As for me I've seen it again and I was still entertained.

Maybe I'm a marvelstan.

Kelvinnchucks:
Honestly tho, I think what ever you type to your Ai to refine is probably better than the rubbish it regurgitates for you to copy.

Speak your own English, nobody will kill you if your grammar isn't perfect. You can't be insecure on a faceless forum.

Just saying tho.

And the movie was stupid btw.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

armadeo:
Brand new day was great.

Evwry mallam to him kettle. As for me I've seen it again and I was still entertained.

Maybe I'm a marvelstan.

and that's perfectly ok, don't let anyone gaslight you. When it comes to media, two or more truths can coexist. Brand New Day was subjectively a very good flick and at the same time a mid one...it just depends on perspective.

Wait, Didn't "The Odyssey " come out before " Brand New Day"?, and yet the digital for the latter is out already. Mann, the greatest disturbance to the force of "the pyrate community" in recent years has been Sir Christopher Edward Nolan! 😩😩. I mean this brother is so deep in gatekeep, he has no love for your boxers/bra wearing bare back on a sofa, watching his film on your rickety laptop/phone screen fgs 😩.

Glad no other filmmaker is like this mad man, if not na filmhouse for dey chop my networth because i be cinephile on Ólóuñ 😭.

Adasun:
People wey use money watch am no rate am like this, u use data dey rate wetin I no understand

Na you buy data for me