₦airaland Forum

TreQuartista:
Guy pepi na, haba. Onto wetin? Abeg melembe jo.

homesteady:
Na wa for this man oh
So just 1 loss in as many as 12 games signifies a loss of form?
Even the great Pep's barca also went unbeaten for 11 games and this current team has done the same!
It's quite obvious you did not watch the match, and you are just seeing the scores!
the Malaga guys parked 2 chelsea buses, and it was a Dani Alves error that gave them the goal!

By tomorrow, barca will do what chelsea couldn't do this season! beat Man city!

AirborneLacer:
Loss of form? Where in my post did I assert such?

It's been you and your side-kick that have been hollering about early form and late form - an assertion I consider to be hogwash.

All I told you lot was that Barca haven't been geniunely tested this year hence their good run of form, and beating Atletico who might have failed to exploit your weaknesses thrice on a trot doesn't define how formidable you guys must have become.

Barca's defenceline is as horrendous as f**k and is susceptible to counters. If a team can defend in numbers, close down on your players quick enough and hit you ninnies on the break, then a win is sure on the cards. That was exactly what Malaga did to win and what every brilliant manager would do to win Barca.

homesteady:
like seriously? are we still going through the early and late form tutorials?

so Malaga is now the true test because we lost against them? Let Chelsea meet this A . Madrid, and they'll be raped by Griezman alone!

despite playing with a very highline defense, we still have conceded the least goals in la liga! does that look like a horrendous defense? which 4-man or 3- man defense is not susceptible to counters? So spare me that counter trash!
Was it in your dream that malaga scored through a counter attack? it was a misplaced pass from Alves to the keeper that led to the goal! So your counter cool story did not work!

Ask Atletico Madrid, they tried the same tactics, but it did not work!
?

AirborneLacer:
In a manner of speaking, yes, Malaga was a good test.

Not that they had at their disposal the calibre of players who could have eviscerated Barca, but that they had managerial brilliance by their side.

That said, the surest tests never come sef.

Chelsea, Real and a sane assembled Bayern side go thrash una blue black this term.

Citeh even have a chance of staging a cute upset tomorrow if only they would remain focused for 90mins.

Ibime:
How can you expect competence from referees when the Head of referees used to referee like this in his day:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mM747L9Wf8M

homesteady:
Wonder Wonder!
What makes chelsea a sure test while Atletico madrid who nearly turned Stamford Bridge into a stumping ground last season not a sure test?
are you just trying to have this feel-good effect?

AirborneLacer:
Stop thinking like a billy-goat.

Atleti have proven themselves to be Chelsea's boogey team that's all. They aren't placed on the same pedestal with Chelsea in Europe.

We have more European experience, enjoy more European consistency, and have at our disposal more European tested players and manager.

Not to mention that, there are few things we know how to do right against Barcelona that Atleti haven't been doing.

You lot haven't won in your last five matches against us, negro Bruv what could be a bigger test?

Bayern and Real have the best squads in Europe this season, they would definitely provide Barca with a sterner test than Atleti.

Homesteady, to whom brain is given, sense is expected.

Ibime:
How can you expect competence from referees when the Head of referees used to referee like this in his day:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mM747L9Wf8M

AirborneLacer:
Stop thinking like a billy-goat.
Atleti have proven themselves to be Chelsea's boogey team that's all. They aren't placed on the same pedestal with Chelsea in Europe.

to mention that, there are few things we know how to do right against Barcelona that Atleti haven't been doing.
You lot haven't won in your last five matches against us, negro what could be a bigger test?

Bayern and Real have the best squads in Europe this season, they would definitely provide Barca with a sterner test than Atleti.

Homesteady, to whom brain is given, sense is expected.

coogar:
are you suggesting campbell didn't foul rooney in the box? it was a penalty - campbell swung his leg out & tripped rooney.

mike riley was outstanding in that game. you dunno the pressure in the atmosphere on that day. it was the most difficult match to ref in the history of the premier league.

riley wanted the match to breathe so that no side would have a man-advantage over the other. united quickly tuned themselves to that while arsënal wanted to be cry-babies - nick a draw and complete their 50th unbeaten run.

coogar:
are you suggesting campbell didn't foul rooney in the box? it was a penalty - campbell swung his leg out & tripped rooney.

TreQuartista:
That was a stonewall penalty. But 8 out of 8 is some consistency, brotherly.

Nihilist:
Allah Kompany is a flop

homesteady:
Where is that yeye AirborneDisease?
rubbish!

AirborneLacer:
That said, the surest tests never come sef.

Chelsea, Real and a sane assembled Bayern side go thrash una blue black this term.

AirborneLacer:
Here's my stand again:

That said, the surest tests never come sef.Chelsea, Real and a sane assembled Bayern side go thrash una blue black this term.

So don't burst out looking for Lacer each time Barca wins a game.

homesteady:
this is what is making me angry! Calling Chelsea name among top teams!
The strongest side chelsea have played against this season is Man City - we all know how it played out!
Chelsea played 19th century football, and got a draw in both games! But Barca went to their home and nearly destroyed them in just the 1st half!
So I'm still trying to figure out the logic you used in putting chelsea among teams that will give barca a tough time!

timbros:
Bro, it's your logic that is flawed.

The fact that Barca destroyed Man City that Chelsea couldn't win doesn't mean Chelsea stands no chance against Barca.

Check out this scenario: Chelsea drew Man City. Arsenal won Man City. By your logic, Arsenal should have won Chelsea but no, Chelsea won Arsenal.

Don't forget that in England, it's only Chelsea that knows how to play Barca. And Barca have NEVER won an 11 man Chelsea team in a game.

So when talking about stern test for Barca, Chelsea will always be in the list.

homesteady:
this our argument has an origin, you have to start from the beginning to understand better!

homesteady:
this is what is making me angry! Calling Chelsea name among top teams!
The strongest side chelsea have played against this season is Man City - we all know how it played out!
Chelsea played 19th century football, and got a draw in both games! But Barca went to their home and nearly destroyed them in just the 1st half!
So I'm still trying to figure out the logic you used in putting chelsea among teams that will give barca a tough time!

AirborneLacer:
This line of reasoning is flawed my good friend.

That Barcelona beat Atletico and Citeh doesn't make Chelsea less of a top team in Europe neither does it erase the fact that we are your nightmare.

Chelsea not a top team? S'onsiere ni?

AirborneLacer:
Barca's defenceline is as horrendous as f**k