₦airaland Forum

raumdeuter:
Its basic common sense that Harry Kane if he post better stats at the end of this season would be a better striker than Aguero, If he keeps it up over time then he would be a better striker

WHat has Lampard vs Xavi got to do with this?

We are going to ignore that Xavi played in a 3 man midfield while Lamps was just behind the front man, and took all Chelsea Penalties and Freekicks

Nihilist:
It's simple logic

If according to you, De Bruyne will be better than Hazard on the back of his stats, then Kane is already better than Aguero, and Lampard has been better than Xavi for several years

raumdeuter:
Thats why ppl say the IQ of Chelsea fans are the lowest on here.

Before you tell me to counter, I would expect you to verify but in a typical Chelsea manner just chorus any falsehood dumped on your plate

See Ribery assist stats below

raumdeuter:
If DeBruyne keeps posting better goals and assists stats than Hazard next season then he would be a better player, If Harry Kane continue posting better stats he would be a better player

Lampard and Xavi played different roles its like comparing Alonso to Mata

raumdeuter:
Ibime, Are you digging these stats from your adipose tissues?

11/12 Ribery 21 league assists

Ibime:
Mr man, where did you get these stats from?

Whoscored is showing 12 league assists that season as is ESPN.

Ibime:
Mr man, where did you get these stats from?

Whoscored is showing 12 league assists that season as is ESPN.

Ibime:
Mr man, where did you get these stats from?

Whoscored is showing 12 league assists that season as is ESPN.

Nihilist:
Them don ban am lol

Even spambot don tire for raumdeuter's logic defying yarns

Nihilist:
See Dayo downloading dumps

PietroRico:
. . See hate

coogar:
dayo must pass by force.....

torres2:
Some kind of agbero analysis here makes me laugh

sleekdot:
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/1513669_343805722490948_2404123089901991564_n.jpg?oh=0e3019082e5bc57e17e131e9f70fa169&oe=55A9D458&__gda__=1437685187_77bc2edb2cf088091ffb99f7e5fe415d

pazienza:
I am not a Chelsea fan, but being neutral, I believe that only two players are currently better than Hazard in world football, Ronaldo and Messi.

Hazard is special, you need to remove your bias lens to see that, the dude just dribble pass people like they are not there, and his overall contribution to Chelsea game is enormous, he is so matured and know when not to dribble and when to just pass. I need to see the stats for the midfielders that have created highest goal scoring chances in Europe this season, I am sure he will be in the top 3. Everything good about Chelsea, flows through Hazard, he is the ultimate team player.

Too bad in modern football, all people care about are goals and assists, Hazard just need to add those two more to his game, and the world would be begging him to accept the WPOTY award, once Ronaldo and Messi decline.

You have got to respect a guy so technically gifted that he is capable of dribbling in tight spaces and in slow motion. Neymar, Reus, and their likes are but speedsters, give them no space, and they are easily caged, Hazard is ahead of them, people like Ribery recognize this.


Please, this is but my personal opinion, no ad hominem will be tolerated o!

tobiboss:
Cuadrado's form does nt realy surprise me, he was awful for florentina for the first part of the season, i did not see him at the world cup so i cant say how good he can be, bt i'll say florentina certainly got the better deal for landing salah + cash for himi

raumdeuter:
Can you tell me for certain that Hazard is better than Suarez or Robben or Neymar?

Hazard dribbles nly puts him in the same class with Karim Bellarabi, Firmino and Henrikh Mikitarian until he starts giving the output

[img]http://m0.sportsjoe.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Dribbling-stats-1.jpg[/img]

SailorXY:
hazard over robben

shiit keep rising to fill the mouth here