The Sciences Discussion Thread. - Science/Technology (13) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Science/Technology › The Sciences Discussion Thread. (85083 Views)
1 2 3 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 34 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Chrisbenogor(m): 9:08am On Jun 22, 2015 |
Lushcream:If Isaac newton had this thought process we would be having this chat with scrolls. ![]() |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Chrisbenogor(m): 9:09am On Jun 22, 2015 |
Lushcream:Let me make it more interesting, He has agreed that the earth is moving and we are moving with it, that means the DSTV dish is moving with it. How come we still get the signal? Remember simple explanations, really really simple explanations. ![]() |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by kodeya(m): 11:06am On Jun 22, 2015 |
My field is chemistry. Though I just finished my first degree in it. My flair is space technology. I recently saw this movie, interstellar, and there were some things I didn't really understand in it. Like the relation of time and speed. Something called time dilation. Two astronauts went to a planet closer to the blackhole and when they returned, they discovered that they had gone for 23 years whereas they only spent few hours on the planet. I don't know how possible is this. Pls I need a layman explanation on this. Ese gann o |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 12:42pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
I am everything chemistry. I love talking about how it affects our everyday lives. I also love its application, from classroom to the industry. My area is pharmaceutical, food and environmental chemistry. I do more of research. Lets get talking... |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by calculator123(m): 1:32pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
Freemanan:great mathematicians |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by calculator123(m): 1:37pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
Teempakguy:are u mathematician? |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by XploraBen(m): 1:56pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
I don't know if this would be permitted here.I just want to ask this question: Why are most philosophers atheist? For instance Bertrand Russell,Socrates and Confucius. |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by 1miccza: 2:11pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
johnydon22:Exactly but i would have thought someone would at least improve on the designs of the water wheeel and make it much more better.. |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 2:14pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
calculator123:Great Mate |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 2:20pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
XploraBen:Socrates wasn't an Atheist... He Just wasn't around to witness organised Religion.... To answer your question Why most Philosophers aligns themselves to Atheism is because Religion blocks your mind from rational and rigorous thinking and a Philosopher can't afford that. So in order to think rigorously and critically, you must jettison Religion... I am not saying great thinkers cannot exist even with them being religious, NO NO NO, at least Soren Keikegarrd and Hegel were great believers yet they made great footprint in Philosophy.. Just that depending on your sphere in Philosophy you might likely drop Religion for you to be renowned... Political Philosophy, Epistemology and Cosmology might likely lead you to Atheism.... |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by johnydon22(m): 2:27pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
1miccza:We borrowed the idea mechanism in water wheels to make pumps... i think Dams too can be classified improved versions of water wheels. . . So the technology is still pretty much in use |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Chrisbenogor(m): 2:29pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
XploraBen:If the answer to everything is God did it, why bother being a philosopher? |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by XploraBen(m): 2:39pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
Freemanan:Okay now I understand.Only some branches of Philosophy brings about the inclination to atheism. |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by XploraBen(m): 2:53pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
Chrisbenogor:I'm not studying or intending to study philosophy;don't get it twisted.I'm only a curious mind. My question was borne out of the fact that most philosophers do strongly negate anything involving God.And secondly,I do come across their wisdom quotes. |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 2:59pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
XploraBen:Yes sir |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by johnydon22(m): 3:01pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
XploraBen:The famous philosopher of Alexandria, Hypatia said: Fables should be taught as fables Myths as myths and miracles as poetic fancies. To teach superstition as truth is horrifying the mind of the child accepts it and only through great pain or perhaps tragedy can he be free of it. men would fight for superstition as quick as for the living truth- even more so, since superstition is intangible, You can't get at it to refute it but truth is a point of view and so is changeable. |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 3:57pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
NDprudent:yes, but not so such a large extent as he described. One cannot write the entire DNA and make his child smarter just by 'acting smart' right? |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 4:03pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
Chrisbenogor:how the dstv gets signals? We have to find a simple and fun way to explain electromagnetism. Try telling him that there are some types of light he and you cannot see. ![]() he will ask, how do you know its there? Then you will tell him about tesla's experiments. How he used his brilliant mind to find that light. Then tell us his next question. ![]() |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 4:05pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
calculator123:i am a physicist. By implication, i am a mathematician. ![]() |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by Nobody: 4:07pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
kodeya:ah yes, noted. I will give an explanation in the night. Thanks. |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by RobinHez(m): 4:57pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
dazzlingd:because, the moon landing was a hoax ![]() |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by KingTom(m): 5:02pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
RobinHez:Exactly ![]() |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by RobinHez(m): 5:14pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
RobinHez: |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by RobinHez(m): 5:19pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
lets spice this up a little. Two friends were fishing in a river. The first friend made a bet that he could make a stone float on the river. He won the bet. How is this possible? |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by johnydon22(m): 5:20pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
RobinHez:Hahahahahahahaha really, you have really read some conspiracy theory, so now let us hear your reasons for thinking its a hoax then maybe give them some good rebuttals |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by RobinHez(m): 5:21pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
johnydon22:the best reason is the question the guy asked? why after 40 yrs of advancement in technology, we havent been able to make it back? |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by johnydon22(m): 5:34pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
RobinHez:Is that the only one you could come up with for now?. . . lol. . . Did you see my reply to the guy that asked a similar question? |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by RobinHez(m): 5:37pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
Horlufemi:see what would happen to you! http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150525-a-black-hole-would-clone-you i read this last week |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by RobinHez(m): 5:49pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
johnydon22:actually, i'm just reading through the posts.... ok, i saw ur points. Vaĺid! But lets tackle those theories here for all to learn (including me) I believe we can make it to the moon now, but then.... check next post |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by johnydon22(m): 5:51pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
RobinHez:waiting for them, the first unmanned craft to the moon was in 1957 by Russia. . . Man had the technological capability then to send a craft to the moon and again there was a space race between america and Russia that triggered rush in the need for scientific feat accomplishments |
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by RobinHez(m): 5:52pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
1. The fluttering flag
|
| Re: The Sciences Discussion Thread. by 1miccza: 6:04pm On Jun 22, 2015 |
johnydon22:A dam is natural of course, i still believe that we could still produce improved and more mobile versions with more work efficiency than the pumping machine , talk about a moving pumping machine... |
Universe Or Multiverse. (A Discussion) • Who Has Seen Smartbird? Discussion Thread For Novel ways to fly. • Possibility Of Alien Life (discussion Thread) • 2 • 3 • 4
Inside Unhatched Egg Of Dinosaur That Lived In Argentina 80 Million Yrs Ago (Pix • Leatherback Sea Turtle Caught In Bayelsa - Foropa Kingdom Island (Photos) • Extreme Military Engineering: Fascinating Facts About Aircraft Carriers.
.... it depends strongly on effort of research and development in evolving tools that can Cruise successfully the different bodies in the galaxy in their different conditions. ....... I am always scared whenever I think we mankind will wake up one bigger trouble from the space one day maybe Animal or something out of this world that mankind as never seen before 



